Page 1 of 1
Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:18 pm
by conyoviejo
Outstanding today ,head and shoulders above anybody else.. He didn't deserve to be on the losing side.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:19 pm
by Rowls
Excellent today.
MOM and best player on the mud.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:20 pm
by ksrclaret
Our biggest threat today, and our only player who looks to drive with the ball and pass into feet in the absence of McNeil.
Pleased that he’s now developing into a key player.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:21 pm
by Burnley1989
Fantastic, think we have a gem there, will only get better hopefully
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:21 pm
by taio
Yes best player on the pitch
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:22 pm
by Top Claret
All the midfield were poor 1st half and he didn't show enough quality on the ball 2nd half.
We are desperate for a strong central midfielder who as quality and can carry the ball and carve out openings
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:25 pm
by warksclaret
He played well-and has been doing for some time. Got to say if I was Dale Stephens I would have been disappointed at not starting and in fairness when he came on did well, and showed his experience. I also think its a little early for Benson to be thrown in-a couple of times Leeds might have scored through him ball watching or giving the ball away in a dangerous position
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:26 pm
by DCWat
Top Claret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:22 pm
All the midfield were poor 1st half and he didn't show enough quality on the ball 2nd half.
We are desperate for a strong central midfielder who as quality and can carry the ball and carve out openings
I think that’s harsh on Brownhill, who barring his shooting, had a great game, particularly in the second half. I do agree about having someone able to drive forward with the ball though.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:27 pm
by Top Claret
DCWat wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:26 pm
I think that’s harsh on Brownhill, who barring his shooting, had a great game, particularly in the second half. I do agree about having someone able to drive forward with the ball though.
He got into some scoring positions but did not have the quality to execute
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:28 pm
by Zlatan
No surprise he played well on a Championship pitch, wasn’t long ago he was playing on them week in week out.
Cracking player for us today, clearly MoM for me, we’ve got a good player there.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:37 pm
by huw.Y.WattfromWare
Our MoM and even better after Stephens came on to hold and he had more freedom.
We should stick with 4-3-3. In fact as we knew before kick off that they had know recognised CBs available we should have started with it today.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:39 pm
by FactualFrank
Cork will have a fight on his hands.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:52 pm
by JinkingJames
With Cork fit we could go 4 3 3 with attacking full backs. Westy, Brownhill, Cork are decent. Jay, Barnesy and Wood up top with Deeney coming in off the bench. Confuse a few teams.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:56 pm
by tiger76
FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:39 pm
Cork will have a fight on his hands.
Good that's how it should be, maybe we're finally adding some depth to our midfield options. My one criticism of Brownhill is his final ball, but he delivered a peach today, and no-one gambled. If the strikers know that the deliveries will come in, perhaps they'll make the forward runs in future.
Re: Brownhill
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:56 pm
by JohnMac
Deeney?
Confusing me never mind the opposition
