Page 1 of 1
Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:42 pm
by Stonehouse

- IMG_1673.png (1.46 MiB) Viewed 4091 times
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:50 pm
by pushpinpussy
I’m surprised women get paid to play football and more surprised that someone would pay to watch them play. You might as well go up Towneley on a Sunday as it’s a better standard. There’s a massive difference between men’s and women’s football that doesn’t warrant them getting a big wage at all (if any) since the commercial value of a women’s team is probably zero compared to a men’s team.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:32 pm
by bfcjg
Chicken feed.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:33 pm
by ClaretsPadiham
Women don’t deserve big money as they aren’t good at football. They’re getting paid minimum wage because they are minimum wage players.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:38 pm
by ElectroClaret
Let's hope this scaling-down of funding reaches the mens team as well.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:41 pm
by bumba
Paid more than top earners at clubs like Padiham for playing a lot lower standard, if they don't like it don't play
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:53 pm
by Burnley1989
pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:50 pm
I’m surprised women get paid to play football and more surprised that someone would pay to watch them play. You might as well go up Towneley on a Sunday as it’s a better standard. There’s a massive difference between men’s and women’s football that doesn’t warrant them getting a big wage at all (if any) since the commercial value of a women’s team is probably zero compared to a men’s team.
You're just not a very nice person are you?
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:54 pm
by Tricky Trevor
Neanderthals live.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:55 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:53 pm
You're just not a very nice person are you?
He is a brilliant solicitor though

(allegedly)
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:55 pm
by Fretters
bumba wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:41 pm
Paid more than top earners at clubs like Padiham for playing a lot lower standard, if they don't like it don't play
Padiham top earners are on less than minimum wage?
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:57 pm
by bumba
Fretters wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:55 pm
Padiham top earners are on less than minimum wage?
Paid per game usually
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:59 pm
by Fretters
bumba wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:57 pm
Paid per game usually
I wasn't sure how it worked, but I'd imagine the hourly rate is still higher than - or equal to - minimum wage. Surely it has to be, legally.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:14 pm
by Bosscat
pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:50 pm
I’m surprised women get paid to play football and more surprised that someone would pay to watch them play. You might as well go up Towneley on a Sunday as it’s a better standard. There’s a massive difference between men’s and women’s football that doesn’t warrant them getting a big wage at all (if any) since the commercial value of a women’s team is probably zero compared to a men’s team.
And you wonder why people pick on you


Mysogeny alive and well and on holiday on the Costa Del Bacup
Re: Our Effluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:31 pm
by gawthorpe_view
Stonehouse wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:42 pm
IMG_1673.png
*You spelt effluent incorrectly.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:33 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Not a chance on earth would a Solicitor or whatever he claims to be, write such drivel on a public forum.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:51 pm
by SalouClaret
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:33 pm
Not a chance on earth would a Solicitor or whatever he claims to be, write such drivel on a public forum.
Careful, he'll threaten legal action against you for calling him a liar like he did with me

he's absolutely, embarrassingly cringeworthy.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:55 pm
by Bosscat
SalouClaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:51 pm
Careful, he'll threaten legal action against you for calling him a liar like he did with me

he's absolutely, embarrassingly cringeworthy.
So our resident "Faux Solicitor" hasn't brought proceedings against you yet then

Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:58 pm
by South West Claret.
ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:38 pm
Let's hope this scaling-down of funding reaches the mens team as well.
Here here.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:03 pm
by SalouClaret
Bosscat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:55 pm
So our resident "Faux Solicitor" hasn't brought proceedings against you yet then
Unfortunately not

Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:08 pm
by Buxtonclaret
ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:38 pm
Let's hope this scaling-down of funding reaches the mens team as well.
Is that the pecking order?

Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:09 pm
by roperclaret
bumba wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:41 pm
Paid more than top earners at clubs like Padiham for playing a lot lower standard, if they don't like it don't play
But the lads at Padiham aren’t good enough to be professionals
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:11 pm
by Steddyman
pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:50 pm
I’m surprised women get paid to play football and more surprised that someone would pay to watch them play. You might as well go up Towneley on a Sunday as it’s a better standard. There’s a massive difference between men’s and women’s football that doesn’t warrant them getting a big wage at all (if any) since the commercial value of a women’s team is probably zero compared to a men’s team.
Is that you Joey?
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:14 pm
by Bosscat
Steddyman wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:11 pm
Is that you Joey?



Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:35 pm
by Clarets4me
Shouldn't this read ... " our Affluent effluent friends down the road " ?
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 6:36 pm
by IPAclaret
No doubt the eye watering sums the venkys have thrown around keeping the men's team afloat has had a knock on effect on the women's team
Same old bturds, always spending other people's money and always wanting more
It's about time someone flushed the effluent away
UTC
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 9:05 pm
by Volvoclaret
SalouClaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:03 pm
Unfortunately not
I will repeat from another thread, reading the highway code and watching 3 episodes of Judge Judy does NOT make you a Solicitor.
Re: Our Effluent friends down the road.
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 11:37 pm
by houseboy
gawthorpe_view wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:31 pm
*You spelt effluent incorrectly.
Damn you. I only came on here in the hope I could get in first with that.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:03 am
by aggi
pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 2:50 pm
I’m surprised women get paid to play football and more surprised that someone would pay to watch them play. You might as well go up Towneley on a Sunday as it’s a better standard. There’s a massive difference between men’s and women’s football that doesn’t warrant them getting a big wage at all (if any) since the commercial value of a women’s team is probably zero compared to a men’s team.
Next season Arsenal women's team will have a higher average attendance than Burnley men's team.
Those who don't understand the commercial appeal of women's teams are, to be generous, out of touch.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:44 am
by atlantalad
aggi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:03 am
Those who don't understand the commercial appeal of women's teams are, to be generous, out of touch.
Would a dense population have more appeal?
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 6:47 am
by bumba
roperclaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:09 pm
But the lads at Padiham aren’t good enough to be professionals
9k a year for a part time job isn't that bad and the lads at Padiham are better footballers than the women
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 6:49 am
by bumba
aggi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:03 am
Next season Arsenal women's team will have a higher average attendance than Burnley men's team.
Those who don't understand the commercial appeal of women's teams are, to be generous, out of touch.
Arsenal womens SEASON tickets last year cost less than an Arsenal mens MATCH ticket
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:30 am
by roperclaret
bumba wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 6:47 am
9k a year for a part time job isn't that bad and the lads at Padiham are better footballers than the women
Yet not good enough to make a career out of it.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:36 am
by fatboy47
aggi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:03 am
Next season Arsenal women's team will have a higher average attendance than Burnley men's team.
Those who don't understand the commercial appeal of women's teams are, to be generous, out of touch.
To be fair aggi, I'd expect dwarf-tossing and hunt-the-thimble would attract packed crowds if they were hyped and promoted to the extent that womens football was.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:57 am
by Shaggy
It’s all horses for courses I suppose.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:18 am
by jlup1980
Sadly, there are a lot of the usual comments on this thread. We know Women's football isn't as fast or physical of the Men's game but why does that matter? Football isn't always entertaining, whether it's men or women. For example, the knockout phase of the Euros has been a borefest. Why is this not getting the same scrutiny?
The Women's game is gaining more and more traction with every passing season. The standard will improve over the coming years and it's appeal will get greater. My best mate is running an Girl's team and they're having a great time. The atmosphere seems very different from the Boy's game - it's a lot more encouraging and enjoyable from coaches and parents alike.
The sad thing here is Rovers not backing their Women's team. This shows the attitude a lot have towards their game. It's seen as a dispensable part of the club, but it shouldn't be.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:38 am
by claretonthecoast1882
aggi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:03 am
Next season Arsenal women's team will have a higher average attendance than Burnley men's team.
Those who don't understand the commercial appeal of women's teams are, to be generous, out of touch.
They will do, but if you make it virtually free to attend an event at the Emirates people will watch anything.
They also had 7 home games which attracted crowds of just over 3,000 each time last season for games at their home ground.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:39 am
by bumba
roperclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:30 am
Yet not good enough to make a career out of it.
Neither are the women playing for Blackburn ladies or they'd be at a higher level getting paid a higher wage
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 10:17 am
by GetIntoEm
i'm pretty sure the braindead ones who slag off womens football have never genuinely watched it. They just think its cool to slag it off. look at me, what a lad. waheeey. same characters that slag off the mens team too btw.
thick as 2 short planks the lot of them.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 10:51 am
by aggi
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:38 am
They will do, but if you make it virtually free to attend an event at the Emirates people will watch anything.
They also had 7 home games which attracted crowds of just over 3,000 each time last season for games at their home ground.
3,500 is the capacity for their other stadium. Next season they are moving to having the vast majority of their games at the Emirates which will see their average attendance have a hefty bump.
From what I remember tickets are something like £10-£20 so considerably cheaper but you're also getting 50,000 into the Emirates buying drinks, overpriced twixes, pies, scarves, shirts, etc.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 2:53 pm
by AfloatinClaret
A legend in his own lunchtime I heard.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 2:56 pm
by AfloatinClaret
Volvoclaret wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 9:05 pm
I will repeat from another thread, reading the highway code and watching 3 episodes of Judge Judy does NOT make you a Solicitor.
So how many do you have to watch to qualify? I know it's an awful programme, but them Solicitors make a good wedge, I reckon I could stomach eight or nine episodes (maybe a dozen if I'd a case of beer) if that'd get me a soliciting job.
Re: Our Affluent friends down the road.
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 4:29 pm
by claretonthecoast1882
AfloatinClaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 2:53 pm
A legend in his own lunchtime I heard.
Think it is more bottomless brunchtime with some of his nonsense