It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tiger76 » Thu May 20, 2021 3:00 pm

I don't want to lambast our reserve keepers, but both BPF and Norris have struggled in their brief appearances, and if we sold Nick or he was out injured for any length of time I really would fear the worst, so it's essential we rebuff any advances for Nick's services this summer, as selling him would leave an even bigger hole to fill than Tarks going.

beddie
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1408 times
Has Liked: 520 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by beddie » Thu May 20, 2021 3:04 pm

Yes I agree unless we get an offer we simply can’t refuse. I’ve mentioned on another thread that I’d have Tom back if Pope goes and still look for another number 2.

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 3:19 pm

If Nick goes I suggest two good keepers. Heaton would be great and there are some good keepers around-Sam Johnstone for me of WBA has been brilliant this year
These 2 users liked this post: beddie basil6345789

Erasmus
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 1:46 pm
Been Liked: 574 times
Has Liked: 44 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Erasmus » Thu May 20, 2021 3:29 pm

We generally are more able to hang on to our existing players than recruit new ones, probably because of the wages we can pay and because we have a rather unfashionable image amongst Premier League club. We're not a glamour club. So I suspect our most successful efforts will be in keeping players of Nick Pope's ability rather than signing others of an equivalent standing. Tarkowski may be different because he seems to have a strong desire to move to a higher status club, and probably earn higher status wages.

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 3:36 pm

Erasmus wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:29 pm
We generally are more able to hang on to our existing players than recruit new ones, probably because of the wages we can pay and because we have a rather unfashionable image amongst Premier League club. We're not a glamour club. So I suspect our most successful efforts will be in keeping players of Nick Pope's ability rather than signing others of an equivalent standing. Tarkowski may be different because he seems to have a strong desire to move to a higher status club, and probably earn higher status wages.
Might all change once Nick has spent Summer with theoretically the best English players in the Euros, and le\rning the deals they are on

Down_Rover
Posts: 1753
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Manchester

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Down_Rover » Thu May 20, 2021 3:39 pm

Even if we keep Pope I would seek an experienced back up because I don't think BPF or Norris are yet ready for an extended spell in the team.

Heaton is likely to sign for Manure so I suggest someone like Butland or Berkovic.

one thing that struck me yesterday was that Norris had to tell the defenders he was left footed. Surely they should know things like this. it makes you wonder how much the regular first team players know about our back up keepers. Makes their job that little bit harder

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10914
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5560 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by TheFamilyCat » Thu May 20, 2021 3:39 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:36 pm
Might all change once Nick has spent Summer with theoretically the best English players in the Euros, and le\rning the deals they are on
Are you suggesting he has no idea of how much the best players in the country earn?

There is also the matter of another club wanting to buy him.

bf2k
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 336 times
Has Liked: 1516 times
Location: Burnley

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by bf2k » Thu May 20, 2021 3:40 pm

No. Sam Johnson at WBA looks a very good keeper as well. I'm sure he'll be a lot cheaper than whatever we manage to get for Pope

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 3:40 pm

Erasmus wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:29 pm
We generally are more able to hang on to our existing players than recruit new ones, probably because of the wages we can pay and because we have a rather unfashionable image amongst Premier League club. We're not a glamour club. So I suspect our most successful efforts will be in keeping players of Nick Pope's ability rather than signing others of an equivalent standing. Tarkowski may be different because he seems to have a strong desire to move to a higher status club, and probably earn higher status wages.
Might all change once Nick has spent Summer with theoretically the best English players in the Euros, and learning the deals they are on

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10914
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5560 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by TheFamilyCat » Thu May 20, 2021 3:41 pm

Down_Rover wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:39 pm
Even if we keep Pope I would seek an experienced back up because I don't think BPF or Norris are yet ready for an extended spell in the team.

