Trafford

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Shaggy » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:49 pm

His positioning wasn’t the best. He always seems to be in the do I don’t I category when playing as the sweeper keeper.

I also think he gets beaten too easily with shots. That first from Son today was criminal. Yes it was a lovely dink but
Has he never rushed to the floor he saves that. I’m certain Muric saves that.

His distribution is miles away from Muric aswell.

I think he is a good prospect but the way we are set up and his lack of experience he shouldn’t be in the first team at the moment. 11 times picking the ball out the net in 3 games kind of tells its own story.

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Sheedyclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:49 pm

His distribution was dreadful today

bfcjg
Posts: 13354
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5087 times
Has Liked: 6901 times

Re: Trafford

Post by bfcjg » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:53 pm

Muric is better, bad buy. When we signed him, there at least 3 keepers we enquired about first.

Down_Rover
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Manchester

Re: Trafford

Post by Down_Rover » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:55 pm

If our back line is going to play so high we need a sweeper keeper.

Muric will fit our style better just like he did at Forest last week

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8529
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 2010 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Tricky Trevor » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:56 pm

I’ve long had a down on young keepers. As far back as DL picking young Paul Robinson over Nigel Martyn, they were relegated, up to Aaron Ramsdale and his first two relegations.
All these youngsters have amazing reflexes and make stunning saves but can they organise the defence in front of them?
This is my concern with Trafford. It was like a ballet last season with Muric behind Beyer, Ekdal, Al Dakhil. They flowed into position leaving Muric with very little to do. Now it’s a different game, the quality of opposition has been scarily good but the drop off of our defenders has been so bad. VK said it would take time and in that respect losing home games to teams we probably would have lost at home to at any point of the season is not a bad thing but the affect on morale is worrying.
I’d be resting Trafford and play Muric for the short term at least.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6652
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2006 times
Has Liked: 3347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:59 pm

AGENT_CLARET wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:43 pm
Over 70% of his kicking (the way we are set up to play) either went out or to a Spurs player
Interesting stat. I hadn't seen it, but my gut feeling at the game was that Trafford didn't pass the ball out very well and when he did he put players in crappy situations. Tbf, I felt Spurs closed really well, but Muric is better in those situations I feel.
Last edited by Dark Cloud on Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Uwe Noble
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 111 times
Has Liked: 286 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Uwe Noble » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:00 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:44 pm
Focus is back on Trafford I see.

People are looking in the wrong direction after today's defeat
Got to have a scapegoat!
This user liked this post: theonlywayisup

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:02 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:47 pm
It's a thread about Trafford. You'll have to explain who you thought we would be discussing ? :lol:
It’s a thread that didn’t need re-opening

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:03 pm

I hope VK hasn’t fallen out with Muric and gets him back in the team sharpish, we looked a much better team against forest. Time for the experienced heads to come back in to steady the ship.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:04 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:02 pm
It’s a thread that didn’t need re-opening
nobody asked you to open it. We are clearly going to discuss another dreadful performance by the side, if you don't want to participate then don't open the thread
This user liked this post: Carlos the Great

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Boss Hogg » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:05 pm

Muric should have started the season. Big mistake starting Trafford. Muric needs to go back in from the next match. More confident, better with his feet, better communication with defence and more experience a higher level.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Trafford

Post by FCBurnley » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:07 pm

Just watching Pope screwing up twice in 20 secs to give Brighton the first goal so it happens to the best. However I thought Trafford was caught out of position for the first goal today giving Son an easy finish and his awful ball out to AD led to another. He just doesn’t look commanding or confident especially with crosses and distribution. He has shipped 11 goals in 3 home games and needs a break otherwise his confidence will be shot. He is young and will be a very good keeper but City seemed happy to take the our money

Murger
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1244 times
Has Liked: 846 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Murger » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:08 pm

Massive mistake throwing a rookie keeper straight in. But there is no way Kompany will drop him though. To do that would be an admittance he’s dropped a bollock.

