Page 1 of 15

TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:35 pm
by StayingDown4Ever
I’m sorry but those who continue to defend his selection are as pathetic as Vincent is for persisting with him.

The guy is a joke and not up to this level.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:37 pm
by whiffa
I cannot fathom how Muric isn't even getting a chance. Baffled

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:37 pm
by Swizzlestick
Utterly shocking goalkeeping. Should have been out of the team months ago.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:38 pm
by Mark the Claret
The goals he's cost us must be into double figures

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:38 pm
by Aclaret
Good shot stopper....but sadly that's about it.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:40 pm
by roperclaret
James Flapper

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:41 pm
by MT03ALG
At this stage of his career Trafford should NOT be playing in the Premier League. He would be better off out on loan in League 1 or League 2. Giving away so many weak goals will NOT do his confidence any good for the future.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:41 pm
by Westleigh
StayingDown4Ever wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:35 pm
I’m sorry but those who continue to defend his selection are as pathetic as Vincent is for persisting with him.

The guy is a joke and not up to this level.
You can predict this game ,Trafford cocks up again then makes 20 saves to keep us in the game ,and all his fans say what a game he’s had ,rinse and repeat .

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:44 pm
by Sheedyclaret
Said it all season he’s so weak flaps at everything

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:46 pm
by PremierLeagueClass
He looks like he will be a top keeper in time. Thrown in at the deep end this season. However, I don’t think bringing Muric in is a wise move for various reasons.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:48 pm
by Billyblah
Trafford (again)....and yet he's keeping us in it!!

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:52 pm
by IanMcL
No he isn't. All the saves bar 1 are routine. Legs save was OK but all keepers in prem get those.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:53 pm
by Leyland Claret
Sorry young or not that is appalling goalkeeping for Liverpools goal. The basics aren’t there with this lad and I don’t think he will ever make a Premier League keeper. VK you have to drop this stubbornness with him and let Muric have another go. He surely can’t be any worse than JT??

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
by Vincent'sCap
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:55 pm
by BigChaCha
.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:55 pm
by LincsWoldsClaret
Traffords fault - first one this season that is solely down to him

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:58 pm
by Bordeauxclaret
It’s an awful mistake.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:58 pm
by CoolClaret
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
What have you seen to suggest that?

Jack Butland broke onto the scene with far better performances and didn't go on to those heights.

I really don't see it myself, he'll have a decent career of course but 'the very top' ?! no chance.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:58 pm
by Vincent'sCap
BigChaCha wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:55 pm
.
Did you realise what you had written was utter rubbish so you deleted it so a not look a dick? :lol:

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:00 pm
by basil6345789
Can we get some Blacklaw videos to show him?

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:00 pm
by Casper2
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
speak for yourself .

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:01 pm
by StayingDown4Ever
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:58 pm
Did you realise what you had written was utter rubbish so you deleted it so a not look a dick? :lol:
You just called Trafford fantastic and you are calling the guy out for posting rubbish?

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:01 pm
by boatshed bill
basil6345789 wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:00 pm
Can we get some Blacklaw videos to show him?

The nature of crossing has changed quite a lot since the 60's.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:02 pm
by Kilson810
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
Yeah I reckon Real Madrid will be lining up a £50m bid in the summer, hopefully we hold out for £60m though.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:09 pm
by wilks_bfc
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
I don’t doubt that Trafford will one day be a good keeper in the Premier League and maybe even be Englands number 1, but you don’t chuck a 20yr old keeper with only league 1 experience straight into this league, and certainly not with an inexperienced defence inform of him

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:11 pm
by Westleigh
And again

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:13 pm
by whiffa
Trafford at fault for the second too, put Delcroix under pressure faffing about and concedes possession.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:14 pm
by Leyland Claret
Trafford get out of my club but you are absolute gash

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:15 pm
by Westleigh
Several players at fault but Trafford didn’t clear his lines again

