TRAFFORD
Re: TRAFFORD
Isn’t Crouch about 6’7”, on that basis Trafford is not 6’6”. Probably more like 5” 11 or 6ft.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I agree about Muric’s potential and I’m quite surprised the club didn’t try to capitalise on that while developing Trafford in the background.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:10 pmI find it strange to how people seem to only talk about Traffords potential, muric is what 24/25 years old, already has the natural vision and feet that a modern keeper has, muric has the potential to be a quality keeper given the chance.
However the games we have won and drawn we would have regardless of which keeper we had in goal and I can’t think why games that Trafford has directly cost us points, the 10 other players in front haven’t been good enough
Top teams want keepers who are good with the ball at their feet. They’re less bothered about the more traditional aspects of goalkeeping as they expect to be called in to action less often. I honestly think we could’ve made a fortune off Muric had we played him more and I’m disappointed we didn’t to get to find out.
That said, I find the singling out of Trafford quite shocking. He could’ve done better with each goal, yes, but in both cases the absolute lackluster performances defending the corner and then conceding from our own throw in (Amdouni, Ekdal both extremely poor) shows me that Trafford isn’t the problem, but what’s in front of him.
As you point out, I’m not sure we’d have picked up any more points with Muric and arguably less as I’m not sure he would’ve made many of the saves Trafford has to keep us in games.
Anyone shouting Muric to Kompany/our England U21 gk needs to have a word with themselves.
These 2 users liked this post: bfcjg Bosscat
Re: TRAFFORD
I think Trafford has come in with a very strict agreement that he plays. I firmly believe, but have no evidence, that there is a buy back already agreed.NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:58 amI agree about Muric’s potential and I’m quite surprised the club didn’t try to capitalise on that while developing Trafford in the background.
Top teams want keepers who are good with the ball at their feet. They’re less bothered about the more traditional aspects of goalkeeping as they expect to be called in to action less often. I honestly think we could’ve made a fortune off Muric had we played him more and I’m disappointed we didn’t to get to find out.
That said, I find the singling out of Trafford quite shocking. He could’ve done better with each goal, yes, but in both cases the absolute lackluster performances defending the corner and then conceding from our own throw in (Amdouni, Ekdal both extremely poor) shows me that Trafford isn’t the problem, but what’s in front of him.
As you point out, I’m not sure we’d have picked up any more points with Muric and arguably less as I’m not sure he would’ve made many of the saves Trafford has to keep us in games.
Anyone shouting Muric to Kompany/our England U21 gk needs to have a word with themselves.
He is a really good keeper, he’s getting better. He will be Englands no1 post Pickford.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Is that actually a thing for players who have been bought?
I understand it being written into loan agreements and you see players being returned who can’t get into the side - but to be forced to play someone who is ours doesn’t seem right.
Re: TRAFFORD
Fans have every right to shout what they want. They’ve just ****** the league with a keeper that’s been dropped for the whole of this season and there’s been no explanation why. His replacement hasn’t pulled any trees up and made mistake after mistake with no chance of Muric getting back in.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: TRAFFORD
No player has that sort of agreement, other than some loans.
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I can’t understand us not signing Trafford last season and giving him a year in championship instead of getting muric, had Trafford had 12 months with us already he would be a completely different keeper now
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: TRAFFORD
Yes its a Trafford thread but I'm actually surprised that Muric is still with us. Not a murmur in the transfer window about any suitors or agent release to the press to stir up interest.
As has been said, he has the trait of being good with his feet which is often desirable amongst the top teams and you can't imagine he'd be too expensive given he's currently a reserve, albeit the one who won championship GK of the year.
Hopefully its not that hes on some silly contract like Man City do, where other teams arent prepared to match his wages.
As has been said, he has the trait of being good with his feet which is often desirable amongst the top teams and you can't imagine he'd be too expensive given he's currently a reserve, albeit the one who won championship GK of the year.
Hopefully its not that hes on some silly contract like Man City do, where other teams arent prepared to match his wages.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Strange how Muric’s mistakes in the first half of last season have all been forgotten
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
What mistakes? Blackpool at home which Cullen is equally to blame and then Watford at home which is solely on muric but he was hooked at half time for it. Other than that name another mistake muric made that lead to a goal?LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:43 amStrange how Muric’s mistakes in the first half of last season have all been forgotten
You can’t compare the two seasons due to the opposition but muric isn’t been given a chance.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Perhaps they’ve been forgotten because a) there wasn’t that many of them and b) he markedly improved as the season went on, and was a crucial part of the team that romped to promotion.
-
- Posts: 7466
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2258 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: TRAFFORD
We conceded 35 goals in 46 games mate and lost 3 games all seasonLincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:43 amStrange how Muric’s mistakes in the first half of last season have all been forgotten
This season of course a higher standard, we've won just three and conceded 47 in 23 games, all while actually losing our playstyle and identity in the process.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Don’t remember a 15 page thread on Muric last season.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:43 amStrange how Muric’s mistakes in the first half of last season have all been forgotten
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
Re: TRAFFORD
Muric was judged by different standards. If Muric was beaten by a near post header from 4 yards out (deflected), there were no great cries about how incompetent he was and how it's unacceptable to be beaten from that range.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:43 amStrange how Muric’s mistakes in the first half of last season have all been forgotten
This user liked this post: Big Vinny K
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: TRAFFORD
My main concern about Trafford is that if we go down Im not sure we'll be able to keep hold of him and we'll probably have to settle for our money back or only a small profit.
-
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 280 times
Re: TRAFFORD
We could go through the first dozen or so games last season and list the mistakes Muric made but let’s just keep it simple.
Most fans last year were thinking WTF at the start of last season and but for the fact that the teams we were playing were mostly sh-ite we would have been punished like we have been this season.
Muric then got better with his decision making and we also improved as a team and ended up with the best defensive record - Muric was part of that but he also benefited from the fact we just became a better team.
Traffords journey this season has also been similar. He’s got better as we got better - he’s been partly responsible for that improvement.
I don’t think Trafford has conceded many goals at all he should have saved. But I’d rather have Muric because he does distribute the ball quicker and better.
At the end of the day both keepers right now are not good enough for the PL but we’d probably get away with their many shortcomings in the championship
Most fans last year were thinking WTF at the start of last season and but for the fact that the teams we were playing were mostly sh-ite we would have been punished like we have been this season.
Muric then got better with his decision making and we also improved as a team and ended up with the best defensive record - Muric was part of that but he also benefited from the fact we just became a better team.
Traffords journey this season has also been similar. He’s got better as we got better - he’s been partly responsible for that improvement.
I don’t think Trafford has conceded many goals at all he should have saved. But I’d rather have Muric because he does distribute the ball quicker and better.
At the end of the day both keepers right now are not good enough for the PL but we’d probably get away with their many shortcomings in the championship
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I agree - but Trafford is the one who has kept us in games - pretty much every week. He has an ever-changing and poorer defence in front of him, yet he receives all the abuse on this board (but not from the wider audience). You can choose most of our players in the side to have a go at, singling out the keeper is massively wrong.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 12:28 pmWe conceded 35 goals in 46 games mate and lost 3 games all season
This season of course a higher standard, we've won just three and conceded 47 in 23 games, all while actually losing our playstyle and identity in the process.
He is not responsible for the change in playing style - he does what he’s told.
Re: TRAFFORD
If there is a buy back that is even worse. We watch him make all the rookie errors, and when he gets good, City buy him back anyway
Anyone who thought Trafford had a "good" game on Saturday knows nothing about goalkeeping. He saved 3-4 routine shots, and the tip over the bar was a very good save I'll give him that. And I get he is a young lad, and I would never boo him or slag him at the games as that is unfair.
BUT
Once again:
Indecision on when to come out of his area in general
Poor communication at corners, why didn't he organise the defence to get Fulham's number 4 away from him. That is HIS job
Indecision on the deflected cross which led to the 1st goal
General flapping at corners in the second half once again
Poor distribution
He just doesn't fill me with any confidence, and although he has had some good games, I feel as though he is a flashy GK which makes easy saves look good and prone to the odd error.
If I was Muric right now I'd be absolutely fuming
These 2 users liked this post: Westleigh k90bfc
Re: TRAFFORD
When you say that he should have come for the deflected cross and ignored Muniz who looked likely to head it towards goal, it makes it hard to take the rest of it seriously. It is nonsense to say a keeper should ignore the man who is trying to shoot because saving the corner is more important. you can't simply rely on the centre half (O'Shea) stopping Muniz from shooting.Ric_C wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:38 pmIf there is a buy back that is even worse. We watch him make all the rookie errors, and when he gets good, City buy him back anyway
Anyone who thought Trafford had a "good" game on Saturday knows nothing about goalkeeping. He saved 3-4 routine shots, and the tip over the bar was a very good save I'll give him that. And I get he is a young lad, and I would never boo him or slag him at the games as that is unfair.
BUT
Once again:
Indecision on when to come out of his area in general
Poor communication at corners, why didn't he organise the defence to get Fulham's number 4 away from him. That is HIS job
Indecision on the deflected cross which led to the 1st goal
General flapping at corners in the second half once again
Poor distribution
He just doesn't fill me with any confidence, and although he has had some good games, I feel as though he is a flashy GK which makes easy saves look good and prone to the odd error.
