Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
summitclaret
Posts: 4498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1003 times
Has Liked: 1595 times
Location: burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by summitclaret » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:37 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:35 pm
Would any of us take losing Cornet to get O'Hare and 8/10m in the bank for other incomings? Posing the question....
Yes. He's hardly ever fit and I know nothing about O'Hare. P.S. the money is already spent.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13053
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:39 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:35 pm
Would any of us take losing Cornet to get O'Hare and 8/10m in the bank for other incomings? Posing the question....
If we could get a decent striker and Ohare for that value it would probably be worth it. But making that call takes some big balls

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13053
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:40 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:36 pm
Any proven quality players linked yet? Like top championship performers, or players we’re beating significant other clubs for?
No not yet. But hopefully in the next few weeks there will be

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14889
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3519 times
Has Liked: 6411 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:40 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:20 pm
Cornet to Newcastle starting to do the rounds.

Lee Ryder from Chronicle live saying we have offered him to newcastle
It doesn't say we've offered him to Newcastle, just that he's been offered so it could be his agent hawking him around, because the same agent also represents some Newcastle players.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13053
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:42 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:40 pm
It doesn't say we've offered him to Newcastle, just that he's been offered so it could be his agent hawking him around, because the same agent also represents some Newcastle players.
Apologies should read he’s been offered to newcastle
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

dsr
Posts: 16199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:30 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 8:17 pm
From YouTube he very much reminds me off Andre Gray. Explosive pace and power but lacking of control
You don't say who you're talking about, but if he is 'another Andre Gray' then he's good enough for me. Championship Player of the Season and Golden Boot with 25 goals, wasn't it?

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:34 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:28 am
You don’t need to be so negative about everything Dande.

Sean has gone mate, he won’t be back anytime soon.

Move on, embrace the change, you’ll feel much better for it.
Change is change…. And reality is reality. We’ll do very well to find a whole host of people playing below their appropriate level. It’s a huge risk, and one I find strange given the position the club was in. I also continue to find it interesting how lower league players are valued higher than players who have played most of their careers at higher levels. It’s a common theme in the world that potential is over rated compared to actual output. The easiest thing to sell is bags of potential…… one of the hardest things to do is get potential to achieve expectations.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by arise_sir_charge » Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:31 am

That’s as maybe but the reality is we were only heading one way and something had to change. That change nearly worked but sadly it didn’t and now we need to start afresh. Plus the players we had can’t go on forever, time has caught up with them.

We are now in a new world and another reality is that not every signing will work out, they never have and never will.

Potential is potential and without it every player that ever kicked a ball would start at a level and finish at the very same level. Players move up and down the levels so assuming one player is better than another because he’s played at an higher level previously is daft.

As for signing proven players, we survived for 6 years in the Premier League and we didn’t sign many proven players at that level, we tended to sign players with potential to play at that level.

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 199 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Sheedyclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:35 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:34 pm
Change is change…. And reality is reality. We’ll do very well to find a whole host of people playing below their appropriate level. It’s a huge risk, and one I find strange given the position the club was in. I also continue to find it interesting how lower league players are valued higher than players who have played most of their careers at higher levels. It’s a common theme in the world that potential is over rated compared to actual output. The easiest thing to sell is bags of potential…… one of the hardest things to do is get potential to achieve expectations.
We still have a good core of experienced pros

Goobs
Posts: 4581
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1540 times
Has Liked: 1059 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Goobs » Sun Jul 10, 2022 1:22 am

Wrong thread

WiscoClaret
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 11:34 am
Been Liked: 42 times
Has Liked: 288 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by WiscoClaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:06 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:40 pm
No not yet. But hopefully in the next few weeks there will be
I've heard Cullen is actually mid level Prem quality... Take it with a grain of salt but most folks who have seen him rate him massively. Most thought he'd be on to a Prem team at the end of his contract and some are upset he's "taking the step down" to play with Kompany again.

