Chris Wood offside
-
- Posts: 18063
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3862 times
- Has Liked: 2071 times
Chris Wood offside
He was given offside last night when we should have had a free kick on the edge of their box for a high foot, when he was actually 5 yards on.
Has there ever been a worse offside call?
Has there ever been a worse offside call?
These 3 users liked this post: Dark Cloud IanMcL simonclaret
-
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
- Location: standing like a clock on the shelf
Re: Chris Wood offside
Flag happy idiot.
-
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3338 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Strange call that one.
Re: Chris Wood offside
Officials were pretty weak last night - Robertson jumped on Lowton from behind which was definitely a card IMO.
-
- Posts: 3951
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1766 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Why did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: Chris Wood offside
I like that lass with the ponytail running a line, she’s fantastic at offside calls, but how did she miss Williams handball. It was directly in front of her.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
I’ll see your wood offside and raise you Dunn scoring whilst almost stood by the keeperQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 9:30 amHe was given offside last night when we should have had a free kick on the edge of their box for a high foot, when he was actually 5 yards on.
Has there ever been a worse offside call?
Re: Chris Wood offside
Just the refs way of not having to give a FK for dangerous play! Whisper to lino, "Flag". Sorted!
-
- Posts: 18063
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3862 times
- Has Liked: 2071 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Dunn was a yard off, not 5 on.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 9:48 amI’ll see your wood offside and raise you Dunn scoring whilst almost stood by the keeper
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 482 times
- Has Liked: 2292 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Yes, I like her too.minnieclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 9:47 amI like that lass with the ponytail running a line, she’s fantastic at offside calls, but how did she miss Williams handball. It was directly in front of her.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:31 pm
- Been Liked: 96 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Chris Wood offside
because var can only get involved in a very limited set of circumstances and that wasn't one of them. if it had led to a goal then maybe.Herts Clarets wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 9:46 amWhy did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.
-
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 673 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
The replay showed he ran past about 3 or 4 Liverpool players AFTER the ball had been passed. It wasn't even close.
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32413 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Chris Wood offside
I’ve just found it on the recording.
There are six Liverpool players, including Alisson, who are all behind him. Wood must be at least onside by five yards. It’s an incredible decision.
There are six Liverpool players, including Alisson, who are all behind him. Wood must be at least onside by five yards. It’s an incredible decision.
Re: Chris Wood offside
Decisions like that last night really do suggest that the rumours of corruption may have credence it was one of the worst I have witnessed in a long while.
Re: Chris Wood offside
I thought the offside was given against Brownhill (?) earlier in the move? That was much closer.
Re: Chris Wood offside
Was there also an incident with 2 balls on the pitch or did I dream it?
Taylor had the "real" ball, and everyone (on both sides) sorted of slowed down and stopped whilst Mee kicked the 2nd ball out, before Taylor continued with the other ball.
It didn't affect anything but I don't think it was done "by the book"?
Taylor had the "real" ball, and everyone (on both sides) sorted of slowed down and stopped whilst Mee kicked the 2nd ball out, before Taylor continued with the other ball.
It didn't affect anything but I don't think it was done "by the book"?
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: Chris Wood offside
Agreed but the ball went nowhere near him and he made no attempt to go after it.
These 2 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 IanMcL
-
- Posts: 3780
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1830 times
- Has Liked: 2624 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Chris Wood offside
It was a very poor decision. It should have been a free kick for dangerous play, however, it was the wrong team who were sinned against!
Yes, there were two balls on the pitch at one time but Ben Mee kicked it off very quickly and play carried on.
Yes, there were two balls on the pitch at one time but Ben Mee kicked it off very quickly and play carried on.
Last edited by Ashingtonclaret46 on Thu May 20, 2021 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Chris Wood offside
Didn't he play the ball?minnieclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 1:54 pmAgreed but the ball went nowhere near him and he made no attempt to go after it.
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32413 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Chris Wood offside
Just watching it again. Liverpool clear the ball with no suggestion of offside and you can see the lino showing no interest. The clearance finds Tarkowski who plays it forward to Wood. At this point Brownhill is close to being offside but obviously not active. Wood gets through and after the high kick the lino then flags. Can only be for Wood and it’s a shocker of a decision.
-
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2004 times
- Has Liked: 3339 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Very true and I couldn't believe a PL ref allowed Ben Mee to kick the spare ball out of play whilst Taylor had the other one "in play" and he didn't stop the game!! It was definitely on a par with Wood's ludicrous offside decision, but maybe liners have just got used to Wood being pretty much permanently offside so they simply flag anyway!!!775claret wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 1:49 pmWas there also an incident with 2 balls on the pitch or did I dream it?
Taylor had the "real" ball, and everyone (on both sides) sorted of slowed down and stopped whilst Mee kicked the 2nd ball out, before Taylor continued with the other ball.
It didn't affect anything but I don't think it was done "by the book"?
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Nah the officials were wearing red shirts underneath last night. Pretty much everything went their way
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Chris Wood offside
Let's get this right....are we actually saying that a Prem ref should give Burnley a FK in a really dangerous goalscoring place, when a players head is nearly removed from his neck?
Show me them Prem rule which says a referee has to compromise a desired outcome (Liverpool winning and thus setting up a last day interest for the prem) and give a correct decision?
Nowhere!
The rule is....everything required to ensure top four is correct top four.
Show me them Prem rule which says a referee has to compromise a desired outcome (Liverpool winning and thus setting up a last day interest for the prem) and give a correct decision?
Nowhere!
The rule is....everything required to ensure top four is correct top four.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
Some people complain about linesman playing on for VAR reviews but this is exactly why they do it. They've stopped doing it as regularly as before because of the stupid complaints.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32413 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Chris Wood offside
It wasn’t a potential penalty. Had it been then VAR would have reviewed it and seen there was no offside.Herts Clarets wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 9:46 amWhy did VAR not review it? It was a clear and obvious error.
-
- Posts: 7339
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2218 times
- Has Liked: 2207 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
You don't half talk some crap!IanMcL wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 6:17 pmLet's get this right....are we actually saying that a Prem ref should give Burnley a FK in a really dangerous goalscoring place, when a players head is nearly removed from his neck?
Show me them Prem rule which says a referee has to compromise a desired outcome (Liverpool winning and thus setting up a last day interest for the prem) and give a correct decision?
Nowhere!
The rule is....everything required to ensure top four is correct top four.
-
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 835 times
- Has Liked: 543 times
Re: Chris Wood offside
In the 2 ball incident ref definitely just shrugged his shoulders and motioned for everyone to carry on. A bit “Towneley” but you can’t say it wasnt common sense or affected anything apart from possibly his assessors report.
This user liked this post: dsr
Re: Chris Wood offside
Plenty of prem ref evidence to the contrary, over many seasons.
I remember when Jack Wiltshire went from Arsenal to Bournemouth. He actually made the point that refs seem to decide differently from when Arsenal were involved.