Was I seeing things on match of the day?

I thought he had had them done!

Looked like he'd eaten a family sized bag of Wotsits.

Going off-ish topic, I was near enough rolling about on the floor when Pickford shouted..... "Keepers!" then f***ing fairyhoused it like a homosexual windmill.

It looked like lipstick to me... do they get a makeover before interview...

Matt Ritchie's own goal

Bin Ont Turf wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:33 pm

Matt Ritchie's own goal

It would be funnt if it didnt put us back in the drop zone. Almost Chris Brass like!

i don't think he's the full shilling...

cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:45 pm

It would be funnt if it didnt put us back in the drop zone. Almost Chris Brass like!

Nowt's decided after 12/13/14 games.

Although I must admit, Fulham are looking part decent at the moment.

Yer very orange lips indeed maybe have a bottle of Tango anfter the game

Bin Ont Turf wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:54 pm

Nowt's decided after 12/13/14 games.

Although I must admit, Fulham are looking part decent at the moment.

To be fair, Fulham played very well the season before they came up last time - and the last time they were in the Prem. For the last 3-4 seasons they've passed the ball very well, had good possession and pass percentage.

It seems to have been a leaky defence that let them down the last time they were in the Premier League. If they keep that tight, they'll stay up.

I thought they could have at least made fun of him on the panel but no mention at all

Giftonsnoidea wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:34 am

I thought they could have at least made fun of him on the panel but no mention at all

Because they do not dare, someone would say that were being racist, shame but true I think.

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 12:19 pm

Because they do not dare, someone would say that were being racist, shame but true I think.

Have we gone so far backwards that we or ( the post match interviewer) can’t even ask what the lipstick is for , thought it was hilarious when he came on. Must be going out after....

Didn’t see this, but why should the interviewer or pundits question, or even comment on a footballer’s appearance?

Giftonsnoidea wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:25 pm

Have we gone so far backwards that we ( post match interviewer) can’t even ask what the lipstick is for , thought it was hilarious when he came on. Must be going out after....

If that's aimed at me they you are a bit thick cos no ones questioned you. What's rediculous is that someone has suggested the only reason some TV interviewer has not mentioned it is that they are scared of being accused of being racist.

The interviewer can mention if he likes or if he doesn't give a sh*t then he doesn't have to but have we really gone so far backwards that if we (post match interview) dont even mention a players lips it must be because they are scared of being accused of being racist

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:33 pm

If that's aimed at me they you are a bit thick cos no ones questioned you. What's rediculous is that someone has suggested the only reason some TV interviewer has not mentioned it is that they are scared of being accused of being racist.

The interviewer can mention if he likes or if he doesn't give a sh*t then he doesn't have to but have we really gone so far backwards that if we (post match interview) dont even mention a players lips it must be because they are scared of being accused of being racist

Not aimed at you lol

Giftonsnoidea wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:46 pm

Not aimed at you lol

My apologies then

Thought Gary could have at least said “ that’s a nice shade of orange “ his jokes are usually poor anyway

To comment on his lipstick would not be in line with LBGTQ+ guidelines if it is said in a joking or sarcastic manner. it’s a shame because it could put someone off commenting if they genuinely liked the colour.

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:33 pm

If that's aimed at me they you are a bit thick cos no ones questioned you. What's rediculous is that someone has suggested the only reason some TV interviewer has not mentioned it is that they are scared of being accused of being racist.

The interviewer can mention if he likes or if he doesn't give a sh*t then he doesn't have to but have we really gone so far backwards that if we (post match interview) dont even mention a players lips it must be because they are scared of being accused of being racist

Of course it is ridiculous but I didn’t suggest that that’s the only reason, but would not be surprised if if was.

Rileybobs wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:28 pm

Didn’t see this, but why should the interviewer or pundits question, or even comment on a footballer’s appearance?

Why not? The White Suits Liverpool wore at Wembley one year were quite a talking point.

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:00 pm

Of course it is ridiculous but I didn’t suggest that that’s the only reason, but would not be surprised if if was.

