Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
KellyClaret
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:54 am
Been Liked: 40 times

Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by KellyClaret » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:20 pm

I know there has been plenty of debate on various threads about how we lined up against both Spurs and Sunderland - how we lined up tactically and if we used different formations etc.

I've found the average position maps for both matches and put them side-by-side for comparison (I've had to flip one of the maps so are both facing the same direction)


BFCaveragepositionsSMALL.jpg
BFCaveragepositionsSMALL.jpg (43.92 KiB) Viewed 829 times

The formation on the left is from the Spurs game and on the right is our aver positions against Sunderland

morninbob
Posts: 854
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:00 pm
Been Liked: 161 times

Re: Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by morninbob » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:25 pm

As I thought, sonne in a back 5 was higher up than JBL in an alleged back 4. In fact it was similar for both, just that we did more defending against spurs.

KellyClaret
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:54 am
Been Liked: 40 times

Re: Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by KellyClaret » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:39 pm

It does seem to be a 3atb system used in both games so far with us playing wider against Sunderland.

Our formation actually doesn't seem to dissimilar to what Amorim is trying to play at ManUre

ollieclarets8
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 165 times

Re: Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by ollieclarets8 » Thu Aug 28, 2025 7:07 pm

I watched the Sunderland game so knew JBL spent his time at the back, making it a back 5. We did change when on the attack as you'd expect.

Beckm0
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:20 pm
Been Liked: 4 times

Re: Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by Beckm0 » Thu Aug 28, 2025 7:23 pm

KellyClaret wrote:
Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:39 pm
It does seem to be a 3atb system used in both games so far with us playing wider against Sunderland.

Our formation actually doesn't seem to dissimilar to what Amorim is trying to play at ManUre
Its distinctly different. As much as anything its actually situationally flexible, going into a 442 at times, 4
541 at other and even 325 in other phases.

ecc
Posts: 6334
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 1775 times

Re: Average position maps from Spurs and Sunderland

Post by ecc » Thu Aug 28, 2025 7:25 pm

KellyClaret wrote:
Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:20 pm
I know there has been plenty of debate on various threads about how we lined up against both Spurs and Sunderland - how we lined up tactically and if we used different formations etc.

I've found the average position maps for both matches and put them side-by-side for comparison (I've had to flip one of the maps so are both facing the same direction)



BFCaveragepositionsSMALL.jpg

Hi KellyClaret,

Thank you for taking the time to find and post that. I was wondering how we were lining up.

IMHO the "three at the back/five at the back" (depending on one's view of it) can and, ideally should, be fluid. I might be wrong but I would also hope to see Kyle Walker go out wide with the RWB tucking in to enable him to overlap when we're going for a game.

Post Reply