Trafford Contract

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Penwortham_Claret
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:23 am
Been Liked: 123 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Trafford Contract

Post by Penwortham_Claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am

Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by taio » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:16 am

No.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Jakubs Tash » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:34 am

I think these ‘it’s written in their contracts they have to play’ theories are silly - especially for permanent players. Players might be loaned to us with their parent clubs encouraging us to use them as much as possible but I cant see how it could be written in contracts of permanent players. In fact, it’s a bit ridiculous in my opinion.
These 2 users liked this post: nettiepicot92 Dark Cloud

Penwortham_Claret
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:23 am
Been Liked: 123 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Penwortham_Claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:37 am

Yet here we are!

A young player, full of potential, being suited by a PL club, raised concerns about a lack of playing time being detrimental to his development and international career aspiration, only agrees to sign with such a clause and it is agreed.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7410
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2319 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:41 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
No
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

steve1264b
Posts: 617
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:31 pm
Been Liked: 160 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by steve1264b » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:50 am

The contrast between Brighton and how they have nursed Verbruggen, i think 10 appearances to how we have used Trafford is stark.

In what other position other than goalkeeper would a 20 year old from league one be played in every game?

Yesterday was a mental mistake, he needs a rest. Were looking to sell Muric in the summer. Its time to put him in the shop window.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Carlos the Great
Posts: 581
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 150 times
Has Liked: 375 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Carlos the Great » Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:53 am

steve1264b wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:50 am
The contrast between Brighton and how they have nursed Verbruggen, i think 10 appearances to how we have used Trafford is stark.

In what other position other than goalkeeper would a 20 year old from league one be played in every game?

Yesterday was a mental mistake, he needs a rest. Were looking to sell Muric in the summer. Its time to put him in the shop window.


I am going to be seriously disillusioned with VK if he allows Muric to be sold …
This user liked this post: k90bfc

LincsWoldsClaret
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
Been Liked: 41 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by LincsWoldsClaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:02 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
No
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

StayingDown4Ever
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 161 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by StayingDown4Ever » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:21 am

Someone mentioned this weeks ago and I don’t believe it to be true myself.

Surely we’re not that stupid to put anything like that in a contract. It would be understandable if he was on loan but nobody in the right mind would put it in a permanent one. Imagine being stuck with this chump in goals for the next five years with no choice but to play him 🤢

Holtyclaret
Posts: 1131
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
Been Liked: 345 times
Has Liked: 1571 times
Location: Wantage

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Holtyclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:21 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
No, managers chosen his number one and is sticking with him. Rightly or wrongly.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Poulton-le-Claret
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 95 times
Has Liked: 197 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Poulton-le-Claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:26 am

No, I just think VK is stubborn and feeling like he has to play his big money signing.

NewClaret
Posts: 13511
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3833 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by NewClaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:30 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
No
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

StayingDown4Ever
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 161 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by StayingDown4Ever » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:37 am

Poulton-le-Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:26 am
No, I just think VK is stubborn and feeling like he has to play his big money signing.
And it’s getting more and more humiliating for him as every game passes.
These 3 users liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret IanMcL k90bfc

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Shaggy » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:40 am

I can believe that he was signed as a star player and was promised to be our no1.

That shouldn’t mean that he is undroppable though. Especially after never showing that he is remotely up to the required standard.
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL k90bfc

jlup1980
Posts: 2178
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by jlup1980 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:53 am

Carlos the Great wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:53 am
I am going to be seriously disillusioned with VK if he allows Muric to be sold …
If he hasn't already, Muric will be requesting a move in the summer. As will Roberts, Zaroury and Benson. The way that all of last season's players have been treated is beyond ridiculous. Our starting 11 in August will be another total rebuild, the third in three years, which is simply not sustainable. Mismanagement is one way to describe what is going on, gross negligence is another.
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL k90bfc

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:00 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
You where the guy that said tella was having a medical, think it’s time you looked at your sources

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4073
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Swizzlestick » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:01 am

Penwortham_Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:15 am
Are people starting to believe the information that I heard at the start of the season yet?

When fit, contractually, Trafford has to start!

There’s nothing else that can explain why Kompany won’t drop him.
I think you’ve had one too many in The Fleece…

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 443 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by alwaysaclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:01 am

Carlos the Great wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:53 am
I am going to be seriously disillusioned with VK if he allows Muric to be sold …
Are you not disillusioned already ?

StayingDown4Ever
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 161 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by StayingDown4Ever » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:01 am

Does anyone actually know what The Project is and how long it’s supposed to take?

We’re going to be two years into it come the summer and be exactly where Vincent started - heading to the Championship and a huge rebuild needing to be done.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Bob Lorder
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 5:25 pm
Been Liked: 16 times
Has Liked: 175 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Bob Lorder » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am

I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !

Holtyclaret
Posts: 1131
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
Been Liked: 345 times
Has Liked: 1571 times
Location: Wantage

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Holtyclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:26 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
😂😂😂😂😂😂
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

claret2018
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 819 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by claret2018 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:29 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
Of all the made up ******** I’ve ever read on here this might be the most ridiculous.

If it was true he’d have dropped him a while ago to protect his investment falling any further
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

burnleymik
Posts: 5137
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1176 times
Has Liked: 2921 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by burnleymik » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:29 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
Sure it will cost him an awful lot more if he destroys his own career and is out of work as a consequence. Not to mention, who would want his scouting system after this?
Last edited by burnleymik on Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

ksrclaret
Posts: 6919
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2567 times
Has Liked: 769 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:30 am

I used to laugh off the OP but if Trafford is announced in the team at 12pm next Sunday I won’t be laughing anymore.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1164 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by daveisaclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:30 am

They should do a documentary on the psychology of people who make up lies about Burnley goalies.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16900
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6965 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:30 am

I think the Kosovan mafia yarn is more likely.

It Is What It Is
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 407 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by It Is What It Is » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:31 am

Shipping in shedloads of goals week in and week out can't be good for his mental health.
Totally demoralising to say the least.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

Clive 1960
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 152 times
Has Liked: 197 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Clive 1960 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:31 am

If he was on loan that might be different but not someone you buy , just think Vincent is being Vincent and won't drop him..

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:32 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
I can believe city’s clause and also that Kompany has skin in the game for development of players and commission on deals where he generates a profit. I don’t think any of these concepts are new.

What I don’t believe is VK forgoing his bonus for keeping us in the PL, not to mention his own reputation, on the basis Trafford might suddenly play himself into a £40m+ transfer and city come knocking.

Face it - VK doesnt think Muric is good enough for the PL.
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret

Westleigh
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 5:09 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 230 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Westleigh » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:34 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
Can’t be true ,we all know how Cities finances have been crawled over the last few years.😱😱😱

Poulton-le-Claret
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 95 times
Has Liked: 197 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Poulton-le-Claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:40 am

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:32 am
I can believe city’s clause and also that Kompany has skin in the game for development of players and commission on deals where he generates a profit. I don’t think any of these concepts are new.

What I don’t believe is VK forgoing his bonus for keeping us in the PL, not to mention his own reputation, on the basis Trafford might suddenly play himself into a £40m+ transfer and city come knocking.

Face it - VK doesnt think Muric is good enough for the PL.
Spot on. The conspiracy theories around VK playing Trafford to make more money for himself simply do not add up or make sense.
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:42 am

It Is What It Is wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:31 am
Shipping in shedloads of goals week in and week out can't be good for his mental health.
Totally demoralising to say the least.
I don't think bringing mental health into it will do any good

Perhaps it's just that the coaching staff know more about his personality, than anyone on here who's just guessing how he's coping

And just to add, anyone who thinks that any permanent contract would include a clause that the player has to play every game needs to do a little research and see if any such clause has ever been placed in a contract. I'd have a guess at never.
These 2 users liked this post: Holtyclaret dsr

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:46 am

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
I think that there's only one person being played here

How many hitmen have you paid?

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 443 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by alwaysaclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:57 am

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:32 am
I can believe city’s clause and also that Kompany has skin in the game for development of players and commission on deals where he generates a profit. I don’t think any of these concepts are new.

What I don’t believe is VK forgoing his bonus for keeping us in the PL, not to mention his own reputation, on the basis Trafford might suddenly play himself into a £40m+ transfer and city come knocking.

Face it - VK doesnt think Muric is good enough for the PL.
Well one thing's for sure, Trafford certainly isn't.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin k90bfc

dandeclaret
Posts: 3563
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 2604 times
Has Liked: 301 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:00 am

I’d heard that the kosovan mafia had bought him, and they’d told Craig Bellamy that they’d out him as being a Swansea fan if he didn’t make VK play him every week…. But they’d also cut him in when they told JJ watt to put pressure on little Al to sell him
Back to Man City for at least a 300% profit.

It came from a lad inside the club…. Literally…. He works in one of the turnstiles.
This user liked this post: Darthlaw

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 443 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by alwaysaclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:02 am

StayingDown4Ever wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:01 am
Does anyone actually know what The Project is and how long it’s supposed to take?

We’re going to be two years into it come the summer and be exactly where Vincent started - heading to the Championship and a huge rebuild needing to be done.
You think we can sustain another rebuild in the summer, as naive as this board are, can't imagine they'll agree to that.

