When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end?

When identity politics ends.

Even if I do say so as a white man.

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Why is it a problem? It’s totally boring and dull. I don’t care who anybody else finds sexy. However there is nothing wrong with being attracted by intelligence any more than size of boobs... whatever floats your boat.

When whats going to end - crappy showbiz news or people needless concerning themselves with something that has absolute no baring on their existence at all?

Devils_Advocate wrote:When whats going to end - crappy showbiz news or people needless concerning themselves with something that has absolute no baring on their existence at all?

The irony is killing me

andyh wrote:Why is it a problem? It’s totally boring and dull. I don’t care who anybody else finds sexy. However there is nothing wrong with being attracted by intelligence any more than size of boobs... whatever floats your boat.

But do boobs float better than brains?

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

When people don’t feel left out for being different and when they have proved they are more ‘individual’ than anyone else. We’ve a long way to go yet. I might identify as a tree today but a dustbin tomorrow. Some ‘celebs’ really are fickle idiots. When they are not in the press enough in a positive way they are probably sobbing in a room somehere.

It's like Sam Smith wanting to be referred to as 'they'. It's not an issue for me, I have no interest in meeting Sam Smith. As for Mark Ronson, I'm not intelligent, so he won't fancy me.

I am femsapiosexual and I would guess most of us are 1) attracted to who we identify to be attractive but 2) fall in love with the person rather than their looks.
I mean would any of use fall for an attractive but Rovers supporting partner?

Well if I met Mark Ronson I would play dumb

Blackrod wrote:When people don’t feel left out for being different and when they have proved they are more ‘individual’ than anyone else. We’ve a long way to go yet. I might identify as a tree today but a dustbin tomorrow. Some ‘celebs’ really are fickle idiots. When they are not in the press enough in a positive way they are probably sobbing in a room somehere.

I’m not sure why, but identifying as a tree made me chuckle

What tree? I considered Horse-chestnut but wouldn’t fancy people launching sticks and footballs at me for a few months a year just to pinch my conkers

After reading the article and googling his 3 exs that are mentioned it must just be totally coincidental that they are all slim, very attractive women then

Imagine caring

BertiesBeehole wrote:After reading the article and googling his 3 exs that are mentioned it must just be totally coincidental that they are all slim, very attractive women then

He won't be hooked up with either of the women (is that word allowed) off the Chase despite his desire for intelligence. He would have been better off saying he is attracted to publicity first.

A sapiosexual male is a man who would rather go to bed with Malcom Muggeridge than with Cara Delavigne. Are there really a lot of them about?

mdd2 wrote:I am femsapiosexual and I would guess most of us are 1) attracted to who we identify to be attractive but 2) fall in love with the person rather than their looks.
I mean would any of use fall for an attractive but Rovers supporting partner?

Neigh lad, let's not go there

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

When everybody gets their fair share of attention, I guess.

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Poster outraged at person being attracted based on intelligence unaware they are writing their own **** take

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Call me thick but what’s saiposexual and who’s mark ronson?

BertiesBeehole wrote:After reading the article and googling his 3 exs that are mentioned it must just be totally coincidental that they are all slim, very attractive women then

Exactly, he went out with them for their brains, my ar$e !!!!

What a twonk - who is he anyway ?

mdd2 wrote:Well if I met Mark Ronson I would play dumb

I wouldn't know Mark Ronson if I met him so couldn't care less.

Would it not just be easier for these people to put a poster on the tube, announcing that they have a new album coming out?

As long as people have this need to 'look at me look at me'.
Sad pathetic losers all of them.

Damo wrote:Would it not just be easier for these people to put a poster on the tube, announcing that they have a new album coming out?

Or a new lighter !

ZizkovClaret wrote:Poster outraged at person being attracted based on intelligence unaware they are writing their own **** take

You've missed the point ZC, you've missed the point.

Funkydrummer wrote:Exactly, he went out with them for their brains, my ar$e !!!!

What a twonk - who is he anyway ?

I mean, their attractiveness doesn't tell me if they are intelligent or not....

Up to you if you want to assume i guess

Burnley1989 wrote:I’m not sure why, but identifying as a tree made me chuckle

What tree? I considered Horse-chestnut but wouldn’t fancy people launching sticks and footballs at me for a few months a year just to pinch my conkers

Depending on the person they can throw what they want at me as long as they pinch my conkers afterwards

Funkydrummer wrote:When is all this sh!te going to end ?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... li=BBoPWjQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What the ***** it go to do with you?

