This will go down like a lead balloon

Whether she’s wise to be posting it or not, let’s not have a pile on of a relatively young lass for asking folk to be kind to people.

Absolutely not. I can’t imagine the abuse they’ve probably had on social media over the last few days!

Clowbridge89 wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:39 pm

Absolutely not. I can’t imagine the abuse they’ve probably had on social media over the last few days!

It’s already startered on Twitter. Makes me feel uncomfortable.

She's posted worse to be fair.

She probably has a better idea what is going on than us.

I thought that, but the Nathan Tella debacle last year might suggest otherwise

"She's posted worse to be fair." Worse? get a grip

It sure if this question makes me seem embarrassingly far removed from those ITK, but…who is she?

Thing is, she's right. Way some people go about Wout are ridiculous

I don’t do any social media besides looking on here
But my first thought was that must be fake
If not
She is right to suggest that people should be careful of the words they put on social media

I know that they would love moronic unrest on Saturday and then Alan can play the victim

Almost like she’s on a wind up

Start with the indefensible Wout loved Burnley then link that to her Daddy and see what occurs

GetIntoEm wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:48 pm

Thing is, she's right. Way some people go about Wout are ridiculous

Give over

Middle-agedClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:46 pm

It sure if this question makes me seem embarrassingly far removed from those ITK, but…who is she?

Pace’s daughter.

I wasn’t aware that Wout had been abused. The reception he received when he came on at Luton was the exact opposite.

But I think she is very badly advised to post that.

"I know that they would love moronic unrest on Saturday and then Alan can play the victim

Almost like she’s on a wind up

Start with the indefensible Wout loved Burnley then link that to her Daddy and see what occurs"

Seriously?

You are being serious?

WOW

ClaretTony wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:54 pm

I wasn’t aware that Wout had been abused. The reception he received when he came on at Luton was the exact opposite.

But I think she is very badly advised to post that.

This^

I bet he didnt love us. If the club communicated at appropriate times. Such as confirming Wout was free to leave if we went down to protect his World Cup place, given a pre existing agreement then folk would have perhaps understood, well most would. Instead they enabled it to get out of control and Wout never recovered from those views he was a deserter.

Absolute ignorance at times from our owners relating to fans. Nobody is expecting weekly memos but an awareness of what is actually happening would be nice occasionally.

I've never been abusive to anyone linked to Burnley, player or otherwise. That doesn't mean people can't be extremely critical at times if things aren't as you would like to see them, they're so naive with some of the stuff they put out there and criticism is part of playing football, or if you're someone that likes to take loans out to be a custodian. I accept her view that people go too far and make it personal and there is no need for that.

If you dont want criticism, do better.

I think she’s probably posted that off her own bat but who knows these days.

BleedingClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:48 pm

I don’t do any social media besides looking on here
But my first thought was that must be fake
If not
She is right to suggest that people should be careful of the words they put on social media

I know that they would love moronic unrest on Saturday and then Alan can play the victim

Almost like she’s on a wind up

Start with the indefensible Wout loved Burnley then link that to her Daddy and see what occurs

It’s definitely not fake. I took the screenshot myself

Would any club reveal contractual details really? The reaction to Weghorst has been overblown (especially initially) but yes, ill advised to post.

She's a bit of a moron tbh. Luckily I don't look at her Instagram.

billyhamilton82 wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:55 pm

"I know that they would love moronic unrest on Saturday and then Alan can play the victim

Almost like she’s on a wind up

Start with the indefensible Wout loved Burnley then link that to her Daddy and see what occurs"

Seriously?

You are being serious?

WOW

He probably is

Goliath wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:59 pm

She's a bit of a moron tbh. Luckily I don't look at her Instagram.

Know her well?

Ill advised or not perhaps she's posting from the heart and head. Something's are bigger than BFC and if they get too personal need calling out IMO

Clowbridge89 wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:58 pm

It’s definitely not fake. I took the screenshot myself

I’ll advised then, poking the wasps nest

Unless that’s the plan

ClaretTony wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:54 pm

I wasn’t aware that Wout had been abused. The reception he received when he came on at Luton was the exact opposite.

But I think she is very badly advised to post that.

Most of the players who have been abused online have not been abused at the games, fortunately.
It shows what sort of people doing the abusing are.

Swizzlestick wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:58 pm

Would any club reveal contractual details really? The reaction to Weghorst has been overblown (especially initially) but yes, ill advised to post.