You said it was because they wouldn't dare say it because they would bee seen as racist. This victim mentality and this behaviour of making up a scenario that doesn't exist just to be publicly offended by it is just as bad as any form of culture wars and identity politics that plague and divide our society in these current times

In short its just a bit pathetic

tim_noone wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:06 pm

Why not? The White Suits Liverpool wore at Wembley one year were quite a talking point.

Just because they are sports pundits/journalists, not fashion critics. I don’t recall any footballers being questioned about their hair cuts or tattoos etc.

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:13 pm

You said it was because they wouldn't dare say it because they would bee seen as racist. This victim mentality and this behaviour of making up a scenario that doesn't exist just to be publicly offended by it is just as bad as any form of culture wars and identity politics that plague and divide our society in these current times

In short its just a bit pathetic

Can we not have a sensible debate, now that’s pathetic

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:17 pm

Can we not have a sensible debate, now that’s pathetic

You original post was rediculous so there's not much to debate. An interviewer didn't mention a players lips were a funny colour and you make up a scenario implying the interviewer would have wanted to mention it but didn't dare for fear of being called a racist (god knows why)

My original picture reply to was about all you comment merited

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:22 pm

[quote=durhamclaret post_id=<a href="tel:1444520">1444520</a> time=<a href="tel:1608491860">1608491860</a> user_id=482]
Can we not have a sensible debate, now that’s pathetic

You original post was rediculous so there's not much to debate. An interviewer didn't mention a players lips were a funny colour and you make up a scenario implying the interviewer would have wanted to mention it but didn't dare for fear of being called a racist (god knows why)

My original picture reply to was about all you comment merited
[/quote
I don’t want to be banned from this message board Devils, but I will not be called ridiculous.
I don’t want to exchange messages with you anymore UTC!

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:28 pm

You original post was rediculous so there's not much to debate. An interviewer didn't mention a players lips were a funny colour and you make up a scenario implying the interviewer would have wanted to mention it but didn't dare for fear of being called a racist (god knows why)

My original picture reply to was about all you comment merited
[/quote
I don’t want to be banned from this message board Devils, but I will not be called ridiculous.
I don’t want to exchange messages with you anymore UTC!

Best to ignore him, you have made his night (sadly) now.

I see the Not Allowed To State The Bleeding Obvious Police have arrived!

RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:02 pm

I see the Not Allowed To State The Bleeding Obvious Police have arrived!

What's the bleeding obvious because they only thing I've questioned is the assertion that the interviewer avoided the subject for fear of being called a racist.

Apart from that stupid comment everyone else was having a bit of fun with it and no one had an issue laughing at Sterlings lips or wondering what it was?

Nice to know that I’m stupid now as well as been ridiculous.
Thank you for that.

You lot have some issues being obsessed over a man's lips..

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:10 pm

Nice to know that I’m stupid now as well as been ridiculous.
Thank you for that.

I don't think you're stupid just that particular post.

I left it alone as you said you didn't want to continue which was fair enough but if others try and spin it round like I had a problem with people highlighting Sterlings lips and having a laugh about then I'm gonna point out I didn't.

I've no wish to carry out on arguing with you or anyone else but Im not gonna let certain posters (not you) try and play th victim with me being the bad guy bringing race into it when that's not the truth of the matter

They are still bitter because he let his country down apparently.

I think I read somewhere that the camera filters were set wrong which changed the colour balance

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:25 pm

I don't think you're stupid just that particular post.

I left it alone as you said you didn't want to continue which was fair enough but if others try and spin it round like I had a problem with people highlighting Sterlings lips and having a laugh about then I'm gonna point out I didn't.

I've no wish to carry out on arguing with you or anyone else but Im not gonna let certain posters (not you) try and play th victim with me being the bad guy bringing race into it when that's not the truth of the matter

Fair enough Devils no probs here.

durhamclaret wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:38 pm

Fair enough Devils no probs here.

Nice one Durham.
Everyone knows who was stirring the sh-it on this thread and I don’t think it was you or DA.
Funny how they reappear like a bad smell on certain threads

Rileybobs wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:15 pm

Just because they are sports pundits/journalists, not fashion critics. I don’t recall any footballers being questioned about their hair cuts or tattoos etc.

Plesse allow me to refresh your memory.

http://sport.bt.com/pictures/football/f ... 3880329618

13 of the Worst Haircuts Ever Witnessed in Football

https://www.90min.com/posts/5079261-13- ... n-football

The 17 worst footballer tattoos ever? Lionel Messi joins the list with bizarre tribute to his wife's lips

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/ ... i-10355038

Joe Hart is now among the players with the worst tattoos in football

https://www.givemesport.com/1483993-joe ... n-football

FOOTBALL FASHION FAILS Eleven times footballers got it VERY wrong with their outfit choices

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/10968453 ... g-outfits/

How could anybody forget Beckhams wrap around skirt!!



Come on folks , we all need a laugh right now.

RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:49 pm

Plesse allow me to refresh your memory.

http://sport.bt.com/pictures/football/f ... 3880329618

13 of the Worst Haircuts Ever Witnessed in Football

https://www.90min.com/posts/5079261-13- ... n-football

The 17 worst footballer tattoos ever? Lionel Messi joins the list with bizarre tribute to his wife's lips

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/ ... i-10355038

Joe Hart is now among the players with the worst tattoos in football

https://www.givemesport.com/1483993-joe ... n-football

I obviously wasn’t referring to tabloid articles or trashy websites, and I think you know that. I’ve never heard an interviewer ask a player about their appearance after a match, or the pundits mentioning the same on MOTD.

Obviously you feel that pundits should question footballers about their appearance, which is fine, it’s your opinion. I just think it’s weird.

Zlatan wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:28 pm

I think I read somewhere that the camera filters were set wrong which changed the colour balance

Thanks for clarifying that Zlatan.....it all makes sense now. I know the worlds moved on but I'm not ready for Blokes wearing Lippy at a football match.....

tim_noone wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 10:07 pm

Thanks for clarifying that Zlatan.....it all makes sense now. I know the worlds moved on but I'm not ready for Blokes wearing Lippy at a football match.....

I’m not saying that is the case, but it is a reasonable explanation for it, in fact a much better explanation than those explanations that suit particular agendas on here and cause disagreements isn’t it

Rileybobs wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:28 pm

Didn’t see this, but why should the interviewer or pundits question, or even comment on a footballer’s appearance?

Yes because it's quite the norm for a footballer to play with lipstick. Snowflake alert.

Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:33 pm

If that's aimed at me they you are a bit thick cos no ones questioned you. What's rediculous is that someone has suggested the only reason some TV interviewer has not mentioned it is that they are scared of being accused of being racist.

The interviewer can mention if he likes or if he doesn't give a sh*t then he doesn't have to but have we really gone so far backwards that if we (post match interview) dont even mention a players lips it must be because they are scared of being accused of being racist

See what I mean about the wolves board. They all seem to get on and a difference of opinion is respected . Our replies such as the one quoted here, are far too often. Makes the board such an unfriendly childish place. Shame really

Untinted Glasses wrote: ↑

Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:39 pm

See what I mean about the wolves board. They all seem to get on and a difference of opinion is respected . Our replies such as the one quoted here, are far too often. Makes the board such an unfriendly childish place. Shame really

You mean like this where you tell someone they need to wake up, call them a brainwashed c**t and label the BBC as being full of peadoes?

Untinted Glasses wrote: ↑

Thu Dec 03, 2020 11:38 pm

I havnt read anything other than the op post. Wow you need to wake up pal. The BBC full of peadoes and corruption. Youll realise once its too late.
See the caption where tyson is just saying"jesus loves us all" continuous from his car ? Do you even know what that is about ?

Do your research pal, scary ****. Brainwashed kunts like you lapping it all up