Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Was expecting another sale or two after Pope went for a bargain. As others have said was expecting Collins to go after that goal.
Let's hope we can now use the dosh to get a striker and maybe a winger in
Let's hope we can now use the dosh to get a striker and maybe a winger in
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Only Collins will have any worthwhile add-ons. If Newcastle transfer Pope in future it'll be for a lot less than £10 million, so any money we receive will be chicken feed.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 11:45 amCan people stop adding Tarks and Mee to our transfer outgoings as a negative please?
They were out of contract, we got nothing for them, and got their wages off the wage bill
Pope and Collins for £30-40m plus add ons and sell on fees is a lot fairer way of looking at it
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I'm sorry, but that isn't true
He's a keeper, and he's only just turned 30
He's at his peak now and will be for a fair few more years yet
And anyway, in his case I suspect its the add on fees that might get us a lot more cash as Newcastle should be a lot better and a lot further up the league from now on
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If we sell Cornet and Collins for £40-45m, providing a certain level of player is brought in, I'll be fine with it. Certainly too early to judge anything atm, impossible to predict how we'll fare in the league too. I'm excited for the football to start though, I'd be more excited if those two were replaced with O'Hare, Piroe and Muric though!
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It's hard not to get carried away during this window, in both directions. The only way to judge it will be as a whole at the end of it.
Maybe we need the cash in hand now in order to fill gaps across the squad. Maybe we expected Cornet would already have gone but that doesn't look imminent so have had to accelerate Collins' departure. If we held out until later in the window maybe we'd have been able to push them up to £30m+ but that could be too late for us to get the players in that we want. What's better, a rounded squad having sold Collins for £20m (assuming that's 10p% accurate) or £30m in the bank but a squad with a couple of glaring holes that can't be plugged until the halfway point of the season?
If the squad still has issues when the window closes then that's the time to criticise the sales. Until then judgement is premature either way.
Maybe we need the cash in hand now in order to fill gaps across the squad. Maybe we expected Cornet would already have gone but that doesn't look imminent so have had to accelerate Collins' departure. If we held out until later in the window maybe we'd have been able to push them up to £30m+ but that could be too late for us to get the players in that we want. What's better, a rounded squad having sold Collins for £20m (assuming that's 10p% accurate) or £30m in the bank but a squad with a couple of glaring holes that can't be plugged until the halfway point of the season?
If the squad still has issues when the window closes then that's the time to criticise the sales. Until then judgement is premature either way.
These 5 users liked this post: bobinho Conroysleftfoot tiger76 BuryClaret yosserhughes
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Great post and pretty much my exact thoughts.Mattster wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:03 pmIt's hard not to get carried away during this window, in both directions. The only way to judge it will be as a whole at the end of it.
Maybe we need the cash in hand now in order to fill gaps across the squad. Maybe we expected Cornet would already have gone but that doesn't look imminent so have had to accelerate Collins' departure. If we held out until later in the window maybe we'd have been able to push them up to £30m+ but that could be too late for us to get the players in that we want. What's better, a rounded squad having sold Collins for £20m (assuming that's 10p% accurate) or £30m in the bank but a squad with a couple of glaring holes that can't be plugged until the halfway point of the season?
If the squad still has issues when the window closes then that's the time to criticise the sales. Until then judgement is premature either way.
