Russia Invades
-
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 886 times
- Has Liked: 29 times
Re: Russia Invades
Fuel will be £2 a litre and I was just quoted £450 per month to fix my gas and electric for 2 years. Add in the NI rise next month and the longer this war goes on the worse it’s going to be for a lot of people.
-
- Posts: 6625
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
What I find concerning today is,
US has put further sanctions on.
We have announced the delivery of Starstreak.
Putin has been quiet for two days. That concerns me slightly.
US has put further sanctions on.
We have announced the delivery of Starstreak.
Putin has been quiet for two days. That concerns me slightly.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
U.S. Stocks bounce back after several days of loses due to uncertainty over Ukraine.
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 54434?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 54434?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Not least the Ukrainians, least we can do is suck it up in good grace.claret2018 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:50 pmFuel will be £2 a litre and I was just quoted £450 per month to fix my gas and electric for 2 years. Add in the NI rise next month and the longer this war goes on the worse it’s going to be for a lot of people.
These 3 users liked this post: Colburn_Claret lesxdp alboclaret
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Worsley and Eccles MP is at this moment asking for help for most vulnerable through the crisis…
https://twitter.com/bbcnwt/status/15015 ... 12160?s=21
https://twitter.com/bbcnwt/status/15015 ... 12160?s=21
Re: Russia Invades
£450 a month? What are you currently paying?claret2018 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:50 pmFuel will be £2 a litre and I was just quoted £450 per month to fix my gas and electric for 2 years. Add in the NI rise next month and the longer this war goes on the worse it’s going to be for a lot of people.
You'd think the government would have done 1 of 2 things: Remove VAT from energy bills or freeze the National Insurance and not raise it. But nooooo, instead, they know how much fuel is rising yet they thought, "I know - let's also raise National Insurance as well!"
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Where do you think the money will come from? The country has not had time to recover from the Billions spent and lost due to COVID. With the squeeze against dirty money and investigations left right and centre over awards of contracts given out - Britain has taken its biggest hit since WW2 (and this is not a party political post).BERNIEU wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:00 pm£450 a month? What are you currently paying?
You'd think the government would have done 1 of 2 things: Remove VAT from energy bills or freeze the National Insurance and not raise it. But nooooo, instead, they know how much fuel is rising yet they thought, "I know - let's also raise National Insurance as well!"
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Russia Invades
They'll have to if it hits £1.90 litre. It would be political suicide not to do so.
Re: Russia Invades
Quite true, so we'll leave it there. Back to the thread in hand.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
No its a none political move, probably bourn of necessity - I expect all the parties to line up behind whatever needs to be done, although as we can see Parliament is attempting to mitigate impact for those who will face difficult choices.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:04 pmThey'll have to if it hits £1.90 litre. It would be political suicide not to do so.
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
- Been Liked: 148 times
- Has Liked: 59 times
Re: Russia Invades
Completely off topic but has anyone tried the Shackleton Malt Whiskey? Based on the blend Shackleton took with him, they found 11 bottles under the base camp and copied it. Has been on offer at Tesco at £18 this last week. Salted a couple of bottles away!elwaclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:22 pmOTHER NEWS: More on Shackleton discovery
https://twitter.com/erelija/status/1501 ... 59873?s=21
-
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 886 times
- Has Liked: 29 times
Re: Russia Invades
£110 currentlyBERNIEU wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:00 pm£450 a month? What are you currently paying?
You'd think the government would have done 1 of 2 things: Remove VAT from energy bills or freeze the National Insurance and not raise it. But nooooo, instead, they know how much fuel is rising yet they thought, "I know - let's also raise National Insurance as well!"
Re: Russia Invades
My car packed in, in May of 2019. I was going to get another early 2020 until Covid hit. Now I'm wondering whether I'm best just sticking with walking, cycling and public transport. It comes across to me that the government are trying to push people into buying electric cars.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:04 pmThey'll have to if it hits £1.90 litre. It would be political suicide not to do so.
-
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 886 times
- Has Liked: 29 times
Re: Russia Invades
Agree completely, but I think a lot won’t be able to afford the huge hit to household incomes that’s coming this year, especially the longer this conflict drags on.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:55 pmNot least the Ukrainians, least we can do is suck it up in good grace.
-
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1244 times
- Has Liked: 211 times
Re: Russia Invades
Is this true re: starstreak ? Very serious kit indeed ,though these are not “ plug n play “ like a stinger . You’d need a lot of trained up soldiers but boy do these beauties lock on .Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:52 pmWhat I find concerning today is,
US has put further sanctions on.
We have announced the delivery of Starstreak.
Putin has been quiet for two days. That concerns me slightly.
Re: US sanctions , they need neither gas or oil , though corporate America totally pulling its ops may cause problems after a couple of months
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
See posts just above for mitigation… already being discussed in Parliament.claret2018 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:15 pmAgree completely, but I think a lot won’t be able to afford the huge hit to household incomes that’s coming this year, especially the longer this conflict drags on.
CAN WE PLEASE MOVE ON NOW.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Perhaps distancing themselves from being accused of driving the war U.S. (by Russia), reject Poland’s plan over MIG transfer
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 63623?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 63623?s=21
Re: Russia Invades
Enter Venezuela, they will ramp up there oil, plus some gas, US will keep their reserves as much as possible, Fracking will ramp up as much as possible, ME asked to ramp up but so far as OPEC they have refused, hence Venezuela.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:21 pmIs this true re: starstreak ? Very serious kit indeed ,though these are not “ plug n play “ like a stinger . You’d need a lot of trained up soldiers but boy do these beauties lock on .
Re: US sanctions , they need neither gas or oil , though corporate America totally pulling its ops may cause problems after a couple of months
-
- Posts: 6625
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
Defence Secretary announced in the Commons today we would supply some in the coming days.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:21 pmIs this true re: starstreak ? Very serious kit indeed ,though these are not “ plug n play “ like a stinger . You’d need a lot of trained up soldiers but boy do these beauties lock on .
Re: US sanctions , they need neither gas or oil , though corporate America totally pulling its ops may cause problems after a couple of months
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
do you not find the way this "Story" is being delivered a little odd ? Why would Poland hold a press conference to announce it for it to then be denied by America ? They are making such a song and dance about it and I don't believe an of it, doubt Putin does either.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:30 pmPerhaps distancing themselves from being accused of driving the war U.S. (by Russia), reject Poland’s plan over MIG transfer
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 63623?s=21
We have an AFB 1 hour or so north of me (Creech), doesn't get much traffic at all because it is a drone base, in the last 10 days there has been 1 C5 Galaxy and 3 x C17 .............they aren't picking up fresh air.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Russia Invades
I think you need to sit down and imagine how we would feel, if we were under attack, and someone was trying to pinch a quarter of our country, under the pretext of a tissue of lies.dermotdermot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 12:55 pmHopefully it would only come to that if the West was stupid enough to give in to Zelensky and implement a no fly zone. I don’t think that they will but am getting increasingly agitated by his demands. The day before he made this so called Churhillian speech he was referring to NATO as being weak for not capitulating to his requests.
Would we be stupid for asking our friends, neighbours, allies to aid us. Should we just capitulate to aggression, just to spare their blushes.
Zelensky has done a hell of a job for his people, under circumstances you obviously don't appreciate, or you wouldn't make such a statement.
This user liked this post: Jellybean
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
sometimes I feel Zelensky is putting on a well orchestrated show, almost as if he is being asked/told what to say by others. His messaging has been very irratic over the last week where previously it wasn't, like it's meant to confuse and show disharmony within NATO etc.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
I think its nothing more than lack of sleep, worry and the fact he's responsible for the fate of his countryVegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:48 pmsometimes I feel Zelensky is putting on a well orchestrated show, almost as if he is being asked/told what to say by others. His messaging has been very irratic over the last week where previously it wasn't, like it's meant to confuse and show disharmony within NATO etc.
He knows that his mere presence in the Western media is having a huge positive effect for his country, and he's playing on that as much as he can
And there are divisions in NATO, those bordering Ukraine and Russia are far more worried about Russia intentions and are willing to go far further to support Ukraine
I think the UK is on the side of the more militant side of the alliance, and I suspect that side of NATO will ramp up weapon supplies and sanctions
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Me either, unless there are better planes they could substitute. Think this is designed to Reach Putin, be extremely surprised id U.S. was really denying equipment, more likely just their (unnecessary) involvement as intermediaries.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:38 pmdo you not find the way this "Story" is being delivered a little odd ? Why would Poland hold a press conference to announce it for it to then be denied by America ? They are making such a song and dance about it and I don't believe an of it, doubt Putin does either.
