Did ok against Tottenhamboatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:58 pmI don't think any PL team would allow Muric to take up the out-of -box positions he was afforded in the Championship.
TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Would rather the best keeper at the club is sold so he doesn’t have to read posts about him. How very strange.spt_claret wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 12:42 pmHe was awful for the first half of the season and by his own admission not giving it 100%. Fully deserved criticism. Even now he's a divisive player for me, something about his brand of shithousery tips over into the wrong sort for me- the phantom handball attempt, his tendency at times to feign injury I distinctly remember one corner where he fell down holding his head at nothing. He's a trier when he's not distracted by the Welsh team, but he's not a Barnes type loveable dickhead to me.
Well that's a new stance. Wanting a player gone so the posts on here are more to your liking. Most of your posts seem to be more about ridiculing/silencing other posters than about a positive footballing contribution, even this is framed as "let's shut up the people I dont like" rather than an actual footballing justification. Plenty posted on here bothers me. You don't have to post, you don't get to shut others up because you don't like their posts, and your priorities seem here to be more about one upping other posters than anything else. To complain about the content on this board when that's your focus is ironic to say the least.
Says people have an agenda against Trafford what about his agenda against Muric
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
While awful might be pushing it he was some way off it.spt_claret wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 12:42 pmHe was awful for the first half of the season and by his own admission not giving it 100%. Fully deserved criticism
My post was in response to the one above saying he was awesome at right back last season.
This user liked this post: spt_claret
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Why would it get back to normal? It'd become even more baffling if after a full season of dire performances and mistakes we sold the better keeper and kept Trafford for the championship
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
.. Such an agenda that I said I'd have no problem with Muric in goal only about 10 posts ago..Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:12 pmWould rather the best keeper at the club is sold so he doesn’t have to read posts about him. How very strange.
Says people have an agenda against Trafford what about his agenda against Muric
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Imagine saying thisNori1958 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:27 pmI didn't say I wanted him in goal, another day and still you're making stuff up. If he's the one left here he plays, that would be the managers decision, not mine. I'd have no problem with Muric in goal on a footballing basis, but this board would be insufferable
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Just play them both at the same time and be done with it
This user liked this post: quoonbeatz
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 12:58 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 12 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Sell them both and get a decent one.The Shire Claret wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:53 pmJust play them both at the same time and be done with it
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
It's no wonder nobody takes you seriously when you come out with this kind of rubbishSuperjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:21 pmNori is on an appearance bonus for Trafford I bet
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 587 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
There are many things to criticise Trafford for this season.
The inability or unwillingness of whichever 10 outfield players we had on Sunday to find (or in some cases even look for) space is not one of them.
The inability or unwillingness of whichever 10 outfield players we had on Sunday to find (or in some cases even look for) space is not one of them.
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
I see the wannabe bullies are ganging up again, enjoy your evening boys
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
-
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
This board has become downright unpleasant the last few weeks. A small core of 4 or 5 posters are running riot.
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
The whole team performance was ok against Tottenham. No coincidence that, Because Muric makes fast decisions at the back to set up our entire play. It is utterly insane the manager does not see this. It is on VK
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Only the last few weeks? You’re right tho seems to be the same few culprits.
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
I said at the time hes got his cup team arse backwards.
If he played his cup team in the league im sure we would have more points by now.
Super annoying.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Agreed 100%PremierLeagueClass wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:00 pmThis board has become downright unpleasant the last few weeks. A small core of 4 or 5 posters are running riot.
The 4 or 5 wouldn't have lasted two minutes on Claretsmad.
Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)
Claretsmad is still operational, go on there if you don't like constructive debates
This user liked this post: k90bfc