FA to take no action against Alioski
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
FA to take no action against Alioski
Just been announced that no action to be taken against Alioski following incident with Dwight McNeil
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
No surprise really - other than the amount of time it's taken them to reach a decision
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Personally, I didn’t see it as anything other than a childish act. We’ll never truly know if it was anything more than that, as some believe.SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:56 pmNo surprise really - other than the amount of time it's taken them to reach a decision
-
- Posts: 19445
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
I am sure Leeds fans will be making the most of it next season in our games with them
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
That’ll be a given, though so will some of ours.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:59 pmI am sure Leeds fans will be making the most of it next season in our games with them
-
- Posts: 19445
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
indeed, childishness all round in football fandom
This user liked this post: DCWat
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Can’t believe nothing was done
What happened to ungentlemanly conduct charges.
It was ridiculous how many games Andre got banned for something he did years ago at another club while this nasty piece of work is allowed to continue to undermine the officials
If there was no case should have been resolved the week after the game
What happened to ungentlemanly conduct charges.
It was ridiculous how many games Andre got banned for something he did years ago at another club while this nasty piece of work is allowed to continue to undermine the officials
If there was no case should have been resolved the week after the game
-
- Posts: 5886
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1698 times
- Has Liked: 2535 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Must be a very large carpet the FA keep 'brushing matters' under.
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
I can only assume you haven't read the detailed report from the FA on this at the link. And quite how that compares with Gray I don't know.Spike wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:24 pmCan’t believe nothing was done
What happened to ungentlemanly conduct charges.
It was ridiculous how many games Andre got banned for something he did years ago at another club while this nasty piece of work is allowed to continue to undermine the officials
If there was no case should have been resolved the week after the game
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3150 times
- Has Liked: 10260 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
The FA conclusion seems fair to me.
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
-
- Posts: 17283
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6492 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Is anyone surprised?
-
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3150 times
- Has Liked: 10260 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Given the evidence - video, player statements and so on - no, not at all surprised. Nothing to be surprised about.
Alioski was simply being a knob as the FA pointed out albeit indirectly.
Alioski was simply being a knob as the FA pointed out albeit indirectly.
This user liked this post: JohnMac
-
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
- Location: standing like a clock on the shelf
Re: FA to take no action against Alioski
Is Alioski the opposite to Apres ski ?
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie