Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
summitclaret
Posts: 4556
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 1607 times
Location: burnley

Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by summitclaret » Sat Dec 14, 2024 3:39 pm

This user liked this post: Hipper

beddie
Posts: 6356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1783 times
Has Liked: 671 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by beddie » Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:03 pm

KDB on £400k per week. That’s exactly what’s wrong with football at the moment.
These 3 users liked this post: bfcjg Buxtonclaret Poulton-le-Claret

The Shire Claret
Posts: 1133
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 366 times
Has Liked: 279 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by The Shire Claret » Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:29 pm

beddie wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:03 pm
KDB on £400k per week. That’s exactly what’s wrong with football at the moment.
This is why ticket prices baffle me … Burnley would only cover his wages by selling 10,000 tickets for just him

So what’s putting tickets up a tenner going to do …

No footballer no matter how good should be paid that much if it’s stopping football fans being able to afford to watch

Games gone
This user liked this post: bfcjg

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by bfcjg » Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:30 pm

Unbelievable that clubs have to contribute to players pensions unless they opt out,I get it with the bottom league though.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10212
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2418 times
Has Liked: 3332 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Paul Waine » Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:15 pm

The Shire Claret wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:29 pm
This is why ticket prices baffle me … Burnley would only cover his wages by selling 10,000 tickets for just him

So what’s putting tickets up a tenner going to do …

No footballer no matter how good should be paid that much if it’s stopping football fans being able to afford to watch

Games gone
How much does anyone pay to go to the cinema these days? I'm not aware that anyone thinks it's the price of cinema tickets that decides how much a star actor earns. The price of a cinema ticket doesn't stop "film fans" going to the cinema and lots of film fans also subscribe to streaming services. It's the same with football fans, some watch the game at the ground, some watch on streaming, some watch on free to air tv. It's the total revenue a club receives that determines how much they can afford to pay their players. If a club can only pay players from gate receipts they will never be the ones paying top wages.

Dyched
Posts: 6527
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 2043 times
Has Liked: 466 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Dyched » Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:27 pm

beddie wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:03 pm
KDB on £400k per week. That’s exactly what’s wrong with football at the moment.
A key part in winning 6 PL and a CL. One of the best in the PL. Has helped grow the league so all 20 clubs receive millions. Man City receive millions for winning competitions.

So all this money for all clubs involved in these competitions along side Man City, and their star player shouldn’t receive a decent slice of it?

Paul Waine
Posts: 10212
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2418 times
Has Liked: 3332 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Paul Waine » Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:41 pm

bfcjg wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:30 pm
Unbelievable that clubs have to contribute to players pensions unless they opt out,I get it with the bottom league though.
£5,000 (+ change) a month is a bit more than £60,000 per year. The maximum anyone can pay into pension is £60,000 per year - it used to be £40,000 per year. But, if you earn more than £260,000 per year the maximum you can pay into your pension is £10,000 per year.

Foreverly Claret
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 144 times
Has Liked: 186 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Foreverly Claret » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:07 pm

Re KDB .Perhaps our accountant colleagues can tell us what HMRC etc should get from this .Must be around £ 160000 per week tax and employers NI on top around £ 56000 per week .I can understand that there will be ways that he can lower the tax take but I can't see how City could get round the NI .Am I wrong...I often am !!

Rileybobs
Posts: 18733
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7693 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:32 pm

beddie wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:03 pm
KDB on £400k per week. That’s exactly what’s wrong with football at the moment.
If players like KDB don’t deserve to take a significant slice of the pie then who do you suggest does?

summitclaret
Posts: 4556
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 1607 times
Location: burnley

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by summitclaret » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:34 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:32 pm
If players like KDB don’t deserve to take a significant slice of the pie then who do you suggest does?
Desperate Dan?

