Weghorst miss

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Neil
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 263 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Weghorst miss

Post by Neil » Thu May 19, 2022 10:47 pm

I'm a new and pretty unrecognised poster (no offence taken haha) but I've been pretty critical of Weghorst in general and don't rate him.
It's pretty easy to say he should have buried it but the defender flung himself at the ball and got a good break.
Would have been amazing if it went in obviously but I don't massively blame him.
This user liked this post: KateR

Quicknick
Posts: 6699
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1434 times
Has Liked: 9445 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Quicknick » Thu May 19, 2022 10:47 pm

Pointless thread.
This user liked this post: Flixtonclaret1

jedi_master
Posts: 8238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4120 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by jedi_master » Thu May 19, 2022 10:48 pm

I think he’s been pretty useless since he arrived bar a couple of games, but he couldn’t have done more I don’t think bar hitting the target which is what he did. He did lift it a bit too rather than it being a daisy cutter, which is all I’d have hoped for.

Just got to say great block really.
These 3 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin summitclaret KateR

RVclaret
Posts: 16199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by RVclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 10:49 pm

Need to see it back but I think the point is 1. A slightly more mobile striker gets to the ball quicker to finish it (imagine Ings for example) 2. Could he have elevated his shot so it went into the top half of the net, foreseeing the sliding Mings?

Bosscat
Posts: 28779
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9632 times
Has Liked: 20692 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Bosscat » Thu May 19, 2022 10:50 pm

Got to give Mungs the benefit in that one was a great block ... just as we are praising Pope 🙂
This user liked this post: KateR

Rileybobs
Posts: 18547
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7609 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Rileybobs » Thu May 19, 2022 10:52 pm

Couldn’t really have done anything more. Fantastic challenge by Mings. Weghorst started the move off with some decent hold up play, something we were seriously lacking at times with Barnes and in particular Cornet. He’s gone through a rocky patch and the goals aren’t coming for him, but I’m hoping we see him line up for us in the PL next season with a new manager and a full pre-season.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6745
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1973 times
Has Liked: 504 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Thu May 19, 2022 10:52 pm

A sign of a player adapting to the league. He just needs it to be natural to him to lift the shot or drill it low. Instead he stroked it like Barnes stroked the penalty.

In Germany the defender doesn’t get that, which is why Wout was a tad casual. This is a step up. But he’ll get there.
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop

Neil
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 263 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Neil » Thu May 19, 2022 10:52 pm

Quicknick wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:47 pm
Pointless thread.
Thanks for that. 95% of threads are pointless as they're all just discussion points.
These 6 users liked this post: mybloodisclaret Goddy The Hung Juror elwaclaret KateR Juan Tanamera

bf2k
Posts: 1437
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 1519 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by bf2k » Thu May 19, 2022 10:52 pm

Neil wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:47 pm
I'm a new and pretty unrecognised poster (no offence taken haha) but I've been pretty critical of Weghorst in general and don't rate him.
It's pretty easy to say he should have buried it but the defender flung himself at the ball and got a good break.
Would have been amazing if it went in obviously but I don't massively blame him.
I blame him. That is what he’s paid to do finish that kind of chance.

taio
Posts: 12715
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3563 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by taio » Thu May 19, 2022 10:53 pm

Great defending

Boroclaret
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:01 pm
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Boroclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 10:54 pm

Has to score. No excuses.

Andreshotboots
Posts: 2029
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 775 times
Has Liked: 126 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Andreshotboots » Thu May 19, 2022 10:54 pm

He lifted that all he could seeing it back. There simply wasn't the space to get anymore elevation due to a superb piece of defending.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu May 19, 2022 10:55 pm

He didn't miss, it was going in.
These 7 users liked this post: Buxtonclaret mybloodisclaret Zlatan Goddy Bosscat elwaclaret Juan Tanamera

RVclaret
Posts: 16199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by RVclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 10:56 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:55 pm
He didn't miss, it was going in.
Not sure on this take. The question is, could he have done more to ensure it DID go in? For example, if he lifts it into the top corner, it’s a goal because Mings doesn’t get there.

Cubanforever
Posts: 779
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 11:43 am
Been Liked: 268 times
Has Liked: 654 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Cubanforever » Thu May 19, 2022 10:56 pm

Wegs to get the winner against Newcastle
This user liked this post: Goddy

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6496
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2694 times
Has Liked: 1586 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by gandhisflipflop » Thu May 19, 2022 10:57 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:52 pm
A sign of a player adapting to the league. He just needs it to be natural to him to lift the shot or drill it low. Instead he stroked it like Barnes stroked the penalty.

In Germany the defender doesn’t get that, which is why Wout was a tad casual. This is a step up. But he’ll get there.
This. People who actually understand football know that he is adapting to the PL. problem we have is we need him to adapt quicker. If we stay up, I fully expect to see the best of wout next season

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by TsarBomba » Thu May 19, 2022 10:57 pm

Top scorer in the Bundesliga behind Lewandowski over the past 4/5 years.

Parachuted into a team, low on confidence, playing very little football and scrapping for their lives. And not playing to his strengths either.

Can he do more? Of course. And should we stay up and play more football, on the deck and under a new manager, then that will be time to properly judge.

Calling him useless is just moronic.
These 9 users liked this post: gandhisflipflop mybloodisclaret Zlatan Goddy evensteadiereddie Bosscat elwaclaret KateR Juan Tanamera

KRBFC
Posts: 19077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 19, 2022 10:57 pm

Easy with hindsight to say he should've fake shot johan cruyff turned and no look 360'd it into the net. He did everything right, hit the target and 9 times out of 10 it's a goal, great defending from Mings.

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 19490
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 4297 times
Has Liked: 8515 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Buxtonclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 10:58 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:55 pm
He didn't miss, it was going in.
:lol:

DukeOfBar
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by DukeOfBar » Thu May 19, 2022 10:59 pm

Fantastic block, if that is one of our defenders, we sing their praises stopping a nailed on goal.
These 6 users liked this post: jedi_master mybloodisclaret Goddy Bosscat KateR Juan Tanamera

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13045
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Thu May 19, 2022 10:59 pm

TsarBomba wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:57 pm
Top scorer in the Bundesliga behind Lewandowski over the past 4/5 years.

Parachuted into a team, low on confidence, playing very little football and scrapping for their lives. And not playing to his strengths either.

Can he do more? Of course. And should we stay up and play more football, on the deck and under a new manager, then that will be time to properly judge.

Calling him useless is just moronic.
Why don’t we just stop making excuses and call a spade a spade.

He has been useless for us to date, until that changes that is just the honest truth.

One of our highest earners and isn’t even a certain starter should tell you everything.

Burnleyareback2
Posts: 2961
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
Been Liked: 880 times
Has Liked: 1658 times
Location: Mostly Europe

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Burnleyareback2 » Thu May 19, 2022 11:00 pm

It’s Mr.
These 3 users liked this post: distortiondave Goddy Juan Tanamera

Garnerssoap
Posts: 1382
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:50 pm
Been Liked: 400 times
Has Liked: 522 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Garnerssoap » Thu May 19, 2022 11:00 pm

Ron Futcher would have feigned to shoot sent Tyrone to the shops for more gum and stroked it in with his left

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu May 19, 2022 11:01 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:56 pm
Not sure on this take. The question is, could he have done more to ensure it DID go in? For example, if he lifts it into the top corner, it’s a goal because Mings doesn’t get there.
If he had a time machine he would have trapped it, waited for Mings to dive, then flicked it up and headed it at the underside of the crossbar with the ball bouncing just over the goal line.
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace

KRBFC
Posts: 19077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 19, 2022 11:02 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:59 pm
Why don’t we just stop making excuses and call a spade a spade.

He has been useless for us to date, until that changes that is just the honest truth.

One of our highest earners and isn’t even a certain starter should tell you everything.
Certainly wasn't useless away at Palace and Brighton, home to Spurs, Man United. Scored at West Ham too. He's had poor performances sure, to say he's been useless is your typical b**locks though.
Last edited by KRBFC on Thu May 19, 2022 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: mybloodisclaret evensteadiereddie elwaclaret

dandeclaret
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3032 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by dandeclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:02 pm

He’s been very poor.

distortiondave
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 572 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by distortiondave » Thu May 19, 2022 11:03 pm

Great piece of proper football all round. Good ball, good save, good pass, good block.
it looks like he should have scored, and he would have scored, but for a fantastic block.

That's fine, it's part of the game. It's as nature intended.

It's not like not getting a penalty for the exact same reason you conceded a penalty the game before, or anything.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13045
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Thu May 19, 2022 11:03 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:02 pm
Certainly wasn't useless away at Palace and Brighton, home to Spurs, Man United. Scored at West Ham too. He's had poor performances sure, to say he's been useless is ******** though.
So good in them performances he’s been dropped for a player you constantly say is past it in Barnes.

He has been useless and any other opinion is just claret tinted specs. Top earning players don’t get dropped (especially here) unless they are useless.

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 508 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by EarbyClaret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:04 pm

He doesn't do a lot wrong and it's fantastic defending by Mings

You just sense it's that split-second mental agility at this level and he's still adjusting to that. Would have backed Barnes to score in the same situation

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34416
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12517 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:05 pm

outstanding defending

KRBFC
Posts: 19077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:03 pm
So good in them performances he’s been dropped for a player you constantly say is past it in Barnes.

He has been useless and any other opinion is just claret tinted specs. Top earning players don’t get dropped (especially here) unless they are useless.
I said months ago I'd like to see Barnes given a run in the side and a new contract??? We haven't seen Barnes given a real run in the team for a long time, kinda impossible to say he's past it until he was given a run.

I think it's obvious why he's been dropped, the team was set up to defend deep and hit it long, suits Barnes' game more than Wout.

I'm as objective as anyone on here so the claret tinted specs is funny. He's had some really good performances, some not so good.

Boroclaret
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:01 pm
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Boroclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm

Let's have it right, he's been poor and that's why he's on the bench. Not saying that he can't be a good player for us, but at the moment he's exactly where he should be.
Last edited by Boroclaret on Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jedi_master
Posts: 8238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4120 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by jedi_master » Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm

The thing I really hope we start doing when evaluating Wout is stopping with the Bundesliga evidence as the reason he is not the problem and we/the players/our tactics/the manager are.

Judge him on what he is producing here, for us, in this league. Anything else is utterly irrelevant. Paul Stewart was playing for England and Liverpool a couple of years before he came to Burnley - equally pointless saying “Yeah but…” back then considering what he was ‘offering’ us.

This thread shouldn’t be an overall Weghorst bashing thing though, he’s had at least two of them already and did nothing wrong (imo) tonight. He won a couple of duels, did a couple of clearances and did everything he possibly could with the chance he got. Sometimes you just have to hand it to the defender.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3523 times
Has Liked: 7711 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by boatshed bill » Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:03 pm
So good in them performances he’s been dropped for a player you constantly say is past it in Barnes.

He has been useless and any other opinion is just claret tinted specs. Top earning players don’t get dropped (especially here) unless they are useless.
That's so harsh.

The man needs to adjust to the speed of the PL.
you could focus ion the good stuff he does.

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4873
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1245 times
Has Liked: 1468 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Thu May 19, 2022 11:11 pm

Quicknick wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:47 pm
Pointless thread.
The only pointless thread after tonight’s performance is the one containing the man of the match poll :D

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13045
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Thu May 19, 2022 11:11 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm
I said months ago I'd like to see Barnes given a run in the side and a new contract??? We haven't seen Barnes given a real run in the team for a long time, kinda impossible to say he's past it until he was given a run.

I think it's obvious why he's been dropped, the team was set up to defend deep and hit it long, suits Barnes' game more than Wout.

I'm as objective as anyone on here so the claret tinted specs is funny. He's had some really good performances, some not so good.
Your not being objective though, you were raving about him when signed and now he’s turning out to be a poor signing your constantly defending him.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by TsarBomba » Thu May 19, 2022 11:12 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:59 pm
Why don’t we just stop making excuses and call a spade a spade.

He has been useless for us to date, until that changes that is just the honest truth.

One of our highest earners and isn’t even a certain starter should tell you everything.
They’re not excuses. They are facts.

Take 5 mins to look at our team statistics this year.

Lowest possession percentage- 38%
Pass accuracy- 69%
Cross accuracy- 21%
Goals from open play (not set pieces)- 18 (second lowest)
Goals from counter attacks- 1 (joint lowest)

I could go on.

To say Weghorst has been useless, and at the same time completely ignore the circumstances he has come into and how badly we have been playing, is disingenuous and you know it is.
These 2 users liked this post: TommyPicks Goddy

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by claretspice » Thu May 19, 2022 11:13 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 10:49 pm
Need to see it back but I think the point is 1. A slightly more mobile striker gets to the ball quicker to finish it (imagine Ings for example) 2. Could he have elevated his shot so it went into the top half of the net, foreseeing the sliding Mings?
Nah, it’s a good finish. He could go high, he could keep it right on the deck, but he focused on going for the corner and getting clean contact which is all you can ask.

Mings just did miraculously, unfortunately.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18547
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7609 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Rileybobs » Thu May 19, 2022 11:13 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:11 pm
Your not being objective though, you were raving about him when signed and now he’s turning out to be a poor signing your constantly defending him.
One of you is going to die on that hill.

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Steve1956 » Thu May 19, 2022 11:14 pm

Mings did a Tarkowski or Mee block on Weghorst's shot don't be to hard on him...it was a fantastic block

distortiondave
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 572 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by distortiondave » Thu May 19, 2022 11:14 pm

You're. Come on Newcastle, you're nearly 30.
This user liked this post: Greenmile

KRBFC
Posts: 19077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 19, 2022 11:15 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:11 pm
Your not being objective though, you were raving about him when signed and now he’s turning out to be a poor signing your constantly defending him.
He's been fine in the majority of games, certainly an upgrade on what Wood was offering in the same team. I'm fine with him squaring the ball to Vydra to win the Wolves game instead of scoring himself. If you wanna just count productivity in stats and return, he's still our most effective striker goals/assists to minutes played. His hold up and energy means he offers more than just goals/assists though.

TommyPicks
Posts: 204
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:44 pm
Been Liked: 81 times
Has Liked: 38 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by TommyPicks » Thu May 19, 2022 11:17 pm

Couldn’t do much more with that chance for me. It was a fantastic block from Mings.

However, just to put a slightly different slant on things. How many of you would start him against Newcastle over Barnes?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:19 pm

TommyPicks wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:17 pm
Couldn’t do much more with that chance for me. It was a fantastic block from Mings.

However, just to put a slightly different slant on things. How many of you would start him against Newcastle over Barnes?
Me

Barnes very nearly got sent off within five minutes, and Weghorst is better with the ball

Course, we'd have to play it to his feet

Any chance that Jay will be fit anyone know?
These 2 users liked this post: gandhisflipflop nil_desperandum

KRBFC
Posts: 19077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by KRBFC » Thu May 19, 2022 11:19 pm

TommyPicks wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:17 pm
Couldn’t do much more with that chance for me. It was a fantastic block from Mings.

However, just to put a slightly different slant on things. How many of you would start him against Newcastle over Barnes?
I'd start the pair of them together, Cornet and Mcneil on the wings. Revert to 5 at the back in the 2nd half if needed.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by SalisburyClaret » Thu May 19, 2022 11:20 pm

A world class striker would have dummied it and then chipped into an empty net - we’re £100m short so we got the honest hard working striker whose effort was blocked by outstanding defending.

Did brilliantly to get into that position in the first place, excellent effort from Roberts too

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu May 19, 2022 11:20 pm

distortiondave wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:14 pm
You're. Come on Newcastle, you're nearly 30.
I always thought that the 93 in his moniker was the amount of pints he has before coming on here.
These 2 users liked this post: mybloodisclaret Bosscat

jedi_master
Posts: 8238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4120 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by jedi_master » Thu May 19, 2022 11:21 pm

TommyPicks wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:17 pm
Couldn’t do much more with that chance for me. It was a fantastic block from Mings.

However, just to put a slightly different slant on things. How many of you would start him against Newcastle over Barnes?
I’d go 4-4-2 with both playing.

Pope
Roberts Tarky Collins Taylor
McNeil Brownhill Cork Cornet
Barnes Weghorst

We need to assume that we have to win.
This user liked this post: TommyPicks

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by TsarBomba » Thu May 19, 2022 11:22 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:08 pm
The thing I really hope we start doing when evaluating Wout is stopping with the Bundesliga evidence as the reason he is not the problem and we/the players/our tactics/the manager are.

Judge him on what he is producing here, for us, in this league. Anything else is utterly irrelevant. Paul Stewart was playing for England and Liverpool a couple of years before he came to Burnley - equally pointless saying “Yeah but…” back then considering what he was ‘offering’ us.

This thread shouldn’t be an overall Weghorst bashing thing though, he’s had at least two of them already and did nothing wrong (imo) tonight. He won a couple of duels, did a couple of clearances and did everything he possibly could with the chance he got. Sometimes you just have to hand it to the defender.
It’s not utterly irrelevant. He’s proven to be a consistent goalscorer in a top 5 league.

Are we playing to his strengths? Not remotely.

I AM judging him on what he is producing here, and taking into account the backdrop of a relegation scrap, a side low on confidence playing god awful football, it’s not remotely surprising he is finding it tough.

Out of interest, what were you expecting him to do, bearing in mind just how poor we are in possession?

distortiondave
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 572 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Weghorst miss

Post by distortiondave » Thu May 19, 2022 11:24 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:
Thu May 19, 2022 11:20 pm
I always thought that the 93 in his moniker was the amount of pints he has before coming on here.
I thought to make a joke about it being 9.3 but even that is akin to snorting coke off a police dogs truncheon.

What were we talking about?

Post Reply