Outlay, Income and underlay.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Guller Bull
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 960 times
Has Liked: 1332 times

Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Guller Bull » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:45 pm

As we are trying not to clog up the transfer links thread let's have a guess at moneys in, moneys out wages saved (without stating players wages unless they are in the domain - guesstimates will do!)

We know we have debt to service and we know that we are buying and selling in a different market place but lets have a stab at where we are at.
As you can see from the lists and lack of info below I haven't much of a clue in terms of the figures involved and it's guesswork on my part but it would be good to have more of an idea.

Outs

Mee - OOC - Nowt in but wages of 50k ? a week plus savings
Tarks - OOC - Nowt in but wages of 50k ? a week plus savings
Pope - 10 mill in that we are guessing at - Wages - no idea
Weghorst - Loan out - wages 40k?

Loads more out's probably Collins for biggish money but also including Bardsley, Stephens etc so would imagine big chunks of wages saved from OOC players.


In's

Twine - 4 mill - No idea of weekly wage
Bastien - Undisclosed - no idea of wage
Harwood Bellis - Loan - no idea of wage
Egan Riley £400k no idea of wage
McNally - 2 mil? no idea of wage
Cullen - ? Rumoured to be in

Fill it in with what you know or guess at - Just one request - if you said it once don't keep repeating it. :ugeek:

bfcjg
Posts: 14846
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8364 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by bfcjg » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:58 pm

I'm a laminate floor guy myself, depends on the sub floor.
These 2 users liked this post: Guller Bull Bosscat

Bosscat
Posts: 28789
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9634 times
Has Liked: 20695 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Bosscat » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:03 pm

Ariba Ariba Underlay Underlay ... The fastest mouse in all Mehico
speedy-gonzales-looney-tunes.gif
speedy-gonzales-looney-tunes.gif (1.89 MiB) Viewed 1836 times
These 3 users liked this post: Guller Bull bfcjg longsidepies

northeastclaret
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 389 times
Has Liked: 286 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by northeastclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:16 pm

Predictable first unfunny smart arse replies to a sensible thread,
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Top Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:27 pm

Between the 6 outs and 6 ins I bet we have saved 10 Million in wages and then we have the transfer profit.

Transfer out 30 in 10. Profit 20 million

Bosscat
Posts: 28789
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9634 times
Has Liked: 20695 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Bosscat » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:28 pm

northeastclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:16 pm
Predictable first unfunny smart arse replies to a sensible thread,
Almost predictably the first miserable bugger on a thread
These 3 users liked this post: bf2k bfcjg 1968claret

JR1882
Posts: 931
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 283 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by JR1882 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:40 pm

Pieters was alleged on around 40k & I think 40k for Weg is very lowball - I’d think 55-60.

Jay & Cork new contracts will be reduced terms

Probs add Vydra to the list eventually

There will also have been a % wage reduction across the board 25-50% upon relegation.

Our wage bill will currently stand at about 35-40% of what is was last season imo.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm

My assumptions

Last seasons wage bill circa 76m (I’ve deducted 14m from 90m, an approx figure for the year, as we are known to pay a large amount of staying up bonuses, of course we didn’t have to pay them this time)

Tarkowski, Mee, Pieters, Lennon, Bardsley, Stephens, Weghorst, Pope, Collins off the wage bill (let’s say an average of 2m per player for the year) which is 18m saved

76m - 18m = 58m

50% wage cuts on the rest of the squad would leave a wage bill of around 29m

Add back in the newly signed players for less than 1m each per season and you’ve got a current wage bill of approx 33-35m.

Parachute payment in year 1 is around 54m I believe. We are also saving on cat 1 academy costs which is around 4.5m per season if what I read what accurate?

claret2018
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 886 times
Has Liked: 29 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by claret2018 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:04 pm

I’d hazard a guess the wages are very low end as quoted above.

I remember our first season in the PL our top earners were on £50k a week, as I dealt with the payroll software at the time.

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Hipper » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:36 pm

Could include costs of Dyche vs Kompany too. Or maybe it's Dyche PLUS Kompany.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19686
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4184 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Quickenthetempo » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:37 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm
My assumptions

Last seasons wage bill circa 76m (I’ve deducted 14m from 90m, an approx figure for the year, as we are known to pay a large amount of staying up bonuses, of course we didn’t have to pay them this time)

Tarkowski, Mee, Pieters, Lennon, Bardsley, Stephens, Weghorst, Pope, Collins off the wage bill (let’s say an average of 2m per player for the year) which is 18m saved

76m - 18m = 58m

50% wage cuts on the rest of the squad would leave a wage bill of around 29m

Add back in the newly signed players for less than 1m each per season and you’ve got a current wage bill of approx 33-35m.

Parachute payment in year 1 is around 54m I believe. We are also saving on cat 1 academy costs which is around 4.5m per season if what I read what accurate?
I think you are best guessing for the club.

1st year PP is 40m.
We are not signing players on 20k a week from City.
It's very presumptuous to think all players are taking 50% cuts. All coaching staff wages are in included. Do you think they will half their pay?
Agents fees will be up this season with more deals.


Based on Rovers losing money at a 16m wage bill and 40m PP. We will need the wage bill at 50m and then 30 if we don't get promoted.
That's without the loan/debt repayments or any wages the board members might take.

The player sales need to pay our debts off and provide good replacements.
The fees we have got so far are lower than we all expected.

