Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 67892
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32540 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Please leave ratings for all players who have played 20 mins or more.
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
-
- Posts: 2575
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 640 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
-
- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1637 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
From TV
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Mee 8
Tarkowski 9
Pieters 7
Lenny 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 7
MacNeil 6
Cornet 6
Big Dane 6
Jay 7
Disappointing result in absolutely appalling conditions which didn’t help either side
A point is better than none
UTC
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Mee 8
Tarkowski 9
Pieters 7
Lenny 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 7
MacNeil 6
Cornet 6
Big Dane 6
Jay 7
Disappointing result in absolutely appalling conditions which didn’t help either side
A point is better than none
UTC
-
- Posts: 2743
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 667 times
- Has Liked: 2053 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Well that successfully extinguished any lingering hope i had that we might avoid being relegated. On the plus side we've at least surpassed Derby's record low point total.
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 3
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 4
Rodriguez 5
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 3
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 4
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:02 pm
- Been Liked: 146 times
- Has Liked: 124 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope - 7 not much to do but reliable as ever
Roberts - 8 really impressed with his positivity and long throw could be a big weapon if we set up for it right
Tarkowski - 7 steady away, one last ditch tackle but feel that was brought on by him not being strong enough in the first challenge
Mee - 7 stitched up Tarkowski with one wayward pass but got his usual blocks in
Pieter's - 6 no real high or low points, did his job well enough, unfortunate that our best chances fell to him
Lennon - 7 very positive and wanting to take his man on, but hooked when there were other candidates
Stephens - 3 (+1 for lasting 90 mins) terrible. For those calling for Corks head, they need to watch this performance. Stumbling round the pitch with very little urgency and his passing, even simple 5 yard ones were often misplaced and put us under pressure or stifled promising breaks
Westwood - 5 busy enough but usual blind lumps round the corner come to nothing in these conditions
McNeil - 4 worst performance in a Burnley shirt. Didn't look like he fancied it at all, missing Taylor's support
Cornet - 6 as I mentioned on the match thread, he's never been anywhere near being a striker, so I'm not sure why we preservere with him up there, he's wasted.
Weghorst - 6 little support and with him being 6"6, other players naturally just thump it long to him not trusting his footballing ability
Rodriguez - 6 felt he should have replaced McNeil, put himself about and unlucky with flick header.
Roberts - 8 really impressed with his positivity and long throw could be a big weapon if we set up for it right
Tarkowski - 7 steady away, one last ditch tackle but feel that was brought on by him not being strong enough in the first challenge
Mee - 7 stitched up Tarkowski with one wayward pass but got his usual blocks in
Pieter's - 6 no real high or low points, did his job well enough, unfortunate that our best chances fell to him
Lennon - 7 very positive and wanting to take his man on, but hooked when there were other candidates
Stephens - 3 (+1 for lasting 90 mins) terrible. For those calling for Corks head, they need to watch this performance. Stumbling round the pitch with very little urgency and his passing, even simple 5 yard ones were often misplaced and put us under pressure or stifled promising breaks
Westwood - 5 busy enough but usual blind lumps round the corner come to nothing in these conditions
McNeil - 4 worst performance in a Burnley shirt. Didn't look like he fancied it at all, missing Taylor's support
Cornet - 6 as I mentioned on the match thread, he's never been anywhere near being a striker, so I'm not sure why we preservere with him up there, he's wasted.
