Chris Wood offside

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18134
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3881 times
Has Liked: 2075 times

Chris Wood offside

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu May 20, 2021 9:30 am

He was given offside last night when we should have had a free kick on the edge of their box for a high foot, when he was actually 5 yards on.

Has there ever been a worse offside call?
These 3 users liked this post: Dark Cloud IanMcL simonclaret

rufus lumley
Posts: 888
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 7 times
Location: standing like a clock on the shelf

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by rufus lumley » Thu May 20, 2021 9:38 am

Flag happy idiot.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10341
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1965 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 9:42 am

Strange call that one.

HB Claret
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:09 am
Been Liked: 172 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by HB Claret » Thu May 20, 2021 9:45 am

Officials were pretty weak last night - Robertson jumped on Lowton from behind which was definitely a card IMO.

Herts Clarets
Posts: 3968
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1780 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Herts Clarets » Thu May 20, 2021 9:46 am

Why did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by minnieclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 9:47 am

I like that lass with the ponytail running a line, she’s fantastic at offside calls, but how did she miss Williams handball. It was directly in front of her.

Red Fox Rocks Socks
Posts: 451
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
Been Liked: 147 times
Has Liked: 442 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Red Fox Rocks Socks » Thu May 20, 2021 9:48 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:30 am
He was given offside last night when we should have had a free kick on the edge of their box for a high foot, when he was actually 5 yards on.

Has there ever been a worse offside call?
I’ll see your wood offside and raise you Dunn scoring whilst almost stood by the keeper

IanMcL
Posts: 30459
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6397 times
Has Liked: 8761 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by IanMcL » Thu May 20, 2021 10:12 am

Just the refs way of not having to give a FK for dangerous play! Whisper to lino, "Flag". Sorted!

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18134
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3881 times
Has Liked: 2075 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu May 20, 2021 10:41 am

Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:48 am
I’ll see your wood offside and raise you Dunn scoring whilst almost stood by the keeper
Dunn was a yard off, not 5 on.

basil6345789
Posts: 2721
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 484 times
Has Liked: 2293 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by basil6345789 » Thu May 20, 2021 12:53 pm

minnieclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:47 am
I like that lass with the ponytail running a line, she’s fantastic at offside calls, but how did she miss Williams handball. It was directly in front of her.
Yes, I like her too.

corporal jones
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:31 pm
Been Liked: 96 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by corporal jones » Thu May 20, 2021 12:57 pm

Herts Clarets wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:46 am
Why did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.
because var can only get involved in a very limited set of circumstances and that wasn't one of them. if it had led to a goal then maybe.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Jakubs Tash » Thu May 20, 2021 12:57 pm

The replay showed he ran past about 3 or 4 Liverpool players AFTER the ball had been passed. It wasn't even close.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67991
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32584 times
Has Liked: 5288 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by ClaretTony » Thu May 20, 2021 1:25 pm

I’ve just found it on the recording.

There are six Liverpool players, including Alisson, who are all behind him. Wood must be at least onside by five yards. It’s an incredible decision.

bfcjg
Posts: 13401
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5099 times
Has Liked: 6938 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by bfcjg » Thu May 20, 2021 1:29 pm

Decisions like that last night really do suggest that the rumours of corruption may have credence it was one of the worst I have witnessed in a long while.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Tall Paul » Thu May 20, 2021 1:35 pm

I thought the offside was given against Brownhill (?) earlier in the move? That was much closer.

775claret
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:00 am
Been Liked: 31 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by 775claret » Thu May 20, 2021 1:49 pm

Was there also an incident with 2 balls on the pitch or did I dream it?

Taylor had the "real" ball, and everyone (on both sides) sorted of slowed down and stopped whilst Mee kicked the 2nd ball out, before Taylor continued with the other ball.

It didn't affect anything but I don't think it was done "by the book"?

Rileybobs
Posts: 16949
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6980 times
Has Liked: 1488 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Rileybobs » Thu May 20, 2021 1:50 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 1:35 pm
I thought the offside was given against Brownhill (?) earlier in the move? That was much closer.
That was my understanding, and the commentators too. Although when paused it looked level, not that there’s any such thing anymore.

