Cullen “agrees new deal”
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 7:56 pm
Apparently…
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=71273
Yes, but he still has to agree it and the celebration is that most players appear to want to stay, their wages deserve to be appropriate and this is an event to celebrate. He may leave in the future and based on Mission To Burnley we want players to leave to create that pipeline and funding stream, but it has to be on our terms.roperclaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 16, 2023 10:45 pmCome on. Although it gives us a modicum of protection, this is all about bringing his wages in line with the legacy players who will have had their wages reinstated due to gaining promotion. Same as Benson and Zaroury. Expect Al Dakhil to be next.
Of course. But the players aren’t really committing to much given they are only 1 year extensions to their current contracts. It’s way more about rewarding them with ‘Premier League wages’ than it is about them wanting to stayCrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Wed Aug 16, 2023 11:09 pmYes, but he still has to agree it and the celebration is that most players appear to want to stay, their wages deserve to be appropriate and this is an event to celebrate. He may leave in the future and based on Mission To Burnley we want players to leave to create that pipeline and funding stream, but it has to be on our terms.
New contracts are mainly the result of concrete offers being received from other clubs.Pickles wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 7:39 pmNew contract announcements are a great example of spin and supporters always buy it.
"Four more years!" goes down much better on social media than "We've agreed to pay Player X more money in line with other members of the squad."
Not saying it's a bad thing and of course it's a bit more complex than that, new contracts for Benson and Zaroury probably include release clauses etc.
But if a player has three years left on their contract, how significant is extending it to four?
We should hold out until they offer money instead of concreteNonayforever wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 7:44 pmNew contracts are mainly the result of concrete offers being received from other clubs.
Absolutely it does. But the main reason for these new contracts is a salary increase. And nothing wrong with that by the way.AfloatinClaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 7:53 pmIt extends the period before you're over a barrel with regard to either renegotiating or selling the player by 50%; I'd consider that fairly significant
It's rewarding good performances, for all we know, they could have had low release clauses In them.Pickles wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 7:39 pmNew contract announcements are a great example of spin and supporters always buy it.
"Four more years!" goes down much better on social media than "We've agreed to pay Player X more money in line with other members of the squad."
Not saying it's a bad thing and of course it's a bit more complex than that, new contracts for Benson and Zaroury probably include release clauses etc.
But if a player has three years left on their contract, how significant is extending it to four?