Everton v West Ham
-
- Posts: 20686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4545 times
- Has Liked: 2052 times
Everton v West Ham
Nunos first outing for Hammers away at Everton.
2-1 Toffees
2-1 Toffees
-
- Posts: 2440
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
- Been Liked: 666 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Gueye has a nice choice of leggings……………
-
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2486 times
- Has Liked: 2438 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Everton v West Ham
West Ham's defence look dodgy.
They really don't like anyone running at them.
They really don't like anyone running at them.
-
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2486 times
- Has Liked: 2438 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Everton v West Ham
Or crosses..
-
- Posts: 20686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4545 times
- Has Liked: 2052 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Nuno out.
Re: Everton v West Ham
Nice one, Michael.
-
- Posts: 8820
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1886 times
- Has Liked: 2255 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
West Ham are pushing but unless Everton screw up I can't see them winning this one
-
- Posts: 35086
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12755 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Everton v West Ham
Grealish is unplayable, Everton will score loads from set pieces this season
-
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2486 times
- Has Liked: 2438 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Everton v West Ham
It's like a library in there.
Not like Goodison.
Not like Goodison.
-
- Posts: 20686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4545 times
- Has Liked: 2052 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
1-1
Bowen
Bowen
-
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2486 times
- Has Liked: 2438 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Everton v West Ham
Fancy not knowing that Bowen would cut inside and shoot.
-
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 1305 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Diouf for WH looks some player
-
- Posts: 3292
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 876 times
- Has Liked: 428 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Foster got sent off v Forest 2 seasons ago, for the exact same elbow that Mykolenko just got a yellow for
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 662 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
How is that a foul and a booking for winning the ball ? Refs are ruining the game .
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 78247
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38218 times
- Has Liked: 5809 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Everton v West Ham
Yet Paqueta would have you believe it was in his face. So similar to Foster’s red card.Roosterbooster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:46 pmFoster got sent off v Forest 2 seasons ago, for the exact same elbow that Mykolenko just got a yellow for
-
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
- Been Liked: 750 times
- Has Liked: 183 times
- Contact:
Re: Everton v West Ham
Elbowing Paqueta is more deserving of a medal than a card. Cheat of the highest order.
-
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4211 times
- Has Liked: 2250 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
A Moyes Vs Moyes game.
Very poor showing.
Very poor showing.
-
- Posts: 6938
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 2011 times
- Has Liked: 518 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Happy with a point here, Everton unlikely to go down under Moyes but we need to keep them in range just in case.
-
- Posts: 3292
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 876 times
- Has Liked: 428 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
That decision was absolutely inexcusableexpoultryboy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:50 pmHow is that a foul and a booking for winning the ball ? Refs are ruining the game .
I can forgive refs making genuine mistakes. But that's just a complete inability to understand basic football
-
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 589 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Imagine selling your soul to whatever Hill Dickinson is. It's such a shame that this happened both for the club and the sponsor that has powered Everton towards the level of irrelevancy that they probably deserve these days.
-
- Posts: 8820
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1886 times
- Has Liked: 2255 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Everton are in our mini league how shite is Beto and how much did one season wonder Dibling cost.Everton will struggle this year they have no goalscorer
Re: Everton v West Ham
However much they try to big up these new stadiums and say how they've been designed for optimal atmosphere, they never feel the same.distortiondave wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:58 pmImagine selling your soul to whatever Hill Dickinson is. It's such a shame that this happened both for the club and the sponsor that has powered Everton towards the level of irrelevancy that they probably deserve these days.
Spurs was the same, it looks fantastic but that big one tiered end they've built that was apparently inspired by Dortmund has been a bit of a damp squib.
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:01 am
- Been Liked: 127 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Seems like Everton fans,not too happy with the new ground.Complaining about the light show,prices of pies, running out of hot dogs,and empty seats.Sound familiar?
-
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1479 times
- Has Liked: 469 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
It's an international law firm that was founded in Liverpool and is still headquartered in the city.distortiondave wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:58 pmImagine selling your soul to whatever Hill Dickinson is. It's such a shame that this happened both for the club and the sponsor that has powered Everton towards the level of irrelevancy that they probably deserve these days.
In terms of sponsorship it's much more fitting and a lot less dubious than others.
Re: Everton v West Ham
The booking would have been for the dissent afterwards I’d have thought. Still a terrible decision to award the free kick.expoultryboy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:50 pmHow is that a foul and a booking for winning the ball ? Refs are ruining the game .
-
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4211 times
- Has Liked: 2250 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
Can we lend you and Row X to the Everton owners to defend them?Les Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Sep 30, 2025 7:05 amSeems like Everton fans,not too happy with the new ground.Complaining about the light show,prices of pies, running out of hot dogs,and empty seats.Sound familiar?
Be a few less arguments on here for a short while

This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 3292
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 876 times
- Has Liked: 428 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ar ... 7r822yywzo
KDH not happy. And rightly so. But might get him in more trouble, sadly
KDH not happy. And rightly so. But might get him in more trouble, sadly
-
- Posts: 3938
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1882 times
- Has Liked: 2746 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Everton v West Ham
Sadly, it wasn't for the dissent afterwards because he went straight to his pocket when the Everton players foot landed on his opponents foot, even though this is a common thing in a 50/50 challenge. The issue of the card led to the dissent and understandably so because Dewsbury-Hall will be suspended for the next game because he has picked up 5 cautions in 6 PL games.
This is a player who has played 215 matches at senior level as a competitive midfielder and has received 24 cautions and 1 dismissal before this season.
His booking against Liverpool was because he took a quick free kick which the referee didn't sanction from all accounts.
The game really is going to the dogs when so many players are being cautioned for incidents which occur and have a natural coming together. It is a contact sport, by all means get rid of the deliberate intent to injure opponens which some players definitely try to do. However, accept that two players challenging 50/50 will see one win fractionally ahead of the other and their feet have to go somewhere.
Re: Everton v West Ham
Then it’s an absolute rick of the highest order. Thanks for clearing it up.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 30, 2025 12:07 pmSadly, it wasn't for the dissent afterwards because he went straight to his pocket when the Everton players foot landed on his opponents foot, even though this is a common thing in a 50/50 challenge. The issue of the card led to the dissent and understandably so because Dewsbury-Hall will be suspended for the next game because he has picked up 5 cautions in 6 PL games.
This is a player who has played 215 matches at senior level as a competitive midfielder and has received 24 cautions and 1 dismissal before this season.
His booking against Liverpool was because he took a quick free kick which the referee didn't sanction from all accounts.
The game really is going to the dogs when so many players are being cautioned for incidents which occur and have a natural coming together. It is a contact sport, by all means get rid of the deliberate intent to injure opponens which some players definitely try to do. However, accept that two players challenging 50/50 will see one win fractionally ahead of the other and their feet have to go somewhere.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 78247
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38218 times
- Has Liked: 5809 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Everton v West Ham
Dewsbury-Hall's last two yellow cards have been downright ridiculous. That's not because of the way the game is going but because of the clear deterioration of the quality of referees we now have. Darren England, who I wouldn't give a non-league game to, and Sam Barrott, who made an arse of our game at Man U, are the two referees in question.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 30, 2025 12:07 pmSadly, it wasn't for the dissent afterwards because he went straight to his pocket when the Everton players foot landed on his opponents foot, even though this is a common thing in a 50/50 challenge. The issue of the card led to the dissent and understandably so because Dewsbury-Hall will be suspended for the next game because he has picked up 5 cautions in 6 PL games.
This is a player who has played 215 matches at senior level as a competitive midfielder and has received 24 cautions and 1 dismissal before this season.
His booking against Liverpool was because he took a quick free kick which the referee didn't sanction from all accounts.
The game really is going to the dogs when so many players are being cautioned for incidents which occur and have a natural coming together. It is a contact sport, by all means get rid of the deliberate intent to injure opponens which some players definitely try to do. However, accept that two players challenging 50/50 will see one win fractionally ahead of the other and their feet have to go somewhere.
D-H has described the two decisions as mind boggling. David Moyes called the one against West Ham a shabby decision but he also questioned the level of refereeing in the Premier League and reckons all managers will be saying that right now.
Re: Everton v West Ham
I don't get it either. That was just a simple interception. The other player was late in and hurt himself, as a consequence. Nothing huge, just a shin tap.expoultryboy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:50 pmHow is that a foul and a booking for winning the ball ? Refs are ruining the game .
This business of player gets ball, other player doesn't, so kicks first player's boot and hurts himself, is pure rubbish. Tough luck not a free kick to you because you kicked someone on the wrong place!
-
- Posts: 5356
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1539 times
- Has Liked: 1507 times
Re: Everton v West Ham
The days of identifying which are the good and bad refs seem to have gone. They are all bad. Granted not helped by the rules in some cases and the introduction of VAR. I don't think their ruling body and Howard Webb are helping.