The Shire Claret
Posts: 1133
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 366 times
Has Liked: 279 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by The Shire Claret » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:35 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:15 pm
How much does anyone pay to go to the cinema these days? I'm not aware that anyone thinks it's the price of cinema tickets that decides how much a star actor earns. The price of a cinema ticket doesn't stop "film fans" going to the cinema and lots of film fans also subscribe to streaming services. It's the same with football fans, some watch the game at the ground, some watch on streaming, some watch on free to air tv. It's the total revenue a club receives that determines how much they can afford to pay their players. If a club can only pay players from gate receipts they will never be the ones paying top wages.
People stopped going to the cinema due to extortionate prices on tickets and popcorn

Now it’s a lot more reasonable - at one point it was only £4.99 to go…. It’s not now but I think it’s only £7.99 for an adult … at one point it was £16.99

You’re right … tickets don’t cover wages …

So don’t rip people off
This user liked this post: bfcjg

Paul Waine
Posts: 10212
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2418 times
Has Liked: 3332 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Paul Waine » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:37 pm

£400,000: income tax 45%, plus EES NIC 2%, plus ERS NIC 15% = 62% to HMRC = £248,000 per week = £12.9 million per year.

All approx and simplified.

Personal allowance = nil for earnings over £125,000 pa.

Simplified income tax and employees nic. Reality, 20%, 40% and 8% at appropriate steps. All "blown through" in the first week's pay.

It's possible a player earning £20.8 million a year will have "one ir two" tax minimisation" schemes. Though these may be applied to other sources of income, image rights, sponsorship deals and whatever else professional footballers can earn and whatever other expenses they can categorise as deductions from gross earnings, player's agent fees, for example.

Walton
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Been Liked: 866 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Walton » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:51 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:41 pm
£5,000 (+ change) a month is a bit more than £60,000 per year. The maximum anyone can pay into pension is £60,000 per year - it used to be £40,000 per year. But, if you earn more than £260,000 per year the maximum you can pay into your pension is £10,000 per year.
Not strictly true, that's the Annual Allowance, but you can pay more into a pension than the AA if you're happy to pay tax on it.

Dyched
Posts: 6527
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 2043 times
Has Liked: 466 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Dyched » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:59 pm

The Shire Claret wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:35 pm
People stopped going to the cinema due to extortionate prices on tickets and popcorn

Now it’s a lot more reasonable - at one point it was only £4.99 to go…. It’s not now but I think it’s only £7.99 for an adult … at one point it was £16.99

You’re right … tickets don’t cover wages …

So don’t rip people off
Football hasn't got to a point people aren’t going though and the grounds are emptying.

Even if people mention us, that nothing to do with what KDB gets paid.

deanothedino
Posts: 1753
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 749 times
Has Liked: 395 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by deanothedino » Sat Dec 14, 2024 10:02 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:41 pm
£5,000 (+ change) a month is a bit more than £60,000 per year. The maximum anyone can pay into pension is £60,000 per year - it used to be £40,000 per year. But, if you earn more than £260,000 per year the maximum you can pay into your pension is £10,000 per year.
It’s not per month, it’s per annum.
This user liked this post: Paul Waine

bobinho
Posts: 10658
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4656 times
Has Liked: 7303 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by bobinho » Sat Dec 14, 2024 11:13 pm

Saudis involved now…. It’ll get worse before it gats better. May even eat itself, and I personally hope it does. Needs a MASSIVE reset, but it would need turkeys voting to keep Xmas for that to happen.

taio
Posts: 12824
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3587 times
Has Liked: 405 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by taio » Sun Dec 15, 2024 9:11 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:32 pm
If players like KDB don’t deserve to take a significant slice of the pie then who do you suggest does?
I'd start with fans

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1484 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Big Vinny K » Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:30 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:32 pm
If players like KDB don’t deserve to take a significant slice of the pie then who do you suggest does?
1. The fans
2. Local grass roots football
3. Players / clubs in leagues below EPL
4. Inland Revenue
Etc etc

KDB and others deserve to be rewarded for their obvious talents but nobody “deserves” that kind of salary. Would his or any other footballers life be any worse if the maximum they could earn was say £100k a week ? That would also then mean that bang average players would not be able to walk into “smaller” clubs not owned by Saudi billionaires like ours and sign 4 year contracts on £50k a week and decide after a dozen of games that they are too good for us / demand a move away.