Heaton is likely to sign for Manure so I suggest someone like Butland or Berkovic.

one thing that struck me yesterday was that Norris had to tell the defenders he was left footed. Surely they should know things like this. it makes you wonder how much the regular first team players know about our back up keepers. Makes their job that little bit harder
Not acceptable. If he wants to play in our first team he should have to learn to kick with his right foot.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Thu May 20, 2021 3:43 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:40 pm
Might all change once Nick has spent Summer with theoretically the best English players in the Euros, and learning the deals they are on
Yup, it is well known that when he went to last World Cup nobody in the squad spoke to him, also in every international break since the world cup they still haven't spoke to him but this tournament they have agreed to talk money.
This user liked this post: Red Fox Rocks Socks

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 4:03 pm

beddie wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:04 pm
Yes I agree unless we get an offer we simply can’t refuse. I’ve mentioned on another thread that I’d have Tom back if Pope goes and still look for another number 2.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 4:07 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 4:03 pm
Not keen on re-signing ex players, myself.
SD and BM identified Peacock-Farrell and Norris so you have to assume that they rated them good enough. There are obviously problems at present but perhaps a summer's work will change things for the better

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Spijed » Thu May 20, 2021 4:10 pm

In terms of a move, what the likely options for Nick Pope?

Outside of the so called big six clubs, Everton, Leicester and Aston Villa are unlikely to want to replace their keepers.

Are West Ham happy with theirs?

Other than those teams it would be very much a sideways move for him.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 20, 2021 4:16 pm

I said the other day I'd take Sam Johnson at WBA if he left. BPF and Norris are rubbish imo

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18005
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by ElectroClaret » Thu May 20, 2021 4:37 pm

I really hope he stays, and I don't want to be unkind to Norris and BPF, but in their respective last games for us, they've been less than impressive.
Here's hoping they improve, but they're not up to PL spec at the moment.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5876
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2534 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Silkyskills1 » Thu May 20, 2021 4:38 pm

It's quite interesting that not long ago on here Nick Pope's kicking and distribution was under scrutiny and cited as the main reason why he would always be behind Pickford in the international pecking order. I think we have seen in our last two fixtures that a good goalkeeper is worth a lot more than his ability to 'chip' a ball out to a wide player. Quod erat demonstrandum.
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 5543
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2340 times
Has Liked: 1405 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by gandhisflipflop » Thu May 20, 2021 4:39 pm

i have full faith in SD to get the right man should nick leave

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 4:41 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 3:43 pm
Yup, it is well known that when he went to last World Cup nobody in the squad spoke to him, also in every international break since the world cup they still haven't spoke to him but this tournament they have agreed to talk money.
As you get more familiar with people you ask more and more questions. Or maybe you are the type that goes to a job interview and before you have even shaken hands with the interviewer you ask how much the job pays

Claret_tinted
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:19 am
Been Liked: 43 times
Has Liked: 69 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Claret_tinted » Thu May 20, 2021 4:49 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 4:37 pm
I really hope he stays, and I don't want to be unkind to Norris and BPF, but in their respective last games for us, they've been less than impressive.
Here's hoping they improve, but they're not up to PL spec at the moment.
Plays one game after not playing for months against two very attacking teams = written off by fickle Burnley fans

Shocker!

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4292
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 1521 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tarkys_ears » Thu May 20, 2021 5:07 pm

It's the Premier League love.

Make your excuses all you want but neither of our backups are good enough.

Thems cold, hard facts, not people being "fickle"

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3150 times
Has Liked: 10254 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by evensteadiereddie » Thu May 20, 2021 5:13 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 5:07 pm
It's the Premier League love.

Make your excuses all you want but neither of our backups are good enough.

Thems cold, hard facts, not people being "fickle"

"Thems" opinions not cold, hard facts.....love.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tiger76 » Thu May 20, 2021 5:14 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 5:07 pm
It's the Premier League love.

Make your excuses all you want but neither of our backups are good enough.

Thems cold, hard facts, not people being "fickle"
For once we agree, I don't consider myself fickle, but if we line up next season with either BPF or Norris between the sticks it'll be a long season.