We have an AFB 1 hour or so north of me (Creech), doesn't get much traffic at all because it is a drone base, in the last 10 days there has been 1 C5 Galaxy and 3 x C17 .............they aren't picking up fresh air.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Russia Invades
It makes sense, for anyone who can to start car pools, or car sharing. Every little will help.gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:13 pmJust a heads up. Try and get the fuel in while you can because prices are going to be in the high 180s minimum by next week. We have already seen over 2 pound a litre on some motorway sites today.
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop
Re: Russia Invades
Just make sure James Corden isn't sharing.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:59 pmIt makes sense, for anyone who can to start car pools, or car sharing. Every little will help.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Russia Invades
I maybe wrong, but looking at a map the other day it looked like Chernobyl is close to the Belarusian border. If I'm right, I don't think they'd be best pleased either.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Russia Invades
They would be better off putting a tax on the suppliers.BERNIEU wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:00 pm£450 a month? What are you currently paying?
You'd think the government would have done 1 of 2 things: Remove VAT from energy bills or freeze the National Insurance and not raise it. But nooooo, instead, they know how much fuel is rising yet they thought, "I know - let's also raise National Insurance as well!"
The fuel you are buying today was bought, and processed 2 months ago, at 2 months ago prices. They always put prices up instantly, but take 2 months to drop it after the cost of a barrel drops back to normal. Ripping off sods.
-
- Posts: 6625
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
Friend of mine who worked for the NHS, told me some time ago. 3 days without sleep can lead to mental health issues, he probably hasn’t had much sleep for 13 days.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:48 pmsometimes I feel Zelensky is putting on a well orchestrated show, almost as if he is being asked/told what to say by others. His messaging has been very irratic over the last week where previously it wasn't, like it's meant to confuse and show disharmony within NATO etc.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
The usual practice is for a ‘neutral’ team to maintain Nuclear sites that could pose threats - there has been much discussion over who will police power stations, they reached agreement over the one that was attacked; I expect much the same will be happening with Chernobyl - the last thing Russia needs is that blowing towards their cities.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:02 pmI maybe wrong, but looking at a map the other day it looked like Chernobyl is close to the Belarusian border. If I'm right, I don't think they'd be best pleased either.
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
yeah Lancaster made a similar point, but when you put his delivery with the whole Polish Mig "fiasco" I'm just wondering if it's an orchestrated attempt to seed confusion and doubt - I could well be completely over thinking it of course !Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:11 pmFriend of mine who worked for the NHS, told me some time ago. 3 days without sleep can lead to mental health issues, he probably hasn’t had much sleep for 13 days.
-
- Posts: 6625
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
You could be right, I just think it’s probably more due to a lack of sleep. At the start he spoke very well, he now seems to jump a bout a bit and mis messages are not so controlled.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:14 pmyeah Lancaster made a similar point, but when you put his delivery with the whole Polish Mig "fiasco" I'm just wondering if it's an orchestrated attempt to seed confusion and doubt - I could well be completely over thinking it of course !
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
Mariupol maternity hospital destroyed https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/ ... Q7rSeTrplg
Dan Rivers reporting it too
Dan Rivers reporting it too
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Reuters, U.S. House sitting today will be looking for agreement over $1.5T dollar funding deal to cover domestic issues and Ukraine.
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 58305?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 58305?s=21
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
One thing that has to be done is to make sure that Ukraine can rebuild
Its almost certainly a war aim of Russia now to destroy as much of it as possible, and the Western world has to make sure there are funds and people available to rebuild it
Its almost certainly a war aim of Russia now to destroy as much of it as possible, and the Western world has to make sure there are funds and people available to rebuild it
-
- Posts: 6503
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2707 times
- Has Liked: 1593 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: Russia Invades
Absolutely. Texaco in Padiham was already 176.9 this morning. A site in a few places today I’m told are 189.0 so I’m trying to be modest in those predictions. If you are getting fuel in the 150s now, it’s because the garage hasn’t yet bought in new stock, and when they do the prices will soar.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:18 pmGot £1.58 at Asda on Monday
We are going to look at those prices with sighs in the coming weeks I think
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Reading between the lines Germany was uncomfortable about the Polish Mig’s been transferred to U.S. bases in Germany without going through NATO channels.
