

Plus ground improvements (of which there have been plenty since 2009 - new shop, ticketing, two corner stands, concourse of CFS, new screen etc etc) and the training ground.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:18 am2008/09 season was purportedly worth 100 million.
We've been in the PL for 5 full years at roughly 120 million per year.
So over half a billion in income.
So whatever the output of a small club a operating costs plus our average wages of each player (1.6 million per year) (https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... amp?page=5)
Coupled with our transfer spend which isn't bad considering what we've had in incomings..
We've spent it all basically. It costs almost a hundred million per year to run a club in the PL.
I thought it was the chairman’s job to pay for everything else out of his own pocket? When did this new rule come in?claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:10 amThere are some out there who think the only expense in running a football club is the transfer fees paid.
Think it is a rule that is brought in after a defeat, win and we are a well run club, lose and we get all sorts of dross brought out by goons.Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:34 amI thought it was the chairman’s job to pay for everything else out of his own pocket? When did this new rule come in?![]()
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:06 amBeer mat estimated math's over 5 season's
Money from being in the prem tv and sponsorship 700 million
Wages playes, staff ect 300 million (year 1 40 million then up 10 million each year to around 80 million to year 5)
Ground and training ground improvements around 60 million
Transfers in and out net spend around 90 million
Paying off loans ect 50 million
Lets say another 50 million for my underestimating for agent fees ect
A total of around a 550 million
Leaving 150 million
Yet the club says we have about 40 million in the bank, so who knows.
Ps please don't have a go about my figures its a massive guess I dont run a business but if you can do better lets here it.
Sounds like accurate figures!?ClaretMov wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:21 amWe have been in the prem a total of six season's
And five of those have been in the last six season's
Read what I put again (over 5 season's not the last 5 season's) and if you look at the total 6 season's we have been in the prem we have taken out about 780 million and spent around 600 million
The whole thread is conjecture - and I’ll say it one last time !!....money in the bank as reported in the accounts is not the same as reserves - and it’s the latter that is important as that represents retained profits over a number of years...often referred to on here as the “dry powder store” !Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:38 amStill not seen any statement from anyone at the club that says we have £40m in the bank - you may reasonably assume it given the annual growth in that area but you cannot without evidence state that the club have said that is what they have - too many taking it as a de-facto truth rather than the conjecture it appears to be
TVC15 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:00 amWe have been posting healthy profits of around £20m to £30m for the last few years.
These profits are after all operating costs, tax etc.
So we should have a pretty significant amount held in our reserves (that’s not the same as “cash in the bank” btw)
We will still have future transfer fees to pay for as these are invariably spread over a number of years. We might also have income to come from players sales which will also be spread - but what we currently owe will be greater than what we are owed.
Our wage bill could easily be as high as £90m this time.
Upshot is the picture is complicated - what fans see in terms of financial information is always 12 or 18 months out of date whereas the club will be doing the opposite and looking 2 or 3 years forward.
We have a lot of players contracts that are coming to an end in the next year or so - this could mean new players, transfer fees, signing on / agents fees etc.
There is also the obvious “dry powder” policy the club adopt around planning for potential future relegation.
John Gayle has let himself go.
Strange way of looking at it - only relevant if there was a risk our major source of income stopped. We are only paying those wages because the income is guaranteed (and I don’t mean our premier league status is guaranteed)tarkys_ears wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:25 pmLess than 6 months wages in the bank.
Worrying when you see what were shelling out on...
Thought I was quite clear in my reply - which invited a retraction - possibly a better way for the offender in dealing with itClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:40 pmI was alerted to a post on this thread that was libelous. The post has been removed, as has the poster temporarily. What was more concerning was the number of people who opted to like the libelous post and the number who opted to reply to it. So please be very careful what you reply to.
Can only assume he's doing that to cover worse possible case scenario. In reality, he should have many many realistic targets.Granny WeatherWax wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:49 pmHe’s just said incomings still unlikely given money available
Why? Because you don't like him?claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:55 pmHe should have been removed ages ago and for good
Without doubt there are players out there but perhaps when he talks about money he is on about about us not being able to afford premium cost, low risk British based players.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:56 pmCan only assume he's doing that to cover worse possible case scenario. In reality, he should have many many realistic targets.
First time I've been aware of a post that got the poster suspended.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:40 pmI was alerted to a post on this thread that was libelous. The post has been removed, as has the poster temporarily. What was more concerning was the number of people who opted to like the libelous post and the number who opted to reply to it. So please be very careful what you reply to.
You don't think we have players on more than 30k a week ?ewanrob wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:43 pmFag packet calc, 30 players in the squad on average of 30k a week is 47 million, please someone explain where the other 43 is going...I realise there is NI, agents fees etc..but if we have one player in there over 30k then I'm staggered. Very crude calc I know, but something doesn't stack up.
National insurance puts another few million on.ewanrob wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:43 pmFag packet calc, 30 players in the squad on average of 30k a week is 47 million, please someone explain where the other 43 is going...I realise there is NI, agents fees etc..but if we have one player in there over 30k then I'm staggered. Very crude calc I know, but something doesn't stack up.