Richardson
Richardson
What is the point in bringing on Barnes at 4-0 down with 15 minutes left. The game was gone and we learnt nothing new by playing him. There’s surely no harm in bringing Richardson on to give him some experience, we might need him next season with the number of forwards we’ve got out of contract.
These 8 users liked this post: Vegas Claret BOYSIE31 claretgimmer warksclaret Juan Tanamera bfcjg MT03ALG bobinho
-
- Posts: 3562
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1260 times
- Has Liked: 909 times
Re: Richardson
Absolutely. It was the perfect opportunity to give him 20-25 minutes today.
Re: Richardson
It’s Dyche all over, should know that by now
These 2 users liked this post: BLH_Claret claretgimmer
Re: Richardson
4-0 up or 4-0 down, it's never the right moment.
-
- Posts: 17669
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3977 times
- Has Liked: 4931 times
Re: Richardson
True this.
Disappointing we don’t give youth a chance in these situations.
Disappointing we don’t give youth a chance in these situations.
-
- Posts: 3562
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1260 times
- Has Liked: 909 times
Re: Richardson
Too young and raw.
Won't have had that attackinginstinct coached out of him yet.
Also he's quire short, so probably not best suited to handle the hoof!
Won't have had that attackinginstinct coached out of him yet.
Also he's quire short, so probably not best suited to handle the hoof!
These 2 users liked this post: BLH_Claret The Enclosure
-
- Posts: 4485
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1956 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
Re: Richardson
We could have Salah Mane and Vardy up front and they wouldn't score either with the likes of Westwood, Brownhill and McNeil in midfield. If it's not a cross or a set piece then we never look like creating anything.Milltown1882 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:32 pmnone of our other strikers score goals either so he can’t do any worse.
McNeil 0 goals 1 assist
Cork 0 goals 0 assists
Westwood 0 goals 3 assists
Brownhill 1 goal 1 assist
This is from a combined 75 starts. 1 goal in 75 games. 4 assists in 75 games. This is where our problems stem from.
These 6 users liked this post: BOYSIE31 buzzclarets79 claretgimmer boatshed bill Stalbansclaret Murger
Re: Richardson
You left out CornetHerts Clarets wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:59 pmWe could have Salah Mane and Vardy up front and they wouldn't score either with the likes of Westwood, Brownhill and McNeil in midfield. If it's not a cross or a set piece then we never look like creating anything.
McNeil 0 goals 1 assist
Cork 0 goals 0 assists
Westwood 0 goals 3 assists
Brownhill 1 goal 1 assist
This is from a combined 75 starts. 1 goal in 75 games. 4 assists in 75 games. This is where our problems stem from.
-
- Posts: 4485
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1956 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
Re: Richardson
Think you will find it was Dyche that did that

These 3 users liked this post: ClaretMov warksclaret boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2551 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Richardson
Dyche probably sensed the fans itching to destroy a 22 year old youth team product and figured he’d be a moron to expose Richardson to that.
These 6 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret claretspice ClaretTony Hapag Lloyd JohnDearyMe Pearcey
-
- Posts: 3562
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1260 times
- Has Liked: 909 times
Re: Richardson
Tottenham 4 Burnley 0 - Burnley bring on Lewis Richardson.agreenwood wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:43 pmDyche probably sensed the fans itching to destroy a 22 year old youth team product and figured he’d be a moron to expose Richardson to that.
-
- Posts: 6436
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Richardson
Away.Milltown1882 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:45 pmTottenham 4 Burnley 0 - Burnley bring on Lewis Richardson.
As for the logic of the change - pretty obviously we’re trying to get Barnes minutes to get back to full sharpness.
-
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 892 times
- Has Liked: 11172 times
Re: Richardson
I agree with the poster further up. It did make sense to bring Barnes on for minutes. It's what gets me when people say Richardson should be starting! And I bet they've never seen him kick a ball.
-
- Posts: 17349
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3563 times
- Has Liked: 7820 times
Re: Richardson
So how many (possibly wasted) minutes will that take?claretspice wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:47 pmAway.
As for the logic of the change - pretty obviously we’re trying to get Barnes minutes to get back to full sharpness.
I've been a huge fan on Ashley Barnes but can't help thinking his time is up now.
Re: Richardson
I think his time will be up after this season unless we go down. I can see him staying next season in the Championship if we do drop.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:55 pmSo how many (possibly wasted) minutes will that take?
I've been a huge fan on Ashley Barnes but can't help thinking his time is up now.
-
- Posts: 11245
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3633 times
- Has Liked: 2237 times
Re: Richardson
Be a bit weird from a manager who’s had nothing but praise for the home fans recently.agreenwood wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:43 pmDyche probably sensed the fans itching to destroy a 22 year old youth team product and figured he’d be a moron to expose Richardson to that.
-
- Posts: 77648
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37991 times
- Has Liked: 5769 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
There was no point bringing him on at all but sense in giving Barnes a few minutes.agreenwood wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:43 pmDyche probably sensed the fans itching to destroy a 22 year old youth team product and figured he’d be a moron to expose Richardson to that.
Totally agree though, why on earth would you risk a young player in that toxic atmosphere?
This user liked this post: Burnleyareback2
-
- Posts: 2998
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
- Been Liked: 891 times
- Has Liked: 1680 times
- Location: Mostly Europe
Re: Richardson
*see scapegoat/ mcneil threadsBordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 8:22 pmBe a bit weird from a manager who’s had nothing but praise for the home fans recently.
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Richardson
He gets match day experience even on games he doesn't feature.thelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:28 pmWhy is he on the bench then if there is zero chance of him ever coming on?
-
- Posts: 17349
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3563 times
- Has Liked: 7820 times
Re: Richardson
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:17 pmThere was no point bringing him on at all but sense in giving Barnes a few minutes.
Totally agree though, why on earth would you risk a young player in that toxic atmosphere?
Could it have lifted the mood?
Re: Richardson
Not having that, why would a young player be destroyed whilst coming on , you can't think for one minute that he would be turned on by the crowd.agreenwood wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:43 pmDyche probably sensed the fans itching to destroy a 22 year old youth team product and figured he’d be a moron to expose Richardson to that.
These 2 users liked this post: BERNIEU bobinho
-
- Posts: 77648
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37991 times
- Has Liked: 5769 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
No. The second half performance on the pitch today was disappointing. The crowd performance was shocking.
These 3 users liked this post: boatshed bill Leisure Rowls
Re: Richardson
The priority was quite clearly (and rightly) to give Barnes minutes because he's the most likely to be involved in the next few games, so needed more fitness. We all know that (well 99%). But had Barnes been match fit and ready? Then Barnes would have come on earlier - so Richardson still wouldn't have come on.
-
- Posts: 17349
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3563 times
- Has Liked: 7820 times
Re: Richardson
So the ongoing problem for an emerging young player would seem to be:
If we are playing well we don't need him.
if we are playing badly we can't risk him.
Not great, is it?
If we are playing well we don't need him.
if we are playing badly we can't risk him.
Not great, is it?
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 296 times
- Has Liked: 621 times
Re: Richardson
Why is he on the bench ???boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:37 pmSo the ongoing problem for an emerging young player would seem to be:
If we are playing well we don't need him.
if we are playing badly we can't risk him.
Not great, is it?
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Richardson
Of course, it’s all the crowds fault.
-
- Posts: 13285
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3732 times
- Has Liked: 2149 times
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
You don’t remember young Hewitt coming on then?
Ok it not so much being “turned on” (that sounds so wrong btw) but he misplaced a pass and there were groans, which tbh would still have happened if it was Messi
If they are “good enough” to be on the bench then I do agree that they need the opportunity to see how they do in the first team, but I’m not sure against a team like Chelsea it would have been the best place
Re: Richardson
Best thing that could happen for Richardson would be for us to be relegated.
Could be 3rd or at worst 4th striker if that happened and would probably get on more weeks than not.
If it wasn’t for ALK I would be happy to be relegated, Clear out the old wood and have the opportunity to blood some players who may not be Prem standard just yet. Having said that it may prompt ALK into a fire sale where we have no chance to get back up.
Could be 3rd or at worst 4th striker if that happened and would probably get on more weeks than not.
If it wasn’t for ALK I would be happy to be relegated, Clear out the old wood and have the opportunity to blood some players who may not be Prem standard just yet. Having said that it may prompt ALK into a fire sale where we have no chance to get back up.