Thankfully they have only featured in games once we're safe, and not fixtures which we needed the points in.

The problem with having a poor keeper who the defence doesn't trust is this uncertainty transmits itself throughout the whole team, and along with centre half a solid keeper is an absolute necessity to ensure success at any level let alone the PL.

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 5:33 pm

Think we were spoiled with Nick. Heaton has an injury early in the game, Pope comes on v Palace, none of us know much about him but he makes a worldy save with his feet v Benteke to ensure we get the three points.Suddenly he is a hero. In the following few games he played the game of his life v Liverpool, and several other clubs. Before we knew it we had almost forgotton about poor old Tom and Nick continues to play so well he gets 4 England caps

By contrast this season BPF stands in and looks like a rabbit in headlights. We know he has been poor, because despite his loyalty SD gives the shirt last night to our third choice keeper. He lets a goal in last night that maybe some of our outfielders playing in goal might have kept out, and looked very guilty for the third goal

For me you need two good keepers as your No 1 might put his shoulder out first game of the season. Before you say theres little chance of that happening, it HAS happened twice to us in the past 3 years or so

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu May 20, 2021 5:47 pm

unlike a certain other player Pope keeps saying how much he enjoys it here and wants to stay, I suspect given what we've recently seen that it would take mega money for us to sell him

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 5:53 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 5:33 pm
Think we were spoiled with Nick. Heaton has an injury early in the game, Pope comes on v Palace, none of us know much about him but he makes a worldy save with his feet v Benteke to ensure we get the three points.Suddenly he is a hero. In the following few games he played the game of his life v Liverpool, and several other clubs. Before we knew it we had almost forgotton about poor old Tom and Nick continues to play so well he gets 4 England caps

By contrast this season BPF stands in and looks like a rabbit in headlights. We know he has been poor, because despite his loyalty SD gives the shirt last night to our third choice keeper. He lets a goal in last night that maybe some of our outfielders playing in goal might have kept out, and looked very guilty for the third goal

For me you need two good keepers as your No 1 might put his shoulder out first game of the season. Before you say theres little chance of that happening, it HAS happened twice to us in the past 3 years or so
Whilst not disagreeing about nick Pope vs Palace, I would say that the team were defending better then than they are now.

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4292
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 1521 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tarkys_ears » Thu May 20, 2021 6:12 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 5:47 pm
unlike a certain other player Pope keeps saying how much he enjoys it here and wants to stay, I suspect given what we've recently seen that it would take mega money for us to sell him
Unfortunately "mega money" to us is generally not a lot of money to the clubs that might want him.

I've resigned myself to him leaving. If he stays it'll be a bonus for me.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu May 20, 2021 6:16 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 6:12 pm
Unfortunately "mega money" to us is generally not a lot of money to the clubs that might want him.

I've resigned myself to him leaving. If he stays it'll be a bonus for me.
if we put a 50 million pound fee on his head there will be very few if no takers at that price. We kept hold of Tarks doing that

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 20, 2021 6:27 pm

Silkyskills1 wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 4:38 pm
It's quite interesting that not long ago on here Nick Pope's kicking and distribution was under scrutiny and cited as the main reason why he would always be behind Pickford in the international pecking order. I think we have seen in our last two fixtures that a good goalkeeper is worth a lot more than his ability to 'chip' a ball out to a wide player. Quod erat demonstrandum.
That was never in question though, was it?
Pickford is a far far better shot stopper than BPF or Will Norris.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6975
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1489 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Woodleyclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 8:05 pm

Ramsdale would be a decent shout as back up to Nick

dougcollins
Posts: 6727
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by dougcollins » Thu May 20, 2021 8:24 pm

