Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:17 am
Apparently Andrew is resisting a move from the Royal Lodge to Frogmore Cottage because he does not want to "downsize". Frogmore has 10 bedrooms 
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
Frogmore Cottage
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=67956
Page 1 of 2
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:23 am
Not important.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:25 am
Hes lived in the other place for decades hasn't he?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:30 am
It’s good to see he can resist something.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:33 am
......yawn.......
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:42 am
He should be in prison nevermind Frogmore cottage.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:30 pm
Thought the Toad would jump at the chance to live in Frogmore
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:55 pm
Are the ferrets still in Toad Hall?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:57 pm
Frogmarched out of Frogmore.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:21 pm
On a lighter note, the Markles have been evicted to make way for him. 
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:22 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:26 pm
This is a 63 year old man who screamed and berated a member of staff for arranging the Teddy Bears on his bed in the " wrong " way ..... He was offered a route to redemption, following blueprint of John Profumo, who after resigning from the War Office, working quietly and without fuss, devoting most of the rest of his life to Toynbee Hall, a London charity devoted to poverty relief. Prince Andrew refused.
In the days of Empire, he'd have been fired off to be Governor General of Bermuda, or some such .... he's an entitled waste of DNA !
In the days of Empire, he'd have been fired off to be Governor General of Bermuda, or some such .... he's an entitled waste of DNA !
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:56 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:59 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:24 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:26 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:27 pm
you need to keepup with events, stayingup
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:34 pm
Mention of Toynbee Hall takes me back. In 1970 I applied to do 4 months of Voluntary Service and was interviewed by Polly Toynbee at Toynbee Hall. She gave me 4 months at Hither Green Hospital as a nursing auxiliary. Loved it and was was invited by one of the Matrons to apply for a place there as a nurse. I like to have an outlook of 'no regrets' but occasionally I wish I'd taken up the offer.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:54 pm
I thought that these sort of topics were taboo on this forum.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 12:01 am
I don't think he'll lose any sweat over it.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 3:18 pm
I read that it had been given to H&M as a gift from the late Queen, not loaned. Seems a poor do that it is now being taken away, whatever your opinion of the couple, a gift, once given, shouldn't be taken back.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:24 pm
The " Gift " was their entitlement to use it, on a lease basis .....ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 3:18 pmI read that it had been given to H&M as a gift from the late Queen, not loaned. Seems a poor do that it is now being taken away, whatever your opinion of the couple, a gift, once given, shouldn't be taken back.
In any event, my " well of sympathy " dries up long before we get to those two !!
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:32 pm
Very disturbing who they've (Charles & Co.) now offered they keys to it. Shows they have an "anything goes" attitude!
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:17 pm
His current abode, Frogmore Lodge, reportedly has serious damp issues and needs a new roof, having had little spent on it in the 20 years since the pampered prince, fergie and the kids moved in.
I'd hazard a guess that the state of disrepair isn't a sudden issue - you'd have thought someone might have said there's a drip in the "saloon" and that bucket the underservant placed to catch the water last week is getting full, do you think someone should empty it, get a bigger bucket or even fix the bloody thing. Of course there's a bit of history, remember mum's wedding gift Sunningdale Park. Perhaps things are different in Royal circles.
Notwithstanding, the King realising his brother's misfortune has offered him Harry's old pad which is pretty close by. This can't have been easy for Charlie as I'm sure it won't have gone down too well with the Spare and his missus, what with them having no-other place in the UK to call home. Andy's not keen, evidently.
I can't believe he's expecting the Royal (taxpayers) Grant to cover the Frogmore Lodge repairs and the RN pension probably won't stretch to it. Sadly (and I do mean that) his mum and dad have passed away recently and you'd have thought they might have left him a bob or too, perhaps not, so he's probably in the midst of arranging one of those equity release loans. Trouble is the Royals do have a bit of a habit for hanging on a bit after pension age so that might be an issue or there could be a problem with the credit score, given the reported problems he had not paying the mortgage on time for the Ski Chalet. Just my opinion like, but these things often do come back to bite when you least expect them.
Of course downsizing to Frogmore Cottage does present it's own issues. A man of his reputation surely has an ongoing need for 7 bedrooms, but I guess when he comes to terms with no longer using all those military uniforms, it frees up some wardrobe space.
Anyway I'm pretty sure he'll get what he deserves.