Firthy
Posts: 5391
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1718 times
Has Liked: 299 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Firthy » Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:25 am

As much as I'm happy with our current signings, I'm still apprehensive about our chances this season. We need at least one proven goal scorer if not two. Barnes and JRod just don't have the goals in them IMO.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:05 am

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:31 am
That’s as maybe but the reality is we were only heading one way and something had to change. That change nearly worked but sadly it didn’t and now we need to start afresh. Plus the players we had can’t go on forever, time has caught up with them.

We are now in a new world and another reality is that not every signing will work out, they never have and never will.

Potential is potential and without it every player that ever kicked a ball would start at a level and finish at the very same level. Players move up and down the levels so assuming one player is better than another because he’s played at an higher level previously is daft.

As for signing proven players, we survived for 6 years in the Premier League and we didn’t sign many proven players at that level, we tended to sign players with potential to play at that level.
The difference being that we’ve just come from the premier league. It’s a time when you get to pick up the best of the rest as clubs aim to become yo-yo clubs. We’re not picking those players up. We seem to be picking up players who need to step up to be effective in the championship. Last time the club was relegated it signed Andre Gray…. Young, high performing in the championship and with potential, whereby one good season sees them lift the results of the club and become very valuable. This time we’re targeting players if a similar profile but on the leagues below that. It’s a big step to replace 4 first team regulars without targeting players of that calibre.

Guller Bull
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 960 times
Has Liked: 1332 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Guller Bull » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:08 am

Dande Meldrew cheer up ya grumpy git. Have a cup of tea.

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Spijed » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:11 am

WiscoClaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:06 am
I've heard Cullen is actually mid level Prem quality... Take it with a grain of salt but most folks who have seen him rate him massively. Most thought he'd be on to a Prem team at the end of his contract and some are upset he's "taking the step down" to play with Kompany again.
Who knows how good a player can be until they perform at a higher level. Many championship players look great but struggle in the Prem.

We are definitely going into unknown territory with our signings.
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:15 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:05 am
The difference being that we’ve just come from the premier league. It’s a time when you get to pick up the best of the rest as clubs aim to become yo-yo clubs. We’re not picking those players up. We seem to be picking up players who need to step up to be effective in the championship. Last time the club was relegated it signed Andre Gray…. Young, high performing in the championship and with potential, whereby one good season sees them lift the results of the club and become very valuable. This time we’re targeting players if a similar profile but on the leagues below that. It’s a big step to replace 4 first team regulars without targeting players of that calibre.
We’ve signed two players from the league below? One being the leagues POTY with 20 goals and 13 assists, and the other being a highly rated young centre half who might not even start for us. When we were in the Prem, we would always look at the Championship and crave signing the best players from that level, why is it different now we are looking at the best players from the level below we are at?

By the way, Andre Gray type signings are now 15m+ at this level (Piroe and Diaz for example) which would break our transfer record in the PL.
These 2 users liked this post: fatboy47 tiger76

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:22 am

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:40 pm
It doesn't say we've offered him to Newcastle, just that he's been offered so it could be his agent hawking him around, because the same agent also represents some Newcastle players.
We need to sort out Cornet ASAP. In my view one of two things need to happen, otherwise, with the release clause we could lose him the last day of the window, or any other window
He either needs to be sold before the start of the season, or negotiate a new contract including the removal of the release clause.

The second option is very unlikely, so I would be looking to sell if a club meets the required figure, and hopefully use the funds to buy the elusive striker.

beddie
Posts: 6262
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1729 times
Has Liked: 653 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by beddie » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:48 am

I’ve been an advocate of youth for some time but I’m now concerned we need to put some real emphasis on a striker or two, I’m sure the management will have that in hand. Incidentally, surprised to see Sterling moving to Chelsea.

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:49 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:22 am
We need to sort out Cornet ASAP. In my view one of two things need to happen, otherwise, with the release clause we could lose him the last day of the window, or any other window
He either needs to be sold before the start of the season, or negotiate a new contract including the removal of the release clause.

