Page 1 of 2
James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:39 pm
by NewClaret
I’ve long wanted Muric in nets but have held off the inane criticism because, like Muric, I knew he’d improve as the season progressed. That will continue.
I think it’s fair to say that James Trafford was outstanding today.
Saves us multiple times, pulled off some worldies and commanded his box much better. Made sensible decisions with his kicking. Areas to improve of course, but much, much better.
Only a few games ago posters were saying we’d lost money on Trafford

They don’t know what they’re talking about because any 21yo English Keeper who can make saves like that at his age is not selling for £14 or even £19m. Another one we’re lucky to have.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:42 pm
by CoolClaret
I love the Kosovan Mad Man. Think he’s pure genius and worth the admission fee alone.
Still don’t think he deserved to get dropped but Traff was very, very good tonight - no question.
Wish we wouldn’t have him playing out as much but that’s on VK.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:44 pm
by Vegas Claret
TOP keeper
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:44 pm
by Burnley1989
I’ve said all year, he’s miles better than Muric in almost all departments, but I respect some of the reasons some folks disagree.
The stick he’s had on here by the usuals has been daft, again today he played a few ropey passes but on the whole he was brilliant
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:48 pm
by RVclaret
He’s clearly more settled now and showing his keeping skills. I think he has the tools to work on his passing and no doubt it’ll improve with age. It’s not like it’s bad, just can be better.. but some keepers s*** themselves when under pressure, he stays calm, has a good touch and tries to play. I think he’s a better keeper than Bazunu at Saints who some compared Traff too earlier on.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:49 pm
by NewClaret
Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:44 pm
I’ve said all year, he’s miles better than Muric in almost all departments, but I respect some of the reasons some folks disagree.
The stick he’s had on here by the usuals has been daft, again today he played a few ropey passes but on the whole he was brilliant
VERY lucky to have him in this form.
Super James Trafford in goal.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:49 pm
by CoolClaret
Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:44 pm
I’ve said all year, he’s miles better than Muric in almost all departments, but I respect some of the reasons some folks disagree.
The stick he’s had on here by the usuals has been daft, again today he played a few ropey passes but on the whole he was brilliant
‘Almost all areas’
- I’ll Give you shot stopping.
Not having it on crosses or with the ball either touch, vision or passing range.
Would be even better if VK stopped asking him to do things he isn’t great at.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:50 pm
by Superjohnnyfrancis
Now down to just 2 goals conceded per game!
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:51 pm
by FCBurnley
Out of position for first goal and nutmegged for the second. Otherwise very good
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:52 pm
by CoolClaret
RVclaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:48 pm
He’s clearly more settled now and showing his keeping skills. I think he has the tools to work on his passing and no doubt it’ll improve with age. It’s not like it’s bad, just can be better.. but some keepers s*** themselves when under pressure, he stays calm, has a good touch and tries to play. I think he’s a better keeper than Bazunu at Saints who some compared Traff too earlier on.
I think he’s better than Bazunu - the comparison was more about chucking someone young straight in from L1 was doing repeating the Southampton/Bazunu mistake.
He’s started to grow and show his quality but it has taken us a long time.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:54 pm
by JBR
FCBurnley wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:51 pm
Out of position for first goal and nutmegged for the second. Otherwise very good
Yeah looked to me to have misread the flight of the ball for the first and jumped over it
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:56 pm
by Burnley1989
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:49 pm
‘Almost all areas’
- I’ll Give you shot stopping.
Not having it on crosses or with the ball either touch, vision or passing range.
Would be even better if VK stopped asking him to do things he isn’t great at.
Let’s see, I’ll bet you he goes on to have a much more successful career, he’s a kid but improving massively every week
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:56 pm
by GetIntoEm
Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:50 pm
Now down to just 2 goals conceded per game!
And that's all Traffords fault? Are you 10 years old?
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:57 pm
by Steve-Harpers-perm
Put it on ratings thread he stops shots like most keepers but his distribution and lack of command of his area is a continual problem. How much did we pay for him?
