Capacity V Brighton

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Rombald
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 127 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Rombald » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:29 pm

martin_p wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:23 pm
No. That’s why they’re saying the end of September, time for anyone who hasn’t been vaccinated to have both.
No = under 18s won't be allowed or No= No need for under 18s to be tested?

Murger
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1244 times
Has Liked: 846 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Murger » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:29 pm

The Vaccine Passport is discriminatory. I won't be playing along.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2567 times
Has Liked: 769 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:29 pm

Keys, wallet, phone, identity papers, lucky scarf. Check.

Okay, good to go, I do hope Dyche makes a sub today.

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by martin_p » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:33 pm

Rombald wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:29 pm
No = under 18s won't be allowed or No= No need for under 18s to be tested?
Sorry, misread your question. Don’t know. I guess it doesn’t matter for the only confirmed place where this will apply, I.e. nightclubs, as you have to be 18 to get in anyway.

Aclaret
Posts: 4145
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1306 times
Has Liked: 1404 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Aclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:33 pm

Will guess the gate be back for this game ?
Could be some interesting one's.

Rombald
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 127 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Rombald » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:38 pm

martin_p wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:33 pm
Sorry, misread your question. Don’t know. I guess it doesn’t matter for the only confirmed place where this will apply, I.e. nightclubs, as you have to be 18 to get in anyway.
No problems! I guess ,none of us currently know. I'd be very surprised however if this doesn't impact football

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by martin_p » Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:41 pm

The press conference is majoring on ‘the risk posed by nightclubs’ and they haven’t mentioned anything else despite the opportunity to do so. So maybe it is just nightclubs.

mikeS
Posts: 1760
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:21 am
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by mikeS » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:12 pm

I think the passport only applies to inside venues.

There again it could affect internal bits of the club like - corporate hospitality, boxes, lounges, boardrooms, and maybe enclosed spaces like concourses? Who knows - the governments does U-Turns by the day.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Boss Hogg » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:12 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:05 am
Can only think they don't want any fans touching players.
More likely to protect the fans from players spitting ;)

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Boss Hogg » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:14 pm

If vaccination passports aren’t a requirement I wonder whether more or less fans will attend. I’d think twice and certainly won’t be going without a mask.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8509
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2108 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by jrgbfc » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:17 pm

It's a cynical attempt to force young people to have the vaccine, which is why it's focused on nightclubs.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo

Loyalclaret
Posts: 2040
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 437 times
Has Liked: 371 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Loyalclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:19 pm

I would guess less, I say that as someone who is double jabbed and prepared to wear a mask if it was required.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12371
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:20 pm

Dont think they'll be much in it but you can bet the ones we hear about are the anti-vaxers. They've started to sound like vegans in that they've got to tell everyone that they wont get a vaccine and refuse to comply with vaccine passports

How can you tell someone hasn't had the vaccine? Don't worry they'll tell you :lol: :lol: :lol:

ksrclaret
Posts: 6917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2567 times
Has Liked: 769 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:22 pm

I'm looking forward to when the club shop brings out it's range of armbands with the Burnley FC crest on it for those fans who have weaker immune systems. It'll be interesting to try and spot them when there is a break in play.

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Grumps » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:26 pm

jrgbfc wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:17 pm
It's a cynical attempt to force young people to have the vaccine, which is why it's focused on nightclubs.
It's better than offering them cannabis, which one American state is doing to tempt them..

clarethomer
Posts: 3121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
Been Liked: 946 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by clarethomer » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:28 pm

Will have to wait - It sounds like these headlines are likely to face scrutiny and numerous change in direction.

It said on sky news the other venues bit
Screenshot 2021-07-19 at 18.27.48.png
Screenshot 2021-07-19 at 18.27.48.png (136.57 KiB) Viewed 3539 times

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11532
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3191 times
Has Liked: 1872 times
Contact:

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by wilks_bfc » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:54 pm

Grumps wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:26 pm
It's better than offering them cannabis, which one American state is doing to tempt them..
But is it better than this?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/las- ... 52178.html

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:57 pm

The only issue and comparisons to nightclubs are the concourses and toilets

I can't see vaccination passports being required for football matches, if only because the very cynical me knows this will reflect badly on the government.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:20 pm

Boss Hogg wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:14 pm
If vaccination passports aren’t a requirement I wonder whether more or less fans will attend. I’d think twice and certainly won’t be going without a mask.
I will be double jabbed come season start. And wouldn’t attend if a mask was mandatory.

