Page 1 of 1
Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:11 pm
by Rowls
Would you be happy with Sean Dyche as West Ham manager?
You know what to do folks.
https://readwestham.com/2019/11/27/west ... -results=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:14 pm
by Goobs
Job done and as advised I have shared on twitter

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:16 pm
by LeadBelly
Pile in there. "NO" leading at the mo but not much in it (I expect it might be the other way round if you exclude Clarets fans voting strategically).
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:17 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Where did all those 'Yes' votes come from?
They cannot be serious.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:30 pm
by Rubstuds
Blackburn
I've just voted No
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:42 pm
by Tall Paul
I voted Yes
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:52 pm
by houseboy
I only came on this thread because I thought it was another Brexit one. To my amazement it's (yet another) Dyche is going to West Ham thread.
Grow up...and no, I haven't voted.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 4:22 pm
by Clarets4me
It's 66% - 34% at the moment in favour of not appointing Sean to their great Club ...
Mr Gold and his daughter would have to satisfy an awful lot of frustrated ladies with their products, to afford the compensation Burnley would be asking !!
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:03 pm
by IanMcL
Just voted. 32% yes 68% no.
We are winning!
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:10 pm
by claretblue
IanMcL wrote:We are winning!
it's West Ham...we generally do!

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:27 pm
by KateR
my NO vote is in.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:37 pm
by Lowbankclaret
71/29, cast my no vote.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 6:13 pm
by MrTopTier
No
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 6:59 pm
by LeadBelly
I wonder how many of the 396 (currently) "NO" votes are from Clarets?
When this vote was flagged on here (and presumably other Claret-related sites) the voting was something like 49/51 now 27/73 split.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:08 pm
by beddie
I'm in.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:25 pm
by GodIsADeeJay81
LeadBelly wrote:I wonder how many of the 396 (currently) "NO" votes are from Clarets?
When this vote was flagged on here (and presumably other Claret-related sites) the voting was something like 49/51 now 27/73 split.
Technically all the votes are from 'Clarets'
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:31 pm
by bobinho
Done. 73% currently say no.

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:33 pm
by brexit
I voted yes
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:33 pm
by brexit
I voted yes
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:47 pm
by Funkydrummer
Done.
WTF is this claim all about ?
"It has been previously suggested that it was Dyche himself who offered his services to West Ham, but it’s looking like an unrealistic outcome."
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:55 pm
by bfcjg
74 26 no.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:10 pm
by otto1959
bfcjg wrote:74 26 no.
75-25 NOW
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:18 pm
by Funkydrummer
otto1959 wrote:75-25 NOW
They've lost a no !!

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:47 pm
by gawthorpe_view
I voted remain.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:00 pm
by MACCA
This very once I'll vote remain.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:58 pm
by IanMcL
Currently 76-24
That's a good 3-1 win!
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:36 am
by dsr
One thing I will guarantee - Sean Dyche has not approached West Ham and offered his services. Not a chance in a million.
It would be possible that Dyche's agent could approach them and drop hints; pretty broad hints, but no more. Or more likely, that West Ham have approached one or two agents off their own bat to sound them out. Dyche would no doubt keep his agent well informed about future intentions.
But most likely of all, a journalist has made it up, or has added two + two and got four thousand.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:51 am
by Rowls
brexit wrote:I voted yes
brexit, again wrote:I voted yes
And you apparently voted twice, you gerrymandering get.
This is a serious poll and should be treated accordingly.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:24 am
by Cirrus_Minor
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:25 am
by Cirrus_Minor
Done
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:20 am
by houseboy
IanMcL wrote:Just voted. 32% yes 68% no.
We are winning!
Who's we? You a west Ham fan now?
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:23 am
by tarkys_ears
Trying to figure out if people are stupid or desperate here...
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:24 am
by houseboy
What a ridiculous thread. Voting on something that has no influence or bearing on something that is never going to happen. It must be a slow news week. It's like a man in a totally dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. Pointless.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:04 am
by Rubstuds
It's called. ''a bit of fun''
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:32 am
by tarkys_ears
Rubstuds wrote:It's called. ''a bit of fun''
...easily pleased? Wonder what your sex life is like. New doll this year?
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:39 am
by Funkydrummer
It's like a broken pencil.
Pointless.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:43 pm
by houseboy
Rubstuds wrote:It's called. ''a bit of fun''
If that's all it was I could understand, but to many I don't think it is. I think there are some poor souls on here who are taking it very seriously and who actually think it makes a blind bit of difference, even if there was a connection with Dyche and the dreadful ones, which there isn't. FFS sake the job isn't even available and people are getting jittery. People are weird.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:53 pm
by Rowls
houseboy wrote:If that's all it was I could understand, but to many I don't think it is. I think there are some poor souls on here who are taking it very seriously and who actually think it makes a blind bit of difference, even if there was a connection with Dyche and the dreadful ones, which there isn't. FFS sake the job isn't even available and people are getting jittery. People are weird.
Oh lord.
Now it’s even MORE fun.

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:56 pm
by houseboy
Rowls wrote:Oh lord.
Now it’s even MORE fun.

If you think this is fun try reading a telephone book bud, that wiil split your sides.

Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:58 pm
by bfcjg
houseboy wrote:What a ridiculous thread. Voting on something that has no influence or bearing on something that is never going to happen. It must be a slow news week. It's like a man in a totally dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. Pointless.
It might be brilliant at hiding.
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 1:02 pm
by houseboy
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 1:35 pm
by Spijed
From West Ham forum KUMB:
"With Dyche and Howe seemingly very much under consideration it would be interesting to see a side by side comparison of their respective league positions and net spend for the duration of their tenures."
Re: Vote "NO"
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:36 pm
by houseboy