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by aggi » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:45 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm
My assumptions

Last seasons wage bill circa 76m (I’ve deducted 14m from 90m, an approx figure for the year, as we are known to pay a large amount of staying up bonuses, of course we didn’t have to pay them this time)

Tarkowski, Mee, Pieters, Lennon, Bardsley, Stephens, Weghorst, Pope, Collins off the wage bill (let’s say an average of 2m per player for the year) which is 18m saved

76m - 18m = 58m

50% wage cuts on the rest of the squad would leave a wage bill of around 29m

Add back in the newly signed players for less than 1m each per season and you’ve got a current wage bill of approx 33-35m.

Parachute payment in year 1 is around 54m I believe. We are also saving on cat 1 academy costs which is around 4.5m per season if what I read what accurate?
My finger in the air would be pretty similar. Plus, I would assume, very hefty promotion bonuses.

I suspect our backroom wage bill will have dropped a fair bit too which is obviously part of that wages figures.

I don't think we'll be saving much, if anything, on academy costs. Assuming we are downgraded (things seem to have gone a bit quiet again and it's not really clear whether the downgrade happened) it seems fairly marginal and they are probably aiming to get Category 1 back so I wouldn't think much has been saved on costs.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:52 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:37 pm
I think you are best guessing for the club.

1st year PP is 40m.
We are not signing players on 20k a week from City.
It's very presumptuous to think all players are taking 50% cuts. All coaching staff wages are in included. Do you think they will half their pay?
Agents fees will be up this season with more deals.


Based on Rovers losing money at a 16m wage bill and 40m PP. We will need the wage bill at 50m and then 30 if we don't get promoted.
That's without the loan/debt repayments or any wages the board members might take.

The player sales need to pay our debts off and provide good replacements.
The fees we have got so far are lower than we all expected.
1st year parachute payment is 55% of the PL tv revenue. I’m pretty sure ChesterPerry said this was roughly 53m with the new TV deal.

Yes just basing off other clubs accounts the entire wage bill was cut in half, so that would include staff.

I believe Egan Riley (signing from City) was earning roughly £3.5k a week according to various online sources, while Harwood Bellis around 7.5k a week. So even less than my forecasted amount.

Last accounts suggested the board members may not have taken any pay yet.

You don’t know if player sales are paying off the debt - that is an assumption yes. I’d say the likes of Collins / Cornet sales will help pay off / cancel out the transfer debt to the clubs we bought them from at least, reducing our player amortisation.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:56 pm

aggi wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:45 pm
I don't think we'll be saving much, if anything, on academy costs. Assuming we are downgraded (things seem to have gone a bit quiet again and it's not really clear whether the downgrade happened) it seems fairly marginal and they are probably aiming to get Category 1 back so I wouldn't think much has been saved on costs.
It will be interesting to see what happens on that front.

Am I right in saying Blackburn are the only club in the league with a Cat 1 academy now?

And the funding for it has mainly come from their owners.

Is a cat 1 academy even sustainable at this level without PL money?

Guller Bull
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 960 times
Has Liked: 1332 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Guller Bull » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:33 pm

Outs

Mee - OOC - Nowt in but wages of 50k ? a week plus savings
Tarks - OOC - Nowt in but wages of 50k ? a week plus savings
Pope - 10 mill in that we are guessing at - Wages - no idea
Weghorst - Loan out - wages 40k?
Collins -£21 mill - wages 30k

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:41 pm

Spent a year delivering carpets when I was a lot younger

Try unloading 50 rolls of Duralay Supreme into a corner shop run by a pillock who has his storeroom up a flight of stairs
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat Stalbansclaret bfcjg 1968claret

bfcjg
Posts: 14846
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8364 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by bfcjg » Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:58 pm

northeastclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:16 pm
Predictable first unfunny smart arse replies to a sensible thread,
Do you get out and about much ?
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Chester Perry
Posts: 20134
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3296 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by Chester Perry » Wed Jul 13, 2022 2:16 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:52 pm
1st year parachute payment is 55% of the PL tv revenue. I’m pretty sure ChesterPerry said this was roughly 53m with the new TV deal.
the first year parachute payment is 55% of the equal share payments - so forget merit payments and TV appearance/facilities fees money above the minimum - in the current format of parachute payments are: Year 1 - £41.8m; Year 2 - £34.2m; Year 3 - £15.2m. There remains a chance those payments will increase as we enter a new TV cycle, but it will not be by much. Even if the 20 Premier League clubs vote in favour of increasing the equal share element of the Overseas TV revenue, this would only likely amount to an additional £5m in year 1, £4m in year 2 and £2m in year 3.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Outlay, Income and underlay.

Post by RVclaret » Wed Jul 13, 2022 5:53 am

Chester Perry wrote:
Wed Jul 13, 2022 2:16 am
the first year parachute payment is 55% of the equal share payments - so forget merit payments and TV appearance/facilities fees money above the minimum - in the current format of parachute payments are: Year 1 - £41.8m; Year 2 - £34.2m; Year 3 - £15.2m. There remains a chance those payments will increase as we enter a new TV cycle, but it will not be by much. Even if the 20 Premier League clubs vote in favour of increasing the equal share element of the Overseas TV revenue, this would only likely amount to an additional £5m in year 1, £4m in year 2 and £2m in year 3.
Thanks.

Think it was this I was going off when I saw West Brom’s 53m broadcasting revenue from 2019. Swiss ramble comments that the revenue decrease from 2019 - 2020 is due to a ‘lower parachute payment’. Any ideas on this?
Attachments
DEDF393E-A63B-4745-9D23-DF337D0FC868.jpeg
DEDF393E-A63B-4745-9D23-DF337D0FC868.jpeg (458.55 KiB) Viewed 844 times

Post Reply