If I was Muric right now I'd be absolutely fuming
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
A show pony springs to mind, how many times has he turned a simple standard dive into something spectacular, just for the cameras.Ric_C wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:38 pmIf there is a buy back that is even worse. We watch him make all the rookie errors, and when he gets good, City buy him back anyway
Anyone who thought Trafford had a "good" game on Saturday knows nothing about goalkeeping. He saved 3-4 routine shots, and the tip over the bar was a very good save I'll give him that. And I get he is a young lad, and I would never boo him or slag him at the games as that is unfair.
BUT
Once again:
Indecision on when to come out of his area in general
Poor communication at corners, why didn't he organise the defence to get Fulham's number 4 away from him. That is HIS job
Indecision on the deflected cross which led to the 1st goal
General flapping at corners in the second half once again
Poor distribution
He just doesn't fill me with any confidence, and although he has had some good games, I feel as though he is a flashy GK which makes easy saves look good and prone to the odd error.
If I was Muric right now I'd be absolutely fuming
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: TRAFFORD
alwaysaclaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:46 pmA show pony springs to mind, how many times has he turned a simple standard dive into something spectacular, just for the cameras.
I don't think it's that. He is very agile, but Gordon Banks made saves look easy, that's real class
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
No, all for the camera in my opinion, and Trafford will never be anywhere remotely near banks class, light year's off..boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:49 pmI don't think it's that. He is very agile, but Gordon Banks made saves look easy, that's real class
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: TRAFFORD
Its a cultured cast but such subtlety isnt needed to get a rise from your target demographic here, DA.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:12 pmMy main concern about Trafford is that if we go down Im not sure we'll be able to keep hold of him and we'll probably have to settle for our money back or only a small profit.
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: TRAFFORD
There can't be an adult anywhere that really thinks when Trafford is facing a shot he is thinking how can I make this look good for the camera.
I get there is some real dross posted about him but that's laughably daft.
I get there is some real dross posted about him but that's laughably daft.
These 3 users liked this post: longsidepies Bosscat Anonymous
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
If we do sell him for a small profit in the summer it would be a great deal whilst still having muricDevils_Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:12 pmMy main concern about Trafford is that if we go down Im not sure we'll be able to keep hold of him and we'll probably have to settle for our money back or only a small profit.
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
That's your opinionclaretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:58 pmThere can't be an adult anywhere that really thinks when Trafford is facing a shot he is thinking how can I make this look good for the camera.
I get there is some real dross posted about him but that's laughably daft.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
Re: TRAFFORD
whilst I appreciate your jest I would have been happy to see him leave last month for half of what we paid for him if it got him out the side stinking out the place.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:12 pmMy main concern about Trafford is that if we go down Im not sure we'll be able to keep hold of him and we'll probably have to settle for our money back or only a small profit.
Re: TRAFFORD
I think it'd take some real convincing on VK's part to convince Muric to stay and be number 1 next season even if Trafford leaves. He'd be thinking that if we got promoted again he'd not be given a chance. His mind will already be made up to leave123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:59 pmIf we do sell him for a small profit in the summer it would be a great deal whilst still having muric
Re: TRAFFORD
Who knows?
Maybe there were enquiries, maybe we quoted to high, maybe we refused so we didn't have the problem of finding another GK in January, maybe Muric wants to stay til the summer because it opens up more options.
None of us will ever know will we.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: TRAFFORD
That is not HIS job
That role has been allocated to Vitinho- even though he is combative, he is not going to shift a hulking striker. In the end he just got in Traffords way.
Roberts was far better, he was the guard for Muric in the early part of last season until Muric got better at crosses.
Every team knows we mark zonally and mark badly - so we’re just going to continue to be weak at corners until the set piece coach gets replaced
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: TRAFFORD
And we give very cheap corners away.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:38 pmThat is not HIS job
That role has been allocated to Vitinho- even though he is combative, he is not going to shift a hulking striker. In the end he just got in Traffords way.
Roberts was far better, he was the guard for Muric in the early part of last season until Muric got better at crosses.
Every team knows we mark zonally and mark badly - so we’re just going to continue to be weak at corners until the set piece coach gets replaced
Re: TRAFFORD
Muric has not played one league game this season so how do you work that one out?Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:21 pm
At the end of the day both keepers right now are not good enough for the PL but we’d probably get away with their many shortcomings in the championship
Re: TRAFFORD
Settled in area getting paid to sit on his backside.
Why kick up a fuss when his understudy is taking all the flack from poor performances making him look even better on the bench. Clever move I would say. Can walk off into the sunset anytime or if Kompany sees sense back in the team as the no.1.
Re: TRAFFORD
I'd love him back in but I can't see it happening, he will want to leave to keep his international place.JBR wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:46 pmSettled in area getting paid to sit on his backside.
Why kick up a fuss when his understudy is taking all the flack from poor performances making him look even better on the bench. Clever move I would say. Can walk off into the sunset anytime or if Kompany sees sense back in the team as the no.1.
Re: TRAFFORD
His job is to punch, catch the ball, save shots from corners. He is not very good at that. First thing opposition do is look for weaknesses that is our glaring one.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:38 pmThat is not HIS job
That role has been allocated to Vitinho- even though he is combative, he is not going to shift a hulking striker. In the end he just got in Traffords way.
Roberts was far better, he was the guard for Muric in the early part of last season until Muric got better at crosses.
Every team knows we mark zonally and mark badly - so we’re just going to continue to be weak at corners until the set piece coach gets replaced
Most times he cannot get to the ball as he doesn’t have the strength to do it.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 246 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Stinking the place out eh?StayingDown4Ever wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:08 pmwhilst I appreciate your jest I would have been happy to see him leave last month for half of what we paid for him if it got him out the side stinking out the place.
A bit like you stink this place out.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: TRAFFORD
But then you look at the second half and the string of punches, catches and shot stopping that kept us in the game and realise that the glaring weakness is not that glaring after all
Re: TRAFFORD
Letting in two goals a game IS a glaring weakness very much so.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 3:01 pmBut then you look at the second half and the string of punches, catches and shot stopping that kept us in the game and realise that the glaring weakness is not that glaring after all
Re: TRAFFORD
Many comments on here on how Trafford will improve after next year in the Championship. He will get bullied on set pieces even more. Way more physical. Like a little kid (palming) flapping in the wind. Can’t see him ever been good in the air.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: TRAFFORD
Apart from this window or in the summer, apparently. VK clearly saw the position as needing an upgrade early in the summer (hence why we went for Verbruggen) so you'd say Muric certainly has had the time to decide if he wants to move to get some first team games, or suitors deciding they wanted an upgrade to put in an offer.
Assuming anyone wanted him, of course.
Re: TRAFFORD
Just to broaden this discussion out a bit. There have been lots of keepers making mistakes this season, in part due to the new style of play they are required to have. Ramsdale and Raya were getting criticised earlier this season. At the weekend Pickford was being heavily criticised for his kicking on the radio and Allison, well, he didn't do well either. Vicario was getting a lot of stick (again what I heard on the radio) for being pinned at corners and weak.
There's also the saga of Onana. Point being that though we might think that these criticisms of Trafford are unique it seems that they aren't. Plenty of other clubs have similar issues.
There's also the saga of Onana. Point being that though we might think that these criticisms of Trafford are unique it seems that they aren't. Plenty of other clubs have similar issues.
Re: TRAFFORD
I think they’re both good keepers, the problem to me is the crap that’s been in front of them, or should I say in front of Trafford as Muric only plays cup games. If Trafford had Tarky and Mee in front of him we’d be raving about him. Compare
Al Dakhill - Ekdal - Beyer- O’Shea to the likes of Davies, McGreal, Sinclair, Cahill, Caldwell, Tarky, and Mee, to name only a few, the current defenders we have are simply not good enough.
Al Dakhill - Ekdal - Beyer- O’Shea to the likes of Davies, McGreal, Sinclair, Cahill, Caldwell, Tarky, and Mee, to name only a few, the current defenders we have are simply not good enough.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2023 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 27 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Trafford is short in basic athleticism, he has no spring and no bounce.
The opposition all have him sussed on corners, he's bullied every game and it'll be the same again next season
I have no idea how his career will work out but do know he'll be the first player dropped when the next manager takes over.
The opposition all have him sussed on corners, he's bullied every game and it'll be the same again next season
I have no idea how his career will work out but do know he'll be the first player dropped when the next manager takes over.
These 2 users liked this post: JBR k90bfc
-
- Posts: 18102
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: TRAFFORD
That's because Darthlaw wasn't on a mission to defend every mistake Muric made.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 12:59 pmDon’t remember a 15 page thread on Muric last season.
Re: TRAFFORD
That’s why I don’t have any evidence. I think City sold him to us, free up some transfer cap space, and agreed that they’ll have him back when Ederson indicates he wants to move to Real Madrid.
Agreements don’t always have to be on paper
-
- Posts: 18102
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: TRAFFORD
https://twitter.com/historyinmemes/stat ... _yiPA&s=19
Darthlaw comforts Trafford after getting lobbed from the half way line again.
Darthlaw comforts Trafford after getting lobbed from the half way line again.
This user liked this post: beddie
Re: TRAFFORD
Going off the very sickly hugging with Pep there might be something in this. Dodging the finances most likely as usual.
This user liked this post: Cooclaret
Re: TRAFFORD
I'd rather go with evidence and history