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:15 pm
by gandhisflipflop
I’m sorry but this guy is bloody awful he has cost us both goals today.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:15 pm
by cav
This goalkeeper is pathetic. Good performance undone by Trafford. Hopefully he has a relegation clause in his contract because I can’t put up with another season of watching this clown

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:16 pm
by BurnleyFC
This expensive goalkeeping experiment could well cost Vinny his job and chance for redemption next season.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:21 pm
by Aclaret
BurnleyFC wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:16 pm
This expensive goalkeeping experiment could well cost Vinny his job and chance for redemption next season.
Vinny is doing it all by himself by picking the lad, no matter how he plays !

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:21 pm
by alwaysaclaret
boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:01 pm
The nature of crossing has changed quite a lot since the 60's.
Still the same basics though, which this gut just doesn't possess

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:22 pm
by alwaysaclaret
BurnleyFC wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:16 pm
This expensive goalkeeping experiment could well cost Vinny his job and chance for redemption next season.
Not beyond the realms of possibility

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:23 pm
by claretburns
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
So you clearly support Trafford, so what exciting Premier League coaching/management role do you work in?

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:24 pm
by Billyblah
Trafford gifts a goal.. But Oderbert misses a golden opportunity. I'm not sure which is the more frustrating.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:26 pm
by boatshed bill
alwaysaclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:21 pm
Still the same basics though, which this gut just doesn't possess
I'm not so sure about that, TBH.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:27 pm
by Westleigh
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
Well I won’t be going to a mundane minimum wage job on Monday oh superior one ,JT should be going to the dole office.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:29 pm
by Billyblah
Good save from Jota👍

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:31 pm
by StayingDown4Ever
Billyblah wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:29 pm
Good save from Jota👍
Routine save.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:42 pm
by alwaysaclaret
boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:26 pm
I'm not so sure about that, TBH.
Well I certainly am, it's Sunday league basics

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:43 pm
by boatshed bill
alwaysaclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:42 pm
Well I certainly am, it's Sunday league basics
Was that your level? Sorry, but you set that one up for me ;) ;)

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:46 pm
by spt_claret
Given up on the Trafford debate and not gonna dignify quoting the guy he's the only person on my ignore list but what an absolutely disgusting comment to make. Taking a dig at fellow fans and at working class people by implying any critics are on minimum wage 9-5 jobs and that there's something wrong with doing that kind of job. I worked such a job for a time when younger, I suspect he did, what an appallingly classist, elitist comment to make.
If you don't make a lot of money you're not worth an opinion I guess.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:49 pm
by Murger
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
****.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:50 pm
by Westleigh
spt_claret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:46 pm
Given up on the Trafford debate and not gonna dignify quoting the guy he's the only person on my ignore list but what an absolutely disgusting comment to make. Taking a dig at fellow fans and at working class people by implying any critics are on minimum wage 9-5 jobs and that there's something wrong with doing that kind of job. I worked such a job for a time when younger, I suspect he did, what an appallingly classist, elitist comment to make.
If you don't make a lot of money you're not worth an opinion I guess.
Couldn’t agree more ,what a complete moron coming out with a comment like that,

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:53 pm
by Swizzlestick
And there’s another game gone. Yes, there’s other issues but it’s basic errors that have again cost us. Totally derailed our season. Not the lad’s fault but cannot believe this has been allowed to go on for so long.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:56 pm
by up_the_clarets_1989
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
Absolute 🔔 end

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:59 pm
by BurnleyFC
Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:54 pm
Fantastic keeper who will go to the very top of the game,unlike his detractors on here who will be getting up at 7 am on a Monday to go to their mundane minimum wage jobs.
I’ll be up at 03:10 on Monday morning, I’ll have you know.

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:04 pm
by alwaysaclaret
boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:43 pm
Was that your level? Sorry, but you set that one up for me ;) ;)
🤣 You wish, a bit above that, but doesn't change the statement.