Page 1 of 2

Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:28 pm
by Tricky Trevor
How can they come out in “one rovers against discrimination” T-shirts after only giving us 2k tickets. Surely that is discrimination?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:34 pm
by taio
It was many things but certainly not discriminatory and should have no bearing on wearing such t-shirts

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:38 pm
by Targetman
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:34 pm
It was many things but certainly not discriminatory and should have no bearing on wearing such t-shirts
Maybe you might need to re-think that?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:43 pm
by taio
Targetman wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:38 pm
Maybe you might need to re-think that?
Happy to if you want to elaborate

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:43 pm
by BleedingClaret
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:34 pm
It was many things but certainly not discriminatory and should have no bearing on wearing such t-shirts
It was the epitome of discrimination

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:46 pm
by bobinho
Only in the same way that absolutely EVERYTHING is discriminatory these days.

They hate us so it’s a hate crime. 🤣

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:47 pm
by Targetman
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:43 pm
Happy to if you want to elaborate

To quote Alan Pace......."We are being treated differently to every other club who has visited Ewood Park this season and it doesn't sit well with us"

Isn't that discrimination?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:49 pm
by taio
Targetman wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:47 pm
To quote Alan Pace......."We are being treated differently to every other club who has visited Ewood Park this season and it doesn't sit well with us"

Isn't that discrimination?
Now you put it that way I can better see the viewpoint. But I tend to think of it as prejudice against individuals with protected characteristics, which I guess is what the t-shirts relate to.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:56 pm
by Culmclaret
Well I can think of a time when being a Burnley fan was definitely worthy of a protected characteristic….

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:58 pm
by jos
Targetman wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:47 pm
To quote Alan Pace......."We are being treated differently to every other club who has visited Ewood Park this season and it doesn't sit well with us"

Isn't that discrimination?
But to put a positive spin on it, it did mean that less money went into their coffers by both ticket sales and half time refreshments.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:59 pm
by Exsus
Hmm.. yeah..I had to read that phrase a couple of times.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:59 pm
by Rick_Muller
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:34 pm
It was many things but certainly not discriminatory and should have no bearing on wearing such t-shirts
Many football fans could not get a ticket based upon the colour of their shirt - that is discriminatory.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:09 pm
by agreenwood
Shame Luton have nothing riding on this. They can’t finish anywhere except 3rd.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:09 pm
by 4midable
Even if they get in playoffs they arent winning out

Proper crap side

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:17 pm
by It Is What It Is
A must win game for the horses and the grounds half empty.
Fickle Fairweather fans...well..not fans at all at really.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:20 pm
by ElectroClaret
HT 0-0 mostly the Undead having the majority of the possession but fizzling out in the last third.

Let's hope it stays like that.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:23 pm
by RickyBobby
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 5:34 pm
It was many things but certainly not discriminatory and should have no bearing on wearing such t-shirts
They have given every team that whole end if they have wanted it, but chose to give us only 2,000 because they dislike us.
That is the very definition of discrimination. Treating another differently to everyone else. Discrimination doesn’t just have to be race, gender, or disability.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:27 pm
by taio
RickyBobby wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:23 pm
They have given every team that whole end if they have wanted it, but chose to give us only 2,000 because they dislike us.
That is the very definition of discrimination. Treating another differently to everyone else. Discrimination doesn’t just have to be race, gender, or disability.
It would be commendable if you and others pursued a discrimination claim through the civil court under the Equality Act. I wouldn't fancy your chances of success though.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:34 pm
by Rowls
taio wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:27 pm
It would be commendable if you and others pursued a discrimination claim through the civil court under the Equality Act. I wouldn't fancy your chances of success though.
No but that's because the kinds of discrimination covered by the Equality Act isn't the same as the dictionary definition of the word.

Burnley fans were unfairly (but legally) discriminated against.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:36 pm
by taio
Rowls wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:34 pm
No but that's because the kinds of discrimination covered by the Equality Act isn't the same as the dictionary definition of the word.

