Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:41 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm
Collins is only 21, isn't he? Hardly what I'd describe as a senior pro.
What was Nick Pope?

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2749 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:42 pm

burnleymik wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:38 pm
That's true, but he was a regular at Stoke in the Championship and now has Premier League experience under his belt. That would be invaluable with the players we now have in.
Don't get me wrong, I'd prefer him to stay, but he's far from the finished article, as his naivety in that final league game showed. A season at this level would have done him good in my opinion.
This user liked this post: burnleymik

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:43 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:40 pm
He tweeted Hull had bid 3m plus add ons for Scott Twine with a deal advancing.
Which was true, Twine chose us over Hull.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2749 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:43 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:41 pm
What was Nick Pope?
A keeper, why?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:44 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:40 pm
He tweeted Hull had bid 3m plus add ons for Scott Twine with a deal advancing.
Bid

And we came from nowhere for Twine (thankfully!)

He's about as reliable as its possible to be

randomclaret2
Posts: 7745
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3054 times
Has Liked: 4796 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by randomclaret2 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:44 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm
New policy of buying youth is only good if we keep our experienced players.

We can't expect to challenge for promotion with Hardwood-Bellis, Egan-Riley, Keving Long and Luke McNally as our centre backs.

It's just not going to happen.

Pace seems intent on accepting any offer we get for our senior pros.

Insanity.
Hardwood-Bellis could be a central plank of our defence this season

Stu
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 19 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Stu » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:45 pm

Any news on the Cullen medical ?

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:46 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:43 pm
Which was true, Twine chose us over Hull.
Yes very true and very reliable Percy - was referring to Lancaster’s specific comment that when he tweets it means it’s definitely happening.

While you are here, your post suggested Stoke will get 5/6m which I don’t believe is correct.

The clause will be % (15-20 as a guess) of profit (7/8m ish), which would work out to be around 1-1.5m in total to them.

fatboy47
Posts: 5300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2852 times
Has Liked: 3210 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?


Dont go there Dan. I had my arse kicked and handed to me last year when I suggested that it'd be on the cards at the first sign of stormy weather.

4 champagne players out of the club for beer prices.

ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1802
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 507 times
Has Liked: 173 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ashtonlongsider » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm

Whilst understanding the logistics of relegation and the need to put 'our house in order'. However, I find it hard to believe we've agreed a release clause on Collins of around £20m. To me it doesn't make sense, especially taking into account the sell on clause Stoke will no doubt have included. I can't help feeling that if Collins does indeed move which now seems highly likely, our chances of a quick return to the PL are severely dented.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2749 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm

randomclaret2 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:44 pm
Hardwood-Bellis could be a central plank of our defence this season
I hope he's better than a plank or we're in trouble!

:shock:

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:43 pm
A keeper, why?
Thought I better check with an expert, saves any further errors.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76649
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37351 times
Has Liked: 5704 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:28 pm
Yes - interesting one this as no other outlet has reported it.

Nixon still thinks we want more than 20.5m.
This one came from John Percy and he's one you can virtually always rely on.

warksclaret
Posts: 8520
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2266 times
Has Liked: 1243 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:48 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:46 pm
Yes very true and very reliable Percy - was referring to Lancaster’s specific comment that when he tweets it means it’s definitely happening.

While you are here, your post suggested Stoke will get 5/6m which I don’t believe is correct.

The clause will be % (15-20 as a guess) of profit (7/8m ish), which would work out to be around 1-1.5m in total to them.
The Stoke media saying Stoke will benefit from a 7 figure fee-thats suggests jto me ust over a million. If significantly more I think the figure would have been specified

gawthorpe_view
Posts: 5479
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
Been Liked: 1467 times
Has Liked: 3227 times
Location: 'Turf

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by gawthorpe_view » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:48 pm

It could be that without the quoted release clauses, Collins and Cornet would not have signed for us.
These 3 users liked this post: RVclaret fidelcastro boatshed bill

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:49 pm

It’s not insanity, it’s reality. Had we stayed up, Collins would have had 2-3 seasons with us before potentially going for big money to a top club, that’s still the model. As it happens he’s going for less because he wants to go. Not hard to understand really.

Andreshotboots
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 775 times
Has Liked: 126 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Andreshotboots » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:49 pm

People slagging the club off for release clauses.

Do people actually think a lot of these talented players like Collins, Cornet etc would actually sign for us in the first place knowing we've always a chance of relegation if we didn't have them in their contracts?

Players hold all the power at a club like ours I'm afraid..