The second option is very unlikely, so I would be looking to sell if a club meets the required figure, and hopefully use the funds to buy the elusive striker.
We won't have any option to sell if a club meets the required figure. We should hold out for that in my view. As you suggest, there's zero chance he's signing a new contract.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:58 am

taio wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:49 am
We won't have any option to sell if a club meets the required figure. We should hold out for that in my view. As you suggest, there's zero chance he's signing a new contract.
And that's the problem, we have no say when a club makes that offer, if it's after five games, as the window is shutting we won't have time to replace him

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:07 am

Guller Bull wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:08 am
Dande Meldrew cheer up ya grumpy git. Have a cup of tea.
You know me GB…. Always cheery even when I disagree with things. On my way to photograph Puffins, that will keep me cheery.

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:08 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:58 am
And that's the problem, we have no say when a club makes that offer, if it's after five games, as the window is shutting we won't have time to replace him
It's nothing new and we have to deal with it. We should be pretty we'll covered by the time we've finished, assuming we sign a forward which seems an obvious gap right now.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8515
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1844 times
Has Liked: 2187 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:17 am

Imo I would cut Newcastle a deal Cornet for £12m and Chris Wood. We would then have a proven goalscorer with a stellar midfield to support him.

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:18 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:17 am
Imo I would cut Newcastle a deal Cornet for £12m and Chris Wood. We would then have a proven goalscorer with a stellar midfield to support him.
Sounds realistic :roll:

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:20 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:17 am
Imo I would cut Newcastle a deal Cornet for £12m and Chris Wood. We would then have a proven goalscorer with a stellar midfield to support him.
Wood is now on 90k a week, not happening.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:22 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:15 am
We’ve signed two players from the league below? One being the leagues POTY with 20 goals and 13 assists, and the other being a highly rated young centre half who might not even start for us. When we were in the Prem, we would always look at the Championship and crave signing the best players from that level, why is it different now we are looking at the best players from the level below we are at?

By the way, Andre Gray type signings are now 15m+ at this level (Piroe and Diaz for example) which would break our transfer record in the PL.
Has there ever been a player in the lower divisions who isn’t highly rated? Has there ever been a premier league academy youngster who isn’t highly rated. We’ve lost 4 first team starters, if these lads aren’t going to start even, then we’re even further behind than I was first concerned about.

Parachute payments, the reduction of the wage bill etc are there to allow for investment in suitable talent to become a yo-yo club. Or for Burnley, maybe it’s to widen the gap between expenditure and income for whatever reason that may be desirable.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:23 am

I would sell Cornet we won't get value from him in the championship, he isn't physically or mentally strong enough
Last edited by Top Claret on Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1464
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 178 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by FeedTheArf » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:24 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:17 am
Imo I would cut Newcastle a deal Cornet for £12m and Chris Wood. We would then have a proven goalscorer with a stellar midfield to support him.
I know Newcastle have money to burn (but don’t seem to be going crazy as some thought they would), but I can’t seem them valuing the bloke they paid £25m for in January at £5.5m.

Even less likely than that is Chris Wood wanting to return.

Even less likely than that is Kompany wanting him back.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:26 am

FeedTheArf wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:24 am
I know Newcastle have money to burn (but don’t seem to be going crazy as some thought they would), but I can’t seem them valuing the bloke they paid £25m for in January at £5.5m.

Even less likely than that is Chris Wood wanting to return.

Even less likely than that is Kompany wanting him back.

We can't afford Woods wage, he is way out of ourd and most premier League clubs League

Gp8419
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 11:17 am
Been Liked: 124 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gp8419 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:30 am

Top Claret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:23 am
I would sell Cornet we won't get value from him in the championship, he isn't physically or mentally strong enough
Exactly we won’t get value off him in this league.He won’t stay fit he was hobbling around every match in the prem.He won’t be around sat/tues then sat/tues in the winter in this league no chance.He won’t be staying anyway you can see there planning without him being here.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by arise_sir_charge » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:31 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:05 am
The difference being that we’ve just come from the premier league. It’s a time when you get to pick up the best of the rest as clubs aim to become yo-yo clubs. We’re not picking those players up. We seem to be picking up players who need to step up to be effective in the championship. Last time the club was relegated it signed Andre Gray…. Young, high performing in the championship and with potential, whereby one good season sees them lift the results of the club and become very valuable. This time we’re targeting players if a similar profile but on the leagues below that. It’s a big step to replace 4 first team regulars without targeting players of that calibre.
The problem is; there might not be an Andre Gray available.

