Muric

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ksrclaret
Posts: 6937
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2581 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Muric

Post by ksrclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:52 am

This weirdo poster needed a new target to spend all his time getting angry about since Vydra left. Leave him to it.

KRBFC
Posts: 18160
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3814 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:54 am

Prefeot wrote:
Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:56 pm
Indeed and I’m just on here adding my comments which are as valid as yours . I’m not a Muric fan (as you can see) onwards and upwards with or without him
You're clearly not a Burnley fan either

Prefeot
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:28 am
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 69 times

Re: Muric

Post by Prefeot » Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:56 am

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:54 am
You're clearly not a Burnley fan either
Am so

KRBFC
Posts: 18160
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3814 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:01 am

Prefeot wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:56 am
Am so
You just openly admitted to silently waiting for Muric to make a mistake, then jumping on here after his first mistake in months to criticise him. How are you a fan wanting our goalkeeper to make a mistake like a vulture? Sad

Prefeot
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:28 am
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 69 times

Re: Muric

Post by Prefeot » Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:07 am

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:01 am
You just openly admitted to silently waiting for Muric to make a mistake, then jumping on here after his first mistake in months to criticise him. How are you a fan wanting our goalkeeper to make a mistake like a vulture? Sad
Not true at all that’s just lies tbh. I personally think Muric is too kamikaze for my liking. That’s basically all I’ve ever said . He’s not my cup of tea.

up_the_clarets_1989
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:33 pm
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Muric

Post by up_the_clarets_1989 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:34 am

Even if he did make a mistake tonight, he’s 24, played well under a 100 professional club games and is a massive reason as to why we are top of the league. Sadly he will never win the ‘get rid of it!’ brigade around. I’d prefer to get rid of them. Clowns.

pushpinpussy
Posts: 2128
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 134 times

Re: Muric

Post by pushpinpussy » Wed Feb 15, 2023 6:15 am

I have not read this thread but i have major doubts with Muric. I appreciate anyone can have an off day and that we play a certain way nowadays and a certain system. However, what i also want from my Keeper is someone who is dominant, can catch a ball and makes saves. Unfortunately he does not tick any of those boxes and he will be a massive liability in the Prem.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 6:39 am

up_the_clarets_1989 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:34 am
Even if he did make a mistake tonight, he’s 24, played well under a 100 professional club games and is a massive reason as to why we are top of the league. Sadly he will never win the ‘get rid of it!’ brigade around. I’d prefer to get rid of them. Clowns.
Those clowns can probably see beyond their noses

I think everyone agrees we will be in the premier League next season, and that is where the problems lie.

There won't be teams like Preston who allow him the control play like he did on Saturday, he won't get half the time on the ball he gets this season, thus taking away his best contribution.

Watford had one shot on target, and scored, and it's not the first time this season that the opposition have scored with their only shots on target. Next season we will be facing six or seven telling shots on target most games, and I have seen nothing from Muric this season to suggest he can cope with that .
This user liked this post: Benson

TheOriginalLongsider
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:41 am
Been Liked: 426 times
Has Liked: 219 times

Re: Muric

Post by TheOriginalLongsider » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:06 am

In the interview following the game Kompany was asked why he made the half time change and he said it was a “technical change”. Nothing there about being ill

I don’t think he is a good keeper, but I do see why he’s in the team. He allows us to play in the way we do - basically 11 outfield players. No doubt we have won games because of this.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:13 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 6:39 am
Those clowns can probably see beyond their noses

I think everyone agrees we will be in the premier League next season, and that is where the problems lie.

There won't be teams like Preston who allow him the control play like he did on Saturday, he won't get half the time on the ball he gets this season, thus taking away his best contribution.

Watford had one shot on target, and scored, and it's not the first time this season that the opposition have scored with their only shots on target. Next season we will be facing six or seven telling shots on target most games, and I have seen nothing from Muric this season to suggest he can cope with that .
It’s not really though is it? There’s been a problem with him, by several posters, since day one in THIS league. The PL doesn’t start until August, its miles off. Lately, in this league; we’ve conceded just 4 goals in 11 matches, winning 10, hes rightly been praised for outstanding performances that have contributed to this.