NewClaret
Posts: 17441
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3931 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:49 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm
This one came from John Percy and he's one you can virtually always rely on.
I’m hoping it’s a misplaced full stop and he means £205m.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2749 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:50 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm
Thought I better check with an expert, saves any further errors.
I don't see the relevance or comparison with Pope.

We've just sold him at the age of 30 after being our first choice keeper for a number of years.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76649
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37351 times
Has Liked: 5704 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:50 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:49 pm
It’s not insanity, it’s reality. Had we stayed up, Collins would have had 2-3 seasons with us before potentially going for big money to a top club, that’s still the model. As it happens he’s going for less because he wants to go. Not hard to understand really.
Does he want to go? I've not seen that anywhere.

Greekclaret
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:59 am
Been Liked: 99 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Greekclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm

Would love for Collins to stay. Him and THB at the back is more than enough for a promotion push. However, if we are to lose Collins I’d like for us to be in for a veteran CB. Someone who’s been around and done it already. What’s Ben Mee up to these days? 🤷🏻‍♂️

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:46 pm
Yes very true and very reliable Percy - was referring to Lancaster’s specific comment that when he tweets it means it’s definitely happening.

While you are here, your post suggested Stoke will get 5/6m which I don’t believe is correct.

The clause will be % (15-20 as a guess) of profit (7/8m ish), which would work out to be around 1-1.5m in total to them.
Where did I say Stoke will get anything? I have no idea what % if any Stoke will get

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:50 pm
Does he want to go? I've not seen that anywhere.
I’m assuming that’s the case, otherwise why would we be discussing imminent departures to Wolves

Claretnick
Posts: 816
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:41 am
Been Liked: 283 times
Has Liked: 237 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Claretnick » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm

Collins would not have signed for us without a release clause, a negative aspect of relegation I'm afraid, not much we can do about it. Bite the bullet and move on.

I am hoping Bobby Thomas, just a few months younger than Collins, is given a good chance to show if he is capable at Championship level.

warksclaret
Posts: 8520
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2266 times
Has Liked: 1243 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:52 pm

NO GK and none of our three central defenders-the pressure on the new players is going to be immense, particularly if we cannot take pressure of them by having several strong attacking forwards

ClaretTony
Posts: 76649
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37351 times
Has Liked: 5704 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:52 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm
I’m assuming that’s the case, otherwise why would we be discussing imminent departures to Wolves
Probably because Wolves have made an offer and we want to sell
This user liked this post: Zlatan

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:52 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm
Where did I say Stoke will get anything? I have no idea what % if any Stoke will get
Apologies must have been another poster near you who said it

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:53 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:52 pm
Probably because Wolves have made an offer and we want to sell
2 sides to the coin CT

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:53 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:51 pm
I’m assuming that’s the case, otherwise why would we be discussing imminent departures to Wolves
because we are absolutely desperate to sell anything that breathes

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:53 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:50 pm
Does he want to go? I've not seen that anywhere.
I think his very non-committal interview with the Irish press post the game he scored in suggested he’d be open to leaving.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:54 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:50 pm
I don't see the relevance or comparison with Pope.

We've just sold him at the age of 30 after being our first choice keeper for a number of years.
Think you'll find much of our fanbase thought 10m was a low offer for Nick Pope with 2 years on his deal. (1 year + option)

30 is nothing for a goalkeeper, he could have 8 or 9 years left yet.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5988 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:55 pm

matttheclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:19 pm
I'd say for any of these young players we are signing - don't get too attached to them. I'd say virtually all of them will have release clauses in their contracts which end up being considerably lower than we think it should be.

It's the ALK model isn't it? Sign for cheap(ish) and aim for a smallish profit. I have my doubts it's a model that will get us back into the Premier League any time soon.
I'd guess that players and their agents hold all the cards when dealing with a club like us (especially when we're in the PL. They either price themselves out of our wage structure or make us agree to release clauses so we can do little to stop them from moving on.

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:55 pm

Anyway… some cryptic Twitter noise suggesting Cullen is close

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 424 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm

ashtonlongsider wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:47 pm
Whilst understanding the logistics of relegation and the need to put 'our house in order'. However, I find it hard to believe we've agreed a release clause on Collins of around £20m. To me it doesn't make sense, especially taking into account the sell on clause Stoke will no doubt have included. I can't help feeling that if Collins does indeed move which now seems highly likely, our chances of a quick return to the PL are severely dented.
Like you I find it hard to believe that the release clause is so low. If, for instance, he was to stay will us and had a tremendous season helping us to regain our PL status we would still have to let him go for 20m when a team came in for him. Just seems wrong.