The game is not any better because of these insane salaries.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10212
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2418 times
Has Liked: 3332 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Paul Waine » Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:37 am

deanothedino wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 10:02 pm
It’s not per month, it’s per annum.
Yes, thanks for the correction. So, £100/week employer's contribution to the player's pension.

Poulton-le-Claret
Posts: 1791
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 544 times
Has Liked: 1332 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Poulton-le-Claret » Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:50 am

Crazy money, even bang average players are earning a packet. My father in law was telling me that Blackpool striker Ashley Fletcher is earning £8k a week and he is absolutely crap.

KDB will probably be off Saudi in the summer and will earn even more money.

aggi
Posts: 9704
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2338 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by aggi » Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:52 am

Paul Waine wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 6:15 pm
How much does anyone pay to go to the cinema these days? I'm not aware that anyone thinks it's the price of cinema tickets that decides how much a star actor earns. The price of a cinema ticket doesn't stop "film fans" going to the cinema and lots of film fans also subscribe to streaming services. It's the same with football fans, some watch the game at the ground, some watch on streaming, some watch on free to air tv. It's the total revenue a club receives that determines how much they can afford to pay their players. If a club can only pay players from gate receipts they will never be the ones paying top wages.
The last couple of times I went (in London) it was £6 at my local Vue and £11 at the fancy Picturehouse.

That fancy Picturehouse is coincidentally just near the Emirates where you would be paying ten times that to watch arsenal.

aggi
Posts: 9704
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2338 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by aggi » Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:56 am

Foreverly Claret wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:07 pm
Re KDB .Perhaps our accountant colleagues can tell us what HMRC etc should get from this .Must be around £ 160000 per week tax and employers NI on top around £ 56000 per week .I can understand that there will be ways that he can lower the tax take but I can't see how City could get round the NI .Am I wrong...I often am !!
Footballers do pay a big chunk of tax on their earnings, probably a lot more than similar earners in other areas.

The main mechanism for reducing income tax is image rights that are paid into a company (often an overseas one). HMRC are pretty hot on ensuring this amount is reasonable but for high profile players like KDB there is a good argument that those image rights are worth a lot.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18733
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7693 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:21 am

Big Vinny K wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:30 am
1. The fans
2. Local grass roots football
3. Players / clubs in leagues below EPL
4. Inland Revenue
Etc etc

KDB and others deserve to be rewarded for their obvious talents but nobody “deserves” that kind of salary. Would his or any other footballers life be any worse if the maximum they could earn was say £100k a week ? That would also then mean that bang average players would not be able to walk into “smaller” clubs not owned by Saudi billionaires like ours and sign 4 year contracts on £50k a week and decide after a dozen of games that they are too good for us / demand a move away.

The game is not any better because of these insane salaries.
Obviously the salaries are obscene. But the product is unbelievably popular and therefore generates an enormous amount of money. And players like KDB are the reason for this so deserve their piece of the action in my opinion. The same goes for boxers, movie stars, musicians etc.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1484 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Big Vinny K » Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:38 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:21 am
Obviously the salaries are obscene. But the product is unbelievably popular and therefore generates an enormous amount of money. And players like KDB are the reason for this so deserve their piece of the action in my opinion. The same goes for boxers, movie stars, musicians etc.
Yep they do - but do not deserve as much as they get….anywhere near as much.
And if they are going to get that much then tax them at 80% or 90% on everything over £5m a year and ring fence the tax receipts to give to grass roots, community sports projects, anything else related to health / wellbeing etc.

And if that means that players decide to play elsewhere that would also be a positive in my view. Again if that reduces the popularity of the EPL in other countries that’s another massive plus for me. The league becomes more competitive, fans in this country manage to get a ticket to support their own team (instead of being priced out of it by the Scandinavian supporters club), corporate hospitality numbers reduce, etc etc

There’s just no downsides for me. All this nonsense about getting to see the best players in the world in the EPL. Who cares ? The players certainly don’t….at a drop of a hat they would move to another league - as we will soon find out when KDB takes his Saudi contract

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 950 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Hipper » Sun Dec 15, 2024 2:06 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:30 am
1. The fans
2. Local grass roots football
3. Players / clubs in leagues below EPL
4. Inland Revenue
Etc etc

KDB and others deserve to be rewarded for their obvious talents but nobody “deserves” that kind of salary. Would his or any other footballers life be any worse if the maximum they could earn was say £100k a week ? That would also then mean that bang average players would not be able to walk into “smaller” clubs not owned by Saudi billionaires like ours and sign 4 year contracts on £50k a week and decide after a dozen of games that they are too good for us / demand a move away.