Weghorst - 6 little support and with him being 6"6, other players naturally just thump it long to him not trusting his footballing ability
Rodriguez - 6 felt he should have replaced McNeil, put himself about and unlucky with flick header.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:44 am
- Been Liked: 1 time
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7 - Kicking a let down yet again, otherwise good
Roberts 6 - Shame after so good last week
Tarkowski 8 - Good game
Mee 7 - Some awful passing, but solid
Pieters 6 - Offers nothing going forwards
Lennon 5 - Didn't get into it
Westwood 4 - Didn't want the ball, passing so so bad
Stephens 6 - Decent game I thought, though some loose passing
McNeil 5 - Needs people to pass him the ball
Weghorst 5 - Not an ideal debut
Cornet 5 - Well off the pace
Rodriguez 7 - Looked good when he came on
Roberts 6 - Shame after so good last week
Tarkowski 8 - Good game
Mee 7 - Some awful passing, but solid
Pieters 6 - Offers nothing going forwards
Lennon 5 - Didn't get into it
Westwood 4 - Didn't want the ball, passing so so bad
Stephens 6 - Decent game I thought, though some loose passing
McNeil 5 - Needs people to pass him the ball
Weghorst 5 - Not an ideal debut
Cornet 5 - Well off the pace
Rodriguez 7 - Looked good when he came on
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 4 - please no one try to say he’s better going forward the Taylor ever again
Lennon 5
Westwood 4 - passing miles off it
Stephens 5 - doesn’t have the intensity for a 4-4-2 anymore
McNeil 3 - he always has a stinker in these conditions, really struggles
Weghorst 6 - showed some promise
Cornet 5 - for the love of God play him on the wing, he is not a striker
Jay 6
Against United Dyche simply must try 4-4-1-1 with McNeil in the 10. It’s just not happening for him out wide anymore. The midfield needs more passing options as the gap between them and strikers is too wide, plus Maxwel needs to operate out wide. It seems so obvious yet I don’t hold my breath. Thought we missed Charlie Taylor’s drive massively today, Pieters offers no where near as much.
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 4 - please no one try to say he’s better going forward the Taylor ever again
Lennon 5
Westwood 4 - passing miles off it
Stephens 5 - doesn’t have the intensity for a 4-4-2 anymore
McNeil 3 - he always has a stinker in these conditions, really struggles
Weghorst 6 - showed some promise
Cornet 5 - for the love of God play him on the wing, he is not a striker
Jay 6
Against United Dyche simply must try 4-4-1-1 with McNeil in the 10. It’s just not happening for him out wide anymore. The midfield needs more passing options as the gap between them and strikers is too wide, plus Maxwel needs to operate out wide. It seems so obvious yet I don’t hold my breath. Thought we missed Charlie Taylor’s drive massively today, Pieters offers no where near as much.
This user liked this post: Stevie Morgan
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
- Been Liked: 278 times
- Has Liked: 3308 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 4
Lennon 7
Westwood 3
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 4
Lennon 7
Westwood 3
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 6
-
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1702 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Mee 6
Tarks 7
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
westwood 5
Stephens 4
Cornet 7
Lennon 5
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 7
Roberts 6
Mee 6
Tarks 7
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
westwood 5
Stephens 4
Cornet 7
Lennon 5
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 7
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Mee 5
Pieters 6
McNeil 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
Lennon 6
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Mee 5
Pieters 6
McNeil 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
Lennon 6
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
McNeil 6
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Sub
Rodriguez 6
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
McNeil 6
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Sub
Rodriguez 6
-
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3771 times
- Has Liked: 7571 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarks 8 **
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5 - tried hard.
Westwood 5 looks a bit lost.
Stephens 4 - that wasn't good.
McNeil 5 - do think he's better with Charlie in the side.
Cornet 5 (looked out of sorts as well as out of position)
Weghorst 6 welcome to the zoo.
Rodriguez 6 looked OK.
Sorry.
But that was poor against a poor side who, probably shaded it.
Could be a bad couple of months.
Roberts 6
Tarks 8 **
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5 - tried hard.
Westwood 5 looks a bit lost.
Stephens 4 - that wasn't good.
McNeil 5 - do think he's better with Charlie in the side.
Cornet 5 (looked out of sorts as well as out of position)
Weghorst 6 welcome to the zoo.
Rodriguez 6 looked OK.
Sorry.
But that was poor against a poor side who, probably shaded it.
Could be a bad couple of months.