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 68098?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 68098?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
OTHRE NEWS: Reuters now confirming ‘Endurance’ found
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 51011?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 51011?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
New York Times reporting a major increases in Oligarch sanction list expected from Europe, along with the closure of Crypto loopholes
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1501 ... 93540?s=21
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1501 ... 93540?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Poland seem to be confirming that NATO must be involved in the plane transfer
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 09571?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 09571?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Ukrainian’s are barricading Odessa’s landmarks in an attempt to prevent Russian missiles destroying them.
https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/sta ... 77568?s=21
https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/sta ... 77568?s=21
Re: Russia Invades
I've just watched a market webinar with JP Morgan and they think the NI rise will go ahead and there won't be any VAT cuts on energy costs. The reason being is that once they reduce tax / halt increases it would be nearly impossible for them to put them back on. What they expect is more Government direct help for low / middle income earners as we have seen in the £150 council tax rebate recently announced.BERNIEU wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:00 pmYou'd think the government would have done 1 of 2 things: Remove VAT from energy bills or freeze the National Insurance and not raise it. But nooooo, instead, they know how much fuel is rising yet they thought, "I know - let's also raise National Insurance as well!"
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Another standoff as unarmed Ukrainian civilians block a Russian troop advance “Ukrainians are incredible” Gary Linacre comments as he retweets.
https://twitter.com/garylineker/status/ ... 17444?s=21
https://twitter.com/garylineker/status/ ... 17444?s=21
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Russia Invades
Putin signs another finance law to try to stabilise Russia
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 53992?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1501 ... 53992?s=21
-
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 190 times
- Has Liked: 320 times
- Location: Dorset
Re: Russia Invades
This is a summary by an ex colleague of mine from my Army days. Ex Intelligence Corps who has been working as a consultant for a number of years. He posted this on he FB page.
"All else being equal and assuming that the Russians don’t suddenly decide to declare a unilateral end to operations and simply squat, sullenly, on those parts of Ukraine they’ve occupied, but, rather, carry grimly on, eventually, they’ll no doubt be able to eliminate or at least sufficiently attrite the Ukrainian Armed Forces and occupy at least some urban centres. It’ll cost them more casualties, more destroyed (and practically irreplaceable) high tech platforms, land and air alike and further demoralise an already not notably enthusiastic land force.
Russian combat power has been inexorably declining since the start of the war in Ukraine. The Russians deployed the bulk of their combat-ready and high-technology forces in the action and these are largely ineffective, or will be soon, through both hostile action and mechanical attrition. By the time they ‘win’, they’ll effectively be back in the 1980s, with boots on the ground toting automatic rifles and last-generation vehicles, nowhere near as fragile as their high-tech equivalents and, vitally, within the competence of the Russian logistic and maintenance operation to keep serviceable, at least against 1st line equipment failures.
The operations to date have shown some very serious weaknesses in Russian staff work, as well, ranging from dreadful pre-invasion intelligence and assessment of likely Ukrainian resistance, through ****-poor management and control of logistics, through very poor coordination of air and ground operations, to some breathtakingly inept tactical decisions (I’m thinking here of the desant at the airfield outside Kiyiv in a contested air environment and a recent clip of a T-90 regiment making a 100km approach march to Ukraine on its tracks – panzer veterans will know just how impactful that is on track mileage and serviceability).
What then? There is no way in the world a hundred thousand or so Russians can conceivably occupy an immense nation of 40,000,000 people. They can hold the urban centres, probably and secure some of the vital land communications links between them – major roads and railways, that kind of thing – but will be unable to dominate the white space on the map – and thus ensure the supply of food, energy and vital services to the cities and their garrisons. The Russians haven’t shown themselves to be remotely concerned for the fates of local civilians in Grozny or Aleppo, of course and if the Ukrainians muster – as I’d expect them to – staunch partisan and insurgent resistance, that lack of concern will become ever more evident.
This is unsustainable, short of national mobilisation in Russia – which, frankly, they couldn’t afford and which would – even given the power and strength of Russian internal propaganda – not attract wide public support. Unless, of course, it can be spun as Russia versus an aggressive NATO. That’s why we’re treading very carefully and actively avoiding giving the Russians a pretext for involving NATO in an Article 5 action.