I probably wouldn’t attend half of much of jabs were mandatory. And I’d have had them both.
This user liked this post: Murger

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:25 pm

If you've got a valid medical reason not to be jabbed twice, then fair play

If you haven't, then the only explanation is that you've read some ******** somewhere and now believe even more keenly than Luke became a Jedi within five minutes of hearing about it in Star Wars.
These 2 users liked this post: ŽižkovClaret tiger76

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:37 pm

Absolutely disgusting from the Government coercing people to take a vaccine and the start of a very slippery slope.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret

ksrclaret
Posts: 6917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2567 times
Has Liked: 769 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:42 pm

Blessed be the 442.

May the Chairman’s cheque book open.

Under his hoof.

These are pre-approved greetings for fellow supporters upon entering the ground, having shown your papers. The ceremony will then take place for 90 minutes. See you there, folks.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:42 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:37 pm
Absolutely disgusting from the Government coercing people to take a vaccine and the start of a very slippery slope.
Yup

Think a much better solution is persuading people to take it, and taking on those that say its not safe to prove them wrong

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10915
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5560 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:51 pm

martin_p wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:07 pm
Interesting statement from the vaccine minister in the last half hour.

‘ Zahawi has announced that people will be required to be fully vaccinated to attend "large crowded settings" such as nightclubs from the end of September - after all over-18s have had the chance to receive both vaccine doses and develop immunity.

"So at that point we plan to make full vaccination a condition of entry to nightclubs and other venues where large crowds gather, proof of a negative test will no longer be sufficient," he said.

"We will ensure the appropriate exemptions for those who have genuine medical reasons of why they can't get vaccinated and I'm clear we will always look at the evidence available and do all we can to ensure people can continue to do the things they love."

Wonder if ‘venues where large crowds gather’ will include sports stadia?
Genuinely baffled by this. If you need a covid passport that should start now not in 2.5 months. How much damage is going to have been done by the end of September? Or do they just hope anyone who isn't double jabbed will just wait until they are?

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:52 pm

Aclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:33 pm
Will guess the gate be back for this game ?
Could be some interesting one's.
Hope so I like guess the gate. but yes you're right it could be a tricky one to predict. :)

Loyalclaret
Posts: 2040
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 437 times
Has Liked: 371 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Loyalclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:26 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:51 pm
Genuinely baffled by this. If you need a covid passport that should start now not in 2.5 months. How much damage is going to have been done by the end of September? Or do they just hope anyone who isn't double jabbed will just wait until they are?
The youngest group have only just been allowed to start having their jabs, add 8/12 weeks and the timing makes sense.

If they have not had it by then, it is their choice but may not be able to access certain situations. They'll be a u-turn in this by September/October

karatekid
Posts: 3145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1111 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by karatekid » Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:33 pm

Probably just trying to encourage young people to get double jabbed before winter and using the nightclub thing as a carrot. If it makes them go out and get DJ'd its a good move. ( see what I did there) ;)
This user liked this post: Loyalclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:53 pm

karatekid wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:33 pm
Probably just trying to encourage young people to get double jabbed before winter and using the nightclub thing as a carrot. If it makes them go out and get DJ'd its a good move. ( see what I did there) ;)
Can you or someone please explain why young people, with a survival rate higher than being struck by lightning on the street, have to get a vaccine that no one knows long term potential side effects to? Everyone who needs a vaccine has had one, everyone who needs two has had one. I’m 27, I’ve had COVID, hardly felt it as I’m extremely health / fit and never had the flu in my life. Why should I be forced to have a vaccine to attend a football match or go to a bar? It’s nonsensical.
These 5 users liked this post: Murger fatboy47 cricketfieldclarets Milltown1882 gandhisflipflop

Dyched
Posts: 5950
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 1923 times
Has Liked: 446 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Dyched » Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:12 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:53 pm
Can you or someone please explain why young people, with a survival rate higher than being struck by lightning on the street, have to get a vaccine that no one knows long term potential side effects to? Everyone who needs a vaccine has had one, everyone who needs two has had one. I’m 27, I’ve had COVID, hardly felt it as I’m extremely health / fit and never had the flu in my life. Why should I be forced to have a vaccine to attend a football match or go to a bar? It’s nonsensical.
I’m a few years older and baffled by it. People have been “forced” to have it with talk of vaccine passports. People have lost the plot massively over this.