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:59 pm
by Superjohnnyfrancis
GetIntoEm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:56 pm
And that's all Traffords fault? Are you 10 years old?
Why are the dumb ones so triggered by factual posts?
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:02 pm
by CoolClaret
Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:56 pm
Let’s see, I’ll bet you he goes on to have a much more successful career, he’s a kid but improving massively every week
He may, he may not, we will see.
Put it this way - a club in the pl will be more inclined to want Trafford with the homegrown quarter etc
Can easily see Muric playing for some big clubs in Europe as well.
Still believe we’d have been on a higher points total rn with slowly integrating the new lads but it is what it is.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:06 pm
by Goliath
Of course hes improving, hes been given 6 months to build on his experience at the top level without any worries about losing his place.
The debate really is whether we could afford to put his individual development ahead of the teams results. Id argue that the league table answers that and we are now so far down the Trafford road that we may as well leave him in and hope to reap the rewards from our very generous treatment of him in the first half of the season
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:07 pm
by CoolClaret
Homegrown quota *
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:10 pm
by Superjohnnyfrancis
Goliath wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:06 pm
Of course hes improving, hes been given 6 months to build on his experience at the top level without any worries about losing his place.
The debate really is whether we could afford to put his individual development ahead of the teams results. Id argue that the league table answers that and we are now so far down the Trafford road that we may as well leave him in and hope to reap the rewards from our very generous treatment of him in the first half of the season
He’s had a decent game today but we have sacrificed the season to hope he reaches the level we need him for. Bad management that.
Manager too comfortable feels no pressure from above. That’s on Pace.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:10 pm
by chekhov
Question: is a keeper that’s nutmegged always at fault?
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:10 pm
by fatboy47
In 2 years time, barring injury, he'll be the best British keeper around and established in a top 6 side.
No doubt about it.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:11 pm
by AlargeClaret
Trafford was perfectly good from when he started playing for us, he’s simply been busy recently with a few shots that have been stoppable . His feet are good and today a good but better than arguably one of the worlds best keepers Allison .He’s a child prodigy and starting to get the experience hd needs .
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:14 pm
by CrosspoolClarets
Improving fast and already worth £20m (and we paid mich less than £18m, especially if we go down because there is a likely survival payment in there).
Can see him exceeding Pope’s shot stopping within 12 months, also being in the full England squad, and that is some accolade at his age. Many top keepers are rooted to their line, so that doesn’t affect his value. His distribution is improving though still iffy at times. Can see a top team buying him as a number 2 because he is English. Personally though I think if we drop the worst thing he could do is leave unless we choose to sell. 2 more years with us and he could then be ready for a Champions League move.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:18 pm
by CoolClaret
Goliath wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:06 pm
Of course hes improving, hes been given 6 months to build on his experience at the top level without any worries about losing his place.
The debate really is whether we could afford to put his individual development ahead of the teams results. Id argue that the league table answers that and we are now so far down the Trafford road that we may as well leave him in and hope to reap the rewards from our very generous treatment of him in the first half of the season
Agreed here.
‘Child prodigy’ comment is a little embarrassing - I mean, he’s 21 and has over 100 games of Professional Men’s Footy under his belt.
Dean Henderson had less hype and arguably had a better debut season (so far) in the Premier League at pretty much the same age.
Let’s just calm down a bit on the hyperbole.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:22 pm
by BurnleyFC
Aside from a few dodgy bits of distribution in the first half, he had a very good game tonight.
Well done, Traff.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:29 pm
by spt_claret
He's a very very good shot stopper, he also has shown signs the last 2 games of growing more confident and physical at high balls- not fantastic but he's claimed some which, although expected claims, he was spilling earlier in the season.
I've said from the start he WILL be a top keeper. After a very ropey first 14-15 games he's starting to develop.
I think he probably is a better shot stopper than Muric- hard to compare as we've not seen Muric at this level, but I lean probably 70/30 towards it being yes.
