Man City bench
-
- Posts: 30712
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11055 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Man City bench
Strongest bench in the history of the PL ?
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2023-05-21 8.21.52 AM.png (32.27 KiB) Viewed 3569 times
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Man City bench
And their “second” team is still outplaying and beating Chelsea.
-
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3191 times
Re: Man City bench
The "headless chicken" is having a good game.
Re: Man City bench
An atmosphere that befits a pre-season friendly, not a title winning party. They sound as bored as I am by it.
This user liked this post: Ampth7
-
- Posts: 67896
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Man City bench
I’ve said it before and I genuinely believe that the Premier League is at a tipping point right now with the top of the table slowly becoming uncompetitive.
I do not know what the answer is, but it cannot be heathy for the game when clubs are backed by oil rich nations who are happy and able to spend billions as though it’s pocket change!
I do not know what the answer is, but it cannot be heathy for the game when clubs are backed by oil rich nations who are happy and able to spend billions as though it’s pocket change!
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Man City bench
YupAmpth7 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 6:04 pmI’ve said it before and I genuinely believe that the Premier League is at a tipping point right now with the top of the table slowly becoming uncompetitive.
I do not know what the answer is, but it cannot be heathy for the game when clubs are backed by oil rich nations who are happy and able to spend billions as though it’s pocket change!
& the bottom sort of 5 or 6 isn’t to far removed from the top 5/6 of the champ, which is turning into PL2 a bit
Re: Man City bench
can achieve.
Re: Man City bench
Some absolutely embarrassing comments, can people not accept and appreciate greatness?
This City team is outstanding and should be applauded.
This City team is outstanding and should be applauded.
-
- Posts: 2071
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 819 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: Man City bench
If City don’t win the treble this season then they will have underperformed
Re: Man City bench
I presume nobody had a issue with our domination of the Championship with a budget far, far greater than the rest of the division?
-
- Posts: 2243
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 4036 times
Re: Man City bench
We sold a couple of players to be fair, and had to get a new squad.
Re: Man City bench
I simply do not see the comparison whatsoever! All things considered, we sold way more than we spent, replacing proven premier league players with complete unknowns, many of whom had zero experience of playing in this country!
City on the other hand, buy wingers for £100 million quid who still took a year to adapt to their new surroundings and despite winning the league again, will no doubt spend another £100-200 million quid this summer with zero need to sell for monetary reasons.
I for one, do not believe opposing managers in the Championship when they say, ‘I wish we had the parachute money’. The reason being because as nice as that safety net is, you do generally need to sell players upon relegation along with downgrading others salaries as per their contracts which is hardly motivational. It’s just a lazy excuse for poor managers to use to absolve themselves of responsibility for the outcome if they lose.
Furthermore, teams like Luton have once again proven that it can be done in the Championship much like when we first won promotion to the prem. However, I think we all know what will happen to them next year if they go up. The point being, the gap now is becoming unsustainable and unhealthy for the game in my opinion and appears to be getting worse each season and that’s just for avoiding relegation, let alone winning the league!
Re: Man City bench
Ok equinox I'll bite ...
We had a budget far, far greater than anyone else ?
Well it was funded by £70M player sales which is sound business sense and not a bottomless pit of money from some oil rich state.
But I think you already know this.
Bizarre comment TBH.
We had a budget far, far greater than anyone else ?
Well it was funded by £70M player sales which is sound business sense and not a bottomless pit of money from some oil rich state.
But I think you already know this.
Bizarre comment TBH.
These 2 users liked this post: Ampth7 pureclaret
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Man City bench
TBF I think the atmosphere at the Turf was pretty flat for a title winning party last week. I think it’s different when you’ve a) won it before the game kicked off, and b) known you were going to win it for weeks. Also, in City’s case, they probably are getting a bit bored with it now.
Re: Man City bench
Start by properly penalizing clubs that cheat?Ampth7 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 6:04 pmI’ve said it before and I genuinely believe that the Premier League is at a tipping point right now with the top of the table slowly becoming uncompetitive.
I do not know what the answer is, but it cannot be heathy for the game when clubs are backed by oil rich nations who are happy and able to spend billions as though it’s pocket change!
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
Re: Man City bench
It’s a gross exaggeration of what has always happened. Darwen paying players and pretending they worked in their factories. Rovers buying the Premier League with one man’s money.
The inevitable consequence of wealth, ego and poor governance.
Fair competition and ‘sport’ go out of the window.