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Roberts 7
Mee 7
Tarks 8
Pieters 6
Mcneil 4 just never got into the game, crowded out and poor midfield gives him no option but to drop deep and inside.
Westwood 4 really poor, zero quality, sums up the team
Stephens 3 dreadful passing
Lennon 6 looked threatening without doing anything
Cornet 6 not his best game, not helped by the poor midfield.
Weghorst 6 nice touches on the deck, worked hard, touch of class at start of 2nd half, looks an upgrade on Wood just appalling service upto him.
Roberts 7
Mee 7
Tarks 8
Pieters 6
Mcneil 4 just never got into the game, crowded out and poor midfield gives him no option but to drop deep and inside.
Westwood 4 really poor, zero quality, sums up the team
Stephens 3 dreadful passing
Lennon 6 looked threatening without doing anything
Cornet 6 not his best game, not helped by the poor midfield.
Weghorst 6 nice touches on the deck, worked hard, touch of class at start of 2nd half, looks an upgrade on Wood just appalling service upto him.
-
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3604 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarky 7 MOM
Mee 7
Pieters 5
Lennon 7
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Weghorst 4
Cornet 6
Absolute ****. Cold, wet, miserable - that explains both how I’m feeling back in my car and that joke of a performance.
We are down, and whilst that has seemed inevitable for ages it’s still sad to say it with (now) certainty.
Early days but I personally thought Weghorst looked miles off the pace and reminded me of Nikola Zigic. Slower than I had hoped. Hope he improves…
Roberts 6
Tarky 7 MOM
Mee 7
Pieters 5
Lennon 7
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Weghorst 4
Cornet 6
Absolute ****. Cold, wet, miserable - that explains both how I’m feeling back in my car and that joke of a performance.
We are down, and whilst that has seemed inevitable for ages it’s still sad to say it with (now) certainty.
Early days but I personally thought Weghorst looked miles off the pace and reminded me of Nikola Zigic. Slower than I had hoped. Hope he improves…
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2351 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Hi Dave, the new lad we've just signed, Wout Weghorst is from the Netherlands not Denmark. I assume that's who you mean by "Big Dane."DAVETHEVICAR wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:12 pmFrom TV
Big Dane 6
Disappointing result in absolutely appalling conditions which didn’t help either side
A point is better than none
UTC
A night when it's good to be watching on tv.
Full credit for all those who were at the Turf in this weather.
UTC
This user liked this post: DAVETHEVICAR
-
- Posts: 3959
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 6
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 6
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:16 pm
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Pieters 5
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 6
McNeil 3
Stephens 3
Westwood 3
Lennon 6
Weghorst 5
Cornet 5
Rodriguez 6
Missing this opportunity to strengthen the midfield was absolutely criminal and will ultimately cost us our place in the PL.
Roberts 6
Pieters 5
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 6
McNeil 3
Stephens 3
Westwood 3
Lennon 6
Weghorst 5
Cornet 5
Rodriguez 6
Missing this opportunity to strengthen the midfield was absolutely criminal and will ultimately cost us our place in the PL.
Last edited by fungus_the_bogeyman on Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
From tv
Pope 7 did nothing wrong
Roberts 6
Tarks 7 mom
Mee 5 to think some people on here touted him for England
Pieters 6
Lennon 4 get rid
Westwood 3 get rid
Stephens 3 who the fuk made the decision to sign him
McNeil 3 one trick pony, every team knows exactly how to play him
Weghorst 6 some nice touches
Cornet 6
Jayrod 4 looks ready to hang up his boots
Dyche 3 another predictable, boring, tacticless performance. But never mind Barnsey will be back soon.
Pope 7 did nothing wrong
Roberts 6
Tarks 7 mom
Mee 5 to think some people on here touted him for England
Pieters 6
Lennon 4 get rid
Westwood 3 get rid
Stephens 3 who the fuk made the decision to sign him
McNeil 3 one trick pony, every team knows exactly how to play him
Weghorst 6 some nice touches
Cornet 6
Jayrod 4 looks ready to hang up his boots
Dyche 3 another predictable, boring, tacticless performance. But never mind Barnsey will be back soon.