I think he's a very good keeper for the cameras, and looks better on TV than he often actually is, can make saves look very dramatic. Not a criticism, not a positive, just think he can be a bit deceptive at times and look like he's had to do more than he actually did.
I think he's still got a long way to grow at commanding his area, but is improving- it's where Muric improved massively last season, Traffords' still not as good right now but headed in the right direction.
I think he's way way behind as a ball player, but my frustration there is with Kompany sticking to a system needing him to be one, rather than adapting to help Trafford out- he's the most utilised keeper in the league for passing and it's not his strong suit, it exposes him but that's a managerial fault as much as a Trafford weakness.
I still think we'd have a lot more points had Muric played the first 12-15 games.
I don't think Muric will ever play a league game for us again, so I'm backing Trafford.
I do still feel a slight sense of disconnect from the team because of the persistent stubbornness of Kompany's behaviour this season very much selecting against form and pedigree in favour of intangibles known only to him.
I do think Trafford won us a point against West Ham and kept us in the game today.
I hope Trafford keeps developing and doing well, but don't think it's going to be enough to save us unless we adapt & improve elsewhere.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:29 pm
by South West Claret.
NewClaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:39 pm
I’ve long wanted Muric in nets but have held off the inane criticism because, like Muric, I knew he’d improve as the season progressed. That will continue.
I think it’s fair to say that James Trafford was outstanding today.
Saves us multiple times, pulled off some worldies and commanded his box much better. Made sensible decisions with his kicking. Areas to improve of course, but much, much better.
Only a few games ago posters were saying we’d lost money on Trafford

They don’t know what they’re talking about because any 21yo English Keeper who can make saves like that at his age is not selling for £14 or even £19m. Another one we’re lucky to have.
That’s good to here about Trafford’s performances.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:33 pm
by AlargeClaret
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:18 pm
Agreed here.
‘Child prodigy’ comment is a little embarrassing - I mean, he’s 21 and has over 100 games of Professional Men’s Footy under his belt.
Dean Henderson had less hype and arguably had a better debut season (so far) in the Premier League at pretty much the same age.
Let’s just calm down a bit on the hyperbole.
Well at 9 with Blackburn’s GK coach ( Ben Benson) guiding him when at Carlisle he had Newc/Sunderland/ city/utd / Everton all keeping very close tabs on him . He was unable to sign as parents couldn’t move . When I watched him play his last game (Carl vs Man Utd) he was 12 and was going to City and St Bedes where their academy lot get educated . “He’d “turned down quite lucrative moves to other clubs and had been in the Eng junior set up “ underage “ So trust me JT was a child prodigy . Thats no guarantee of anything of course and I personally prefer Muric, though facts are facts .
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:36 pm
by Steve-Harpers-perm
‘Child prodigy’ christ there is some utter guff posted on here at times!!!!!
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:39 pm
by CoolClaret
AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:33 pm
Well at 9 with Blackburn’s GK coach ( Ben Benson) guiding him when at Carlisle he had Newc/Sunderland/ city/utd / Everton all keeping very close tabs on him . He was unable to sign as parents couldn’t move . When I watched him play his last game (Carl vs Man Utd) he was 12 and was going to City and St Bedes where their academy lot get educated . “He’d “turned down quite lucrative moves to other clubs and had been in the Eng junior set up “ underage “ So trust me JT was a child prodigy . Thats no guarantee of anything of course and I personally prefer Muric, though facts are facts .
I took your post as meaning ‘he is (right now) a child prodigy’
That’s interesting to know and I’ll give you that - though I’d have expected that ‘most’ English players playing right now in the PL were being monitored as youngsters.
Interestingly, our now 2nd choice backup did enough as a child to get a move to City from Switzerland as a 16 yr old - could argue he was a child prodigy as well!
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:42 pm
by taio
Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:36 pm
‘Child prodigy’ christ there is some utter guff posted on here at times!!!!!