Devils_Advocate wrote:When whats going to end - crappy showbiz news or people needless concerning themselves with something that has absolute no baring on their existence at all?

It might be a typo, but it’s ‘bearing’ not ‘baring’.

Imploding Turtle wrote:What the ***** it go to do with you?

Exactly the same as what I say/write/do/ think has to do with you.

What really annoys me about this, what I think, is pointless virtue signalling by this Ronson chap is that it tends to trivialise a serious issue.

Funkydrummer wrote:Exactly the same as what I say/write/do/ think has to do with you.

Well, one is a protected characteristic isnt it?

And it isnt spouting shite on a board

Funkydrummer wrote:Exactly the same as what I say/write/do/ think has to do with you.

Except i'm laughing at you. You're getting angry at gender science.

Lord Beamish wrote:It might be a typo, but it’s ‘bearing’ not ‘baring’.

No typo just poor English!!

Imploding Turtle wrote:Except i'm laughing at you. You're getting angry at gender science.

Science? I'm firmly in the live and let live camp, but this stuff is more in the astrology and homeopathy bracket than science.

But as above, it's harmless. I shall await an update on pronouns for Mr Ronson and be sure to make a note.

dsr wrote:A sapiosexual male is a man who would rather go to bed with Malcom Muggeridge than with Cara Delavigne. Are there really a lot of them about?

Cara is a bright lass and alive ... whereas Muggeridge died in 1990 so perhaps a Muggeridge lover would be a Necrophiliac

Bosscat wrote:Cara is a bright lass and alive ... whereas Muggeridge died in 1990 so perhaps a Muggeridge lover would be a Necrophiliac

Even when he was alive he was a pompous and hypocritical wind-bag. I’d prefer a w*nk.

Try not giving a sh*t. You'll find it helps.

claptrappers_union wrote:It's like Sam Smith wanting to be referred to as 'they'. It's not an issue for me, I have no interest in meeting Sam Smith. As for Mark Ronson, I'm not intelligent, so he won't fancy me.

If I bumped into Sam Smith I would say Oy I'm happy to call you and your lot them and they but if he then said call me yours I'd say Oy Sam you can sing a little bit and sold a few records to mindless teenagers but if you think you can win me across to saying those , they , them and they're with a few harmonies you better think again son!

And if he was to correct me and say I'm neutral don't call me son , I'd say Noooo I'm not having this 2020 rubbish if you want to bat for the other team your either us or them so your them to me and us to them compriende!

So he’s basically saying that he’s bisexual, the intelligence bit is nowt to do with it. Attention seeking.

It's brave of Ronson to come out and talk about this, especially with the added burden of having some new product to flog at the minute.

It’s like me coming out saying I go for big tits before looks.

He’s basically saying he’s bisexual and will use whether they have brains or not as a way to choose between em.

File as attention seeking and have done with it.

If he was necro-sapiosexual, he could dig up Albert Einstein and have his ideal partner.

Wtf b@@@@is

NottsClaret wrote:Science? I'm firmly in the live and let live camp, but this stuff is more in the astrology and homeopathy bracket than science.

But as above, it's harmless. I shall await an update on pronouns for Mr Ronson and be sure to make a note.

You're wrong. Science has quite a good understanding of how gender dysphoria occurs during foetal development. Just because YOU don't know that, or just don't accept that, doesn't mean it's not true.

Imploding Turtle wrote:You're wrong. Science has quite a good understanding of how gender dysphoria occurs during foetal development. Just because YOU don't know that, or just don't accept that, doesn't mean it's not true.

None of this however, has anything to do with gender.
We are discussing somebody's sexuality.
If you insist on being the most woke person on the message board, at least get your facts right

Damo’s right Turtle. We all know you’ve read that article on gender dysphoria. That’s not what this is.

Turtles head has just been nipped off by his own sphincter lost up his own anus amongst like minded piles.

NottsClaret wrote:Damo’s right Turtle. We all know you’ve read that article on gender dysphoria. That’s not what this is.

I could have done a better job of making this point clear: the bigotry is the same.

Bigotry is that when Tom Biggs scored for Worcester Warriors

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Biggs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;