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by minnieclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 1:54 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 1:35 pm
I thought the offside was given against Brownhill (?) earlier in the move? That was much closer.
Agreed but the ball went nowhere near him and he made no attempt to go after it.
These 2 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 IanMcL

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3789
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1832 times
Has Liked: 2636 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Thu May 20, 2021 2:13 pm

It was a very poor decision. It should have been a free kick for dangerous play, however, it was the wrong team who were sinned against!

Yes, there were two balls on the pitch at one time but Ben Mee kicked it off very quickly and play carried on.
Last edited by Ashingtonclaret46 on Thu May 20, 2021 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Tall Paul » Thu May 20, 2021 2:13 pm

minnieclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 1:54 pm
Agreed but the ball went nowhere near him and he made no attempt to go after it.
Didn't he play the ball?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67991
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32584 times
Has Liked: 5288 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by ClaretTony » Thu May 20, 2021 2:29 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 1:35 pm
I thought the offside was given against Brownhill (?) earlier in the move? That was much closer.
Just watching it again. Liverpool clear the ball with no suggestion of offside and you can see the lino showing no interest. The clearance finds Tarkowski who plays it forward to Wood. At this point Brownhill is close to being offside but obviously not active. Wood gets through and after the high kick the lino then flags. Can only be for Wood and it’s a shocker of a decision.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6674
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2009 times
Has Liked: 3358 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by Dark Cloud » Thu May 20, 2021 2:29 pm

775claret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 1:49 pm
Was there also an incident with 2 balls on the pitch or did I dream it?

Taylor had the "real" ball, and everyone (on both sides) sorted of slowed down and stopped whilst Mee kicked the 2nd ball out, before Taylor continued with the other ball.

It didn't affect anything but I don't think it was done "by the book"?
Very true and I couldn't believe a PL ref allowed Ben Mee to kick the spare ball out of play whilst Taylor had the other one "in play" and he didn't stop the game!! It was definitely on a par with Wood's ludicrous offside decision, but maybe liners have just got used to Wood being pretty much permanently offside so they simply flag anyway!!! ;)

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 619 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by BabylonClaret » Thu May 20, 2021 5:41 pm

Nah the officials were wearing red shirts underneath last night. Pretty much everything went their way
This user liked this post: IanMcL

IanMcL
Posts: 30459
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6397 times
Has Liked: 8761 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by IanMcL » Thu May 20, 2021 6:17 pm

Let's get this right....are we actually saying that a Prem ref should give Burnley a FK in a really dangerous goalscoring place, when a players head is nearly removed from his neck?

Show me them Prem rule which says a referee has to compromise a desired outcome (Liverpool winning and thus setting up a last day interest for the prem) and give a correct decision?

Nowhere!

The rule is....everything required to ensure top four is correct top four.

superdimitri
Posts: 4972
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1009 times
Has Liked: 726 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by superdimitri » Thu May 20, 2021 7:17 pm

Some people complain about linesman playing on for VAR reviews but this is exactly why they do it. They've stopped doing it as regularly as before because of the stupid complaints.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67991
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32584 times
Has Liked: 5288 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by ClaretTony » Thu May 20, 2021 8:17 pm

Herts Clarets wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:46 am
Why did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.
It wasn’t a potential penalty. Had it been then VAR would have reviewed it and seen there was no offside.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7365
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by fidelcastro » Fri May 21, 2021 2:54 am

IanMcL wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 6:17 pm
Let's get this right....are we actually saying that a Prem ref should give Burnley a FK in a really dangerous goalscoring place, when a players head is nearly removed from his neck?

Show me them Prem rule which says a referee has to compromise a desired outcome (Liverpool winning and thus setting up a last day interest for the prem) and give a correct decision?

Nowhere!

The rule is....everything required to ensure top four is correct top four.
You don't half talk some crap!

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3164
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Fri May 21, 2021 3:42 am

In the 2 ball incident ref definitely just shrugged his shoulders and motioned for everyone to carry on. A bit “Towneley” but you can’t say it wasnt common sense or affected anything apart from possibly his assessors report.
This user liked this post: dsr

IanMcL
Posts: 30459
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6397 times
Has Liked: 8761 times

Re: Chris Wood offside

Post by IanMcL » Fri May 21, 2021 7:46 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 2:54 am
You don't half talk some crap!
Plenty of prem ref evidence to the contrary, over many seasons.

I remember when Jack Wiltshire went from Arsenal to Bournemouth. He actually made the point that refs seem to decide differently from when Arsenal were involved.

Post Reply