Burnley fans were unfairly (but legally) discriminated against.
Yes I subsequently acknowledged the broader point of view.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:36 pm
by Bigvince
Get in

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:37 pm
by summitclaret
Wonderful

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:37 pm
by ElectroClaret
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:38 pm
by simonclaret
Rankin-Costelloe is complaining about a foul, would you believe? Lovely stuff.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:38 pm
by Loyalclaret
Brilliant

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:38 pm
by Rowls
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:38 pm
by Carwin261
Whoooooah 😂😂

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:38 pm
by RVclaret
Get in

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:39 pm
by gawthorpe_view
😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:39 pm
by Pickles
Hahahahahaha

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:40 pm
by Bowclaret
:D We are in dreamland

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:42 pm
by Shaggy
Excellenty. Hope that’s the final score which effectively kills off their play off hopes.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:42 pm
by Tricky Trevor
I’d just said to Mrs T. they are a team of two halves. They were decent first half so they’ll be poor this. 0-1.
I hope I haven’t jinxed it by posting.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:42 pm
by Zom Zom
Hairy Palms Dack to the rescue from the bench?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:47 pm
by Somethingfishy
Are they booing Brereton-Diaz? :D

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:50 pm
by Pickles
Somethingfishy wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:47 pm
Are they booing Brereton-Diaz? :D
Big div probably thinks it's Spanish

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:51 pm
by Somethingfishy
Pickles wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:50 pm
Big div probably thinks it's Spanish
In Blackburn? They barely speak English.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:53 pm
by gawthorpe_view
Shirt sponsor for next season- Totally W@nked.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:53 pm
by Stayingup
Somethingfishy wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:51 pm
In Blackburn? They barely speak English.
I read somewhere they speak a b@stard language called 'Shadish'.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:55 pm
by Bosscat
Oh dear oh dear oh dear just got a ban from the Lancashire Telegraph ... Their Trolls can post incestuous garbage and stuff but I get a ban for laughing at Woeful Woevers ... Hey ho never mind 🤣🤣🤣

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 6:58 pm
by Somethingfishy
Bosscat wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:55 pm
Oh dear oh dear oh dear just got a ban from the Lancashire Telegraph ... Their Trolls can post incestuous garbage and stuff but I get a ban for laughing at Woeful Woevers ... Hey ho never mind 🤣🤣🤣
How are you going to sleep tonight? :lol: :lol:

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:00 pm
by ElectroClaret
Luton hit the bar.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:02 pm
by gawthorpe_view
Bosscat wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:55 pm
Oh dear oh dear oh dear just got a ban from the Lancashire Telegraph ... Their Trolls can post incestuous garbage and stuff but I get a ban for laughing at Woeful Woevers ... Hey ho never mind 🤣🤣🤣
I'd see that as a badge of honour.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:03 pm
by Hibsclaret
Anyone feel a bit sorry for them?

:D

I actually wanted them to fail in the last game. This is a bit premature but at least it’s in front of their few hangers on.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:03 pm
by Robbie_painter
Zom Zom wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 6:42 pm
Hairy Palms Dack to the rescue from the bench?
Hadn’t even noticed he was on the pitch.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:09 pm
by ClaretPope
Anyone fed up of the commentators saying how unlucky they were last Tuesday?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:09 pm
by Somethingfishy
Hibsclaret wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 7:03 pm
Anyone feel a bit sorry for them?

:D

I actually wanted them to fail in the last game. This is a bit premature but at least it’s in front of their few hangers on.
Ermmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........

Nah.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:09 pm
by Tricky Trevor
They are wide open to the counter attack but Luton are sitting to deep.
I can see an equaliser here.

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:10 pm
by ElectroClaret
ClaretPope wrote:
Mon May 01, 2023 7:09 pm
Anyone fed up of the commentators saying how unlucky they were last Tuesday?
Yes.
Pain in the arse, ain't they?

Re: Them v Luton

Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 7:12 pm
by Hibsclaret
They were unlucky that they didn’t have anyone good enough to seriously test our defence tbh.