I'd hazard a guess that the state of disrepair isn't a sudden issue - you'd have thought someone might have said there's a drip in the "saloon" and that bucket the underservant placed to catch the water last week is getting full, do you think someone should empty it, get a bigger bucket or even fix the bloody thing. Of course there's a bit of history, remember mum's wedding gift Sunningdale Park. Perhaps things are different in Royal circles.
Notwithstanding, the King realising his brother's misfortune has offered him Harry's old pad which is pretty close by. This can't have been easy for Charlie as I'm sure it won't have gone down too well with the Spare and his missus, what with them having no-other place in the UK to call home. Andy's not keen, evidently.
I can't believe he's expecting the Royal (taxpayers) Grant to cover the Frogmore Lodge repairs and the RN pension probably won't stretch to it. Sadly (and I do mean that) his mum and dad have passed away recently and you'd have thought they might have left him a bob or too, perhaps not, so he's probably in the midst of arranging one of those equity release loans. Trouble is the Royals do have a bit of a habit for hanging on a bit after pension age so that might be an issue or there could be a problem with the credit score, given the reported problems he had not paying the mortgage on time for the Ski Chalet. Just my opinion like, but these things often do come back to bite when you least expect them.
Of course downsizing to Frogmore Cottage does present it's own issues. A man of his reputation surely has an ongoing need for 7 bedrooms, but I guess when he comes to terms with no longer using all those military uniforms, it frees up some wardrobe space.
Anyway I'm pretty sure he'll get what he deserves.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:48 pm
The guy is a complete waste of fresh air. 7 bedrooms? How many teddy bears does this clown have?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:50 pm
It's bigger than Ghislane's pad! Maybe he should remember that.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:45 am
There is no such place as Frogmore Lodge. Andrew has been living in The Royal Lodge. He can’t maintain it. It has fallen into disrepair. His last house, Sunninghill, fell into disrepair and was sold so that someone else could salvage it. He is totally incapable of doing anything. He was alone at Windsor Castle when it was virtually burnt down. If he is being offered Frogmore Cottage, he should be quite grateful.Claret Toni wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:17 pmHis current abode, Frogmore Lodge, reportedly has serious damp issues and needs a new roof, having had little spent on it in the 20 years since the pampered prince, fergie and the kids moved in.
I'd hazard a guess that the state of disrepair isn't a sudden issue - you'd have thought someone might have said there's a drip in the "saloon" and that bucket the underservant placed to catch the water last week is getting full, do you think someone should empty it, get a bigger bucket or even fix the bloody thing. Of course there's a bit of history, remember mum's wedding gift Sunningdale Park. Perhaps things are different in Royal circles.
Notwithstanding, the King realising his brother's misfortune has offered him Harry's old pad which is pretty close by. This can't have been easy for Charlie as I'm sure it won't have gone down too well with the Spare and his missus, what with them having no-other place in the UK to call home. Andy's not keen, evidently.
I can't believe he's expecting the Royal (taxpayers) Grant to cover the Frogmore Lodge repairs and the RN pension probably won't stretch to it. Sadly (and I do mean that) his mum and dad have passed away recently and you'd have thought they might have left him a bob or too, perhaps not, so he's probably in the midst of arranging one of those equity release loans. Trouble is the Royals do have a bit of a habit for hanging on a bit after pension age so that might be an issue or there could be a problem with the credit score, given the reported problems he had not paying the mortgage on time for the Ski Chalet. Just my opinion like, but these things often do come back to bite when you least expect them.
Of course downsizing to Frogmore Cottage does present it's own issues. A man of his reputation surely has an ongoing need for 7 bedrooms, but I guess when he comes to terms with no longer using all those military uniforms, it frees up some wardrobe space.
Anyway I'm pretty sure he'll get what he deserves.
If they can remove him, who will then live there? And who will live in FROGMORE HOUSE? Take a gander. A really nice looking place. Who has been living there all these years? I’m quite surprised that there are so many of these houses that are suddenly appearing on the Windsor Estate. Apparently William and Kate live in Adelaide Cottage, yet another large establishment in the grounds.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:50 am
When the Queen went there should have been a referendum on whether we keep this entitled lot...
Should be given to the homeless is my view...
Should be given to the homeless is my view...