I really don't like Ramsdale.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tiger76 » Thu May 20, 2021 8:25 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 8:05 pm
Ramsdale would be a decent shout as back up to Nick
Would he come though if he didn't think he'd be number 1, plus he wouldn't come cheap, he only signed for Sheff Utd last year for £18m or so, and he's still got 3 years on his deal, I genuinely will be staggered if we spend big on a 2nd choice keeper when we've got other holes in the squad to cover, of course if we sold Nick then yes that would be a different story entirely.

dougcollins
Posts: 6727
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by dougcollins » Thu May 20, 2021 8:28 pm

I'd suggest Ramsdale was partly culpable for the Blades' indifferent season. Though I appreciate Henderson going back to Man u was not their choice.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 8:28 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 8:25 pm
Would he come though if he didn't think he'd be number 1, plus he wouldn't come cheap, he only signed for Sheff Utd last year for £18m or so, and he's still got 3 years on his deal, I genuinely will be staggered if we spend big on a 2nd choice keeper when we've got other holes in the squad to cover, of course if we sold Nick then yes that would be a different story entirely.
No better than BPF in my opinion.
Patience is required. A pre-season with new players (hopefully) and new tactics and the whole picture could change.
I hope we keep NP though.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tiger76 » Thu May 20, 2021 8:38 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 8:28 pm
No better than BPF in my opinion.
Patience is required. A pre-season with new players (hopefully) and new tactics and the whole picture could change.
I hope we keep NP though.
I'd like to think we can at least keep hold of NP for another 12 months, and that time should allow SD and the coaches to fully assess BPF and Norris, however even if we do hold onto Nick what happens should he suffer a serious injury in the first few weeks of the season, we'll then find ourselves up the creek without a paddle.

Our mainstays in recent seasons have been Mee, Pope & tarks, and that triumvirate have been absolutely vital to our stay in this league, it's bad enough that we'll probably lose Tarks this summer, but to lose our 1st choice keeper, and the guy who's won us countless points with his displays will be hard to replace.

Hence why we should only sell if we get a crazy offer, and for me that would be £40m upwards, that's how important NP is to us, and if clubs come sniffing we need to play hard ball, as keeping Pope could well be the difference between relegation or not.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 8:41 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 8:38 pm
I'd like to think we can at least keep hold of NP for another 12 months, and that time should allow SD and the coaches to fully assess BPF and Norris, however even if we do hold onto Nick what happens should he suffer a serious injury in the first few weeks of the season, we'll then find ourselves up the creek without a paddle.

Our mainstays in recent seasons have been Mee, Pope & tarks, and that triumvirate have been absolutely vital to our stay in this league, it's bad enough that we'll probably lose Tarks this summer, but to lose our 1st choice keeper, and the guy who's won us countless points with his displays will be hard to replace.

Hence why we should only sell if we get a crazy offer, and for me that would be £40m upwards, that's how important NP is to us, and if clubs come sniffing we need to play hard ball, as keeping Pope could well be the difference between relegation or not.
If we could pull £40m we could bring in a very good goalkeeper, though I have no idea who that might be.
FWIW, my favourite keeper in teams near the bottom is Dubravka. I really rate him.

CleggHall
Posts: 3281
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 843 times
Has Liked: 1050 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by CleggHall » Thu May 20, 2021 9:21 pm

Why would Dubravka leave Newcastle for Burnley? I can’t think of any good reason.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by RVclaret » Thu May 20, 2021 9:27 pm

Sam Johnstone would be the best target and realistic should we lose Nick. Fee of around £10-15m has been touted while we should be looking at £35m+.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15259
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 20, 2021 9:30 pm

CleggHall wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:21 pm
Why would Dubravka leave Newcastle for Burnley? I can’t think of any good reason.
I'm not suggesting that he would, only saying that down the bottom end of the PL he is very good.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by tiger76 » Thu May 20, 2021 9:38 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:27 pm
Sam Johnstone would be the best target and realistic should we lose Nick. Fee of around £10-15m has been touted while we should be looking at £35m+.
Johnstone is perhaps realistic should we need a new goalie, and given West Brom might have to sell we might be able to drive a hard bargain, however I suspect we wouldn't be the only PL club interested in him especially at that money.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5876
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2534 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Silkyskills1 » Thu May 20, 2021 10:15 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 6:27 pm
That was never in question though, was it?
Pickford is a far far better shot stopper than BPF or Will Norris.
I think you've missed the point.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 20, 2021 10:35 pm