Also if you look at his career trajectory it’s not dissimilar to what we are trying to do with the players we are bringing in. We could have got Gray for 1/5 of what we paid had we gone for him 12 months earlier.

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:32 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:22 am
Has there ever been a player in the lower divisions who isn’t highly rated? Has there ever been a premier league academy youngster who isn’t highly rated. We’ve lost 4 first team starters, if these lads aren’t going to start even, then we’re even further behind than I was first concerned about.

Parachute payments, the reduction of the wage bill etc are there to allow for investment in suitable talent to become a yo-yo club. Or for Burnley, maybe it’s to widen the gap between expenditure and income for whatever reason that may be desirable.
That’s just a daft question. Of course there are many many players that aren’t rated.

But we have signed two of the highest rated players from the league below. That’s according to research available to us inc data, reviews from pundits / their club fans, watching them live on occasions, as well as most importantly our clubs recruitment team and manager. Kompany has made it clear he wants to use our existing experienced core to allow for the development of younger exciting players. He has a track record of success doing this already in a few short years at Anderlecht.

Harwood Bellis already has 2 seasons at this level. If / when we sign Cullen, he’s 26 years old and a full international - Ireland fans can’t believe he’s coming to the Championship and that he’s easily a PL quality player. Brennan Johnson was One of the leagues best players last season despite 0 minutes at the level previously, after a good season at League One on loan - Twine is more likely than not to be similar.

If you expected us to rebuild with 8 new signings all at ‘Andre Gray’ cost then you are looking at 30-40m spend, which in my opinion is entirely unrealistic, before even getting into their higher wages (for this level). I’d personally much prefer the wage bill being managed sustainably in the event we don’t go up.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Suntan

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:36 am

Austrian keeper Peter Pentz is of interest to us on a free transfer according to Alan Nixon. He says Muric is still the first choice but we may bring Pentz in too as we look to shake up this department.

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:40 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:32 am
That’s just a daft question. Of course there are many many players that aren’t rated.

But we have signed two of the highest rated players from the league below. That’s according to research available to us inc data, reviews from pundits / their club fans, watching them live on occasions, as well as most importantly our clubs recruitment team and manager. Kompany has made it clear he wants to use our existing experienced core to allow for the development of younger exciting players. He has a track record of success doing this already in a few short years at Anderlecht.

Harwood Bellis already has 2 seasons at this level. If / when we sign Cullen, he’s 26 years old and a full international - Ireland fans can’t believe he’s coming to the Championship and that he’s easily a PL quality player. Brennan Johnson was One of the leagues best players last season despite 0 minutes at the level previously, after a good season at League One on loan - Twine is more likely than not to be similar.

If you expected us to rebuild with 8 new signings all at ‘Andre Gray’ cost then you are looking at 30-40m spend, which in my opinion is entirely unrealistic, before even getting into their higher wages (for this level). I’d personally much prefer the wage bill being managed sustainably in the event we don’t go up.
I think his point is it's quite risky. He's right. There are lots if unknowns until the season starts and beyond.

I don't think he's suggesting we sign 8 new players at that cost. There were and are players in a different mould that would provide more balance.

I'm looking forward to the season and can appreciate Pace and Kompany's strategy. If it works the rewards will be greater.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:41 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:32 am
That’s just a daft question. Of course there are many many players that aren’t rated.

But we have signed two of the highest rated players from the league below. That’s according to research available to us inc data, reviews from pundits / their club fans, watching them live on occasions, as well as most importantly our clubs recruitment team and manager. Kompany has made it clear he wants to use our existing experienced core to allow for the development of younger exciting players. He has a track record of success doing this already in a few short years at Anderlecht.

Harwood Bellis already has 2 seasons at this level. If / when we sign Cullen, he’s 26 years old and a full international - Ireland fans can’t believe he’s coming to the Championship and that he’s easily a PL quality player. Brennan Johnson was One of the leagues best players last season despite 0 minutes at the level previously, after a good season at League One on loan - Twine is more likely than not to be similar.