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by spt_claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:11 am

Carlos the Great wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:53 am
I am going to be seriously disillusioned with VK if he allows Muric to be sold …
Get ready to be disillusioned. I've resigned myself that Muric, Benson and Zaroury are gone. He keeps trotting out "everyone's been given a chance" which every single fan can see isn't true. They're never playing for us seriously again (and no, Benson's cameo yesterday was not a serious chance. It was to say 'he, he got a chance, now shut up'.)
Something's gone seriously different with Kompany's man management this season. I suspect we'll never know what, even if Mission To Burnley 2 does air.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

StayingDown4Ever
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 161 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by StayingDown4Ever » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:35 am

alwaysaclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:02 am
You think we can sustain another rebuild in the summer, as naive as this board are, can't imagine they'll agree to that.
I don’t think we’ll have much of a choice. Luckily a handful of the big earners are out of contract so we can get them off the books.

Some posters on here claimed we’d double our money on Trafford - with any luck we’ll get shut of him in the summer too. Sadly though if he does move we’d probably lose out on about £17,000,000 we overpaid for him.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by dsr » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:38 am

Poulton-le-Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:26 am
No, I just think VK is stubborn and feeling like he has to play his big money signing.
Which is why Tresor and Ramsey have about 6 starts between them?
This user liked this post: k90bfc

FCBurnley
Posts: 9857
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by FCBurnley » Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:53 am

Follow the money. It always provides the answer. Has VK scouting company screwed Pace thru various contracts ? We will never know but using somebody else’s money to bet with sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Think football hedge fund.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Boss Hogg » Sun Feb 25, 2024 11:24 am

dsr wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:38 am
Which is why Tresor and Ramsey have about 6 starts between them?
6 too many

IanMcL
Posts: 30418
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6390 times
Has Liked: 8742 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by IanMcL » Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:35 pm

It Is What It Is wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:31 am
Shipping in shedloads of goals week in and week out can't be good for his mental health.
Totally demoralising to say the least.
If a defender misses tackles or headers - replaced.
Attacker fails to score - replaced.
Midfield not competing and passing - replaced.

Goalkeeper who let's in loads, full of schoolboy errors and gives defence the jitters - leave him be.
These 3 users liked this post: bumba Taffy on the wing k90bfc

CoolClaret
Posts: 7460
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2257 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:17 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:35 pm
If a defender misses tackles or headers - replaced.
Attacker fails to score - replaced.
Midfield not competing and passing - replaced.

Goalkeeper who let's in loads, full of schoolboy errors and gives defence the jitters - leave him be.
Whilst we all have to sit through a season of watching him (not) develop, whilst playing a different, utterly turgid brand of football to facilitate his inclusion.

It's very strange.
This user liked this post: bumba

Poulton-le-Claret
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 95 times
Has Liked: 197 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Poulton-le-Claret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:51 pm

dsr wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:38 am
Which is why Tresor and Ramsey have about 6 starts between them?
AR has been injured/unfit loads this season, before his injury he looked set to become another undroppable. Not a clue about Tresor though apart from his recent illness.

Whatever is keeping JT in the team, it certainly isn't good form.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9474
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 779 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 3:51 pm

StayingDown4Ever wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:01 am
Does anyone actually know what The Project is and how long it’s supposed to take?

We’re going to be two years into it come the summer and be exactly where Vincent started - heading to the Championship and a huge rebuild needing to be done.
It's project full circle from start to finish.

Culmclaret
Posts: 1548
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
Been Liked: 473 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Culmclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:00 pm

As I understand it, the aim of the project is to play s**t football and lose every week. Safe to say we are well ahead of schedule.
These 2 users liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis k90bfc

roperclaret
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by roperclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:13 pm

Holtyclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:21 am
No, managers chosen his number one and is sticking with him. wrongly.
Fixed that :D

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3150 times
Has Liked: 10257 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by evensteadiereddie » Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:16 pm

Bob Lorder wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:22 am
I was told months ago that VK had money tied up in the Trafford deal … City have a buy back clause of triple what they paid for him, meaning VK would make a profit of 300% on the deal ..
That’s why he doesn’t get dropped and keeps defending him !

Of course people will try to say I’m wrong & he can’t get involved like this & cite reasons why … but the information came from within the club .. ( You can buy something without actually handing over the cash yourself, a bit like getting a hitman to do a job for you, you get the benefits but you still have to pay ) ..

All will out eventually, we are being played !
A pitiful attempt.
This user liked this post: nettiepicot92

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9474
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 779 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:20 pm

It's a simple case of VK honouring his word to Trafford before Trafford arrived I believe he asked for reassurances that the number 1 spot would be his & he was reassured it would be.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Trafford Contract

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:31 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:20 pm
It's a simple case of VK honouring his word to Trafford before Trafford arrived I believe he asked for reassurances that the number 1 spot would be his & he was reassured it would be.
At least that is plausible

Post Reply