The reality is that Russian combat power is barely sufficient to take and hold Ukraine. They couldn’t possibly do anything much in the Baltic or against the Finns, never mind the Poles. The Russians – or, more accurately, the President of Russia – has driven the nation into a strategic cul-de-sac. He may choose to escalate in the hope of sparking national mobilisation, but I sincerely hope that sanctions will bite his backers hard enough that he is persuaded to pack it in – or that the General Staff, who aren’t in any way stupid – will have now begun to realise just how useless their much-vaunted high-tech military establishment is without the educational, training, logistics and maintenance structures which it signally lacks at the moment.
The Russians bought some very nice and highly advanced kit, certainly – but not the means to deploy and sustain it successfully. Building that means is a generation’s work and the steady flow of body bags back to Russia as Cargo 200 loads will become public knowledge very, very soon."
"All else being equal and assuming that the Russians don’t suddenly decide to declare a unilateral end to operations and simply squat, sullenly, on those parts of Ukraine they’ve occupied, but, rather, carry grimly on, eventually, they’ll no doubt be able to eliminate or at least sufficiently attrite the Ukrainian Armed Forces and occupy at least some urban centres. It’ll cost them more casualties, more destroyed (and practically irreplaceable) high tech platforms, land and air alike and further demoralise an already not notably enthusiastic land force.
Russian combat power has been inexorably declining since the start of the war in Ukraine. The Russians deployed the bulk of their combat-ready and high-technology forces in the action and these are largely ineffective, or will be soon, through both hostile action and mechanical attrition. By the time they ‘win’, they’ll effectively be back in the 1980s, with boots on the ground toting automatic rifles and last-generation vehicles, nowhere near as fragile as their high-tech equivalents and, vitally, within the competence of the Russian logistic and maintenance operation to keep serviceable, at least against 1st line equipment failures.
The operations to date have shown some very serious weaknesses in Russian staff work, as well, ranging from dreadful pre-invasion intelligence and assessment of likely Ukrainian resistance, through ****-poor management and control of logistics, through very poor coordination of air and ground operations, to some breathtakingly inept tactical decisions (I’m thinking here of the desant at the airfield outside Kiyiv in a contested air environment and a recent clip of a T-90 regiment making a 100km approach march to Ukraine on its tracks – panzer veterans will know just how impactful that is on track mileage and serviceability).
What then? There is no way in the world a hundred thousand or so Russians can conceivably occupy an immense nation of 40,000,000 people. They can hold the urban centres, probably and secure some of the vital land communications links between them – major roads and railways, that kind of thing – but will be unable to dominate the white space on the map – and thus ensure the supply of food, energy and vital services to the cities and their garrisons. The Russians haven’t shown themselves to be remotely concerned for the fates of local civilians in Grozny or Aleppo, of course and if the Ukrainians muster – as I’d expect them to – staunch partisan and insurgent resistance, that lack of concern will become ever more evident.
This is unsustainable, short of national mobilisation in Russia – which, frankly, they couldn’t afford and which would – even given the power and strength of Russian internal propaganda – not attract wide public support. Unless, of course, it can be spun as Russia versus an aggressive NATO. That’s why we’re treading very carefully and actively avoiding giving the Russians a pretext for involving NATO in an Article 5 action.
The reality is that Russian combat power is barely sufficient to take and hold Ukraine. They couldn’t possibly do anything much in the Baltic or against the Finns, never mind the Poles. The Russians – or, more accurately, the President of Russia – has driven the nation into a strategic cul-de-sac. He may choose to escalate in the hope of sparking national mobilisation, but I sincerely hope that sanctions will bite his backers hard enough that he is persuaded to pack it in – or that the General Staff, who aren’t in any way stupid – will have now begun to realise just how useless their much-vaunted high-tech military establishment is without the educational, training, logistics and maintenance structures which it signally lacks at the moment.
The Russians bought some very nice and highly advanced kit, certainly – but not the means to deploy and sustain it successfully. Building that means is a generation’s work and the steady flow of body bags back to Russia as Cargo 200 loads will become public knowledge very, very soon."
These 2 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
Only thing I would say about that is the Russians are already making huge efforts not to repatriate their fallen. I suspect that when that becomes common knowledge (if it does) then it will be even more damaging than returning loads of body bags.brunlea99 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:54 pmThis is a summary by an ex colleague of mine from my Army days. Ex Intelligence Corps who has been working as a consultant for a number of years. He posted this on he FB page.