-
- Posts: 6715
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2102 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If Collins is the one wanting this move then I’m disappointed in him, but not exactly surprised.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Haven't read all the posts on Collins but Mattster makes a fair point on the timing. What we do with the money will colour how good/bad a deal it is. Personally I think it's shocking to sell for only £20m - he will be worth Ben White money in 1-2 years - but if we go out and spend half of that on a top striker I'll probably get over it. Unfortunately sales were always inevitable but it does feel like we've had our pants pulled down a bit with Collins/Pope.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Missed out on Hendrick again
Jeff just gone to Reading
Jeff just gone to Reading
-
- Posts: 17190
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
This is not correct though as we brought those players in before the probable sale of Collins.KRBFC wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:18 amReplace them with adequate experience and quality. If you're selling Collins for £30m, we've replaced him with a loan, a freebie kid and a young kid from League One for £1.75m. I don't mind the signings, there has to be some of these funds reinvested on proper ready to go quality though and those players will cost more than £2-3m.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
So you expect us to sign another central defender, a more proven ready to go one? I assume those 3 CBs were signed to replace Collins.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:16 pmThis is not correct though as we brought those players in before the probable sale of Collins.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Of course he is going to want this or any Premier League club move - it's called ambition (or lining your pockets

Seriously, take the gift of going back to the Premier League or risk all with an unknown ability Championship squad
-
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
-
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2266 times
- Has Liked: 1243 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If we suddenly start looking for a new CH, it shows the Collins sale was not necessarily a formality. Looking at who we have left its down to just the three we have just bought. I dont think Long will suit VK's style of play, however dependable, and Thomas will make a good fourth choice CH. If we plan playing 3 at the back at times then we are short in this area.Lets not forget we will have lost 3 great CH's
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 381 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I don't think Collins has taken part in any of preseason. That means the club knew he was going, and it means the 3 CB's we have signed include the replacement for Collins.warksclaret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:28 pmIf we suddenly start looking for a new CH, it shows the Collins sale was not necessarily a formality. Looking at who we have left its down to just the three we have just bought. I dont think Long will suit VK's style of play, however dependable, and Thomas will make a good fourth choice CH. If we plan playing 3 at the back at times then we are short in this area.Lets not forget we will have lost 3 great CH's
I think we're planning on going with what we have at the back.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Id agree with this. Said when we completed all 3 that I thought it meant Collins was off.UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:34 pmI don't think Collins has taken part in any of preseason. That means the club knew he was going, and it means the 3 CB's we have signed include the replacement for Collins.
I think we're planning on going with what we have at the back.
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think some people are over-valuing Collins. He’s got potential, but what has he done to suggest he’s worth more than £20-£25m - considering he was signed for £12m less than 20 appearances ago.
And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
These 2 users liked this post: Damo Greenmile
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
What's he done? He's proved he can look like a very good player in the PL. This time last season, he hadn't done that. He's also had some very good international appearances.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:39 pmI think some people are over-valuing Collins. He’s got potential, but what has he done to suggest he’s worth more than £20-£25m - considering he was signed for £12m less than 20 appearances ago.
And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
As for the comparison with White, it's just an example of what a player with a similar level of experience can be sold for. It was a reply to a post suggesting that any more than £20m for a man of his experience would be unprecendented.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Losing Collins is a huge blow, ignoring the fee (which I think is low) it means we have lost Tarks, Mee, Pope and Collins. That leaves us with 3 very young kids at the back and if the reports on Muric are true it will be the same in the net.
I'll put myself out on a limb and say if we don't sign some older more established players soon we are going to ship a hell of a lot of goals next year.
I'll put myself out on a limb and say if we don't sign some older more established players soon we are going to ship a hell of a lot of goals next year.
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
With respect, he hasn’t looked like a very good player. He’s held his own and probably fitted into the team better than expected. But he was probably the third best centre half in a side that was relegated from the PL. That’s not to say that he won’t go on to better things, but a profit of £9m from just 19 appearances certainly isn’t to be sniffed at. I just don’t get how people think he is worth significantly more than £21m.dsr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:42 pmWhat's he done? He's proved he can look like a very good player in the PL. This time last season, he hadn't done that. He's also had some very good international appearances.
As for the comparison with White, it's just an example of what a player with a similar level of experience can be sold for. It was a reply to a post suggesting that any more than £20m for a man of his experience would be unprecendented.
The Ben White example wasn’t aimed at you, dsr - it was just the most recent player comparison I’d read. I just see these examples of ‘player x sold for £x so why isn’t player y sold for £x?’ All players are different, some are better than others. This, along with a multitude of other factors such as age and experience determine a valuation.
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1253 times
- Has Liked: 902 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Fabrizio Romano confirms it’s done. Rats leaving the sinking ship. On to the next one.
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I'd have preferred Colin and Cullens personally.TheFamilyCat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 11:12 amCollins and Cullen in the same team would cause far too much confusion for some on this board.
It was quite clear that Collins had to go.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Why have the last two pages all been financial discussion on the value of Collins then the thread title is NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It doesn't matter, what you or I thinks the true value of Collins is, it only matters what the club value him at.
Move onto rumours please.
It doesn't matter, what you or I thinks the true value of Collins is, it only matters what the club value him at.
Move onto rumours please.
