Page 1 of 1

Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:48 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
What a signing for West Ham. To think some were ridiculing the mere suggestion of him coming to us. Not that he ever wouldve.

Been outstanding for them. Exactly what we need. Someone with pace and energy through the middle.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:55 pm
by Quickenthetempo
He's proved me wrong for sure. Fair play to him.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:00 pm
by taio
Been a brilliant at West Ham. As you say a few on here thought he wouldn't be good enough for us!

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:04 pm
by elwaclaret
I think it was a reasonable position for our fans to take regarding him coming here. He could well have gone to West Ham and played the big I am and sulked, but the lad has got his sleeves up and shown he not just has the ability, but the attitude to back it. All credit to him.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:08 pm
by Darthlaw
Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:55 pm
He's proved me wrong for sure. Fair play to him.
Same here.

I appreciate form is still temporary but he looks a much better player, unburdened by whatever was keeping him down at Man U.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:11 pm
by Burnley1989
Typical of football fans, he’s better than anything we have and always was.

There’s been some cracking players wrote off on here, all clubs are the same though, that’s what makes football such a funny old game

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:12 pm
by Newcastleclaret93
Burnley1989 wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:11 pm
Typical of football fans, he’s better than anything we have and always was.

There’s been some cracking players wrote off on here, all clubs are the same though, that’s what makes football such a funny old game
100% agree Lingard was always technically miles better than anyone at our club.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:27 pm
by elwaclaret
Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:12 pm
100% agree Lingard was always technically miles better than anyone at our club.
So was Ramsey when he was here.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:29 pm
by Zlatan
He went to the right club, and he’s doing really well for them. I don’t like West Ham, or Lingard for that matter, but it’s good to see a different club challenging at the top end of the table again - it gives some hope to the rest of us in the League that it can happen.

Good luck to them, I hope they make the top 4 and stop one of the traditional big 6 getting some income from it, it all helps level it a bit

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:32 pm
by Awayfromburnley
Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:08 pm
Same here.

I appreciate form is still temporary but he looks a much better player, unburdened by whatever was keeping him down at Man U.
Pogba and hanger ons....

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:52 pm
by warksclaret
...and so is Dawson. An absolute rock for WHU since he got called up into the starting 11

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:59 pm
by bobinho
Whoever suggested Jesse lingard wasn’t good enough for us is a weapons grade fool.

He’s an excellent player when he’s in form. Had a tremendous impact at West Ham, and he could well have had the same impact here, but of course that would be dependent on the role he was given.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:00 pm
by beddie
Not doing a bad job is he David Moyes.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:06 pm
by warksclaret
beddie wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:00 pm
Not doing a bad job is he David Moyes.
Without any hesitation MANAGER OF THE YEAR. Would bet that Klopp, Morinho or Guardiola would not achieve the same with that squad

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:13 pm
by djemba-djemba
bobinho wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:59 pm
He’s an excellent player when he’s in form. Had a tremendous impact at West Ham, and he could well have had the same impact here, but of course that would be dependent on the role he was given.
89th minute substitute no doubt.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:44 pm
by BurnleyFC
bobinho wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:59 pm
Whoever suggested Jesse lingard wasn’t good enough for us is a weapons grade fool.

He’s an excellent player when he’s in form. Had a tremendous impact at West Ham, and he could well have had the same impact here, but of course that would be dependent on the role he was given.
And most of them are noticeable by their absence.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:04 pm
by EarbyClaret
Moyes is doing an amazing job at West Ham - a couple of astute additions in Dawson and Lingard - both of whom deemed not good enough for us by some on here

Only barrier to his continued progress at the London Stadium will be when they let fans back in

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:09 pm
by Boroclaret
Moyes doing a fantastic job. Some great signings in Dawson, Soucek, Coufal and Lingard.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:11 pm
by bobinho
EarbyClaret wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:04 pm
Moyes is doing an amazing job at West Ham - a couple of astute additions in Dawson and Lingard - both of whom deemed not good enough for us by some on here

Only barrier to his continued progress at the London Stadium will be when they let fans back in
Absolutely bang on the money this.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:41 pm
by tiger76
Boroclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:09 pm
Moyes doing a fantastic job. Some great signings in Dawson, Soucek, Coufal and Lingard.
Yep he's also cleared out the dead wood such as Felipe Anderson & Sébastien Haller.

And his signings haven't cost fortunes either, what he seems to have done is galvanised the whole dressing room, and got them all pulling in the same direction, even their recent injury concerns haven't impeded their chase for a CL place, and whether they make the top 4 or not he's got to be the frontrunner as MOTY.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:41 pm
by superdimitri
Certainly helps a manager when you can get signings over the line. Dyche would probably do better than Moyes there.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:45 pm
by boatshed bill
Not sure, but didn't most of the negative posts allude to Lingard "not being a Dyche player" and being above our wage ceiling?

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:24 pm
by DCWat
I must admit, I’d have said no to Dawson. Seeing him this season, admittedly mostly in highlights, I was wrong. Lingard wouldn’t have come to us I don’t think, but it was obvious he’d have easily been good enough for our team.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 3:51 am
by CFS
Lingard in Declan rice out me thinks.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 7:27 am
by beddie
Without doubt a tremendous signing, Moyes gives him the confidence to play. Mentioning Dawson he was always someone I'd hope we'd bring in, especially at the beginning of this season, he'd have been perfect for our set plays. Moyes has to take the credit though for some astute signings.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:45 am
by Jakubclaret
boatshed bill wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:45 pm
Not sure, but didn't most of the negative posts allude to Lingard "not being a Dyche player" and being above our wage ceiling?
In fairness that’s true the majority of the people conceded that JL would have been more than good enough to compliment our squad but wages being the sticking issues, I think a very small number of posters did outrightly dismiss JL regardless of wage demands as just being not good enough for us & the reasons cited were the lack of game time whilst at man United being the chief reason & basically saying he wouldn’t be fit enough for us, but some of the same posters would find reasons for pele in his pomp earning £50 a week as not being good enough, that's just the way some people see things on this forum if it doesn’t align cognitively with there mindset it’s not possible for other things to be believed or the possibility that it could happen.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 11:43 am
by gandhisflipflop
taio wrote:
Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:00 pm
Been a brilliant at West Ham. As you say a few on here thought he wouldn't be good enough for us!
There were people on here who wouldn't have had Danny Ings back.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:18 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
gandhisflipflop wrote:
Mon Apr 12, 2021 11:43 am
There were people on here who wouldn't have had Danny Ings back.
In fairness I was one of those people as I felt the fee Liverpool wanted coupled with Ings' lack of match action and injuries didnt make that particular move a good gamble for us.

Good for him though to come back as well as he has. His talent isnt really in doubt.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:21 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:18 pm
In fairness I was one of those people as I felt the fee Liverpool wanted coupled with Ings' lack of match action and injuries didnt make that particular move a good gamble for us.

Good for him though to come back as well as he has. His talent isnt really in doubt.

Correct, you can imagine what would be written on here had we agreed to pay 20m fee and a huge wage on a 3 year deal and he did his knee within a few months of being here.

Look what gets written about Defour despite being a fraction of the cost.