Go back to the very start. Stay home, protect the elderly, most people won’t even know they’ve had it.

Can you catch it twice? No evidence. How long does the vaccine last. Oh and flu, vanished last year. Now there’s talk of vaccinating young people against flu. Eh?

We’ll be back in lockdown September/October/November because of Flu.

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by martin_p » Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:25 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:53 pm
Can you or someone please explain why young people, with a survival rate higher than being struck by lightning on the street, have to get a vaccine that no one knows long term potential side effects to? Everyone who needs a vaccine has had one, everyone who needs two has had one. I’m 27, I’ve had COVID, hardly felt it as I’m extremely health / fit and never had the flu in my life. Why should I be forced to have a vaccine to attend a football match or go to a bar? It’s nonsensical.
Because when you do have it you may be fine but the person you give it to might be dead.
These 3 users liked this post: Targetman jjclaret Greenmile

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:44 pm

martin_p wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:25 pm
Because when you do have it you may be fine but the person you give it to might be dead.
Which would be a fine argument… if the vaccine stopped you catching and transmitting it.

Again from someone who will be having both jabs.

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:11 am

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:53 pm
Can you or someone please explain why young people, with a survival rate higher than being struck by lightning on the street, have to get a vaccine that no one knows long term potential side effects to? Everyone who needs a vaccine has had one, everyone who needs two has had one. I’m 27, I’ve had COVID, hardly felt it as I’m extremely health / fit and never had the flu in my life. Why should I be forced to have a vaccine to attend a football match or go to a bar? It’s nonsensical.

Read the science on it. It’s not difficult to understand honestly.

If you can’t be arsed to do that then just trust the scientists. I know I didn’t try hard enough at school to argue with all the worlds leading virologists.

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:18 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:44 pm
Which would be a fine argument… if the vaccine stopped you catching and transmitting it.

Again from someone who will be having both jabs.

It doesn’t 100% stop you catching it but so far the evidence suggests that it will massively reduce the risk of catching and spreading.


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanm ... 0/fulltext

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:30 am

martin_p wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:25 pm
Because when you do have it you may be fine but the person you give it to might be dead.
Sorry but false argument - people are still catching it and passing it on despite being double jabbed. Prof Ferguson (I think) yesterday confirmed that 40% of the current hospital admissions have been double jabbed.

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:35 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:30 am
Sorry but false argument - people are still catching it and passing it on despite being double jabbed. Prof Ferguson (I think) yesterday confirmed that 40% of the current hospital admissions have been double jabbed.

That’s because many of those are extremely vulnerable. The good news is those double jabs far less likely to require intensive care. A few days of oxygen on a ward and they go home, where otherwise they would be on ICU with a massive risk of dying. The vast majority of covid patients in intensive care where I work are not vaccinated

Murger
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1244 times
Has Liked: 846 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Murger » Tue Jul 20, 2021 7:42 am

I struggle to see how anybody can actually support this move, essentially creating a 2 tier society. It's nazi Germany all over again.

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:10 am

And there we have it.......Godwin’s law

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
This user liked this post: Greenmile

2 Bee Holed
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:37 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 31 times
Location: South Manchester

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by 2 Bee Holed » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:23 am

Inchy wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:35 am
That’s because many of those are extremely vulnerable. The good news is those double jabs far less likely to require intensive care. A few days of oxygen on a ward and they go home, where otherwise they would be on ICU with a massive risk of dying. The vast majority of covid patients in intensive care where I work are not vaccinated
Now this is interesting. We don't seem to be getting insight into this, or I don't.
Inchy, the patients in ICU, were they elligible for the vaccine or could they not have it?
Do you find the average age of people in ICU is dropping?

lakedistrictclaret
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
Been Liked: 524 times
Has Liked: 186 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by lakedistrictclaret » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:31 am

I'm just looking forward to being able to go back to Turf Moor, for the Brighton game.