It's hardly utter guff. He was very highly rated as a youngster which is why he pretty much represented England at every youth level.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:26 pm
by GetIntoEm
Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:59 pm
Why are the dumb ones so triggered by factual posts?
Can spot the ones who know nothing about football a mile off. Clearly no idea
Probably complain that he doesn't hoof it down the pitch every time too
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:31 pm
by warksclaret
An oustanding display tonight for this promising young keeper. What I like about him is the mental strength he has at such a young age. He is definitely getting noticed and talked about, and it would not surprise me if Southgate gets him involved with the England squad in the near future
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:35 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Legs wider than the Mersey tunnel for their 2nd goal.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:39 pm
by Superjohnnyfrancis
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:35 pm
Legs wider than the Mersey tunnel for their 2nd goal.
He’ll be up for the Balon Dor next season mark my words!
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:40 pm
by ChrisG
I've been critical of him this season, but he played well tonight. The save to tip the Salah effort over the bar was superb.
He still has a way to go, with dominating the area, but he will get there.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:51 pm
by Darnhill Claret
No goalkeeper 'sets himself' with his feet together.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:54 pm
by boatshed bill
chekhov wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:10 pm
Question: is a keeper that’s nutmegged always at fault?
No. He's just trying to spread himself.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:06 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Darnhill Claret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:51 pm
No goalkeeper 'sets himself' with his feet together.
No, but not as wide as Trafford tonight either.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:10 pm
by Goliath
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:06 pm
No, but not as wide as Trafford tonight either.
Agreed. Didnt mention it in the player ratings as i didmt think it had much influence in the game in the end but he gave Jota a target which he shouldnt have had from that angle
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:38 pm
by Stalbansclaret
spt_claret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:29 pm
I do think Trafford won us a point against West Ham and kept us in the game today.
We lost to West Ham !
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:40 pm
by spt_claret
Brighton, even. I'm under the weather currently with a nasty head cold, must have got in my brain.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:50 pm
by AlargeClaret
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:39 pm
I took your post as meaning ‘he is (right now) a child prodigy’
That’s interesting to know and I’ll give you that - though I’d have expected that ‘most’ English players playing right now in the PL were being monitored as youngsters.
Interestingly, our now 2nd choice backup did enough as a child to get a move to City from Switzerland as a 16 yr old - could argue he was a child prodigy as well!
Yes cross wires , and likewise I think JT’s box command is quite poor and he’s flap/punch a concern , though it’s being coached into his game I’d imagine . I can only imagine Muric is off which is very disappointing.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:54 pm
by bobinho
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:55 pm
by AlargeClaret
Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:36 pm
‘Child prodigy’ christ there is some utter guff posted on here at times!!!!!
He had similar profile and club trajectory as Pickford who was earmarked about 8. Few grow tall enough , have 2 good feet , outstanding plyometric stats and the dedication though .
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 12:00 am
by CoolClaret
Bit weird this mate -
PFA champ keeper of the year, part of a defence that conceded less than 30 goals in the Championship.
You’re mental if you think he doesn’t command his area? He got really good at it - imperious towards the end of the season! Did it in pre season and the stats back it up as well!
Kosovan Mad Man is just a bit of fun - coined the term because of things like Cruyff turns in the area, megging that Cardiff player in the area in the last game of the season, running 40 yards out and sticking his nut on it when sweeping up - oh and posting a picture of an exotic cat baby in his passenger seat of his lambo

.
So yeah - Kosovan Mad Man

Re: James Trafford
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 12:08 am
by Darnhill Claret
We have 2 excellent keepers, don't know why so many supporters have to insult either of them.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:08 am
by fungus_the_bogeyman
How some people can’t bring themselves to give him credit for that performance is beyond me. He was outstanding and kept us in the game. The save from Salah was world class.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:11 am
by Longsider
Sadly we have a gem but he will probably be at Newcastle next year.
Re: James Trafford
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:54 am
by alwaysaclaret
Longsider wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:11 am
Sadly we have a gem but he will probably be at Newcastle next year.
Hope so