The game is not any better because of these insane salaries.
May be not directly linked to salaries but all the money swilling around in the game has given us a higher standard of football, fitness levels, nutrition, stadia, pitches etc. etc..

In principle I don't like the inequality of income that exists generally but in the current system, it seems ridiculous that footballers and pop stars, for example, can earn more then the Prime Minister.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18733
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7693 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 15, 2024 2:12 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:38 am
Yep they do - but do not deserve as much as they get….anywhere near as much.
And if they are going to get that much then tax them at 80% or 90% on everything over £5m a year and ring fence the tax receipts to give to grass roots, community sports projects, anything else related to health / wellbeing etc.

And if that means that players decide to play elsewhere that would also be a positive in my view. Again if that reduces the popularity of the EPL in other countries that’s another massive plus for me. The league becomes more competitive, fans in this country manage to get a ticket to support their own team (instead of being priced out of it by the Scandinavian supporters club), corporate hospitality numbers reduce, etc etc

There’s just no downsides for me. All this nonsense about getting to see the best players in the world in the EPL. Who cares ? The players certainly don’t….at a drop of a hat they would move to another league - as we will soon find out when KDB takes his Saudi contract
I think a lot of people probably care that the world’s best players play in the Premier League, I certainly do.

aggi
Posts: 9704
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2338 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by aggi » Sun Dec 15, 2024 2:37 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:38 am
Yep they do - but do not deserve as much as they get….anywhere near as much.
And if they are going to get that much then tax them at 80% or 90% on everything over £5m a year and ring fence the tax receipts to give to grass roots, community sports projects, anything else related to health / wellbeing etc.

And if that means that players decide to play elsewhere that would also be a positive in my view. Again if that reduces the popularity of the EPL in other countries that’s another massive plus for me. The league becomes more competitive, fans in this country manage to get a ticket to support their own team (instead of being priced out of it by the Scandinavian supporters club), corporate hospitality numbers reduce, etc etc

There’s just no downsides for me. All this nonsense about getting to see the best players in the world in the EPL. Who cares ? The players certainly don’t….at a drop of a hat they would move to another league - as we will soon find out when KDB takes his Saudi contract
It always feels a bit classist the complaining about how much footballers earn and how they shouldn't.

Someone like DeBruyne is one of a handful of the best in his field in the world, if that was in other fields then no-one would flinch at what they get paid but football is looked down on. Why should footballers (who generally have a much higher effective tax rate than others earning a similar amount) be the ones criticised?

I remember during Covid when MPs were criticising footballers for taking their salary whilst you got people like Anthony Bamford claiming furlough payments for his companies and still taking millions out himself but that was fine.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1484 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Ex Claret now a Solicitor outlines standard player contract

Post by Big Vinny K » Sun Dec 15, 2024 4:09 pm

aggi wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2024 2:37 pm
It always feels a bit classist the complaining about how much footballers earn and how they shouldn't.

Someone like DeBruyne is one of a handful of the best in his field in the world, if that was in other fields then no-one would flinch at what they get paid but football is looked down on. Why should footballers (who generally have a much higher effective tax rate than others earning a similar amount) be the ones criticised?

I remember during Covid when MPs were criticising footballers for taking their salary whilst you got people like Anthony Bamford claiming furlough payments for his companies and still taking millions out himself but that was fine.
Nothing to do with class.
I’d impose that tax rate on anybody earning that kind of salary.

The issue with football is how these salaries inflate the rest of the market and what that is doing to the game in the general. Personally I do not enjoy the game anywhere near as much and how supporters are treated. All about opinions as clearly plenty of people are happy with the way the game has gone.

Post Reply