If you expected us to rebuild with 8 new signings all at ‘Andre Gray’ cost then you are looking at 30-40m spend, which in my opinion is entirely unrealistic, before even getting into their higher wages (for this level). I’d personally much prefer the wage bill being managed sustainably in the event we don’t go up.
I live in Ireland, there’s never been much talk about Cullen. Plus, they thought Wes Hoolahan should have been at a top half premier league club.

I didn’t expect them all to be at Andre Gray level, but it would be good to be there need to be a couple. The club arent even linked with players of that calibre, there are links to another lower league player, a player on the downgrade, a cheap prem academy cast off or cheap imports from weaker European leagues. Some may pay off, and we all hope they do, but the statistical reality is, that most of these won’t be of a suitable level to go out of the championship at the upper end.

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:44 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:41 am
I live in Ireland, there’s never been much talk about Cullen. Plus, they thought Wes Hoolahan should have been at a top half premier league club.

I didn’t expect them all to be at Andre Gray level, but it would be good to be there need to be a couple. The club arent even linked with players of that calibre, there are links to another lower league player, a player on the downgrade, a cheap prem academy cast off or cheap imports from weaker European leagues. Some may pay off, and we all hope they do, but the statistical reality is, that most of these won’t be of a suitable level to go out of the championship at the upper end.
Well he’s a regular starter for them and by all accounts has been the first name on the team sheet for Anderlecht over the past couple of seasons.

We’ve just been linked with O’Hare, one of the Championships top attacking midfielders over the past few seasons? Reports suggest we are finding that move too expensive and they want over 8m. Coventry also want north of 15m for Gyrokes, Boro have been quoted - similar amount of goals scored to Gray before we signed him, by the way. Do you honestly think we’d spend all of our budget on one player? Isn’t that more risky?

jedi_master
Posts: 8241
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4125 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:47 am

At the risk of breaking the ‘no financial discussion’ aspect of this thread, the other point is that the loan against us has probably changed the type of target we’re aiming for in our position.

We clearly now want to buy low, sell high and to become a more sustainable club - as opposed to attempting to buy our way out of this league with players who are 28-30 ‘proven’ at this level that still don’t guarantee promotion. I’d have like a couple of those (Wallace especially), and surely the belief we tried for him shows that Kompany does too.

I’d like to see a bit of Championship experience coming in to supplement what we have signed (particularly a striker) but I think the signings we’ve made so far seem (on paper) quite shrewd with the ability to make us a lot of cash in the future. Of course, they could be hopeless, but their career trajectories so far provide optimism (maybe bar Bastien, who is clearly more of a gamble in terms of his form having dropped apparently).

It’s all one giant mystery this season, I find that exciting personally. Nobody on either side of this debate can be certain how it will go - we’ll find out quickly if we’re signing players to fight promotion with or whether they’re out of their depth.

Mattster
Posts: 1892
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 484 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mattster » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:47 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:36 am
Austrian keeper Peter Pentz is of interest to us on a free transfer according to Alan Nixon. He says Muric is still the first choice but we may bring Pentz in too as we look to shake up this department.
Patrick Pentz signed for Reims yesterday...

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:49 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:41 am
I live in Ireland, there’s never been much talk about Cullen. Plus, they thought Wes Hoolahan should have been at a top half premier league club.

I didn’t expect them all to be at Andre Gray level, but it would be good to be there need to be a couple. The club arent even linked with players of that calibre, there are links to another lower league player, a player on the downgrade, a cheap prem academy cast off or cheap imports from weaker European leagues. Some may pay off, and we all hope they do, but the statistical reality is, that most of these won’t be of a suitable level to go out of the championship at the upper end.
We need to overhaul the squad. It’s completely unrealistic every signing to be like Andre Gray, who was a marquee signing.

We’re still likely to lose some of Collins, McNeil, Cornet, Brownhill and maybe Roberts, before the window shuts.

If we do, then I think it will be reasonable to expect direct replacement. O’Hare for example being one of them.