Andreshotboots
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 775 times
Has Liked: 126 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Andreshotboots » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm

When's our first home game again? At this rate the stadium might have been sold by the time we get back!!
This user liked this post: Newcastleclaret93

Row Z
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:17 am
Been Liked: 90 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Row Z » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm

Conroysleftfoot wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm
Like you I find it hard to believe that the release clause is so low. If, for instance, he was to stay will us and had a tremendous season helping us to regain our PL status we would still have to let him go for 20m when a team came in for him. Just seems wrong.
Release clause on relegation?

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm

Nixon saying there is no bid at the valuation yet for Collins

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2749 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:57 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:54 pm
Think you'll find much of our fanbase thought 10m was a low offer for Nick Pope with 2 years on his deal. (1 year + option)

30 is nothing for a goalkeeper, he could have 8 or 9 years left yet.
He could, but it seems we're desperate for money right now.

Bowclaret
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bowclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:58 pm

No doubt Collins is going to go but the fee being touted is ridiculous. Early optimism is turning a little I feel ! The first starting 11 at Huddersfield is going to be very interesting.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17188
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3526 times
Has Liked: 7718 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:58 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:54 pm
Think you'll find much of our fanbase thought 10m was a low offer for Nick Pope with 2 years on his deal. (1 year + option)

30 is nothing for a goalkeeper, he could have 8 or 9 years left yet.

Perhaps that was the only offer we received.

Mattster
Posts: 1889
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mattster » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:59 pm

Nixon saying no bid at our valuation yet. Hopefully this is just Wolves/agent trying to push a lower price in the press following them agreeing personal terms.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:00 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm
Nixon saying there is no bid at the valuation yet for Collins
Probably that 20.5m is their opening bid and they're not too far offer the valuation, so the deal is seen as in 'advanced talks'

It's probably a minor quarrel, like they want 20.5m + addons to make 25m, Burnley want a flat 25m.

It's expected that they will be able to make a deal.

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1464
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 178 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by FeedTheArf » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:00 pm

From the outside looking in, Collins has played 18 games in the Premier League. We of course know he’s worth more than that, and his value will likely continue to increase, but it’s a hard sell to convince teams of that especially when we’re in the league below and skint (hoping this doesn’t count as financial discussion).

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 973 times
Has Liked: 593 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:01 pm

Shock Horror!!! A Premier League standard player doesn't want to stay at a relegated club. This is the reality of us being relegated.

Just like we don't seem to be hanging around signing players, moving into next targets quickly rather than hanging around we seem to be doing the same when players are wanting to leave, yes we may not our desired value but once a player wants to go...he is going, so best getting them out the door.

Not happy with this but was always going to happen, now let's get him out the door, get the money and re invest

kentonclaret
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1196 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kentonclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:02 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:52 pm
Probably because Wolves have made an offer and we want to sell

More likely Wolves have made an offer and we HAVE to sell because of our widely reported financial predicament.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17188
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3526 times
Has Liked: 7718 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:02 pm

Anyone else seen this one?


Newcastle United have been offered Watford and Nigeria forward Emmanuel Dennis, 24, along with Burnley's 25-year-old Ivory Coast winger Maxwell Cornet. (Chronicle Live)

RVclaret
Posts: 16214
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:02 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:00 pm
Probably that 20.5m is their opening bid and they're not too far offer the valuation, so the deal is seen as in 'advanced talks'

It's probably a minor quarrel, like they want 20.5m + addons to make 25m, Burnley want a flat 25m.

It's expected that they will be able to make a deal.
I’d agree with that.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 534 times
Has Liked: 187 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretPete001 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:02 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm
Best players usually get sold on relegation.

Bournemouth made 75m in sales when they came down and spent a grand total of 0.

Glad we aren’t doing that.
You know that isn't true because you are aware of Ryan Christie.

agreenwood
Posts: 4462
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2462 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:03 pm

Just looked it up. Nathan Ake & Ben Godfrey appear to be the only Championship defenders who have gone for more than the reported £20.5m. Ake had several seasons in the Prem under his belt at that point and Godfrey has just played a full Prem season for Norwich.

I mentioned Keane above, but his move was whilst we were still in the Prem.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 724 times
Has Liked: 3198 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Burnley Ace » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:03 pm

If it hadn’t been for an injury Collins wouldn’t have played more than a handful of games and nobody would have missed him.

Post Reply