Subs- zero impact this year
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Subs- zero impact this year
Just seen on twitter that none of our subs have impacted the game with a goal or assist in our 31 games this season.
Staggering stat.
Staggering stat.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
We could have done with one or two last two weeks just to protect what we had!
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Hardly surprising, how many total minutes have our substitutes played?
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Subs have always been Dyches achilles heel!
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
He certainly doesn't like to use them unless taking Defour or Vydra off.
He must have done an inspired substitute at some time in his Burnley career?
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
A team that has struggled for goals all season with a squad that has a depleted bench most the season hasn't had a scoring sub, there's a shock.
Always good to find a new sentence that can be used after each match.
Always good to find a new sentence that can be used after each match.
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Not just no scoring subs, they havent contributed an assist either....nothing. Squad depth or lack thereof, is coming perilously close to costing us big timeclaretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:12 amA team that has struggled for goals all season with a squad that has a depleted bench most the season hasn't had a scoring sub, there's a shock.
Always good to find a new sentence that can be used after each match.
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
We have always had a CF on the bench haven't we? Maybe the odd game we haven't?claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:12 amA team that has struggled for goals all season with a squad that has a depleted bench most the season hasn't had a scoring sub, there's a shock.
Always good to find a new sentence that can be used after each match.
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Most games yes, wonder how many goals and assists have come from the bench in the last 3 seasons.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:21 amWe have always had a CF on the bench haven't we? Maybe the odd game we haven't?
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
I think Jay Rod might have been a sub at Bournemouth with his 90th minute winner and Wood scoring the 94th minute penalty against Wolves?
-
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Whilst not a surprise, that really is an incredible stat. Huge summer coming up for BFC.
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
I still don't get the thrust of the "lack of depth in the forwards" argument. Are people saying that Wood-Barnes-Rodgriguez-Vydra is not enough forwards, or that one or more of them are inadequate and should have been replaced? There have been a fair few threads about not having strength in depth up front this season, and I don't suppose they are whingeing about injuries because that isn't anyone's fault. So is it the quality or the quantity of forwards that is causing the complaints?
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:54 pm
- Been Liked: 172 times
- Has Liked: 23 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
The subs that have been brought when we are defending a lead will not show in that stat but will have impacted a game.
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Newcastle showed how making substitutions can win a game. If Dyche was Newcastle manager they wouldn’t have won that game. We were crying out for someone like cork in midfield on Sunday. Dyches reluctance to use substitutes costs us a lot of points over a season.
-
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1029 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Maybe we should start more games with our best players on the bench like Newcastle did on Sunday.
-
- Posts: 67887
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
What utter nonsensethelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 1:11 pmNewcastle showed how making substitutions can win a game. If Dyche was Newcastle manager they wouldn’t have won that game. We were crying out for someone like cork in midfield on Sunday. Dyches reluctance to use substitutes costs us a lot of points over a season.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
I would say that one issue is that most clubs have a winger or midfielder who can be used as an attacking sub playing up front. Whilst our front 4 may or may not be strong enough (personally I'd say not) we don't really have options outside of them.dsr wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:31 pmI still don't get the thrust of the "lack of depth in the forwards" argument. Are people saying that Wood-Barnes-Rodgriguez-Vydra is not enough forwards, or that one or more of them are inadequate and should have been replaced? There have been a fair few threads about not having strength in depth up front this season, and I don't suppose they are whingeing about injuries because that isn't anyone's fault. So is it the quality or the quantity of forwards that is causing the complaints?
-
- Posts: 67887
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Don’t know about assists but five of our Premier League goals last season were scored by substitutes.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:27 amMost games yes, wonder how many goals and assists have come from the bench in the last 3 seasons.
-
- Posts: 2743
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 667 times
- Has Liked: 2053 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Remember us beating Everton 2-1 at home back in 2018 coming back from 1 goal down. Pretty sure that involved bringing on Wood who scored one of the goalsQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:11 amHe certainly doesn't like to use them unless taking Defour or Vydra off.
He must have done an inspired substitute at some time in his Burnley career?
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Vokes against Rovers is one straight awayQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:11 amHe certainly doesn't like to use them unless taking Defour or Vydra off.
He must have done an inspired substitute at some time in his Burnley career?
Think Barnes came on as a sub in the Palace game when he scored the winner
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Dyche doesn’t do squads, or Subs.
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
He does do keeping us in the PL on a relatively tiny budget though.
This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 67887
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
And he came on as a sub in the next game and scored twice at West HamJohnDearyMe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:32 pmRemember us beating Everton 2-1 at home back in 2018 coming back from 1 goal down. Pretty sure that involved bringing on Wood who scored one of the goals
-
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 935 times
- Has Liked: 608 times
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Vydra against Southampton and Olympiakos
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
I know the OP is referring to PL games, but Mumbongo headed on to Vydra in the FA Cup for the last minute equaliser. So subs haven't been entirely unproductive this season.
-
- Posts: 6975
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
As stated previously Sean doesn't do subs unless he has to
V Newcastle triple subs at 1-0 up would have helped
We had players on the bench whocould have come on and perhaps helped us to a victory instead we did nothing till it was too late
V Newcastle triple subs at 1-0 up would have helped
We had players on the bench whocould have come on and perhaps helped us to a victory instead we did nothing till it was too late
-
- Posts: 6522
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 982 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Burnley also are very close to bottom (if not bottom) of the PL table for goals scored in the final 15 minutes of games.