So far, we can be pleased with our recruitment.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:49 am

Edit- duplication
Last edited by TsarBomba on Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:49 am

Mattster wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:47 am
Patrick Pentz signed for Reims yesterday...
Nixon miles off it with that one then, got his name wrong too.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:52 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:05 am
The difference being that we’ve just come from the premier league. It’s a time when you get to pick up the best of the rest as clubs aim to become yo-yo clubs. We’re not picking those players up. We seem to be picking up players who need to step up to be effective in the championship. Last time the club was relegated it signed Andre Gray…. Young, high performing in the championship and with potential, whereby one good season sees them lift the results of the club and become very valuable. This time we’re targeting players if a similar profile but on the leagues below that. It’s a big step to replace 4 first team regulars without targeting players of that calibre.
You should post more Dan

There isn't enough realism on this board

We can't talk about the finances (because people are refusing to be realistic about them), pretty soon we won't be able to talk about how signing League One players to challenge at the top end of the championship might be a struggle

That doesn't mean I don't think we are going about it the right way btw, but the realistic aims for next season are a lot less than what many appear to be saying
Last edited by Lancasterclaret on Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:53 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:44 am
Well he’s a regular starter for them and by all accounts has been the first name on the team sheet for Anderlecht over the past couple of seasons.

We’ve just been linked with O’Hare, one of the Championships top attacking midfielders over the past few seasons? Reports suggest we are finding that move too expensive and they want over 8m. Coventry also want north of 15m for Gyrokes, Boro have been quoted - similar amount of goals scored to Gray before we signed him, by the way. Do you honestly think we’d spend all of our budget on one player? Isn’t that more risky?
Personally I would spend the majority of our remaining budget on a striker. To be fair though if we do our other signings will have allowed that to happen.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:53 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:44 am
Well he’s a regular starter for them and by all accounts has been the first name on the team sheet for Anderlecht over the past couple of seasons.

We’ve just been linked with O’Hare, one of the Championships top attacking midfielders over the past few seasons? Reports suggest we are finding that move too expensive and they want over 8m. Coventry also want north of 15m for Gyrokes, Boro have been quoted - similar amount of goals scored to Gray before we signed him, by the way. Do you honestly think we’d spend all of our budget on one player? Isn’t that more risky?
And the Irish National team is rotten at the moment, and Anderlecht finished 3rd in a 3 horse race. As bad as they’ve ever been. Most of the £15m is remaining from the Wood sale, let alone funds from Pope, plus surplus from the gap between Wages and parachute payments given all of the departures. It shouldn’t be all of the budget. There’s a need to fill significant gaps in the first team with suitable replacements, we have differing views on whether that has been done, and that’s what makes the game so open to discussion. I hope fully you are right, and I am as wrong as anything I’ve ever been. I just don’t see a very rosy picture at all at present, and think the club is taking a lot of unnecessary risks.

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:54 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:52 am
You should post more Dan

There isn't enough realism on this board

We can't talk about the finances (because people are refusing to be realistic about them), pretty soon we won't be able to talk about how signing League One players to challenge at the top end of the championship might be a struggle
Oh here we are the classic being negative is realistic post, top stuff

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:56 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:54 am
Oh here we are the classic being negative is realistic post, top stuff
Ah, so you think anyone being realistic is negative?

Thats really helpful!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13053
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:56 am

WiscoClaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:06 am
I've heard Cullen is actually mid level Prem quality... Take it with a grain of salt but most folks who have seen him rate him massively. Most thought he'd be on to a Prem team at the end of his contract and some are upset he's "taking the step down" to play with Kompany again.
I would argue potentially low end prem quality at best.

Mid table prem quality players don’t move for 2m euros

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:57 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:56 am
Ah, so you think anyone being realistic is negative?

Thats really helpful!
So you think anyone being positive/optimistic is not realistic?

That’s really helpful!

taio
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:57 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:54 am
Oh here we are the classic being negative is realistic post, top stuff
Dande speaks a lot sense. He's right to be cautious because of the degree of uncertainty and unknowns. Im sure he'll want to be proven wrong.
These 3 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Newcastleclaret93 longsidepies

Mattster
Posts: 1892
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 484 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mattster » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:57 am

Top Claret wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:23 am
I would sell Cornet we won't get value from him in the championship, he isn't physically or mentally strong enough
What are you basing him not being mentally strong enough on?

Post Reply