-
- Posts: 19686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Have you forgotten his performances away at Man City and Spurs?Rileybobs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:39 pmI think some people are over-valuing Collins. He’s got potential, but what has he done to suggest he’s worth more than £20-£25m - considering he was signed for £12m less than 20 appearances ago.
And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
When there are rumours they are discussed. When there aren’t rumours other things are discussed. What’s the problem?Steddyman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:59 pmWhy have the last two pages all been financial discussion on the value of Collins then the thread title is NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It doesn't matter, what you or I thinks the true value of Collins is, it only matters what the club value him at.
Move onto rumours please.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not at all. Have you forgotten his performance at home to Newcastle?Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:01 pmHave you forgotten his performances away at Man City and Spurs?
-
- Posts: 19686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No, he had one mistake. Just like Tarky with his stupid marking for the 2nd goal.
But for a player so young to look so comfortable against such good opposition is rare, especially in a CB.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
What rumour would you like to discuss?Steddyman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:59 pmWhy have the last two pages all been financial discussion on the value of Collins then the thread title is NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It doesn't matter, what you or I thinks the true value of Collins is, it only matters what the club value him at.
Move onto rumours please.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I thought the objection was to constantly banging on about the club’s financial situation rather than querying the sum received for any particular sale. Cullen in for £2.5m and Collins out for 8 times the amount looks like exactly the sort of business we should be doing. Now let’s see who else we can buy with the money.
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Equally, for a defender worth more than £20m to make that ridiculous error against Newcastle in such an important game is equally rare.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:06 pmNo, he had one mistake. Just like Tarky with his stupid marking for the 2nd goal.
But for a player so young to look so comfortable against such good opposition is rare, especially in a CB.
Collins is a good player, but on the evidence to hand I would say £20m is a good price. Not that I’d rather the club have £20m than Collins, just in the context of what we paid for him and how recently we paid it.
Edit - he made another error leading to a red card against Brentford, so it wasn’t just one mistake.
-
- Posts: 18553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7612 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
By the way, asking for transfer rumours without financial discussion is silly and unrealistic.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Collins can go for me… it’s not like we had a song for him or anything
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:14 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
-
- Posts: 9268
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2750 times
- Has Liked: 2741 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It was a very big mistake though. A needless handball which we never recovered from and ended up losing the game, as well as our PL status.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:06 pmNo, he had one mistake. Just like Tarky with his stupid marking for the 2nd goal.
But for a player so young to look so comfortable against such good opposition is rare, especially in a CB.
Collins still has massive potential, but he's far from the finished article, and the price rumoured sounds about right to me.
If we end up getting more, that's a bonus!
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We don’t know the payment plan for this £20.5M. It may be we’ve settled for that because we demanded more up front. Same with Nick Pope.
Relegation generally results in losing your better players.
Our incomings have been very solid so far, and we have a heck of a lot of business to do yet.
I get there are some concerns, but the time to properly judge will be in 7 weeks.
Relegation generally results in losing your better players.
Our incomings have been very solid so far, and we have a heck of a lot of business to do yet.
I get there are some concerns, but the time to properly judge will be in 7 weeks.
-
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 428 times
- Has Liked: 372 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Or alternatively, premier league quality players leaving as expected to progress their career at a higher level to earn more wages when bigger teams show an interest, and Burnley having very little influence over the decision so work on a new strategy in a new leagueMilltown1882 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:50 pmFabrizio Romano confirms it’s done. Rats leaving the sinking ship. On to the next one.
-
- Posts: 17190
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
-
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 504 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Worth saying that virtually everyone we bought so far we have bought cheaper than what they are valued at on those sites that do that stuff. We've had a player not yet in his prime who has been bid at £12m in the past going for under £1m, three or four “next big things” bought for about £5m-£10m combined.
Arguably the club have saved £10m there so if we have lost £10m on what we may have sold Pope and Collins for, the two could net off. It’s obviously not a sellers market currently.
Having to be a club with this style of trading was necessary once the club was sold in the way it was, the key is whether it can be done in a way that pleases the fans and is successful. For that, we'll have to see.
Arguably the club have saved £10m there so if we have lost £10m on what we may have sold Pope and Collins for, the two could net off. It’s obviously not a sellers market currently.
Having to be a club with this style of trading was necessary once the club was sold in the way it was, the key is whether it can be done in a way that pleases the fans and is successful. For that, we'll have to see.