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 7
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 7
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8 did what he had to do very well
Roberts 6 thought we missed Lowton
Tarks 8 our best defender today by a mile
Mee 5 not at his best
Pieters 5
Lennon 4. Did little of note
Stephens 3 hope it’s his last game for us
Westwood 5 a one man midfield
McNeil 4 poor today. He needs to play wide left 100%
WW 4. Thought he was off the pace. Hopefully he will improve
Cornet 5 started brightly then faded quickly. Looked like he had been away on vacation
JRod 6 certainly better than Lennon
Team overall 5
Roberts 6 thought we missed Lowton
Tarks 8 our best defender today by a mile
Mee 5 not at his best
Pieters 5
Lennon 4. Did little of note
Stephens 3 hope it’s his last game for us
Westwood 5 a one man midfield
McNeil 4 poor today. He needs to play wide left 100%
WW 4. Thought he was off the pace. Hopefully he will improve
Cornet 5 started brightly then faded quickly. Looked like he had been away on vacation
JRod 6 certainly better than Lennon
Team overall 5
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 am
- Been Liked: 103 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Mee 6
Tarky 8
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Stephens 5
Westy 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Jay 5
2 teams battling it out not to finish with the wooden spoon. I think the performance was slightly worse than the weather which was biblical
Roberts 7
Mee 6
Tarky 8
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Stephens 5
Westy 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Jay 5
2 teams battling it out not to finish with the wooden spoon. I think the performance was slightly worse than the weather which was biblical
Last edited by Leyland Claret on Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3341 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Jay 6
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
WW 5
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 5
WW 5
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
- Been Liked: 59 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Pieters 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Stephens 4
Westwood 3
Lennon 4
McNeill 4
Weghorst 6
Cornet 5
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 6
Pieters 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Stephens 4
Westwood 3
Lennon 4
McNeill 4
Weghorst 6
Cornet 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Decent first 20 mins then we lost a bit of momentum. Poor second half.
Pope 7 - great save in the 2nd half
Roberts 7 - looks good and his throw could be a weapon if we had people to attack it
Tarks 7 (mom) solid
Mee 6 - decent enough
Peiters 6 solid but little forward bite
Lennon 6 - thought he did pretty well
Stephens 6 - alright
Westwood 5 - a bit off it
McNeil 4 - nothing happening for him
Cornet 6 - quiet but a decent effort that was well saved by Foster
Weghorst 5 - too early to judge but didn't really do enough
Jay 4 - usual performance we've come to expect. Made zero difference
Pope 7 - great save in the 2nd half
Roberts 7 - looks good and his throw could be a weapon if we had people to attack it
Tarks 7 (mom) solid
Mee 6 - decent enough
Peiters 6 solid but little forward bite
Lennon 6 - thought he did pretty well
Stephens 6 - alright
Westwood 5 - a bit off it
McNeil 4 - nothing happening for him
Cornet 6 - quiet but a decent effort that was well saved by Foster
Weghorst 5 - too early to judge but didn't really do enough
Jay 4 - usual performance we've come to expect. Made zero difference
-
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2169 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 3
Stephens 5
McNeil 3 - awful
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 3
Stephens 5
McNeil 3 - awful
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 4
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 4
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
WW 5
Subs
Rodriguez 6
Roberts 4
Tarkowski 7
Mee 5
Pieters 4
Lennon 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
WW 5
Subs
Rodriguez 6
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8 - brilliant when needed
Roberts 7 - decent, we need to have a plan for his throws
Tarkowski 8* - organised the defence, defended well, good in attack, showed passion
Mee 6 - some good but some dodgy moments put us under pressure
Pieters 6 - pretty decent but we miss Charlie
Lennon 5 - likes the safe pass backwards
Westwood 5 - pretty poor
Stephens 4 - poor throughout
McNeil 5 - he has no right foot so just can’t play on the right
Cornet 6 - still at AFCON speed
Weghorst 6 - worked hard on very little service
Rodriguez 7 - looked lively
Roberts 7 - decent, we need to have a plan for his throws
Tarkowski 8* - organised the defence, defended well, good in attack, showed passion
Mee 6 - some good but some dodgy moments put us under pressure
Pieters 6 - pretty decent but we miss Charlie
Lennon 5 - likes the safe pass backwards
Westwood 5 - pretty poor
Stephens 4 - poor throughout
McNeil 5 - he has no right foot so just can’t play on the right
Cornet 6 - still at AFCON speed
Weghorst 6 - worked hard on very little service
Rodriguez 7 - looked lively
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 50 times
- Has Liked: 17 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Jay 5
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 3
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Jay 5
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 6
-
- Posts: 7361
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Without looking at anyone else's ratings.