By the way it’s possible we bring in another keeper to challenge, its also not possible. All promoted clubs last season bought a new keeper, so I’d say it’s quite likely we will look to… but if his keeping was at a very high level already, there’s not a chance we would have signed him as he’d already be playing for a top 5 league club.

You are suggesting we concede from very little chances/shots, may I point out this is not the case (according to Opta stats), Muric is actually in the top 6 keepers in the league when it comes to ‘goals prevented’. This metric is calculated by subtracting the actual goals he’s conceded from ‘expected goals on target’, of which he’s currently in the positive (any positive is good for a keeper).

Ironically, Bachmann, who a poster on the previous page suggested he prefers, is well below Muric on this ranking.
This user liked this post: Pickles

Muric Leggings
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 9:09 pm
Been Liked: 28 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Muric

Post by Muric Leggings » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:17 am

Is Muric your Dad

Yawn!!! give it a rest.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:22 am

Muric Leggings wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:17 am
Is Muric your Dad

Yawn!!! give it a rest.
It’s a bit bizarre when I’m told on a Muric discussion thread by a poster who’s named himself Muric’s Leggings that I am Muric’s dad.
Last edited by RVclaret on Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

CryerBFC
Posts: 408
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 8:29 am
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Muric

Post by CryerBFC » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:22 am

All of this - he won't have as much time in the Prem, personally I feel, until we get there and find out, is nonsense. Look at the game against Utd in the cup, BPF had more than enough time on the ball at times. Other than maybe the top 6-8 teams in the league, I think most will be hesitant to press high, with Cullen and whoever else we bring in, 2/3 passes and we've broke a press and on the attack. I have confidence in VK and who he picks to do the job he wants.

Vincent'sCap
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
Been Liked: 246 times

Re: Muric

Post by Vincent'sCap » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:29 am

He will be second choice or maybe third next season,quite simply this guy has got a clue on the basics of goalkeeping

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3557
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 657 times
Has Liked: 2902 times

Re: Muric

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:36 am

If only we had some stats on his shot:save or goals conceded/game

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:48 am

Burnley Ace wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:36 am
If only we had some stats on his shot:save or goals conceded/game
No need for stats, watch the games with your own eyes, and see how few proper shots he's had to save this year. The stats will probably show he made two saves second half against Preston, yet they were just lobs towards the goal which were caught easily.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:54 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:48 am
No need for stats, watch the games with your own eyes, and see how few proper shots he's had to save this year. The stats will probably show he made two saves second half against Preston, yet they were just lobs towards the goal which were caught easily.
Incorrect Nori. These two efforts were 0.03 xG each. Basically absolutely nothing and would need to be repeated 30 times to even = 1 expected goal, just FYI.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:05 am

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:54 am
Incorrect Nori. These two efforts were 0.03 xG each. Basically absolutely nothing and would need to be repeated 30 times to even = 1 expected goal, just FYI.
So they weren't shown as shots on target??

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:11 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:05 am
So they weren't shown as shots on target??
Yes, but this is exactly why xG is useful, like you say they were weak, nothing efforts, yet would show as '100% shots on target saved' correct?

Purpose of xG, despite, imo, it's shortfalls, is to show the quality of the chance (which they weren't in this particular case).

What I highlighted above was that Muric is in the + (and also ranked 8th out of all Champ keepers) when it comes to 'expected goals conceded - actual goals conceded'.
Attachments
xgkeepers.png
xgkeepers.png (87.66 KiB) Viewed 1567 times

agreenwood
Posts: 3190
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1777 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Muric

Post by agreenwood » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:12 am

TheOriginalLongsider wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:06 am
In the interview following the game Kompany was asked why he made the half time change and he said it was a “technical change”. Nothing there about being ill

I don’t think he is a good keeper, but I do see why he’s in the team. He allows us to play in the way we do - basically 11 outfield players. No doubt we have won games because of this.
From the Burnley Express:

The ex-Manchester City stopper was replaced by Bailey Peacock-Farrell at half-time, which Sky Bet Championship Manager of the Month, Kompany, put down to illness.

"There's nothing tactical I can solve there," he said. "He wasn't feeling well.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10173
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Muric

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:17 am

Problem with winning runs and successful seasons is it gives some who seem to revel in anything negative very few opportunities to go off on one.