Pickles
Posts: 3610
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1392 times
Has Liked: 1226 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Pickles » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:09 pm

Muric is miles ahead.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Trafford

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:11 pm

Judge Trafford when he has a defence in front of him
This user liked this post: theonlywayisup

Aclaret
Posts: 4145
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1306 times
Has Liked: 1404 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Aclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:11 pm

Pickles wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:09 pm
Muric is miles ahead.
Most of us would probably agree....but the man In charge doesn't.

Casper2
Posts: 1327
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Casper2 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:13 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:11 pm
Judge Trafford when he has a defence in front of him
Not this season then

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:14 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:26 pm
I agree with this to an extent in terms of feel but it's still early days. So far he's done nothing at all to justify his place over Muric BUT we are giving him no protection at all.
His confidence will probably be shot to pieces after the start he has had so would probably be best for a little spell out of the team for now.

This experimental back line doesn’t seem to be working either.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6652
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2006 times
Has Liked: 3347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm

Tbf, I don't feel anyone is blaming Trafford for us getting pumped today, but if you (as a team!) have shipped 5 goals to add to the 6 in two previous games, then surely a "sensible and measured" discussion regarding the goalie is valid?
Last edited by Dark Cloud on Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: Vegas Claret Darnhill Claret

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:03 pm
I hope VK hasn’t fallen out with Muric and gets him back in the team sharpish, we looked a much better team against forest. Time for the experienced heads to come back in to steady the ship.
Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?
This user liked this post: Burnley1989

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:17 pm

Dark Cloud wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm
Tbf, I don't feel anyone is blaming Trafford for us getting pumped today, but if you've shipped 5 goals to add to the 6 in two previous games, then surely a "sensible and measured" discussion regarding the goalie is valid?
I don't disagree, so let's have one....how many goals today were down to poor goalkeeping?

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Trafford

Post by RVclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:18 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm
Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?
Big difference playing Forest reserves vs this Spurs team I agree there

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:19 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm
Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?
I’d play the team that just won a game, we have played some decent teams but not looked like getting anything in all the matches going off the results. Haven’t watched the game today so can’t comment on that specifically.

Seems to be overwhelming feedback the lad is struggling but the defence aren’t helping him much. Time to change both then.

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Trafford

Post by bumba » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:20 pm

He's already worth less than half of what we paid

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:23 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:16 pm
Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?
Sooooooooooooo many people who went to the Forest game all said Muric's distribution was at a different level. Nobody can have a serious argument that Muric isn't better with his feet

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:24 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:19 pm
I’d play the team that just won a game, we have played some decent teams but not looked like getting anything in all the matches going off the results. Haven’t watched the game today so can’t comment on that specifically.

Seems to be overwhelming feedback the lad is struggling but the defence aren’t helping him much. Time to change both then.
There's a lot of over reaction on here as per normal, I don't think he had a chance with the goals. At 3.1 their goalie pulled a worldie to stop Foster scoring, different game if that goes in, but barely gets a mention from those who cannot wait to jump on here and criticise.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:25 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:23 pm
Sooooooooooooo many people who went to the Forest game all said Muric's distribution was at a different level. Nobody can have a serious argument that Muric isn't better with his feet
Did I say he wasn't?

Murger
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1244 times
Has Liked: 846 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Murger » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:26 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:24 pm
There's a lot of over reaction on here as per normal, I don't think he had a chance with the goals. At 3.1 their goalie pulled a worldie to stop Foster scoring, different game if that goes in, but barely gets a mention from those who cannot wait to jump on here and criticise.
It wouldn’t have been a different game. We were all over the shop all game. Pulling a goal back wouldn’t have stopped the thumping.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:28 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:25 pm
Did I say he wasn't?
well it went over your head

"Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?"

Maybe we looked better BECAUSE we kept the ball better with Muric in goal

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6652
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2006 times
Has Liked: 3347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:28 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:17 pm
I don't disagree, so let's have one....how many goals today were down to poor goalkeeping?
And I totally agree with you. Higher up the thread I said he couldn't (imo) be faulted for any goals today, although I did put a question mark against some of his distribution. I did also think he may have have done better against Villa last week, especially for the first goal when he could have been further up the pitch and cut it out, but I honestly wasn't sure. Defensively we were crape(again) and it's definitely not down to him.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Trafford

Post by dsr » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:30 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:49 pm
I also think he gets beaten too easily with shots. That first from Son today was criminal. Yes it was a lovely dink but
Has he never rushed to the floor he saves that. I’m certain Muric saves that.
You're assuming that Son makes his decision on how to shoot without regard for what the keeper is doing, of course. I would think Son is better than that - I think Son can judge what the goalkeeper is doing and shoot accordingly.

You may be right that Muric can save one-on-ones with Son from less than 10 yards out regardless of what Son does, but I have my doubts.
This user liked this post: sjb

Neil
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Neil » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:28 pm
well it went over your head

"Perhaps we looked better against forest because they weren't as good as spurs? And not because Muric was in goal?"

Maybe we looked better BECAUSE we kept the ball better with Muric in goal
Or it went over your head?
Trafford doesn't panic on the ball, can pass it 30 yards as well as short.
Playing against half a forest team and a full strength spurs are two different things to most people.
Stick them both in the net today and we lose comfortably.

roperclaret
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Trafford

Post by roperclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:17 pm
I don't disagree, so let's have one....how many goals today were down to poor goalkeeping?
At least 2

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm

Dark Cloud wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:28 pm
And I totally agree with you. Higher up the thread I said he couldn't (imo) be faulted for any goals today, although I did put a question mark against some of his distribution. I did also think he may have have done better against Villa last week, especially for the first goal when he could have been further up the pitch and cut it out, but I honestly wasn't sure. Defensively we were crape(again) and it's definitely not down to him.
Funny how people see things differently... for villas goal I thought he was too far up the pitch and had to retreat too far which allows Watkins to take the poor touch. Either way he's not as bad as some are saying

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm

We have a keeper with played one won one no goals conceded.

The other one played 3 conceded 11.

I’d play the first guy next game….

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Trafford

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm

The back 4 don’t trust Trafford at the moment, he will be a great keeper but muric needs to come back in

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Nori1958 » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:33 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm
At least 2
Which ones?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:34 pm

Neil wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:32 pm
Or it went over your head?
Trafford doesn't panic on the ball, can pass it 30 yards as well as short.
Playing against half a forest team and a full strength spurs are two different things to most people.
Stick them both in the net today and we lose comfortably.
nope, went over yours too. It's unarguable Muric is better with his feet. I've not blamed Trafford once for a single goal anywhere

roperclaret
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Trafford

Post by roperclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:34 pm

First one, and Sons left footer that beat him at his near post

GetIntoEm
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Trafford

Post by GetIntoEm » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:40 pm

I think it's a confidence thing. I think if he's dropped now we will have lost him for a long time. He's getting better, slowly

Neil
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Neil » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:45 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:34 pm
nope, went over yours too. It's unarguable Muric is better with his feet. I've not blamed Trafford once for a single goal anywhere
I don't think so. Contrary to popular belief, goalkeepers don't need to be Franz Beckenbauer. As long as they don't panic and can find a pass that's enough at out level. Kompany obviously thinks Trafford is a better goalkeeper (the old fashioned thing where they stop shots and claim crosses)
I don't doubt Muric is better with his feet.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Trafford

Post by dsr » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:46 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:34 pm
First one, and Sons left footer that beat him at his near post
I think we're just going to have to accept that, in the Premier League, there are some forwards who are good enough to score regardless of what the keeper does. If someone like Son is given a one-on one with time to control the ball from less than 12 yards out, he will probably score.

