Brady

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Brady

Post by KRBFC » Sat May 22, 2021 4:34 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:23 pm
I don’t think it’s been downhill since that goal. In the following season he was a major influence in the team until the injury.

He got fit eventually, found Dwight McNeil in his way and has since had two years of injuries. A lot have been calf/hamstring injuries and that often happens after a long lay off. This more recent one though can be a bad one. It ended Jon Walters’ career and ruined Matt Taylor’s first season.

Wherever he is next season I hope he can get himself fit and playing regularly.
The players you mentioned is exactly the issue though, ancient players in football terms, clearly nowhere near as good as they once were and we are paying them huge wages to contribute nothing. We are paying Brady £2.1M a year (with bonuses on top) to do what exactly?

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Brady

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat May 22, 2021 4:35 pm

We are honouring the contract we gave him quite simply.

We may not like the return we're getting on the investment, but that's football and the risks involved.

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Brady

Post by KRBFC » Sat May 22, 2021 4:45 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:35 pm
We are honouring the contract we gave him quite simply.

We may not like the return we're getting on the investment, but that's football and the risks involved.
You're right but we keep adding on top of it with more signings like Stephens who have 0 re-sale value, 0 potential to improve, big wages and he's taking up a spot and potentially blocking future incomings. Stephens is 4th/5th choice in central midfield and he must be close to top 5 earners.

We've built a very very good spine, a very good base to build upon. We have 9 or so players who are consistently available and consistent performers, we just need to add to it better.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Brady

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat May 22, 2021 4:57 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:45 pm
You're right but we keep adding on top of it with more signings like Stephens who have 0 re-sale value, 0 potential to improve, big wages and he's taking up a spot and potentially blocking future incomings. Stephens is 4th/5th choice in central midfield and he must be close to top 5 earners.

We've built a very very good spine, a very good base to build upon. We have 9 or so players who are consistently available and consistent performers, we just need to add to it better.
Cork was injured when we signed Stephens wasn't he?

It is what it is with Stephens, if Cork had been out for longer we would've started the season with Brownhill, Westwood and Benson as our only CM options... Doubt anyone wanted that let's be fair, especially those who've decided Brownhill is league 1 quality at best :lol:

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Brady

Post by tiger76 » Sat May 22, 2021 5:01 pm

taio wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 2:24 pm
I wasn't on about Brady - I said he should leave - I was on about contracts generally.
It's fine extending contracts, but eventually you can end up with an ageing dressing room, which is exactly what we're in danger of, and then having to make sweeping changes in a short time which can really affect the morale and team ethic, plus any new players will need time to bed in, that's why ideally you recruit steadily window by window, however we've not had a decent window for a long time now. and these problems are about to come to fruition at a stroke.

I'm all for having an experienced core, but we have a handful of under 30's at the club, and it's showed on several occasions this season when we've looked leggy due to the quick turnaround in games.

This is why we need younger legs in this window to give us much needed energy , and if that means clearing the decks of some older faces then so be it.

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Brady

Post by KRBFC » Sat May 22, 2021 5:02 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:57 pm
Cork was injured when we signed Stephens wasn't he?

It is what it is with Stephens, if Cork had been out for longer we would've started the season with Brownhill, Westwood and Benson as our only CM options... Doubt anyone wanted that let's be fair, especially those who've decided Brownhill is league 1 quality at best :lol:
Surely it wasn't Stephens or nobody though. Hopefully ALK bring a freshness to our recruitment with data.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Brady

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat May 22, 2021 5:05 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:02 pm
Surely it wasn't Stephens or nobody though. Hopefully ALK bring a freshness to our recruitment with data.
It was a strange time though and he's got PL experience and wasn't after a long contract.
Just helped us ensure we had enough bodies for this odd season.

Yeah there should be an improvement this summer with recruitment

ClaretTony
Posts: 67785
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32406 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Brady

Post by ClaretTony » Sat May 22, 2021 5:13 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:02 pm
Surely it wasn't Stephens or nobody though. Hopefully ALK bring a freshness to our recruitment with data.
It was

taio
Posts: 11620
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3240 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Brady

Post by taio » Sat May 22, 2021 5:15 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:01 pm
It's fine extending contracts, but eventually you can end up with an ageing dressing room, which is exactly what we're in danger of, and then having to make sweeping changes in a short time which can really affect the morale and team ethic, plus any new players will need time to bed in, that's why ideally you recruit steadily window by window, however we've not had a decent window for a long time now. and these problems are about to come to fruition at a stroke.

I'm all for having an experienced core, but we have a handful of under 30's at the club, and it's showed on several occasions this season when we've looked leggy due to the quick turnaround in games.

This is why we need younger legs in this window to give us much needed energy , and if that means clearing the decks of some older faces then so be it.
The point was that just because a contract is extended it doesn't mean the player will remain for the duration of the contract. That's all.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30627
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat May 22, 2021 5:16 pm

I'm expecting Brady, Dunne and possibly Stephens to go, you would expect that to be in and around 100K + in wages saved

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9459
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1183 times
Has Liked: 778 times

Re: Brady

Post by Jakubclaret » Sat May 22, 2021 5:17 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:35 pm
We are honouring the contract we gave him quite simply.

We may not like the return we're getting on the investment, but that's football and the risks involved.
That’s true, at the end of the day we are the daft 1s for offering it & he’s a smart cookie for accepting it, him & his agent must have been singing from the rooftops before the ink had even dried.