It would seem after winning 10 in a row that once we draw a game that this is the green light to seize their moment and let some steam off the inning prevents them.
These 5 users liked this post: Pickles RVclaret boatshed bill mybloodisclaret tiger76

boatshed bill
Posts: 15309
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3170 times
Has Liked: 6788 times

Re: Muric

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:27 am

It can't be easy standing there knowing that a number in the crowd can't wait for you to **** up.
I hope this incident hasn't damaged his confidence.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:34 am

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:11 am
Yes, but this is exactly why xG is useful, like you say they were weak, nothing efforts, yet would show as '100% shots on target saved' correct?

Purpose of xG, despite, imo, it's shortfalls, is to show the quality of the chance (which they weren't in this particular case).

What I highlighted above was that Muric is in the + (and also ranked 8th out of all Champ keepers) when it comes to 'expected goals conceded - actual goals conceded'.
So you actually agree with me that Muric hasn't had a lot of difficult shots to stop......which was the very point I was making

Terrier
Posts: 674
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 235 times
Has Liked: 124 times

Re: Muric

Post by Terrier » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:35 am

Always has to be one in the team.
Graham branch always comes to mind with this topic, played more or less every position for us to help the team and the poor lad could still do no right for some!
Paul weller was another, cracking player who had 3 ops for colitis and still recieved plenty of grief!

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:36 am

agreenwood wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:12 am
From the Burnley Express:

The ex-Manchester City stopper was replaced by Bailey Peacock-Farrell at half-time, which Sky Bet Championship Manager of the Month, Kompany, put down to illness.

"There's nothing tactical I can solve there," he said. "He wasn't feeling well.
He was limping before half time..... perhaps that was his illness

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 343 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Muric

Post by JarrowClaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:38 am

agreenwood wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:12 am
From the Burnley Express:

The ex-Manchester City stopper was replaced by Bailey Peacock-Farrell at half-time, which Sky Bet Championship Manager of the Month, Kompany, put down to illness.

"There's nothing tactical I can solve there," he said. "He wasn't feeling well.
I posted this on the last page in reply to spiral but this is the link to his interview with BBC Lancashire Sport in which he says that Muric was ill.

https://twitter.com/bbclancssport/statu ... HmHqGmKG-g

Anyway it is what it is whatever the reason and I have no reason to doubt what Kompany said.

4:20
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:23 am
Been Liked: 1066 times
Has Liked: 1198 times

Re: Muric

Post by 4:20 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:44 am

I feel bad for Muric and hope that if he has some sort of performance anxiety issue after incidents such as the one last night, that he can overcome it at the time. Needs supporting.
These 2 users liked this post: SouthLondonexile Rick_Muller

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Muric

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:45 am

A brief summary regarding many of the comments on this thread would put a children's pantomime to shame.

Subbed or ill etc?

Oh, no he wasn't.... Oh, yes he was. Oh, no he wasn't.... Oh, yes he was. Oh, no he wasn't. Oh yes he was....

frankinwales
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 86 times
Has Liked: 651 times

Re: Muric

Post by frankinwales » Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:49 am

If he was ill then that would account for his poorer performance in my view. We move on and enjoy this amazing season.

Up the Clarets.
This user liked this post: summitclaret

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 343 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Muric

Post by JarrowClaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:03 am

Billy Balfour wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:45 am
A brief summary regarding many of the comments on this thread would put a children's pantomime to shame.

Subbed or ill etc?

Oh, no he wasn't.... Oh, yes he was. Oh, no he wasn't.... Oh, yes he was. Oh, no he wasn't. Oh yes he was....
Oh no it wouldn’t

Spijed
Posts: 17127
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Muric

Post by Spijed » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:08 am

The best thing to come out of last nights game regarding Muric and some of the other players is we had a taste of what it will be like in the Prem next season.

Watford have a few players who are better than Championship level and their pressing at times was a level above what we've been up against this year.

Both VK and Muric will have learnt an awful lot after last night's match in that regard.
This user liked this post: depechedingle

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3557
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 657 times
Has Liked: 2902 times

Re: Muric

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:25 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:48 am
No need for stats, watch the games with your own eyes, and see how few proper shots he's had to save this year. The stats will probably show he made two saves second half against Preston, yet they were just lobs towards the goal which were caught easily.
So he hasn’t had to make any saves or conceded many goals yet he’s a poor goalkeeper? How does that work?

