City charges
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
City charges
Are they going to get away with it?
If they do maybe they will get sued by Everton et al.
What do you think?
If they do maybe they will get sued by Everton et al.
What do you think?
-
- Posts: 6768
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2117 times
- Has Liked: 1058 times
Re: City charges
Everton threatening to sue anyone is irony at its finest.
I hope they get punted into non-league.
I hope they get punted into non-league.
This user liked this post: AfloatinClaret
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
-
- Posts: 3456
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 938 times
- Has Liked: 1804 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: City charges
Manchester City Will imo remain permanently in the Premier Division — maybe a fine that will not affect their super rich owners
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 522 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: City charges
Likely to go on for years without a conclusive result.
-
- Posts: 34673
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12651 times
- Has Liked: 6298 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: City charges
This is what will happen, the appeal for anything will take years, then the appeal to the appeal will be taken to a higher body and that will take years etc etc etc
-
- Posts: 10970
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1342 times
- Has Liked: 890 times
Re: City charges
A bung will happen long before then.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 6:39 pmThis is what will happen, the appeal for anything will take years, then the appeal to the appeal will be taken to a higher body and that will take years etc etc etc
These 2 users liked this post: winsomeyen MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
Re: City charges
This independent secret panel will never get bought

Re: City charges
It seems it can't be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. They would have the right to appeal to an independent panel, so it shouldn't drag on for years because there are limitations to where it can be escalated.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 6:39 pmThis is what will happen, the appeal for anything will take years, then the appeal to the appeal will be taken to a higher body and that will take years etc etc etc
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 461 times
- Has Liked: 5014 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: City charges
Many people will make loads of money including, of course, the FA, the Premier League, etc.
Wembley will paid off in an instance, if not already paid off
Wembley will paid off in an instance, if not already paid off
-
- Posts: 10623
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4637 times
- Has Liked: 7283 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: City charges
Yes. They will throw BILLIONS at it and walk away.Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 6:25 pmAre they going to get away with it?
If they do maybe they will get sued by Everton et al.
What do you think?
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 461 times
- Has Liked: 5014 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: City charges
Alledegly/Apparently the City Barrister is their highest paid 'Player'



-
- Posts: 4894
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 1481 times
Re: City charges
On the face of it it is difficult to see how city are going be exonerated. I think most people are expecting some, if not all, charges will be proven. I hope that they are and we can all watch them struggle to equate cheating with success.
Re: City charges
The thing most people are confusing is the nature of the charges are completely different to the likes of Everton.
-
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 1005 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: City charges
When City start bringing issues such as the Premier League are being racist against their owners it shows they don't have much hope in being found not guilty on the charges.
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 362 times
- Has Liked: 415 times
Re: City charges
If the charges are proven then I hope the punishment is well thought through.. as I see it, relegation just punishes other teams in whatever division they end up.. it effectively creates one less promotion place to play for.. so I hope any punishment is based on exclusion from the Champions League but expect it will be a pointless fine and points deduction
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
Re: City charges
Am I right in thinking that they were paying players and Mancini off the books or something in the early days of this takeover and inflating money gained from sponsorship deals through sister companies?
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
Re: City charges
I think if the financial doping is as wide spread as has been alledged then whatever money they showed in their books should be deducted by psr rules in whatever division they are hopefully relegated to so they have to sell all their best players to basically start again from where they were before the cheating started.Woonderbah wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:55 pmIf the charges are proven then I hope the punishment is well thought through.. as I see it, relegation just punishes other teams in whatever division they end up.. it effectively creates one less promotion place to play for.. so I hope any punishment is based on exclusion from the Champions League but expect it will be a pointless fine and points deduction
I don’t believe they will be found guilty but I’m crossing my fingers tightly.
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 362 times
- Has Liked: 415 times
Re: City charges
I think most of the charges relate to City being uncooperative and not providing relevant accounts.. the truth must be much worse if they're concealing it
Re: City charges
The premier league are not going to kick out the reigning champions and our most recent champs league winners. Not gonna happen
Re: City charges
City have a track record for having the best lawyers
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 461 times
- Has Liked: 5014 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: City charges
Looking forward to Barnoldswick Town v Manchester City. Should be a sell-out



This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 19754
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4198 times
- Has Liked: 2243 times
Re: City charges
Not sure the Premier league can relegate clubs as they don't own the lower leagues, so would have to get their permission.
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:46 pm
- Been Liked: 171 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: City charges
Yes. PL can expel City from the league, but not put them in the EFL. City would have to apply for entry in to the EFL. Can’t see either scenario personally.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:08 pmNot sure the Premier league can relegate clubs as they don't own the lower leagues, so would have to get their permission.
-
- Posts: 8747
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 3122 times
- Has Liked: 2158 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: City charges
I reckon the reason that it's taken so long to be heard is
their lawyers can claim that the prosecution is "time barred"
and therefore there is no case to answer.
Mind you, they will drag it out a while and pretend to suddenly
discover this "flaw" !!!!!! The stench around this case is unpalatable
at the very best.
their lawyers can claim that the prosecution is "time barred"
and therefore there is no case to answer.
Mind you, they will drag it out a while and pretend to suddenly
discover this "flaw" !!!!!! The stench around this case is unpalatable
at the very best.
-
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2211 times
- Has Liked: 3117 times
Re: City charges
Certainly be interesting. Either City get the rule book thrown at them or the Premier League may as well pack up pretending it’s a sporting competition and concentrate on being the Harlem Globetrotters equivalent of a football league.
-
- Posts: 34673
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12651 times
- Has Liked: 6298 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: City charges
I believe so for CAS, they will tie it up somewhere somehow for sure. They've hardly acted out the 'not guilty' in a way that suggests their innocence, it's going to be an interesting watch for sure.
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 85 times
- Has Liked: 11 times
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: City charges
A deal will be done to avoid dragging it out for years.
-
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:31 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 153 times
- Location: Santa Clarita, LA
Re: City charges
Let’s face it!
City will not be found guilty of any charges
They will be found guilty of lesser charges and after appeal will be fined 500 pounds

City will not be found guilty of any charges
They will be found guilty of lesser charges and after appeal will be fined 500 pounds
-
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2018 3:33 pm
- Been Liked: 121 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: City charges
They said that about Rangers and Juventus.......
This user liked this post: Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 727 times
- Has Liked: 3217 times
Re: City charges
It’s not a prosecution it’s a private hearing.Funkydrummer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:53 pmI reckon the reason that it's taken so long to be heard is
their lawyers can claim that the prosecution is "time barred"
and therefore there is no case to answer.
Mind you, they will drag it out a while and pretend to suddenly
discover this "flaw" !!!!!! The stench around this case is unpalatable
at the very best.
Re: City charges
The reason it has taken so long is because City have been tying it up for as long as possible. The CAS stuff was one of their arguments, that the PL isn't the final arbiter.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2024 1:38 amI believe so for CAS, they will tie it up somewhere somehow for sure. They've hardly acted out the 'not guilty' in a way that suggests their innocence, it's going to be an interesting watch for sure.
And City haven't necessarily acted this way because they are innocent, they've acted this way because they can. The PL is about to find out for a second time that some clubs consider themselves above the league and out of any rules.
-
- Posts: 14900
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3522 times
- Has Liked: 6420 times
Re: City charges
Premier league doesn’t have a time limitFunkydrummer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:53 pmI reckon the reason that it's taken so long to be heard is
their lawyers can claim that the prosecution is "time barred"
and therefore there is no case to answer.
Mind you, they will drag it out a while and pretend to suddenly
discover this "flaw" !!!!!! The stench around this case is unpalatable
at the very best.
UEFA did, of 5yrs I think it was
The evidence uefa couldn’t use will be used by the premier league
All city are doing is trying to discredit the evidence etc
They haven’t denied what they’ve allegedly done
Re: City charges
If Leicester can get off , then so can city.