Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:44 pm
well said
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
Rant over 
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
Stan Collymore on PPV
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50677
Page 1 of 1
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:50 pm
Stan Collymore proving yet again that a lot of people do not realise "Robin" is the "Model" not the manufacturer....
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
Rant over 
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
Rant over Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:54 pm
Is less or more clout than he gave his missus?!
Scumbagbastard
Scumbagbastard
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:54 pm
He's a woman-slapping thicko. Should not be a pundit.Bosscat wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:50 pmStan Collymore proving yet again that a lot of people do not realise "Robin" is the "Model" not the manufacturer....
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:56 pm
Stan = the juggernaut
Ulrika = the robin
Ulrika = the robin
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:02 pm
Never heard of him.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:16 pm
10,000 is still just under 150,000. And only 3 games made less then that meaning the rest made more then 150,000. Not overly bad. Still surprised upwards of 10,000 people are feeding sky and bt with more money when you can easily get streams for free online but suppose it is their money so up to them.
From what I have read on here some seem to be proud to be paying over the odds for games and using it as a sort of status symbol to show that £15 is nothing to them. Personally I could afford it but I flat out refuse to.
From what I have read on here some seem to be proud to be paying over the odds for games and using it as a sort of status symbol to show that £15 is nothing to them. Personally I could afford it but I flat out refuse to.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:20 pm
Thanks Alan (Partridge)Bosscat wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:50 pmStan Collymore proving yet again that a lot of people do not realise "Robin" is the "Model" not the manufacturer....
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:24 pm
Far more people have come on here and said they’ve refused to pay it on some kind of principle. But the same ones who had a pop at Garlick and the club for refusing to pay over the odds for players during the transfer window.thelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:16 pm10,000 is still just under 150,000. And only 3 games made less then that meaning the rest made more then 150,000. Not overly bad. Still surprised upwards of 10,000 people are feeding sky and bt with more money when you can easily get streams for free online but suppose it is their money so up to them.
From what I have read on here some seem to be proud to be paying over the odds for games and using it as a sort of status symbol to show that £15 is nothing to them. Personally I could afford it but I flat out refuse to.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:38 pm
Plenty of belting comments everytime he posts
Get it
Belting
Get it
Belting
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:01 pm
Is there a decision on this today then?
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:09 pm
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:15 pm
Ah okay thanks. Mistakenly thought this was under discussion at a PL meeting today.clarethomer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:09 pmhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54692739
not heard anything about todays meeting
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:38 pm
Is he willing to pay to watch UFC 
on PPV?
on PPV?Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:49 pm
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:01 pm
Sure I read there’s a meeting? There’s typically some news emerging from them in recent weeks and can’t imagine PPV is not on the agenda?clarethomer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:49 pmI think there was some suggestion it may be to be fair. Not sure if there is still some news to be expected or not?
Overall, I’ll be disappointed if games become unavailable again. Seems that pricing is the big point they need to debate.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:03 pm
That's my fear. They will just take the view that its not worth doing. Seems like the media, supporters trusts, premier league, broadcasters are all playing a massive game of chicken with each other.NewClaret wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:01 pmSure I read there’s a meeting? There’s typically some news emerging from them in recent weeks and can’t imagine PPV is not on the agenda?
Overall, I’ll be disappointed if games become unavailable again. Seems that pricing is the big point they need to debate.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:54 pm
CT has just said on a separate thread that they did meet today specifically to discuss cost. No decision. Odd to meet without making a decision on anything.clarethomer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:03 pmThat's my fear. They will just take the view that its not worth doing. Seems like the media, supporters trusts, premier league, broadcasters are all playing a massive game of chicken with each other.
Do appreciate the moral standpoint and the impact on fans experiencing hard times, but equally would be gutted to lose the option of watching us whilst basically under house arrest.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:27 pm
Price potentially coming down to £9:95 which of course will mean that you are getting 4 games for the price of 3 against what is charged now.
Will be interesting to see how the supporters trusts/media respond to this.
Will be interesting to see how the supporters trusts/media respond to this.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:32 pm
Yes, just asked CT his thoughts on that topic on the other thread.clarethomer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:27 pmPrice potentially coming down to £9:95 which of course will mean that you are getting 4 games for the price of 3 against what is charged now.
Will be interesting to see how the supporters trusts/media respond to this.
Penny (or 5) for the League Cup’s thoughts on it as well. They charge a flat tenner, which would appear expensive compared if the PL reduces their price - particularly as clubs often play weakened teams in that competition.
Re: Stan Collymore on PPV
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:26 am
The correct term for that ‘vehicle’ being Plastic HumiliatorBosscat wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:50 pmStan Collymore proving yet again that a lot of people do not realise "Robin" is the "Model" not the manufacturer....
You don't talk about a "Fiesta Ford", "Diablo Lamborghini" or "Corsa Vauxhall" .....
Its not "Robin Reliant" ITS "RELIANT ROBIN"
And breathe