I have to say, I'd feel more comfortable if I knew everyone around me had been fully vaccinated.

But I'll go anyway.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12371
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Devils_Advocate » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:44 am

Murger wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 7:42 am
I struggle to see how anybody can actually support this move, essentially creating a 2 tier society. It's nazi Germany all over again.
What a disgraceful comment, you should maybe take some time away from social media to learn about the horrors of what Nazi Germany and the holocaust entailed before making pathetic assertions like this.
These 2 users liked this post: jjclaret Greenmile

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:45 am

Murger wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 7:42 am
I struggle to see how anybody can actually support this move, essentially creating a 2 tier society. It's nazi Germany all over again.
Hmmm, not sure what transpired in Germany in the 30s and 40s is quite the same as high capacity venues penalising someone choosing to reject a proven effective vaccine because they saw Trisha on Facebook say that her uncle's, friends, sisters dog got a brain tumour after having Astra Zeneca. It may become a two tier society by the second tiers choice, it's not like the lower class on the Titanic being banished to the engine room. Anyone (who is not medically exempt, of course) can join the 'upper tier' and party on deck if they wish to do so.

The reality is (as it stands) 87% of eligible adults have had at least one dose as of yesterday. The 13% of people who are, for reasons unknown, choosing to not have the vaccine cannot hold them back. They can call that selfish, I would say that would be incredibly hypocritical.

Only other way is to (and I am not joking here) consider making a vaccine free zone in stadiums for the rest of us all to steer clear and have their own concourse. If we take it as read that 13% of Burnley fans won't have had the vaccine through their own choice, perhaps this could be viable for the Lower Tier of the Jimmy Mac or something. I am genuinely not trying to enrage anyone here, I am trying to suggest solutions to what will invariably become an ongoing/rolling problem to be solved.

I think the anti vaccination public need to begin to accept things such as this - aeroplanes especially will be very interesting, I cannot see a single one authorizing bordering without a vaccine passport due to the re-use of oxygen circulating. Are these affronts to your freedom (and I mean that sincerely) really worth the anti government/anti system/rebellious stance being taken?

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:46 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:30 am
Sorry but false argument - people are still catching it and passing it on despite being double jabbed. Prof Ferguson (I think) yesterday confirmed that 40% of the current hospital admissions have been double jabbed.
It’s not a false argument. Life isn’t that black and white on most things it’s about managing risk. People can still get run over by a car on a zebra crossing but they reduce the risk of doing so so people tend to use them. Vaccines aren’t a silver bullet that stop transmission and mortality but they do significantly reduce the risk so many people (especially those susceptible to respiratory diseases) will be more likely to mix with others knowing that the risk of the worse happening is reduced.

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:46 am

2 Bee Holed wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:23 am
Now this is interesting. We don't seem to be getting insight into this, or I don't.
Inchy, the patients in ICU, were they elligible for the vaccine or could they not have it?
Do you find the average age of people in ICU is dropping?


Vast majority unvaccinated. I’d say slightly younger but not had enough in to accurately say

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:49 am

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:45 am
Hmmm, not sure what transpired in Germany in the 30s and 40s is quite the same as high capacity venues penalising someone choosing to reject a proven effective vaccine because they saw Trisha on Facebook say that her uncle's, friends, sisters dog got a brain tumour after having Astra Zeneca. It may become a two tier society by the second tiers choice, it's not like the lower class on the Titanic being banished to the engine room. Anyone (who is not medically exempt, of course) can join the 'upper tier' and party on deck if they wish to do so.

The reality is (as it stands) 87% of eligible adults have had at least one dose as of yesterday. The 13% of people who are, for reasons unknown, choosing to not have the vaccine cannot hold them back. They can call that selfish, I would say that would be incredibly hypocritical.