Murger
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1244 times
Has Liked: 846 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Murger » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:48 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:40 pm
I think it's a confidence thing. I think if he's dropped now we will have lost him for a long time. He's getting better, slowly
How is going from conceding 3 to conceding 5 improving?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:48 pm

Neil wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:45 pm
I don't think so. Contrary to popular belief, goalkeepers don't need to be Franz Beckenbauer. As long as they don't panic and can find a pass that's enough at out level. Kompany obviously thinks Trafford is a better goalkeeper (the old fashioned thing where they stop shots and claim crosses)
I don't doubt Muric is better with his feet.
Actually, it's pretty clear the way Kompany wants us to play heavily involves our goalkeeper being better than competent with his feet - he must have said it 30+ times last season which makes it a strange decision to rip up what we did so well last season, Muric was vital, Cullen dropping into the middle of the defence to get on the ball was vital yet we've abandoned both.
This user liked this post: burnleymik

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4072
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Swizzlestick » Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:49 pm

He’s just not as good as Muric. Looks nervy. Think we need to bite the bullet on this one.

Neil
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Neil » Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:00 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:48 pm
Actually, it's pretty clear the way Kompany wants us to play heavily involves our goalkeeper being better than competent with his feet - he must have said it 30+ times last season which makes it a strange decision to rip up what we did so well last season, Muric was vital, Cullen dropping into the middle of the defence to get on the ball was vital yet we've abandoned both.
Very few teams pressed us last season. Most of them didn't have a player within 30 yards of Muric. It's obviously a massive leap in the prem. We can't go toe to toe with the bigger clubs and need to find a way to adapt our approach. I guess that when Kompany weighed it up, he thought that Trafford is good enough with his feet and a better all round keeper than Muric ( though that's still to be proven either way)

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11055 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Trafford

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:04 pm

Neil wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:00 pm
Very few teams pressed us last season. Most of them didn't have a player within 30 yards of Muric. It's obviously a massive leap in the prem. We can't go toe to toe with the bigger clubs and need to find a way to adapt our approach. I guess that when Kompany weighed it up, he thought that Trafford is good enough with his feet and a better all round keeper than Muric ( though that's still to be proven either way)
yep, must be a reason for it but for me it's too much change all at once and has created this huge imbalance. I always expected it to be a very painful start and have said on here a few times it's going to get worse before it gets better. I think we all have to remember we are at least 2 years ahead of schedule too. It might be 2 steps forward one back but as long as VK is in charge I do believe it will be good in the end

burnleymik
Posts: 5135
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1175 times
Has Liked: 2920 times

Re: Trafford

Post by burnleymik » Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:06 pm

Neil wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:00 pm
Very few teams pressed us last season. Most of them didn't have a player within 30 yards of Muric. It's obviously a massive leap in the prem. We can't go toe to toe with the bigger clubs and need to find a way to adapt our approach. I guess that when Kompany weighed it up, he thought that Trafford is good enough with his feet and a better all round keeper than Muric ( though that's still to be proven either way)
There were a good few teams that pressed us high last season and although Muric struggled at the start, the number of times he helped us beat that press later on in the season was incredible, even opposing managers commenting on it.

Problem is it's a bad situation now whichever way you turn. Drop Trafford and it hurts his confidence. Play Muric who will already be demoralised at being dropped and hasn't got any Prem minutes under his belt.

Beating the drum, but Should have let Muric have the opportunity and allowed Trafford to earn the shirt.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret

Blatherwickstattoo
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2021 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 100 times
Has Liked: 89 times

Re: Trafford

Post by Blatherwickstattoo » Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:08 pm

Nick pope 10 million

Trafford (reported) 19 million

A million miles apart. The mind baffles.

roperclaret
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Trafford

Post by roperclaret » Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:10 pm

dsr wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:46 pm
I think we're just going to have to accept that, in the Premier League, there are some forwards who are good enough to score regardless of what the keeper does. If someone like Son is given a one-on one with time to control the ball from less than 12 yards out, he will probably score.
There are also keepers in the Premier league that would have saved both of those today. That’s no excuse

Post Reply