Hope for the best but plan for the worse.
Thats surely the best action to take.
Hope for the best but plan for the worse.
I made the suggestion that the border posts that have been left to fall into disrepair thanks to EU rules on freedom of movement could have been utilised in helping to slow the spread of the virus and in quarantining.
There's nothing racist about trying to quell the spread of a disease by border control.RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:38 amI made the suggestion that the border posts that have been left to fall into disrepair thanks to EU rules on freedom of movement could have been utilised in helping to slow the spread of the virus and in quarantining.
You wanted me banned as you thought this was "racist" just like several posters who piled in on Lowbank Clarets imbecilic comments.
My suggestion has now become a policy adopted by the following countries-
Since then,
Czech Republic,
Norway,
Poland,
Denmark,
Austria,
Turkey,
Pakistan.
Vietnam,
Lebanon,
Israel, and a small number of Pacific Islands,
plus New Zealand who its said has the toughest border restrictions in the world. And today, Germany. Have all effectively closed their borders.
My suggestion that border controls could help has been vindicated and adopted by countries, not just in europe but globally. My suggestion, was simply a prediction of what would happen.
I'm more than happy to be on your "foe list" more than happy. It saves me having to respond to logic lacking, irrational , unthinking comments.
You will only spread the virus with contact & exposure, it's absolutely impossible for the virus to be spread if you become a recluse & ramp up the hygiene, it's extremely unlikely you will encounter any problems, the virus can only do what we allow it to do, we are in charge well we should be not the virus.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:08 amRight, but it's not about me or you or people that can get it and recover, it's about giving it to people who are at risk. This virus is infectious without being symptomatic, that's the scary thing. Just spreading it around without even knowing it.
I'm convinced things will close down soon in the UK. We are marginally behind Italy and look at them. We'll do similar when enough pressure is put on the government.
...and there it is...Zlatan wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:32 amI'm not directing this at any forum users in particular, but I am sure I'll offend someone. I saw the following on Twitter and I was going to save it as an insult, but there are too many candidates for it at the moment...
"I see that someone snuck into the genepool when the lifeguards weren't looking"
![]()
Thank you UTC.uptheclarets wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 8:00 pmI very rarely post these days but follow a number of topics.
I have found you Jackupclaret and paulatky to have called things just about right from day 1
Lowbank has also been a good source of information,
What has been noticeable is how sentiment has changed very quickly from “its only flu” to this is a serious issue for the whole of humanity.
Thanks for the detail. As we've already seen, that's an outright lie by a desperate newspaper.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:40 amUK coronavirus crisis 'to last until spring 2021 and could see 7.9m hospitalised'
The coronavirus epidemic in the UK will last until next spring and could lead to 7.9 million people being hospitalised, a secret Public Health England (PHE) briefing for senior NHS officials reveals.
The document, seen by the Guardian, is the first time health chiefs tackling the virus have admitted that they expect it to circulate for another 12 months and lead to huge extra strain on an already overstretched NHS.
It also suggests that health chiefs are braced for as many as 80% of Britons becoming infected with the coronavirus over that time.
Prof Chris Whitty, the government’s chief medical adviser, has previously described that figure as the worst-case scenario and suggested that the real number would turn out to be less than that. However, the briefing makes clear that four in five of the population “are expected” to contract the virus.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... spitalised
Interestingly, Scotland has ignored the UK government advice and are continuing to test all people showing symptoms.Zlatan wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:56 pmI initially quoted South Korea as an example where the data is likely to be more accurate because they’re testing more, which they are (And the fatality rate is still massively lower there And it’s measurably lower because of the data they have). Their only advantage over us and our approach is evidencing that the approach is the right way. I strongly suspect that our government have decided that we don’t need to actually waste time testing to satisfy stats, it is a waste of valuable resource, so don’t do it.
Do you think that locking everyone away is the right thing to do, even if it leads to no improvement at all in public health, just because it's doing something? Sean Dyche said that sometimes the hardest thing to do is to do nothing. Just after we started a 7 match unbeaten run. There is no benefit to anyone if the politicians compete to heap misery on the people if it won't do any good.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:01 amWell, exactly. There's nothing to compare it to. That's what we're supposed to do. Just keep our heads up and wash our hands and watch our loved ones "die before their time".
It's interesting to see the levels other countries have gone to, whilst we sit here doing nothing.
There's no single, correct way to do things, of that I'm sure, but, to do absolutely nothing is just as insane.
If that's the case, presumably you reckon we should have no restrictions. The thing runs through us, a million people have not great ends to their lives (most of whom will have been lucky enough to have lived long lives of material wealth, health, opportunity and peace unknown to 99% of all people ever) and we just get on with it.paulatky wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:43 amThank you UTC.
I have only ever applied my own logic to the known facts and come to a realistic conclusion.
Unfortunately its turning out far worse than even I thought it would be.
This morning’s falls on FTSE just one example of that.
In all honesty I just cant imagine what the world will be like in 12 months time.
Mass unemployment looms and really dark times lie ahead.
There's no single thing that I think is correct. I just think inaction is worse.dsr wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:53 amDo you think that locking everyone away is the right thing to do, even if it leads to no improvement at all in public health, just because it's doing something? Sean Dyche said that sometimes the hardest thing to do is to do nothing. Just after we started a 7 match unbeaten run. There is no benefit to anyone if the politicians compete to heap misery on the people if it won't do any good.