A team can find an obscure talent from some lower league bring them on and still have them taken off them by a team that hoovers up young potential in their academies to begin with.
Although I was originally against it, think I’m coming round to the idea of the European super league and letting them off go to a money spinning circus and leaving the rest to get on with it.
The inevitable consequence of wealth, ego and poor governance.
Fair competition and ‘sport’ go out of the window.
A team can find an obscure talent from some lower league bring them on and still have them taken off them by a team that hoovers up young potential in their academies to begin with.
Although I was originally against it, think I’m coming round to the idea of the European super league and letting them off go to a money spinning circus and leaving the rest to get on with it.
-
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: Man City bench
I actually felt they have been pushed to the wire this season. If Arsenal hadn't bottled it, which they did then they would have won the title. If they had maybe just 2 or 3 more players, mainly cover for Saliba, City would not have won the league this season. The turnover at Arsenal the last 2 seasons has been massive so the gap in my opinion is closing.
I may be wrong but aren't a few of the more important City players leaving this summer, coupled which the age of a few including De Bruyne starting to catch up with them. Now I am not saying the older players can't play as well, but they won't be playing as much.
Plus for all that is said of City you only have to look at the amounts Chelsea have spent, even Southampton this last 12 months, Bournemouth, and it isn't about buying immediate success, it's investing and taking time with players to get used to a system and trusting the process a la what Pep has done with Grealish when everyone wrote him off in the first 12 months
I may be wrong but aren't a few of the more important City players leaving this summer, coupled which the age of a few including De Bruyne starting to catch up with them. Now I am not saying the older players can't play as well, but they won't be playing as much.
Plus for all that is said of City you only have to look at the amounts Chelsea have spent, even Southampton this last 12 months, Bournemouth, and it isn't about buying immediate success, it's investing and taking time with players to get used to a system and trusting the process a la what Pep has done with Grealish when everyone wrote him off in the first 12 months
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2625 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Man City bench
City are the best side in the world, have taken their (Pep's) style of football to a precision engineered art form and the whole thing leaves me entirely cold. Can't say I dislike them at all. The players seems nice enough chaps. Their fans are either once long-suffering types or harmless tourists.
I think everyone is ok with them dominating English football to this level simply because it means Liverpool and Man United aren't. Nobody really cares about the Man City 'project' at all. Guardiola was genuinely enthused in a press conference this week, but not about their title, or the impending treble, but about the Sheffield Wednesday v Peterborough League One play-off game he'd watched, and the atmosphere there that night. Maybe even he misses a bit of that magic only a genuine competition in front of old school football fans can bring.
I think everyone is ok with them dominating English football to this level simply because it means Liverpool and Man United aren't. Nobody really cares about the Man City 'project' at all. Guardiola was genuinely enthused in a press conference this week, but not about their title, or the impending treble, but about the Sheffield Wednesday v Peterborough League One play-off game he'd watched, and the atmosphere there that night. Maybe even he misses a bit of that magic only a genuine competition in front of old school football fans can bring.
These 2 users liked this post: Ampth7 timshorts
Re: Man City bench
Possibly the best side ever. The only other team had the same manager.
Re: Man City bench
Wages though, that's where the gap is.
Vincent Kompany is/was being paid an absolute fortune compared to other Championship managers.
Hey, I like it and laugh but let's not kid ourselves that we haven't had a financial advantage this year.
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Man City bench
That's what parachute money is for. We earned by being a PL club, it wasn't some kind of gift.
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 115 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Man City bench
Very true, and doesn’t that emphasise what a sad state of affairs it has become?claret2018 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 6:41 pmIf City don’t win the treble this season then they will have underperformed
Re: Man City bench
Describe to me in detail what you think parachute payments are meant for. Please.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 9:05 pmThat's what parachute money is for. We earned by being a PL club, it wasn't some kind of gift.
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Man City bench
I think it gives clubs a chance of holding on to some of their better players, in effect it behaves like a parachute by softening the fall.
Importantly it is there for the players, though I'm not sure how well that works.
-
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 311 times
Re: Man City bench
I thought parachute payments were originally brought in to enable clubs coming up from the championship, the ability to sign premier league quality players on the standard 3 year deals with some sort of security, should they get relegated the next season.
Re: Man City bench
But we never did, so were we fraudulent?Winstonswhite wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 9:27 pmI thought parachute payments were originally brought in to enable clubs coming up from the championship, the ability to sign premier league quality players on the standard 3 year deals with some sort of security, should they get relegated the next season.