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Stephens 6
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Disappointing result and performance between two teams that looked relegation fodder.
Only the new signings' first game, but he looked like a cross between Tony Philliskirk and John Gayle.
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Stephens 6
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Disappointing result and performance between two teams that looked relegation fodder.
Only the new signings' first game, but he looked like a cross between Tony Philliskirk and John Gayle.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
fidelcastro wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 9:45 pmWithout looking at anyone else's ratings.
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Stephens 6
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Disappointing result and performance between two teams that looked relegation fodder.
Only the new signings' first game, but he looked like a cross between Tony Philliskirk and John Gayle.
At least Philliskirk scored a hat trick that is almost positive.
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Cornet 5
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Cornet 5
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 17272
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2918 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Have to agree 3....McNeil 2
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Oh. That McNeil thing...
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8 … one excellent save which ultimately won us a point and denied Watford all three
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5 / Jay 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 7
Weghorst 5
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5 / Jay 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 7
Weghorst 5
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6 mixed performance but good long throw
Tarkowski 7 good but with customary slack pass
Mee 6
Pieters 6 ok but some poor delivery
Lennon 4 Rightly subbed. Poor
Stephens 5
Westwood 5
McNeil 5 getting progressively worse
Cornet 6 not a striker he’s a winger isolated but bit behind pace
Weghorst 6 no lack of effort but not overly impressed
JRod 5 the usual
Awful conditions and I got drenched to the skin. Relegation written all over it. We didn’t put a dent on Watford and wouldn’t have scored if we played all night. The gap between the front two and the midfield first half was plain to see. The most exciting part of the game was when the pillow blew on to the pitch. It just summed up the match. Someone came prepared for the expected borefest.
Roberts 6 mixed performance but good long throw
Tarkowski 7 good but with customary slack pass
Mee 6
Pieters 6 ok but some poor delivery
Lennon 4 Rightly subbed. Poor
Stephens 5
Westwood 5
McNeil 5 getting progressively worse
Cornet 6 not a striker he’s a winger isolated but bit behind pace
Weghorst 6 no lack of effort but not overly impressed
JRod 5 the usual
Awful conditions and I got drenched to the skin. Relegation written all over it. We didn’t put a dent on Watford and wouldn’t have scored if we played all night. The gap between the front two and the midfield first half was plain to see. The most exciting part of the game was when the pillow blew on to the pitch. It just summed up the match. Someone came prepared for the expected borefest.
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 5
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:01 pm
- Been Liked: 9 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope - 6 - A couple of good saves. His kicking is getting worse. Simple stuff puts us under pressure.
Roberts - 4 - Couldn't find a claret shirt all night. No real overlaps, content just to hoick it forward.
Mee - 5 - Was lucky he didn't cost us a goal. If he wants longer than 2 year contract we should let him go, been on a downward trend for last 18 months.
Tarky - 6 - Some good, some bad.
Pieters - 5 - Nowhere near good enough
Westwood - 3 - How we didn't improve on centre mid is why we'll go down. Can't keep the ball, not strong enough.
Stephens - 4 - See above.