Unthinking people are more than happy to brandish the "racist" label. By doing so, it devalues and desentisises the term , when , real racism rears its ugly head.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:40 amThere's nothing racist about trying to quell the spread of a disease by border control.
People are perhaps looking at the poster rather than the post.
And you can help massively by not replying to those people on this thread, ever. You'll do a lot more good by ignoring them.RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:01 amThe situation is far far far more serious than a handful of idiots wanting to slap down someone on an irrelevant football message board for simply expressing their opinion.
It's not generally helpful to say "I don't know what to do, but I'm going to do it anyway".ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:00 amThere's no single thing that I think is correct. I just think inaction is worse.
It speaks volumes that other countries are doing things we are not. That's where it doesn't sit right with me.
But people are doing things. World governments are acting.
When several posters brand you "racist" for making a suggestion, which has subsequently been widely adopted across the globe. I reserve the right to reply and defend myself. It's as simple as that. I've got 3 very close family members who fall into to the "vulnerable" groups. I'll not say more than that. So when other posters pile in with their hysterical, unthinking, moronic accusations, claiming I wasn't taking it seriously and calling for me to be banned, I ask them to justify it.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:02 amAnd you can help massively by not replying to those people on this thread, ever. You'll do a lot more good by ignoring them.
No.SalouClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:11 amRingo, I agree you shouldn't have been called a racist. But stop posting the same reply when you aren't getting a response. There's enough bullsh!t to read on this thread as it is![]()
You had to ruin it, didn't you?
When did I say there should be no restrictions ?thatdberight wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:54 amIf that's the case, presumably you reckon we should have no restrictions. The thing runs through us, a million people have not great ends to their lives (most of whom will have been lucky enough to have lived long lives of material wealth, health, opportunity and peace unknown to 99% of all people ever) and we just get on with it.
If you've got such a bad feeling about the future after we take evasive action, surely that's the rational response?
You didn't say it. That was my question.paulatky wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:50 amWhen did I say there should be no restrictions ?
I have said 4 weeks ago that the government would have to decide between personal health and economic health and I thought they would come down on the side of economic health.
That doesnt mean I agree with that policy.
We need a plan whereby we can treat as many people as possible over the next 12 months ,ideally that would be gradual increase without any peaks but that will be impossibe
They made it illegal to eat wild animals a couple of weeks ago, whether they continue this after this passes is another unanswerable question.
Check your facts. They don't eat bats and probably not snakes or pangolins either.
They probably do, just not advertised as such, they'd eat pretty much anything over there, I've seen them.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:02 amCheck your facts. They don't eat bats and probably not snakes or pangolins either.
Probably? Is that a fact?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:04 amThey probably do, just not advertised as such, they'd eat pretty much anything over there, I've seen them.
Again, nothing is black and white. Everyone agrees health is more important, but in 12 months, one way or another, this will be over and we'll still need to fund an NHS.
When I visited China, they certainly appeared to eat just about everything. When I was in Hong Hong, I witnessed them kill and skin live snakes for for food. Albeit that was a few years ago.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:02 amCheck your facts. They don't eat bats and probably not snakes or pangolins either.
Perhaps you are still clinging on to the video that was released very early after the the outbreak claiming to show a woman in Wuhan apparrently eating bat. That was actually filmed in 2014 by an American travel writer in the middle of the Pacific on the island of Palau.
You mentioned probably also in your post, we can't be 100% on what there eat & don't eat, I've seen them eat alsorts indescribable, there are not too fussy over there.
What on earth are you talking about.thatdberight wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:29 amIt's not a competition to see who can come up with the wildest overstatement.
Tarantulas are fair game also, chucked straight into the pan of boiling hot water.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:08 amWhen I visited China, they certainly appeared to eat just about everything. When I was in Hong Hong, I witnessed them kill and skin live snakes for for food. Albeit that was a few years ago.
We chuck live lobsters straight into boiling water!Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:12 amTarantulas are fair game also, chucked straight into the pan of boiling hot water.
In context, you were replying to a post where it was said 0.5% was way too low a number of people who would be seriously affected. You put up 26%. For what? Just as a throwaway comment unrelated? No. If you want to lob 26% in either stand by it or state what it's about. If it's not your version of the 0.5% give that number instead.
I'm sure that you are right and the practice of skinnining a snake is horrific in western eyes, but why is eating a particular animal frowned upon? Many people eat strange things including the Brits. The Cockneys love Jellied Eels. Some people eat sea slugs and sea cucumbers. Really, what's the difference?Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:08 amWhen I visited China, they certainly appeared to eat just about everything. When I was in Hong Hong, I witnessed them kill and skin live snakes for for food. Albeit that was a few years ago.
You labelled me "racist" for making a suggestion ,that has subsequently, been adopted by countries all over Europe and the world.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:08 amWhen I visited China, they certainly appeared to eat just about everything. When I was in Hong Hong, I witnessed them kill and skin live snakes for for food. Albeit that was a few years ago.
Many many people will be in the same boat.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:05 amJust about every Airline is going to ground around 75% of their fleets.
That’s me out of a job.
Just hope I can sort my pension out.