Re: Man City bench
Apparently the Citeh bench was worth £475 million!!
-
- Posts: 30712
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11055 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Man City bench
City have certainly come a long way, I remember when they used to have Eddie Large on their bench
This user liked this post: yTib
Re: Man City bench
I don't buy the argument that they dominate simply because they have the most money. Look at the top transfer fees paid in the PL history and you'll note how many "flops" they've bought - not many! City seem to do their due diligence better than anyone.
Of the top 20 fees paid, City only appear 3 times; Jack Grealish, Kevin De Bruyne and Ruben Dias. Grealish took 12 months to get into the rhythm of things but is now looking like a key player. I don't need to say anything about the other two - they're both key components of the Pep machine.
On the flip side United appear in the top 20 seven times (Pogba, Antony, Maguire, Sancho, Lukaku, Di Maria, Casemiro) and Chelsea six times (Fernandez, Lukaku, Fofana, Havertz, Arrizabalaga, Mudryk). How many of these 13 signings have been genuinely successful? Time will tell on the ones signed this seasons but the likes of Pogba, Lukaku (x2), Sancho, Di Maria, Arrizabalaga have been total flops and proof that money isn't always the answer.
Money alone doesn't make the best team. It never has and it never will. Don't get me wrong it helps, but you can easily spend a lot and end up no better than you were at the start.
Of the top 20 fees paid, City only appear 3 times; Jack Grealish, Kevin De Bruyne and Ruben Dias. Grealish took 12 months to get into the rhythm of things but is now looking like a key player. I don't need to say anything about the other two - they're both key components of the Pep machine.
On the flip side United appear in the top 20 seven times (Pogba, Antony, Maguire, Sancho, Lukaku, Di Maria, Casemiro) and Chelsea six times (Fernandez, Lukaku, Fofana, Havertz, Arrizabalaga, Mudryk). How many of these 13 signings have been genuinely successful? Time will tell on the ones signed this seasons but the likes of Pogba, Lukaku (x2), Sancho, Di Maria, Arrizabalaga have been total flops and proof that money isn't always the answer.
Money alone doesn't make the best team. It never has and it never will. Don't get me wrong it helps, but you can easily spend a lot and end up no better than you were at the start.
Re: Man City bench
They still manage to get through about a quarter of a billion quid a season on new signings. They've already been fined by UEFA for failing to co-operate with an investigation into their finances and they are now facing an investigation by the Premier League which is accusing them of cheating on an industrial scale.
I'm with the poster further up - the Super League can't come soon enough.
I'm with the poster further up - the Super League can't come soon enough.
Re: Man City bench
I think the oil money is only really brought up because they spend big money very well, and are a huge success.
I totally understand the arguments, although I think I've just accepted that it is part of football.
Something that always makes me laugh is that oil money is considered worse than money from investment companies (eg. Chelsea/Liverpool), real estate (man U). Is it because they spend it well? As the others have all spent more with a fraction of the success if any.
People have also said you can't compare it to the championship and parachute payments because we sold players... so did City. They are actually in profit this year.
I totally understand the arguments, although I think I've just accepted that it is part of football.
Something that always makes me laugh is that oil money is considered worse than money from investment companies (eg. Chelsea/Liverpool), real estate (man U). Is it because they spend it well? As the others have all spent more with a fraction of the success if any.
People have also said you can't compare it to the championship and parachute payments because we sold players... so did City. They are actually in profit this year.
These 2 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret RVclaret
Re: Man City bench
Isn't it because "Oil" money is from regimes that treat people no better than members of Islamic State and any people who question those regimes are immediately executed?JTClaret wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 1:12 pmI think the oil money is only really brought up because they spend big money very well, and are a huge success.
I totally understand the arguments, although I think I've just accepted that it is part of football.
Something that always makes me laugh is that oil money is considered worse than money from investment companies (eg. Chelsea/Liverpool), real estate (man U). Is it because they spend it well? As the others have all spent more with a fraction of the success if any.
People have also said you can't compare it to the championship and parachute payments because we sold players... so did City. They are actually in profit this year.
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 512 times
- Has Liked: 1063 times
Re: Man City bench
The only trouble with a Super League is that all monies might go there ( tv) and we might become little old Burnley again.
-
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1104 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Man City bench
Far, far greater? Even than Norwich and Watford, who both came down with EXACTLY the same parachute payments yet didn't even make the play-offs?
Several other clubs were also still getting parachute money too, will be interesting to see how West Brom do without the additional parachute money they have had until now.