Page 1 of 1
Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:09 am
by ClaretMov
Should we be enquiring about Xherdan Shaqiri who has been told he is surplus to requirements.
Apparently he's on 72k a week, we could offer somewhere near that and week in week out football, perfect position we need and set piece expect
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:12 am
by Funkydrummer
Certainly should, but sadly out of our range.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:34 am
by ClaretMov
3.5 million a year wages shouldn't be out of our range with the amount of year's we've been in the prem and the money we have taken out of it, I think by now our top end earners should be around 80k
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:42 am
by claretonthecoast1882
He may be surplus to requirements but they will still want over 20m for him
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:05 am
by Firthy
Looks like we'll be getting a lot more "wishful thinking" posts than actual links to possible transfers before next season. Things are ominously quiet on the transfer front and the only links are all old regurgitated rumours. I hope I'm wrong but I really can't see the board giving SD the money he needs to strngthen our squad sufficiently. We might struggle next season if we have injuries to key players.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:22 am
by Wellsy1882
Player we should be aiming for - yes
Player we will aim for - no
Shame cos hel go to some1 like west ham or leeds
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:38 am
by SGr
Good player, right position but wages definitely too much. And there is Liverpool’s track record of rip-off fees
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:55 am
by jojomk1
When you look at the teams around us (league table wise) not much business has been done by anyone apart from Brighton with a couple of teams making permanent signings of previous loan players
Nothing to panic about yet but the likes of Shaqiri will be way out of our sights
If we are looking at any Prem League teams I can only see it being financially viable for their younger players and we all know SD doesn't favour those types
Championship and below will be our market
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:09 pm
by Ashingtonclaret46
At least he shouldn't be tired after just 265 minutes of top level football since June 2019.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:33 pm
by ClaretMov
Our net spend whilst in the prem is embarrassing to be honest, yes lets not risk the club but come on
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:37 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:33 pm
Our net spend whilst in the prem is embarrassing to be honest, yes lets not risk the club but come on
Do you get embarrassed by our net spend ?
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:39 pm
by theboydonegood
Why would our "net spend" be embarrassing after we finished 10th - it should applauded
TBDG
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:51 pm
by ClaretMov
theboydonegood wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:39 pm
Why would our "net spend" be embarrassing after we finished 10th - it should applauded
TBDG
Imagine what we could achieve with our fantastic management if we spent a little more
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:53 pm
by FCBurnley
Nobody is linked to us !
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:55 pm
by ClaretMov
Is that a question ?????? I said it was embarrassing, so what do you think

Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:56 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:55 pm
Is that a question ?????? I said it was embarrassing, so what do you think
So our net spend is embarrassing you but as you put it "if we just spent a little bit more" then you would be ok ?
How much more is a little bit more ?
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:58 pm
by Jakubs Tash
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:51 pm
Imagine what we could achieve with our fantastic management if we spent a little more
The "fantastic management" that you wanted gone in January?
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:58 pm
by martin_p
It’s all the net spend chants from opposing fans that really hurt.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 2:00 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
martin_p wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:58 pm
It’s all the net spend chants from opposing fans that really hurt.
It's that famous old chant " how **** must you be, your net spend is small"
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 3:12 pm
by Terrier
If he is not good enough for liverpool he is not good enough for us!
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 3:28 pm
by BenWickes
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:55 pm
Is that a question ?????? I said it was embarrassing, so what do you think
It's not what you spend, it's who you spend it on. I'm not convinced, if we we were able to spend £60 million on a player that Dyche would pay it if he could get an equally good player for £25 million. I wouldn't be embarrassed. I'd be quite pleased we bagged a bargain.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 3:39 pm
by theboydonegood
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:51 pm
Imagine what we could achieve with our fantastic management if we spent a little more
What's embarrassing is that you called it embarrassing

Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 4:35 pm
by Giftonsnoidea
If we didn’t have Dwight he’d be a good signing for the left , as it is probably not needed but a good player for someone.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:01 pm
by huw.Y.WattfromWare
Sky reporting 4 PL clubs chasing John Lundstram of SheffU.
If true I’d be hoping we are one of them.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:08 pm
by randomclaret2
FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:53 pm
Nobody is linked to us !
' No one links us, No one links us
No one links us, we don't care,
We are Burnley, super Burnley...'
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:36 pm
by JimmyRobbo
Absolutely not someone I would want to bring in on the wage structure we have. Another show pony. Loads of lovely touches but never plays regularly for any English teams.
We can't afford to miss when spending those funds. I'm much happier with the Brownhill types of purchases. Hungry with desire and enough talent.
Who are we going to be chasing next, Tom Ince? No thanks.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:23 pm
by ClaretMov
Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:58 pm
The "fantastic management" that you wanted gone in January?
Yes I did, I thought we needed to freshen things up and I wasn't on my own was I ????? But most don't have the ball's to admit it.
Fortunately we turned things around and not one single fan including myself could of seen that coming, if they didn't they wouldn't be in charge now, the management team turned it around and for that they are fantastic and the right team to run the club at this moment but thing's change and so do people's opinion
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:26 pm
by conyoviejo
Shakira from Columbia would be a better signing.

Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:31 pm
by ClaretMov
conyoviejo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:26 pm
Shakira from Columbia would be a better signing.

Yes please
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 8:00 pm
by Bigvince
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:23 pm
Yes I did, I thought we needed to freshen things up and I wasn't on my own was I ????? But most don't have the ball's to admit it.
Fortunately we turned things around and not one single fan including myself could of seen that coming, if they didn't they wouldn't be in charge now, the management team turned it around and for that they are fantastic and the right team to run the club at this moment but thing's change and so do people's opinion
I’ll think you’ll find there were quite a few on this board that wanted to give SD a chance to turn things around, after all he has done before!!
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:01 pm
by ClaretMov
Bigvince wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 8:00 pm
I’ll think you’ll find there were quite a few on this board that wanted to give SD a chance to turn things around, after all he has done before!!
And plenty that didn't
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:18 pm
by Bigvince
ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:23 pm
Fortunately we turned things around and not one single fan including myself could of seen that coming
Not one single fan ??????????
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:36 pm
by tim_noone
Can we buy him like Liverpool bought Ings.......and drag it out as long as possible and hope we get him for 30 bob!!!
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:07 pm
by Burnleyareback2
Bigvince wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:18 pm
Not one single fan ??????????
I thought he would turn it around. So that’s 1.
Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:33 pm
by Bigvince
Burnleyareback2 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:07 pm
I thought he would turn it around. So that’s 1.
So did I. So that’s 2 we should start a club

Re: Not linked to us but
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:43 pm
by tiger76
Shaqiri no thanks, and even if we were interested he's well out of our budget, and i'll be surprised if our top earners are on anything like 80k a week. they may do well with bonuses, but a basic wage of that amount no chance,and nor should we be offering those crazy sums.