McNeil - 3 - Needs a rocket up his arse. Needs someone to grab hold of him and tell him to attack the fullback. Can only come from management that he checks and comes insider.
Cornet- 5- Two decent shots what he created himself. Ball just bypassed him as we hoofed it.
Weghorst - 3 - Well. Bloody hell. Too easily shackled by a terrible defence. Think he might have won one header.
Jay- 5- bit more impetuous
Roberts - 4 - Couldn't find a claret shirt all night. No real overlaps, content just to hoick it forward.
Mee - 5 - Was lucky he didn't cost us a goal. If he wants longer than 2 year contract we should let him go, been on a downward trend for last 18 months.
Tarky - 6 - Some good, some bad.
Pieters - 5 - Nowhere near good enough
Westwood - 3 - How we didn't improve on centre mid is why we'll go down. Can't keep the ball, not strong enough.
Stephens - 4 - See above.
McNeil - 3 - Needs a rocket up his arse. Needs someone to grab hold of him and tell him to attack the fullback. Can only come from management that he checks and comes insider.
Cornet- 5- Two decent shots what he created himself. Ball just bypassed him as we hoofed it.
Weghorst - 3 - Well. Bloody hell. Too easily shackled by a terrible defence. Think he might have won one header.
Jay- 5- bit more impetuous
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 9
Mee 8
Pieters 7
Lennon 7
Westwood 7
Stephens 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 8
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 7
Roberts 7
Tarkowski 9
Mee 8
Pieters 7
Lennon 7
Westwood 7
Stephens 6
McNeil 5
Cornet 8
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 7
-
- Posts: 4444
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1300 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
Stephens
Westwood 6
Lennon 5
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 6
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
Stephens
Westwood 6
Lennon 5
Cornet 6
Weghorst 5
Rodriguez 5
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
I'll post tomorrow when I have calmed down and sobered up. At the moment just to angry.
-
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1652 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 9
Mee 8
Pieters 7
McNeil 6
Stephens 6
Westwood 5
Lennon 6
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 7
Scores contain an allowance for the conditions. In those conditions I thought Pope, Mee and Tarkowski, particularly the latter, were immense.
Cornet looked like he had spent 6 weeks near the equator which is as big a shock as you can get coming back to these conditions, and he has also lost Premier League sharpness. Weghorst did Ok but in the weather and with misfiring colleagues he was up against it.
We lost the centre midfield today. Stephens did OK but Westwood had a shocker. Sissoko ran the show in there.
It became a lottery so a “must win” became a “must not lose” for me, it was so tricky, evenly matched and a draw was fair. We can all see ways to play in those conditions but seeing it and doing it are very different, I suggest we be sympathetic and go again on Tuesday,
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 9
Mee 8
Pieters 7
McNeil 6
Stephens 6
Westwood 5
Lennon 6
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 7
Scores contain an allowance for the conditions. In those conditions I thought Pope, Mee and Tarkowski, particularly the latter, were immense.
Cornet looked like he had spent 6 weeks near the equator which is as big a shock as you can get coming back to these conditions, and he has also lost Premier League sharpness. Weghorst did Ok but in the weather and with misfiring colleagues he was up against it.
We lost the centre midfield today. Stephens did OK but Westwood had a shocker. Sissoko ran the show in there.
It became a lottery so a “must win” became a “must not lose” for me, it was so tricky, evenly matched and a draw was fair. We can all see ways to play in those conditions but seeing it and doing it are very different, I suggest we be sympathetic and go again on Tuesday,
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5173 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 7
Tarks 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
McNeil 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 5
Lennon 5
Cornet 6
Wout 6
Jay 6
Roberts 7
Tarks 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
McNeil 5
Westwood 4
Stephens 5
Lennon 5
Cornet 6
Wout 6
Jay 6
-
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 400 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope: 7. A few good saves. Distribution shaky but conditions didn’t help at all
Roberts: 7. Didn’t do much wrong.