This user liked this post: Suntan
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I'm fairly sure that for the rebuild to happen this summer it was always the clubs intention to sell Collins, Pope, Cornet & possibly Dwight.
I don't think any player has requested to leave, but the players were told that if offers came in for them they would be considered and most likely accepted. I even think we have made it known that no player is 'not for sale' and invited offers from other clubs for any player.
£10m plus add ons for a 30yr old keeper in last year of contract was fair.
£25m for a player with massive potential but equally has only played a handful of games in a very defensive orientated side is fair.
Fairly sure Cornet will depart for £17.5m and if anyone should offer £15m + for McNeil we will negotiate his exit.
This was all part of the plan whether we fans like it or not. There's a lot of unknowns at the moment but there's nothing to say McNally doesn't go on to be just as good a player as Collins. And I'm fairly sure based on the values Collins isn't 10x the player of McNally.
Similarly if we sell Dwight for £20m and buy O'Hare for £10m, it doesn't mean we've lost a player who's twice as good - its just the markets we're operating in. O'Hare could potentially go on to be a better Premier League footballer than Dwight, who knows.
I think we just need to back the management and the team and see what the season brings, we may get a nice surprise at the quality of some these players signed this transfer window.
I don't think any player has requested to leave, but the players were told that if offers came in for them they would be considered and most likely accepted. I even think we have made it known that no player is 'not for sale' and invited offers from other clubs for any player.
£10m plus add ons for a 30yr old keeper in last year of contract was fair.
£25m for a player with massive potential but equally has only played a handful of games in a very defensive orientated side is fair.
Fairly sure Cornet will depart for £17.5m and if anyone should offer £15m + for McNeil we will negotiate his exit.
This was all part of the plan whether we fans like it or not. There's a lot of unknowns at the moment but there's nothing to say McNally doesn't go on to be just as good a player as Collins. And I'm fairly sure based on the values Collins isn't 10x the player of McNally.
Similarly if we sell Dwight for £20m and buy O'Hare for £10m, it doesn't mean we've lost a player who's twice as good - its just the markets we're operating in. O'Hare could potentially go on to be a better Premier League footballer than Dwight, who knows.
I think we just need to back the management and the team and see what the season brings, we may get a nice surprise at the quality of some these players signed this transfer window.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81
-
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
With regards to the fee, Nixon is sticking to his "Burnley know different" line.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think some people are reading comments by Irish supporters on twitter when they are suggesting he's worth 40 - 50 million.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:39 pmI think some people are over-valuing Collins. He’s got potential, but what has he done to suggest he’s worth more than £20-£25m - considering he was signed for £12m less than 20 appearances ago.
And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
They were saying similar things about Jimmy Dunne a year or two ago (the Irish fans)
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 381 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Perhaps its being underreported purposely..claretandy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:33 pmWith regards to the fee, Nixon is sticking to his "Burnley know different" line.
That would suit both clubs because it makes it seem like we have less then we do.
Nick Pope fee has been quoted as anywhere between 10m - 15m depending on who you believe.
If this is the case, it's a smart business move by Pace, even if it does irritate the fans.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It may suit us to have a lower fee as Stoke get 20%, as long as the add-ons are achievable.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
This is a perfect example of the money ball strategy that was discussed when pace took over.
I'd expect some of the young players we have recently signed will be sold at a profit too if they reach their potential.
It's something we have never really done before, apart from when we sold Jay and its something we are going to have to get used to
I'd expect some of the young players we have recently signed will be sold at a profit too if they reach their potential.
It's something we have never really done before, apart from when we sold Jay and its something we are going to have to get used to
-
- Posts: 76657
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37351 times
- Has Liked: 5704 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think the top figure is only if a series of targets are hitUpTheClaretsFCBK wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:40 pmNick Pope fee has been quoted as anywhere between 10m - 15m depending on who you believe.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Stoke would get 20% of the add-ons as well.claretandy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:41 pmIt may suit us to have a lower fee as Stoke get 20%, as long as the add-ons are achievable.
-
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 178 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Surely Stoke would get their cut of any future add ons too. Otherwise clubs would sell a player for £1 and do £20m payable after the first appearance (extreme example to illustrate the point).claretandy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:41 pmIt may suit us to have a lower fee as Stoke get 20%, as long as the add-ons are achievable.