Only other way is to (and I am not joking here) consider making a vaccine free zone in stadiums for the rest of us all to steer clear and have their own concourse. If we take it as read that 13% of Burnley fans won't have had the vaccine through their own choice, perhaps this could be viable for the Lower Tier of the Jimmy Mac or something. I am genuinely not trying to enrage anyone here, I am trying to suggest solutions to what will invariably become an ongoing/rolling problem to be solved.

I think the anti vaccination public need to begin to accept things such as this - aeroplanes especially will be very interesting, I cannot see a single one authorizing bordering without a vaccine passport due to the re-use of oxygen circulating. Are these affronts to your freedom (and I mean that sincerely) really worth the anti government/anti system/rebellious stance being taken?
And for the 13% who haven’t had the vaccination it’s worth remembering that the only reason we’re in a position to set foot back in football grounds again is because 87% have been vaccinated.
These 2 users liked this post: jedi_master jjclaret

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:52 am

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:49 am
And for the 13% who haven’t had the vaccination it’s worth remembering that the only reason we’re in a position to set foot back in football grounds again is because 87% have been vaccinated.
Correct!

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:53 am

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:46 am
It’s not a false argument. Life isn’t that black and white on most things it’s about managing risk. People can still get run over by a car on a zebra crossing but they reduce the risk of doing so so people tend to use them. Vaccines aren’t a silver bullet that stop transmission and mortality but they do significantly reduce the risk so many people (especially those susceptible to respiratory diseases) will be more likely to mix with others knowing that the risk of the worse happening is reduced.

Also consider the volume of people with covid in community. It’s massive. Now the vast majority of elderly and vulnerable people have had the jab. They are also more likely to suffer the consequences of covid. Because they are jabbed they are less likely to need to come to hospital. If they do come to hospital they are far less likely to need ICU, and are far less likely to die.

60 percent of admissions are not vaccinated. So they are either elderly vulnerable people who declined the jab because of conspiracy (or other reasons), or they are young and fit and don’t think they will get bad covid.

From what I’m seeing you are far more likely to end up on ICU if you haven’t had the jab

Inchy
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1340 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:56 am

Imagine you found out you had a brain aneurysm. It needs sorting but can be done electively. It’s a time bomb in your head waiting to go off. If not treated it will kill you.

Now in order to have that elective op you need an ICU bed because that’s where you will go post op. But you can’t have an ICU bed because there aren’t any. Most big cities will only have a capacity of about 30 ICU beds. Fill just 5 of them with covids and you cannot have the time bomb sorted. The elective op will be cancelled, rearranged, and cancelled etc etc.


Sounds far fetched. It isn’t
These 2 users liked this post: superdimitri wilks_bfc

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 20, 2021 9:08 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:30 am
Sorry but false argument - people are still catching it and passing it on despite being double jabbed. Prof Ferguson (I think) yesterday confirmed that 40% of the current hospital admissions have been double jabbed.
What he didn't say was whether those 40% were ill with covid. They may have gone to hospital with something else and, when tested (as all hospital admissions are), discovered they had aymptomatic covid.

On the law of averages, if covid made no difference whatsover to health, there would be about 400 covid admissions per day, purely based on 40,000 people per day admitted to hospital and 1% of the population has covid. (It would be a but less in reality, because the age demographic of people admitted to hospital tends to be older, and the age demographic of people with covid is younger.)

In terms of football, in a 20,000 crowd at present you would not expect 200 of them to have covid, because at least some of them know they have it and won't be leaving the house.

Eyres_11
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:45 pm
Been Liked: 73 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by Eyres_11 » Tue Jul 20, 2021 9:22 am

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:37 pm
Absolutely disgusting from the Government coercing people to take a vaccine and the start of a very slippery slope.
They give everyone the chance to get it. If you don't then you won't be able to attend things. Tough.

superdimitri
Posts: 4970
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1009 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Capacity V Brighton

Post by superdimitri » Tue Jul 20, 2021 9:24 am

340,000 fans over the Silverstone weekend and 140,000 at any one time. Would be a bit of a kick in the teeth if that was allowed and 20k isn't.

I mean, if you're been to a race meeting it's much more than a match. It lasts longer, you spend more time around people even when the event isn't on. To most football fans you're in and out pretty fast pubs aside.

Locked