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4439
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1161 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: Brady

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sat May 22, 2021 5:20 pm

If Dyche believes he can recapture the form and fitness he showed a couple of seasons (or so) back or even some of the form he was starting to show earlier this season then I suspect he will be encouraged to keep with our squad. But I suspect he knows where the wind is blowing in terms of first team appearances and may want to move on to somewhere like Celtic.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Brady

Post by tiger76 » Sat May 22, 2021 5:21 pm

taio wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:15 pm
The point was that just because a contract is extended it doesn't mean the player will remain for the duration of the contract. That's all.
Of course but I'd rather we gave contracts out to guys who'll actually be able to contribute on the park, I can only assume the situation was so bad last summer that SD felt he had no option but to keep Brady on, as it doesn't sound like there was anybody coming in to replace Robbie if we'd let him go, so Sean's hand was kind of forced in that sense.

Hopefully the new regime will be more forthcoming regarding funds to improve the squad, otherwise it could be a grim season next year.

taio
Posts: 11620
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3240 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Brady

Post by taio » Sat May 22, 2021 5:24 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:21 pm
Of course but I'd rather we gave contracts out to guys who'll actually be able to contribute on the park, I can only assume the situation was so bad last summer that SD felt he had no option but to keep Brady on, as it doesn't sound like there was anybody coming in to replace Robbie if we'd let him go, so Sean's hand was kind of forced in that sense.

Hopefully the new regime will be more forthcoming regarding funds to improve the squad, otherwise it could be a grim season next year.
Once again I'm not on about Brady. I agree he needs to go.

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: Brady

Post by jojomk1 » Sat May 22, 2021 5:38 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:16 pm
I'm expecting Brady, Dunne and possibly Stephens to go, you would expect that to be in and around 100K + in wages saved
And where are you expecting Stephens to go ?

He's not going to get anywhere near the money he is currently on, even if a club showed any interest

Another one who will run down his contract

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9459
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1183 times
Has Liked: 778 times

Re: Brady

Post by Jakubclaret » Sat May 22, 2021 5:49 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:38 pm
And where are you expecting Stephens to go ?

He's not going to get anywhere near the money he is currently on, even if a club showed any interest

Another one who will run down his contract
Should have given him a 1 year till this autumn & then assessed, but holding out for 2 he probably wouldn’t have agreed to even be here in the first place.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Brady

Post by tiger76 » Sat May 22, 2021 6:34 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 5:16 pm
I'm expecting Brady, Dunne and possibly Stephens to go, you would expect that to be in and around 100K + in wages saved
Brady & Dunne will probably go, but I can't see Stephens going anywhere, I'm afraid we're stuck with him for 12 months, so let's just hope he can actually show why we signed him, plus don't forget Gibson will also be off the wage bill, and I'd wager his salary was pretty hefty, so that should free up some slack for any incomings hopefully.

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: Brady

Post by jojomk1 » Sat May 22, 2021 6:58 pm

If Stephens gets anywhere near the starting 11 it means we have a lot of injuries ;)

£8m from Gibson sale will not go far if we are looking for any reasonable quality and experience and we need that at the back even if JT stays

Given our new debt, it will depend a lot on what we may get for JT to see any significant incomings throughout other areas of the pitch

Unless we see some substantial additional investment from other partners sourced by ALK

Tribesmen
Posts: 5084
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1180 times
Has Liked: 636 times
Location: Tibet

Re: Brady

Post by Tribesmen » Sat May 22, 2021 8:22 pm

I think a few will leave over the summer and sad to say Robbie will be one of them .

Loved Robbie i have to say but just maybe it's time for him to move on .

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30627
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat May 22, 2021 10:46 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 6:34 pm
Brady & Dunne will probably go, but I can't see Stephens going anywhere, I'm afraid we're stuck with him for 12 months, so let's just hope he can actually show why we signed him, plus don't forget Gibson will also be off the wage bill, and I'd wager his salary was pretty hefty, so that should free up some slack for any incomings hopefully.
I'm sure CP (or someone) posted on here that we had an option to release him at the end of this season - how factual that is I don't know of course

edit: CT says he's on a 2 year deal so we have him for another year unless we sell him
Last edited by Vegas Claret on Sun May 23, 2021 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Jel
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:54 pm
Been Liked: 266 times
Has Liked: 1178 times

Re: Brady

Post by Jel » Sun May 23, 2021 12:35 am

I think that his attitude is wrong, he's a liability, dives in late to tackles and that's what injured him against Leicester.
It's happened again more than once since his initial injury.
Time to go.

warksclaret
Posts: 6676
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1696 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: Brady

Post by warksclaret » Sun May 23, 2021 9:13 am

In fairness to Brady I think he has put himself under a lot of pressure to perform and his confidence is shot. This shows in his passing and crossing ability, the way he dives in to make amends for losing possession, and at times he appears to be a yellow or red card waiting to happen. He needs to find a new club where he can see out his career. Maybe a footballing club like a return to Norwich, or even Leeds or Brentford

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Brady

Post by Top Claret » Sun May 23, 2021 9:22 am

I thought when he was fit this season he had a couple of good games and was regaining some form, reminiscent of his pre Leicester injury days.

He really isn't fit enough nor consistent enough to secure a deal with a premier league club, so I think we should offer him a new contract on championship rates, because that is where he will be heading if he left the Turf, the same would apply to JBG

Post Reply