Tarks: 8. He is so solid. Pleasure to watch as a centre half
Mee: 7. Mostly strong, one particularly bad error
Pieters 6. No where near as good as Taylor coming forward.
Lennon 7. Started really bright. Faded second half.
Westwood 5: we were poor in centre mid today
Stephens: 4. Really poor retention. Sloppy.
McNeil 4. I really like him normally, but he really didn’t look up for it today. Barely showed for the ball, was sloppy and generally looked like he didn’t want the ball.
Cornet: 5 looked off the pace. Could still have nicked it for us though
Wenghurst: 6. Nice couple of touches here and there. Think it may take a while to get used to the pace of the premier league
JRod: 7. Looked bright and up for it. Absolutely amazed at the 4 ratings up the thread.
Roberts: 7. Didn’t do much wrong.
Tarks: 8. He is so solid. Pleasure to watch as a centre half
Mee: 7. Mostly strong, one particularly bad error
Pieters 6. No where near as good as Taylor coming forward.
Lennon 7. Started really bright. Faded second half.
Westwood 5: we were poor in centre mid today
Stephens: 4. Really poor retention. Sloppy.
McNeil 4. I really like him normally, but he really didn’t look up for it today. Barely showed for the ball, was sloppy and generally looked like he didn’t want the ball.
Cornet: 5 looked off the pace. Could still have nicked it for us though
Wenghurst: 6. Nice couple of touches here and there. Think it may take a while to get used to the pace of the premier league
JRod: 7. Looked bright and up for it. Absolutely amazed at the 4 ratings up the thread.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Thought Weghorst did well considering, Cornet clearly needs to be on the wing, Stephens was a lot better than Westwood (but still poor, which gives you a clue how bad Westwood was)
Pleased with a clean sheet, but we have to find a formation or a way that gets the best out of our players, particularly the attack minded ones
And our absolute inability to play it through midfield (a combination of our tactics and how poor we are there) means a team that have kept no clean sheets all season looked pretty comfortable (as did we)
10/10 for the weather though, thats about as bad as it gets
Pleased with a clean sheet, but we have to find a formation or a way that gets the best out of our players, particularly the attack minded ones
And our absolute inability to play it through midfield (a combination of our tactics and how poor we are there) means a team that have kept no clean sheets all season looked pretty comfortable (as did we)
10/10 for the weather though, thats about as bad as it gets
-
- Posts: 9319
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4842 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 6
Roberts 6
Tarkowski 8
Mee 5
Pieters 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 5
McNeil 4
Cornet 6
Weghorst 6
Rodriguez 6
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2021 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 100 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Tarks 7
The rest I’m not even arsed about. All 6 or under
Dyche 2. Clueless
Tarks 7
The rest I’m not even arsed about. All 6 or under
Dyche 2. Clueless
Re: Burnley v Watford - Player Ratings
Pope 7 - some good goalkeeping in torrid conditions.
Roberts 6 - decent game
Tarkowski 7 - highlight was seeing him carrying our biggest threat on the counter attack
Mee 6 - okay but another game where a shocking ball could have put us in deep trouble
Pieters 4 - not good
Lennon 4 - not good
Stephens 3 - even worse
Westwood 3 - even worse still
McNeil 4 - way off it
Cornet 5 - off the pace but some decent bits here and there
Weghorst 4 - poor debut but circumstances weren't great
Rodriguez 5 - best of the front line
Another lifeless and turgid display. Both sides will drop.
Roberts 6 - decent game
Tarkowski 7 - highlight was seeing him carrying our biggest threat on the counter attack
Mee 6 - okay but another game where a shocking ball could have put us in deep trouble
Pieters 4 - not good
Lennon 4 - not good
Stephens 3 - even worse
Westwood 3 - even worse still
McNeil 4 - way off it
Cornet 5 - off the pace but some decent bits here and there
Weghorst 4 - poor debut but circumstances weren't great
Rodriguez 5 - best of the front line
Another lifeless and turgid display. Both sides will drop.