CleggHall wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 9:21 pm
Why would Dubravka leave Newcastle for Burnley? I can’t think of any good reason.
Spent a large part of this season out of favor

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Jakubs Tash » Thu May 20, 2021 10:55 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 10:35 pm
Spent a large part of this season out of favor
He’s been injured for parts of this season - not out of favour.

JohnDearyMe
Posts: 2743
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 2053 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by JohnDearyMe » Thu May 20, 2021 11:21 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 8:28 pm
I'd suggest Ramsdale was partly culpable for the Blades' indifferent season. Though I appreciate Henderson going back to Man u was not their choice.
Speaking of Henderson, interesting to see how distinctly average he's looked at Man Utd this season after his stellar year at Sheff Utd. Not sure how much a failure to play week in week out has contributed to that though

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Fri May 21, 2021 7:43 am

warksclaret wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 4:41 pm
As you get more familiar with people you ask more and more questions. Or maybe you are the type that goes to a job interview and before you have even shaken hands with the interviewer you ask how much the job pays
Point still stands, why this summer ? You think there is a time delay before footballers talk to each other about money ?

As for me being a certain type, this won't shock you but you are wrong again. I have never been for a job interview in my life, working to make someone money for a job I am doing was never for me. I also don't worry about what anybody else earns, I have no interest if 1 man earns 20k a year and the other one earns 200k, so long I make what I want to make my life is fine.

clitheroeclaret3
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:27 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 285 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by clitheroeclaret3 » Fri May 21, 2021 8:18 am

NP missed last 2 games, bbc stats for shots on target :o
V leeds 4-6
V liverpool 3-3

No goals scored, 7 conceded.

Not sure if it says more about quality of finishing, bad luck but mostly quality of teams goalkeeping??

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Boss Hogg » Fri May 21, 2021 9:20 am

I’m confident we can keep Pope unlike Tarkowski. I think Tarkowski will be easier to replace for us than Pope. It shows the power of having strong players pushing for players. BPF and Norris are not putting Pope under any pressure which is the problem. You can’t have players knowing they will start even if in a bad run of form

dushanbe
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:20 pm
Been Liked: 396 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by dushanbe » Fri May 21, 2021 9:29 am

He's a great keeper but realistically where is he going to go? Rightly or wrongly there's a perception that he can't play football, so which team is going to take him would be my question. Realistically none of the top six, all of whom like to play out from the back.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri May 21, 2021 9:35 am

dushanbe wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 9:29 am
He's a great keeper but realistically where is he going to go? Rightly or wrongly there's a perception that he can't play football, so which team is going to take him would be my question. Realistically none of the top six, all of whom like to play out from the back.
I made this point the other week. Who would be able to afford Pope?

None of the top 6 would want him because he can’t play out from the back.
Then you start to go down the list.
Everton - pickford having his best season for Everton (likely win player of season)
Aston Villa - Martinez has been great
Leeds - Meslier has had a good season
Leicester - Schmeichal is arguably one of the best keepers in the league

Pope isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

warksclaret
Posts: 6690
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1700 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: It is now imperative we keep Pope at all costs

Post by warksclaret » Fri May 21, 2021 9:36 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 7:43 am
Point still stands, why this summer ? You think there is a time delay before footballers talk to each other about money ?

As for me being a certain type, this won't shock you but you are wrong again. I have never been for a job interview in my life, working to make someone money for a job I am doing was never for me. I also don't worry about what anybody else earns, I have no interest if 1 man earns 20k a year and the other one earns 200k, so long I make what I want to make my life is fine.
Fair point my friend-but everyone is different in the way they interact

Post Reply