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:12 am
I'm sure that it would be cheaper to get taylor wimpey to build him a new 10-room house on one of their estates. Sure, half the bedrooms would be poky, only one would have any storage space, there would be negligible space between it and the neighbours and it would need to have a block of social housing flats over the back fence, but hey, it would be under 16 years old, so what's not to like?
Slough is quite close to Windsor, isn't it?
Slough is quite close to Windsor, isn't it?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:18 am
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:22 am
So do cigarettes.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:28 am
Probably not so much recently when you factor in things like lost gdp when the country gets extra days off for funerals, coronations etc.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:31 am
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:50 am
"The Grand Old Duke of York,"
"He gave 12 million quid,"
"To someone he had never met,"
"For something he never did!"
"He gave 12 million quid,"
"To someone he had never met,"
"For something he never did!"
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 9:10 am
That's why all the Republican countries are skint I imagine.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:10 am
Only a small dent.
Plus the amount of interest those events generate also help keep the money flowing, so they probably balance each other out.
People cry and whinge about the royal family, yet their daily lives generally aren't interfered with by the existence of said royal family.
We'd probably be worse off without them when you look at the alternatives.
Do we want a president and PM like France?
Or a president like the USA has?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:14 am
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:19 am
It’s a bit dismissive to describe people who don’t agree with having a monarchy in the 21st century as whinging or crying. They don’t affect my life in any way, but I’m still fundamentally opposed to this archaic system.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:10 amOnly a small dent.
Plus the amount of interest those events generate also help keep the money flowing, so they probably balance each other out.
People cry and whinge about the royal family, yet their daily lives generally aren't interfered with by the existence of said royal family.
We'd probably be worse off without them when you look at the alternatives.
Do we want a president and PM like France?
Or a president like the USA has?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:51 am
Do some really believe that if we became a Republic the tourist numbers in London would drop like a stone?
Where would they go instead?
Paris perhaps?
Where would they go instead?
Paris perhaps?
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 11:12 am
Thanks for the corrections DD. I'm clearly not an expert on the Royal properties. I don't believe, however, it takes anything away from the points I was making about how entitled he feels. As an aside I see the porky prince's former residence at Sunninghill was sold to Timur Kulibayev the son in law of the former Kazakh president for a reported £3m over the asking price. No other bids were on the table or had been for the several years the property had been up for sale. Unusual.dermotdermot wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:45 amThere is no such place as Frogmore Lodge. Andrew has been living in The Royal Lodge. He can’t maintain it. It has fallen into disrepair. His last house, Sunninghill, fell into disrepair and was sold so that someone else could salvage it. He is totally incapable of doing anything. He was alone at Windsor Castle when it was virtually burnt down. If he is being offered Frogmore Cottage, he should be quite grateful.
If they can remove him, who will then live there? And who will live in FROGMORE HOUSE? Take a gander. A really nice looking place. Who has been living there all these years? I’m quite surprised that there are so many of these houses that are suddenly appearing on the Windsor Estate. Apparently William and Kate live in Adelaide Cottage, yet another large establishment in the grounds.
I see it's reported today the entitled one is demanding a residence fit for a king, and it's suggested he takes over the running of the royal residencies as a job. The CV would make an interesting read. Perhaps he could commute between them by helicopter. Given the skills he's displayed over the years I'd suggest he's already fully occupied looking after the late Queens corgis. He really doesn't get it does he.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
People come to see the actual royal family, along with the buildings etc
It's the pomp, the guards, the tradition.
Paris doesn't have that.
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
I like Charles' efforts to slim it down, because it does need modernising.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:04 pm
So if they don't visit London where would they go then?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
If they still want a holiday they'd therefore have to visit a NON Royal destination.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:07 pm
Nobody can seriously believe that if Buckingham Palace fully opened up as a museum after the royals were ****** off that people would STOP going.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pmThe tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:10 pm
This infantile nonsense genuinely made me laugh out loud.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pmPeople come to see the actual royal family, along with the buildings etc
It's the pomp, the guards, the tradition.
Paris doesn't have that.
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
I like Charles' efforts to slim it down, because it does need modernising.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:15 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 2:17 pm
Well, Jimmy Savile was of course a big mate of King Charles. 
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:06 pm
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:07 pm
I'm saying there would be a dip, people come here sometimes purely because of the royal family.
You and the others can deny it all you want, it's clearly making you happy to do so, but you'd be wrong.
Re: Frogmore Cottage
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:07 pm