"All else being equal and assuming that the Russians don’t suddenly decide to declare a unilateral end to operations and simply squat, sullenly, on those parts of Ukraine they’ve occupied, but, rather, carry grimly on, eventually, they’ll no doubt be able to eliminate or at least sufficiently attrite the Ukrainian Armed Forces and occupy at least some urban centres. It’ll cost them more casualties, more destroyed (and practically irreplaceable) high tech platforms, land and air alike and further demoralise an already not notably enthusiastic land force.
Russian combat power has been inexorably declining since the start of the war in Ukraine. The Russians deployed the bulk of their combat-ready and high-technology forces in the action and these are largely ineffective, or will be soon, through both hostile action and mechanical attrition. By the time they ‘win’, they’ll effectively be back in the 1980s, with boots on the ground toting automatic rifles and last-generation vehicles, nowhere near as fragile as their high-tech equivalents and, vitally, within the competence of the Russian logistic and maintenance operation to keep serviceable, at least against 1st line equipment failures.
The operations to date have shown some very serious weaknesses in Russian staff work, as well, ranging from dreadful pre-invasion intelligence and assessment of likely Ukrainian resistance, through ****-poor management and control of logistics, through very poor coordination of air and ground operations, to some breathtakingly inept tactical decisions (I’m thinking here of the desant at the airfield outside Kiyiv in a contested air environment and a recent clip of a T-90 regiment making a 100km approach march to Ukraine on its tracks – panzer veterans will know just how impactful that is on track mileage and serviceability).
What then? There is no way in the world a hundred thousand or so Russians can conceivably occupy an immense nation of 40,000,000 people. They can hold the urban centres, probably and secure some of the vital land communications links between them – major roads and railways, that kind of thing – but will be unable to dominate the white space on the map – and thus ensure the supply of food, energy and vital services to the cities and their garrisons. The Russians haven’t shown themselves to be remotely concerned for the fates of local civilians in Grozny or Aleppo, of course and if the Ukrainians muster – as I’d expect them to – staunch partisan and insurgent resistance, that lack of concern will become ever more evident.
This is unsustainable, short of national mobilisation in Russia – which, frankly, they couldn’t afford and which would – even given the power and strength of Russian internal propaganda – not attract wide public support. Unless, of course, it can be spun as Russia versus an aggressive NATO. That’s why we’re treading very carefully and actively avoiding giving the Russians a pretext for involving NATO in an Article 5 action.
The reality is that Russian combat power is barely sufficient to take and hold Ukraine. They couldn’t possibly do anything much in the Baltic or against the Finns, never mind the Poles. The Russians – or, more accurately, the President of Russia – has driven the nation into a strategic cul-de-sac. He may choose to escalate in the hope of sparking national mobilisation, but I sincerely hope that sanctions will bite his backers hard enough that he is persuaded to pack it in – or that the General Staff, who aren’t in any way stupid – will have now begun to realise just how useless their much-vaunted high-tech military establishment is without the educational, training, logistics and maintenance structures which it signally lacks at the moment.
The Russians bought some very nice and highly advanced kit, certainly – but not the means to deploy and sustain it successfully. Building that means is a generation’s work and the steady flow of body bags back to Russia as Cargo 200 loads will become public knowledge very, very soon."
I do wonder if the reason not to give Ukraine jets is the strong belief that they don't actually need them
I would imagine that the Russians cannot count on the fighting effectiveness of too many of their troops, and the ones they can rely on will have to lead the attacks, with the rather obvious conclusion that they will have less and less of them each attack
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
for reasons I've already stated I think they are being given plenty of dronesLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:05 pm
I do wonder if the reason not to give Ukraine jets is the strong belief that they don't actually need them
Re: Russia Invades
This is awful. Dreadful.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:30 pmMariupol maternity hospital destroyed https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/ ... Q7rSeTrplg
Dan Rivers reporting it too
Re: Russia Invades
Ukraine: Woman travels from home from NI to deliver aid
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-60653666
She said she saw some children who had been sent across the border without their parents, but had contact telephone numbers written on their arms for their families.
Not many words to describe that, just heart-breaking. Imagine going through that as an adult, but as a child.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-60653666
She said she saw some children who had been sent across the border without their parents, but had contact telephone numbers written on their arms for their families.

Not many words to describe that, just heart-breaking. Imagine going through that as an adult, but as a child.