-
- Posts: 18734
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7695 times
- Has Liked: 1593 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Richardson
Nobody is going to turn on a young player when we’re 4-0 down. Who honestly cared about anything that happened in the last half an hour of that game yesterday. If it’s 1-1 and he makes a mistake then obviously the crowd would react, but that’s just not going to happen at 4-0.
-
- Posts: 10659
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4656 times
- Has Liked: 7303 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Richardson
Absolutely BFC123.
The logic on this thread used to explain why Richardson couldn’t and shouldn’t have been introduced would have Leonard Nimoy turning in his grave.
Barnes won’t regain sharpness. He was never sharp to begin with. Brilliant player for us, one of my favourites, but his time at this level is up. Probably only a handful of people can’t recognise that. Sadly one of them is SD.
The biggest problem we have with our substitutions, is they are usually the wrong ones at the wrong time. It’s the main chink in SD’s armour. At 0-1 McNeil should’ve been hooked immediately after the goal. He was shocking in almost every element of his game. Dyche makes a sub, hooks Jay. Not surprising there were boo’s ringing out.
It’s all well and good feeling out the same old same old about there not being enough strength on the bench, but when the players on the pitch (McNeil in this instance) are offering nothing and clearly having a mare, and the option is there to change it up (Cornet) not doing so is downright dereliction.
A wasted opportunity not getting the young lad Richardson some minutes yesterday imho.
The logic on this thread used to explain why Richardson couldn’t and shouldn’t have been introduced would have Leonard Nimoy turning in his grave.
Barnes won’t regain sharpness. He was never sharp to begin with. Brilliant player for us, one of my favourites, but his time at this level is up. Probably only a handful of people can’t recognise that. Sadly one of them is SD.
The biggest problem we have with our substitutions, is they are usually the wrong ones at the wrong time. It’s the main chink in SD’s armour. At 0-1 McNeil should’ve been hooked immediately after the goal. He was shocking in almost every element of his game. Dyche makes a sub, hooks Jay. Not surprising there were boo’s ringing out.
It’s all well and good feeling out the same old same old about there not being enough strength on the bench, but when the players on the pitch (McNeil in this instance) are offering nothing and clearly having a mare, and the option is there to change it up (Cornet) not doing so is downright dereliction.
A wasted opportunity not getting the young lad Richardson some minutes yesterday imho.
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Richardson
Yes but Steven Hewitt misplaced a pass in his 10 minutes of first team football, the crowd reacted and thus we can never try a young player ever again regardless of the game situation.
There is some nonsense written on this board but referencing Steven Hewitt is up there.
There is some nonsense written on this board but referencing Steven Hewitt is up there.
-
- Posts: 77648
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37991 times
- Has Liked: 5769 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
The manager referenced Steven Hewitt at the time and said he didn't think the Burnley fans wanted young players coming through, the exact opposite to how it had been at Watford.arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 12:06 pmYes but Steven Hewitt misplaced a pass in his 10 minutes of first team football, the crowd reacted and thus we can never try a young player ever again regardless of the game situation.
There is some nonsense written on this board but referencing Steven Hewitt is up there.
Re: Richardson, the lad has had 45 minutes football since coming back from his broken ankle. I'm sure he'd have been very much part of the first team squad this season but for the injury. Whether he's ready to come on our not, it's good experience for him being there.
-
- Posts: 77648
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37991 times
- Has Liked: 5769 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
Gaining experience
-
- Posts: 13289
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1989 times
- Has Liked: 388 times
Re: Richardson
Surely he can gain the same experience watching in the crowd as he can on the bench?
If he’s never going to play what is the point
-
- Posts: 77648
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37991 times
- Has Liked: 5769 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Richardson
Absolutely not, I've seen comments from many young players over the years who have been given opportunities to go on the bench and how invaluable it is to be part of things on a match day. Same experience watching in the crowd? Don't make me laugh.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 12:56 pmSurely he can gain the same experience watching in the crowd as he can on the bench?
If he’s never going to play what is the point
-
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Richardson
Sadly that is the brain power of many on here. Experience from watching? I must be a ******* world beater then? Come on Dychey - give me a ring!!!!ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:17 pmAbsolutely not, I've seen comments from many young players over the years who have been given opportunities to go on the bench and how invaluable it is to be part of things on a match day. Same experience watching in the crowd? Don't make me laugh.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony