She appears to ve a piece of work.
Tried to flog the story of Drinkwater spending a night in clink, with newspapers, for money.

Other stuff too allegedly.

The civil action will cost millions. It is obscene and a personal failure by both parties not to seek an out of court resolution. It is a disgrace when so many of us cannot afford food , fuel and dentistry. I say go back home and take both your egos with you.

https://twitter.com/SoozUK/status/1524065325637066753

Convenient Vardy lost her phone days after being ordered to hand it over for disclosure! Right piece of work if you ask me.

HunterST_BFC wrote: ↑

Wed May 11, 2022 11:32 pm

https://twitter.com/SoozUK/status/1524065325637066753

I saw something about Peter Andre and his chipolata sized d**k. Was that another story she sold?

KRBFC wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 5:24 am

I saw something about Peter Andre and his chipolata sized d**k. Was that another story she sold?

Mentioned it in a previous interview years ago I think and was mentioned again in this court case.
I think they're just highlighting what a gobshite she is

She does come across as most people see WAGS, I can confirm a high number of them are like this as well by the way!
I’d not attend a party that those sorts attended, toxic atmosphere and they all bitch about each other the moment their backs are turned.

Burnley1989 wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 6:44 am

… they all bitch about each other the moment their backs are turned.

Thats women in general to be fair.

It’s pretty obscene the costs involved for what is nothing more than an ego driven attempted face saving from Vardy’s mrs . While you can imagine Rooney’s mrs was pretty p1ssed off , surely they could have had an out of court and a nda.

claptrappers_union wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:34 am

Thats women in general to be fair.

Men are no better. Become a regular in your local pub, and you'll see what I mean. This is why I've always preferred bar-hopping in town or Manc city centre pubs.

BTW: I once read somewhere that one o the reasons why some people are never out of their local is because they can't bear the thought that their drinking buddies might be talking about them.

Most people couldn’t give a rats arse who wins. It’s important for their shallowness and egos though. More worthwhile human beings would call a truce and donate some of the costs to a charity such as for the starving or the ill. They don’t live in the real world.

Utterly pathetic the whole thing like 2 girls squabbling in the school yard and lawyers about to rip them both off.

Obsession over talentless ‘celebrities’ is a complete plague.

If no one talked about them, then it wouldn’t get rammed down our throats (yea I’m aware of the hypocrisy in this post)

The amount of airtime this and the Depp/Heard thing have got over the last few weeks on the big national news broadcasts really does depress me. This sort of stuff used to be consigned to the celebrity gossip sections of the tabloids but now I’m getting ‘breaking news’ alerts about it on my phone.

A sad indictment of the social media whores created today with little to no moral compass, and also indicative of the rarified atmosphere they live in completely dislocated from the real world..

Not condoning it but is it any wonder people want to blow us up

Whoever has advised Vardy to take this court case on wants shooting.

All the stuff she has done is coming out left, right and centre.

Whatever happens, there will be two winners here - their legal teams.

martin_p wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am

The amount of airtime this and the Depp/Heard thing have got over the last few weeks on the big national news broadcasts really does depress me. This sort of stuff used to be consigned to the celebrity gossip sections of the tabloids but now I’m getting ‘breaking news’ alerts about it on my phone.

Not quite the same thing. In the Depp/Heard case, the guy can’t work again because of the impact of the libel. Whereas the Wagatha Christie is, as described, a privileged WAG spat

NRC wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 11:32 am

Not quite the same thing. In the Depp/Heard case, the guy can’t work again because of the impact of the libel. Whereas the Wagatha Christie is, as described, a privileged WAG spat

I think in the league table of ‘injustices in the world’ this sits below us not getting a penalty against Norwich (assuming it was libel). Why is headline news?

martin_p wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 11:38 am

Why is headline news?

People soak it up, and it sells advertising space. Just look at any online tabloid and the amount 'celeb' gossip along with inane photo articles, usually of someone you've never heard of sunning themselves at the beach. It's this kind of fodder that drags the punters in, and also receives most clicks.

I’d be interested to hear Wile_Coyote’s take on the case.

The only thing I know about this is that is appears to have energised the loons who were tweeting about Depp v Heard to tweet about this

Vardy "if I'm being honest"

Rooney's lawyer "I would hope you're being honest given that you're sitting in a witness box at the High Court"

Thick as mince.

Absolutely hilarious stuff. Mrs V making herself look as thick as 1 short plank

Reported on the BBC news re lost phone:

Barrister to Mrs Vardy: So this phone has ended up in Davey Jones Locker?

Mrs Vardy: Who is Davey Jones?

How did Mr V end up with Mrs V?

IanMcL wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 1:37 pm

Reported on the BBC news re lost phone:

Barrister to Mrs Vardy: So this phone has ended up in Davey Jones Locker?

Mrs Vardy: Who is Davey Jones?

How did Mr V end up with Mrs V?

Well you know Mickey Dolenz, Mike Naismith and Peter Tork?........

BBC 6pm news did an interview with Deborah James who has just been taken into hospice care after raising money and highlighting bowel cancer, young, beautiful and brave but most of all very inspirational and then two stories later the news fell on these two spoilt brats, doubt if it was intentional but it really showed the pair of them ( and husbands ) up for what they are, no wonder i am going off football.

Unless I'm much mistaken, I believe Jamie Vardy's parents took an instant dislike to the current Mrs Vardy and refused to attend the Wedding and have little or nothing to do with them ...

Seems like they were good judges of character ...

To be fair, this is all of Rebekah Vardy’s making.

She’s suing and so Colleen Rooney is well within her rights to defend herself.

IanMcL wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 1:37 pm

Reported on the BBC news re lost phone:

Barrister to Mrs Vardy: So this phone has ended up in Davey Jones Locker?

Mrs Vardy: Who is Davey Jones?

How did Mr V end up with Mrs V?

I’d never heard that phrase before either tbh.

Aye, she has no choice, unless she gave a full apology and/or settled out of court, and why would do that if she's telling the truth.

Herts Clarets wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 12:20 pm

Vardy "if I'm being honest"

Rooney's lawyer "I would hope you're being honest given that you're sitting in a witness box at the High Court"

Thick as mince.

That’s just a turn of phrase, lawyer is being snide.

Swizzlestick wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 6:57 pm

I’d never heard that phrase before either tbh.

Very clever of Rooney's Brief. By using that phrase he provoked a "huh?" response, affirming the view of her that most people are forming - 2 short planks being involved in the expression

You couldn't write this stuff could you, and I await the inevitable TV series with relish.

Is it only me that's lost as to precisely what their argument concerns, as far as I can surmise it's all a storm in a teacup.

And as mentioned above the only ones smiling when this farce is over will be the lawyers, who'll be coining it in as ever.

tiger76 wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:04 pm

You couldn't write this stuff could you, and I await the inevitable TV series with relish.

Is it only me that's lost as to precisely what their argument concerns, as far as I can surmise it's all a storm in a teacup.

And as mentioned above the only ones smiling when this farce is over will be the lawyers, who'll be coining it in as ever.

More like storm in a "D" Cup Tiger

I find it hilarious reading the snippets in the paper

NRC wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:04 pm

Very clever of Rooney's Brief. By using that phrase he provoked a "huh?" response, affirming the view of her that most people are forming - 2 short planks being involved in the expression

I don’t even think it’s that deep (no pun intended). I doubt most younger people know that phrase ( I could be wrong). I think he’s just being a bit snobby.

Swizzlestick wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 6:59 pm

That’s just a turn of phrase, lawyer is being snide.

Wouldn’t so much say snide, rather it’s the fact that Vardy has brought the case and it’s Rooney’s defence that Vardy is in fact somewhat underhand and less than honest. Any barrister worth their fee is going to make a play on that and take any opportunity to rile Vardy.

Reading the court reporting I’m not sure he’s having to work that hard, either.

Bosscat wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:08 pm

More like storm in a "D" Cup Tiger

I find it hilarious reading the snippets in the paper

Yes I've only seen the snippets as well, but Vardy really doesn't come across as the sharpest tool in the box does she, and what either women hopes to gain from this charade beats me, you'd have thought common sense would have prevailed and they'd have reached an out of court settlement, but vanity appears to be both their middle names.

As entertainment I also find it hilarious, but the problem is once you choose to wash your dirty linen in public the genie can't be put back in the bottle, as both these ladies are about to discover the hard way.

tiger76 wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:04 pm

You couldn't write this stuff could you, and I await the inevitable TV series with relish.

Is it only me that's lost as to precisely what their argument concerns, as far as I can surmise it's all a storm in a teacup.

And as mentioned above the only ones smiling when this farce is over will be the lawyers, who'll be coining it in as ever.

People relishing the inevitable TV series will be manna from heaven for the pair of them. They’ll ensure that there is plenty of coin for themselves, whoring their stories for the highest price to feed to those awaiting their ‘influence’.

Vardy will probably win this given Rooney has to prove it however whatever reputation she had before will be in tatters anyway.

I bet Vardy would have shitt herself if the barrister has said; "so, we now know that Davey Jones has your old mobile phone".

Stolen unashamedly from twitter (Joe @Brikka49)

You just know that if Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney didn’t have money this would have been sorted out ages ago with a scrap outside spoons at 2 in the morning when they’re both ****** on jaeger bombs only stopping when someone’s tit fell out.

Coleen Rooney doesn't have to prove it outright. The verdict will be based on probabilities.

Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:21 pm

Stolen unashamedly from twitter (Joe @Brikka49)

You just know that if Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney didn’t have money this would have been sorted out ages ago with a scrap outside spoons at 2 in the morning when they’re both ****** on jaeger bombs only stopping when someone’s tit fell out.

Something similar was said in the pub the other night

Billy Balfour wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 7:21 pm

Coleen Rooney doesn't have to prove it outright. The verdict will be based on probabilities.

Based on probability it will take a massive turn around for Vardy to win.

Highly paid legal teams were always going to hang her out to dry, especially with her ex agent giving them the ammo.

My understanding is that to win her case Vardy has to prove what Rooney said isn’t true (on balance of probabilities). Not sure she can do that.

I believe it’s the other way round. Rooney has to prove it was Vardy who personally leaked the stories following the pre trial hearing.

Swizzlestick wrote: ↑

Thu May 12, 2022 6:57 pm

I’d never heard that phrase before either tbh.

You will be telling us next that you don't know about doubloons and pieces of eight!