Generally no, I don't want to know about contracts, nor do I expect to. However, they could easily have diffused that particular situation stating yes we agreed to it. Probably wasn't contractual anyway, gentleman's agreement sounds more likely in that instance.

She’s right. I can think of several players and a certain set piece coach who get lots of grief on here and social media. It’s fine saying people should have a thick skin and brush it off but it surely must affect them if they see it or hear about it.

It would me.

" i before e, except after c..."

KernowHouseClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:02 pm

Ill advised or not perhaps she's posting from the heart and head. Something's are bigger than BFC and if they get too personal need calling out IMO

Alan’s not the victim

He’s gambling with a 142 year old football club that is loved by its town and its supporters wherever they may roam

And he’s doing it primarily in the hope of personal profit and then the prestige that may bring

I agree with the sentiment to some extent, but she’s as naive as her dad posting that.

And there’s no way on earth Weghorst loved Burnley.

I'm just pleased my Free Wout posters that I put up around Burnley had the desired effect.

BleedingClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:06 pm

Alan’s not the victim

He’s gambling with a 142 year old football club that is loved by its town and its supporters wherever they may roam

And he’s doing it primarily in the hope of personal profit and then the prestige that may bring

Why mention her dad?

So we’ve been lectured by Pace’s right hand man and now by his daughter .Does she not appreciate what the fans think of what her dad is doing to the club,does she realise how much debt he’s put BFC in?

Row x wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:11 pm

Why mention her dad?

Because that’s whose she’s referring to.

Row x wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:11 pm

Why mention her dad?

She uses poor Wout to say someone else could do with a bit of love now too

Stonehouse wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:11 pm

So we’ve been lectured by Pace’s right hand man and now by his daughter .Does she not appreciate what the fans think of what her dad is doing to the club,does she realise how much debt he’s put BFC in?

She doesn't care, her and her husband have cosy jobs at the club and all these millions Pace is making is just her inheritance, she'll be loving it.

Stonehouse wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:12 pm

Because that’s whose she’s referring to.

How do you know that?

Could it not be Foster?

BleedingClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:13 pm

She uses poor Wout to say someone else could do with a bit of love now too

Foster?

BleedingClaret wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:06 pm

Alan’s not the victim

He’s gambling with a 142 year old football club that is loved by its town and its supporters wherever they may roam

And he’s doing it primarily in the hope of personal profit and then the prestige that may bring

Almost instantly proving her point

I agree with the sentiment. I don't agree with making stuff up to score sympathy points. Wout did not love the club and that's okay.

The concern here is that this is the second post that shows disdain towards fans- the first was Russel Ball's, this one is from within Alans family. That's not the kind of attitude I want to see, I'd much rather see them hear and see that there are some valid concerns and act on them- rather than tell everyone to shut up and be kind.

Row x wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:16 pm

How do you know that?

Could it not be Foster?

She said the owners.

Im flabbergasted.

To suggest that wout loved the club is one thing.
To suggest Alan Pace. Business man. Who has plunged the club I love into debt.
Needs a kind word off me.

He can have one when the clubs functioning soundly again.

Be careful what you post on social media on one hand. Releasing a free Nathan Tella video, which probably only served to **** off Southampton, on the other…

Stonehouse wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:24 pm

She said the owners.

If you are referring to her post, she says players and owners, and where she asks for kindness mentions neither, so yes it could be Foster, or anyone else who's received the abuse

ClaretTony wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:54 pm

I wasn’t aware that Wout had been abused. The reception he received when he came on at Luton was the exact opposite.

But I think she is very badly advised to post that.

I can't believe you've posted that Tony, we've had 3 years of slagging him off on this very message board. Obviously by people too soft to do it in person. Don't claim otherwise

Cant knock her for wanting to defend her dad and suggest that people need to be more careful about how much personal abuse they use on social media but there's little evidence that Wout "loved the club". (No idea if is is or isnt "an incredible person" though).

Row x wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:16 pm

How do you know that?

Could it not be Foster?

Well it could be and that would be just as misplaced

GetIntoEm wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:29 pm

I can't believe you've posted that Tony, we've had 3 years of slagging him off on this very message board. Obviously by people too soft to do it in person. Don't claim otherwise

Was slagging him off in person an option?

LeadBelly wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:34 pm

Cant knock her for wanting to defend her dad and suggest that people need to be more careful about how much personal abuse they use on social media but there's little evidence that Wout "loved the club". (No idea if is is or isnt "an incredible person" though).

Very Devils advocate though

Why not just make the point about her Dad

Use a subject that will get the backs up of many and then relate it to her dad