-
- Posts: 6651
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2005 times
- Has Liked: 3346 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Newcastle won the game because they had by far their best player back from injury. OK he sat on the bench for 60 minutes because he was being eased back into it, but they needed him and he came on and we couldn't cope with him. They are basically stuffed without him as the past few months have proved. Unfortunately we suffered in almost exactly the same way with Ings returning the week before to galvanise Soton who without him had been on an awful run. We can just thank our lucky stars that Zaha was injured when we played Palace because they are another team who have ONE player who is head and shoulders above the rest. A la Grealish at Villa.
-
- Posts: 15259
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6758 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
This is close to the most pointless stat I've ever seen.
There are so many other ways to impact on a game.
There are so many other ways to impact on a game.
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
it's simple, we unfortunately lack Premier League quality in quite a few positions never mind the bench. IF we stay up it needs addressing or we will drop for sure, miracles can't be worked every year.
We need at least 2 starters replacing with far better quality then they can drop to the bench
We need at least 2 starters replacing with far better quality then they can drop to the bench
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Folk have been saying this on here every season since we last got promoted.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:39 pmit's simple, we unfortunately lack Premier League quality in quite a few positions never mind the bench. IF we stay up it needs addressing or we will drop for sure, miracles can't be worked every year.
We need at least 2 starters replacing with far better quality then they can drop to the bench
We haven’t been relegated yet, and it won’t happen this season.
It will happen eventually, though, and then you get to come back and say “I told you so”.
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 129 times
- Has Liked: 40 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
His substitutions are pathetic.
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Why exactly did we buy Dale Stephens? What is his purpose and role in the squad?
-
- Posts: 6651
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2005 times
- Has Liked: 3346 times
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 237 times
- Has Liked: 58 times
- Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Apparently makes a cracking brew
-
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 77 times
-
- Posts: 6651
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2005 times
- Has Liked: 3346 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
And the brews had been crap since Walters left and nobody had had anything remotely resembling a laugh in the dressing room since Crouch(y) left (apparently). So Dale is temporarily covering both roles and all for a million quid up front, so fair play to him.
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
The anti Dyche group grows a little by the week.
Hopefully by the time we are allowed to return to games they have some sort of protest.
Maybe form a group on Brunshaw Road after a game, give everyone else something to laugh at.
Hopefully by the time we are allowed to return to games they have some sort of protest.
Maybe form a group on Brunshaw Road after a game, give everyone else something to laugh at.
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
The quality for sure, since Rodriguez returned we haven't seen him capable at this level consistently. It seems Barnes is injury prone now, feels like he's missed most of the last 2 years with injury. Vydra hasn't been given a real chance until recently, soon as Barnes is fit, Vydra will be on the bench again. Wood has had a poor season by his standards, looks razor sharp now though.dsr wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:31 pmI still don't get the thrust of the "lack of depth in the forwards" argument. Are people saying that Wood-Barnes-Rodgriguez-Vydra is not enough forwards, or that one or more of them are inadequate and should have been replaced? There have been a fair few threads about not having strength in depth up front this season, and I don't suppose they are whingeing about injuries because that isn't anyone's fault. So is it the quality or the quantity of forwards that is causing the complaints?
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
How were we crying out for Cork? we were well in control of that game, we looked like the only team capable of scoring. As for subs, we don't have the luxury of Saint-Maximin and Calum Wilson on the bench. I don't know why people are surprised by the zero impact from subs stat, our bench has been full of unproven novices, defenders and goalkeepers all season. There's only one man to blame for that stat and it isn't Dyche.thelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 1:11 pmNewcastle showed how making substitutions can win a game. If Dyche was Newcastle manager they wouldn’t have won that game. We were crying out for someone like cork in midfield on Sunday. Dyches reluctance to use substitutes costs us a lot of points over a season.
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
Who is that then? Sean has spent all the money available to him on giving the existing players bigger contracts. If they'd all remained on their 2017 contract terms he'd have had an extra 75 million to spend on transfers. Put it another way, our wage bill is nearly 600k a week more than it was in 2017 that's 24k a week extra each for a 25 man squad.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:54 amHow were we crying out for Cork? we were well in control of that game, we looked like the only team capable of scoring. As for subs, we don't have the luxury of Saint-Maximin and Calum Wilson on the bench. I don't know why people are surprised by the zero impact from subs stat, our bench has been full of unproven novices, defenders and goalkeepers all season. There's only one man to blame for that stat and it isn't Dyche.
Don't get me wrong, I admire Sean Dyche for what he's done for the club but after successive poor transfer windows I really can't understand why the wage bill has continued to go up for what is essentially the same group of players.
Re: Subs- zero impact this year
I don't disagree with what you're saying although I'm not sure how much input Dyche has into wage numbers. Even with the incredibly high wage bill, there was money left over, held back from funding transfers. Are the wage numbers you're referring too before or after Hendrick, Lennon, Hart, Legdkins left? I'd assume that was 3 of our highest earners.dibraidio wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:01 pmWho is that then? Sean has spent all the money available to him on giving the existing players bigger contracts. If they'd all remained on their 2017 contract terms he'd have had an extra 75 million to spend on transfers. Put it another way, our wage bill is nearly 600k a week more than it was in 2017 that's 24k a week extra each for a 25 man squad.
Don't get me wrong, I admire Sean Dyche for what he's done for the club but after successive poor transfer windows I really can't understand why the wage bill has continued to go up for what is essentially the same group of players.