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:42 am

Burnley Ace wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:25 am
So he hasn’t had to make any saves or conceded many goals yet he’s a poor goalkeeper? How does that work?
If you actually read my posts you'd realise how it works.

He hasn't had many saves to make this season, next season will be different, which is why his basic skills will need to improve

CoolClaret
Posts: 7477
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2265 times
Has Liked: 2175 times

Re: Muric

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:42 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 7:48 am
No need for stats, watch the games with your own eyes, and see how few proper shots he's had to save this year. The stats will probably show he made two saves second half against Preston, yet they were just lobs towards the goal which were caught easily.
https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias

Stayingup
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 924 times
Has Liked: 2760 times

Re: Muric

Post by Stayingup » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:44 am

He was taken off last night because he gave a goal away. His passing was poor and he was probably affected by it. He'll come back.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6908
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2759 times
Has Liked: 4326 times

Re: Muric

Post by randomclaret2 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am

agreenwood wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:12 am
From the Burnley Express:

The ex-Manchester City stopper was replaced by Bailey Peacock-Farrell at half-time, which Sky Bet Championship Manager of the Month, Kompany, put down to illness.

"There's nothing tactical I can solve there," he said. "He wasn't feeling well.
Perhaps he wasnt feeling well after a bollocking from VK

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Muric

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am

"I know the evidence doesn't back me up, but I see it with my own eyes"

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6998
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1494 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Muric

Post by Woodleyclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am

Coach him to catch and use his physicality better and he will develop into a top keeper

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am
"I know the evidence doesn't back me up, but I see it with my own eyes"
Classic

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:51 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:49 am
"I know the evidence doesn't back me up, but I see it with my own eyes"
Reading your foe list again :lol: :lol: :lol:

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Muric

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:58 am

End of the day, he made a bad mistake yesterday and his passing wasn't as good as it has been

But on Saturday, he has possibly the best passing display you are ever likely to see from a keeper

And he's still young

I think its a bit early to write him off

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Muric

Post by tiger76 » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:06 am

Clearly Muric isn't going to win his critics over, yes he made a howler last night, and usually when keepers make mistakes it results in a goal.

However this is only his 2nd major error that I can recall, and his passing his been vital to the way we now play as well as creating several goals.

Will we need an upgrade in the Prem possibly, but I'm prepared to give him a chance.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16949
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6980 times
Has Liked: 1488 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Muric

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:09 am

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:11 am
Yes, but this is exactly why xG is useful, like you say they were weak, nothing efforts, yet would show as '100% shots on target saved' correct?

Purpose of xG, despite, imo, it's shortfalls, is to show the quality of the chance (which they weren't in this particular case).

What I highlighted above was that Muric is in the + (and also ranked 8th out of all Champ keepers) when it comes to 'expected goals conceded - actual goals conceded'.
Hold on a sec here. Surely if you're using the goals prevented statistic it would be more relevant to use the goals prevented rate which I'm guessing takes into account the number of shots faced? This would show him ranked 11th of the cropped list of goalkeepers below. In any case, having the 8th best shot-stopper in the league when we're comfortably the best side in the league is a bit of an outlier don't you think?

Most of the concerns I've seen leveled against Muric aren't how much his 'traditional' goalkeeping abilities will affect us this season - he goes through most games without having to make anything other than a couple of routine saves - but whether this side of his game will be a liability next season. The 8th best shot-stopper in the Championship (not that I think the statistics actually show that) isn't likely to be sufficiently good at keeping the ball out of the net at Premier League level, where the finishing is much more clinical and the chances conceded much higher.

As for last night, you could tell that Muric wasn't himself very early doors, his passing radar was way off the levels he's set recently. He was due an off-day, and the rest of the team bar one or two also took the same liberty, so it would be unfair to go overboard with criticism. But what this did show was more akin to what we'll face next season in that Watford were very well-drilled with their press and cut out a lot of our passing angles, and they were quick and powerful. It's fine to wax lyrical about Muric's heat map and passing against Preston, but in truth that was like a training session for Muric, one that he made look incredibly simple, but a training session nonetheless. And the big concern I have is that in simple terms, this season the attributes we require from Muric are 90% outfield player/10% goalkeeper, whereas next season this will more likely be 50%/50% - and his raw goalkeeping abilities will be exposed a lot more frequently and ruthlessly.
These 2 users liked this post: Nori1958 Benson

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18134
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3881 times
Has Liked: 2075 times

Re: Muric

Post by Quickenthetempo » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:11 am

Be interested to see who rightfully slammed Pickford for his error last night but wants to defend Murics even bigger error now.

I have said many times he has no goal keeping instincts, he's like a batsman converted to wicketkeeper.

Jos Buttler and Bairstow have been coached to a high level in their 2nd trade, there is hope for Muric yet.
This user liked this post: Nori1958

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:22 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:09 am
Hold on a sec here. Surely if you're using the goals prevented statistic it would be more relevant to use the goals prevented rate which I'm guessing takes into account the number of shots faced? This would show him ranked 11th of the cropped list of goalkeepers below. In any case, having the 8th best shot-stopper in the league when we're comfortably the best side in the league is a bit of an outlier don't you think?
Goals prevented rate is the number of goals that a goalkeeper was expected to concede as a proportion of the number of goals they actually conceded. Having a positive 'goals prevented' is always good (although of course not to be used in isolation). All it does, is show that he's not as 'bad' / 'clueless' at being a keeper as several posters seem to imply, otherwise this would be near the bottom of the list. As for being an outlier, not neccesserily, City are the best team in the PL (well, 2nd atm), yet Ederson is currently at -4.2 for goals prevented this season, which puts him in the bottom 5 keepers in the league!

Barlickclaret
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:08 pm
Been Liked: 85 times

Re: Muric

Post by Barlickclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:25 am

It was just one of those nights you get in football, he wasn't the only one who was below par, game over and another point towards the title.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16949
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6980 times
Has Liked: 1488 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Muric

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:25 am

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:22 am
Goals prevented rate is the number of goals that a goalkeeper was expected to concede as a proportion of the number of goals they actually conceded. Having a positive 'goals prevented' is always good (although of course not to be used in isolation). All it does, is show that he's not as 'bad' / 'clueless' at being a keeper as several posters seem to imply, otherwise this would be near the bottom of the list. As for being an outlier, not neccesserily, City are the best team in the PL (well, 2nd atm), yet Ederson is currently at -4.2 for goals prevented this season, which puts him in the bottom 5 keepers in the league!
I think your Ederson example shows that this particular metric should be taken with a pinch of salt, don't you?

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:29 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:25 am
I think your Ederson example shows that this particular metric should be taken with a pinch of salt, don't you?
Well, I think we'd agree Pope has been having a great season for Newcastle, and unsurprisingly he's in the top 5 according to this, alongside Allison (again no surprise) and Bernd Leno at Fulham, who, on games I've seen of them has been very impressive. So I think it's interesting.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 343 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Muric

Post by JarrowClaret » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:34 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:11 am
Be interested to see who rightfully slammed Pickford for his error last night but wants to defend Murics even bigger error now.

I have said many times he has no goal keeping instincts, he's like a batsman converted to wicketkeeper.

Jos Buttler and Bairstow have been coached to a high level in their 2nd trade, there is hope for Muric yet.
Not sure anyone (certainly I can’t remember reading any) has defended the error itself more defended him I guess.

I don’t agree he doesn’t have goalkeeper instincts that said he does have the look of someone who is wanting to bring out his inner DM self out when he has the ball at his feet. I have seen him live once at Sunderland and yes every time he had the ball at his feet I was crapping myself so I get the concern with him. He made a couple of big saves though in that game though and I don’t think he truly had a chance with either of there goals that day. This is the way we play though and will play whilst we have Kompany as the manager so we need to get used to it as whether it his him or the next keeper they will be doing the same or very similar.

He cocked up it happens we move on let’s win the next 1.

Goalposts
Posts: 2589
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 142 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: Muric

Post by Goalposts » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:37 am

An interesting sub plot is that we are still after Anderlecht goalkeeper Bart Verbruggen , who we just missed out on in the summer, so allegedly now are liverpool according to Nixon. Was VK after this lad to be first choice as opposed to back up and bfp on the way out as some suspected in the early part of the season. BFP has done well when coming on and whilst not having the range of passing of muric has done ok. Does VK think we need a different goalie for the prem ?. Just speculating obviously, but the fact we are still chasing this lad probably speaks volumes,

Post Reply