Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11591
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4726 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:14 am

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:13 am
In your opinion, i'm allowed mine too. We were a worse side with Brownhill playing.
Especially at Leeds

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:16 am

Brownhill will be a massive asset this season, imperative we keep hold of him.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

BigChaCha
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 293 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BigChaCha » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:19 am

Nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level
Since relegation, I've seen loads of comments here saying we should sell at the first opportunity and that we could easily replace him with an upgrade...

Like I've said a few times... Cloud Cuckoo Land!
This user liked this post: Stayingup

Guller Bull
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 960 times
Has Liked: 1332 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - Mainly for Egotistical boring ****S

Post by Guller Bull » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:23 am

It's warm isn't it!
These 4 users liked this post: Zlatan Bosscat Middle-agedClaret longsidepies

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3687
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1460 times
Has Liked: 358 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Big Vinny K » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:38 am

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:13 am
In your opinion, i'm allowed mine too. We were a worse side with Brownhill playing.
Were the results worse last season when Brownhill played ?
I genuinely don’t know the statistics but intuitively it feels like that during our best spell in April / May that Brownhill was playing.
Westy has been a really good player for us and £5m from Villa turned out to be an absolute bargain but before his horrible injury he was having by some distance his worst season for us. Again I don’t know the exact statistics but it felt like our best midfield partnership last year based on results and performances was Cork and Brownhill.

Bigvince
Posts: 2808
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bigvince » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:47 am

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:07 am
3 assists is pre-season against Shrewsbury and he's suddenly Ronaldinho!!!! Is that the same amount of assists in 1 game than he got all last season? :lol: Also wake up, open your eyes, nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level, he was a crap PL midfielder.
He must be improving tho, I mean he didn’t even manage 1 assist against Leeds away last season

johnnyjones
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 11:56 pm
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by johnnyjones » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:06 pm

Fulham try for Cornet with smart deal

https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 3097829376

burnley007
Posts: 4184
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 786 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by burnley007 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:10 pm

johnnyjones wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:06 pm
Fulham try for Cornet with smart deal

https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 3097829376
"Smart"?

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:10 pm

The Clarets will accept a £5 million LOAN fee with the rest of the money paid on achievements. In Fulham’s case that would mean a further £25 million if they stay up.

If Fulham do not win promotion then Burnley get their talented star back - and they hope for a quick return and a reunion.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:10 pm

johnnyjones wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:06 pm
Fulham try for Cornet with smart deal

https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 3097829376
I don’t understand that at all.

£5m Loan fee and 25m obligation to buy. Why would Fulham do that when they can just sign him for 17.5m this season (probably with a similar down payment).

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:13 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:10 pm
I don’t understand that at all.

£5m Loan fee and 25m obligation to buy. Why would Fulham do that when they can just sign him for 17.5m this season (probably with a similar down payment).
It’s a very good deal for us though. If they fail to stay up or we get promoted he stays with us

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:14 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:10 pm
I don’t understand that at all.

£5m Loan fee and 25m obligation to buy. Why would Fulham do that when they can just sign him for 17.5m this season (probably with a similar down payment).
Hedging against income. If they have 1 season of prem money, they probably don't want to commit to outgoings of £12.5m, however, a 2nd season gives greater certainty. Burnley need some significant value to allow that hedge to happen. If Cornet goes and has a bad season, it's unlikely that they will get the £17.5m.

warksclaret
Posts: 8521
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2267 times
Has Liked: 1243 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:15 pm

Fulham are loaded.Whats so difficult here-release clause is well documented. Just pay it, I am sure the club would accept instalments if the fee was right.Lets face it-Fulham must be favorites to go down, so if they do he wont want to stay, and the club wont want the player

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 721 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:18 pm

Don’t for a second believe those figures quoted are accurate. But it would be a cracking deal for us.

AshevilleNCClaret
Posts: 980
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AshevilleNCClaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:20 pm

Interested in jack Hendry. Not sure if we need any more in the back.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/footballle ... -week/amp/

Bigvince
Posts: 2808
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bigvince » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:21 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:14 pm
Hedging against income. If they have 1 season of prem money, they probably don't want to commit to outgoings of £12.5m, however, a 2nd season gives greater certainty. Burnley need some significant value to allow that hedge to happen. If Cornet goes and has a bad season, it's unlikely that they will get the £17.5m.
Just sign him for £17.5m then put the same release clause in his contract, activated if they get relegated!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:22 pm

PremierLeagueClass wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:18 pm
Don’t for a second believe those figures quoted are accurate. But it would be a cracking deal for us.
Nixon has been pretty poor with the figures he’s quoted this summer. I still don’t get why Fulham would commit to 25m next summer when his clause is only 17.5?

dandeclaret
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:24 pm

Bigvince wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:21 pm
Just sign him for £17.5m then put the same release clause in his contract, activated if they get relegated!
But then Fulham are assuming the risk again of relegation, and a loss of form, therefore dramatic drop in value of the player. I'm not saying whether I would or wouldn't accept the deal, but people asked why would it be done, and I'm just providing rationale for that.

warksclaret
Posts: 8521
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2267 times
Has Liked: 1243 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:28 pm

He is an exciting player, and we know now of definite interest from two clubs, which is good for us. We need to be a bit more patient-this may make Everton go stronger . Handled right, this is a WIN, WIN for us. Got the impression re Pope and Collins we were desperate, but that may be because there was only one serious bidder for both players

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8730
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 2155 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:30 pm

Forgive me, but I've not seen on here any mention of the fact that if the personal
terms for Cornet are not to his liking, then he'll not want to go anywhere irrespective
of the transfer details/construction between the club's.

Just a thought.

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:33 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:22 pm
Nixon has been pretty poor with the figures he’s quoted this summer. I still don’t get why Fulham would commit to 25m next summer when his clause is only 17.5?
I'm just guessing, but I think that the £25M value is a sum of the loan agreement for this season (£5M+) and also the transfer fee should it come to pass (£17.5M+) and possibly add-ons. It is the only rational explanation for the approx. £25M value

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:34 pm

Maybe there is no release clause after all.

Bigvince
Posts: 2808
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bigvince » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:36 pm

I’m sure Fulham and Everton would be able to agree personal terms with Max, after all our relegation will have had a negative effect on his salary.

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8730
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 2155 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:36 pm

Please release me, let me go - so sang Inglepump Enderplonk.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

Kevwando
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 51 times
Has Liked: 47 times
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Kevwando » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:37 pm

Nixon doesn’t often get the transfer fee correct.

Nixon unsure if there’s a release clause in his contract.
This user liked this post: louieollie

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8730
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 2155 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:39 pm

Bigvince wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:36 pm
I’m sure Fulham and Everton would be able to agree personal terms with Max, after all our relegation will have had a negative effect on his salary.
I agree, but it's still a variable no matter how remote I suppose.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:42 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:33 pm
I'm just guessing, but I think that the £25M value is a sum of the loan agreement for this season (£5M+) and also the transfer fee should it come to pass (£17.5M+) and possibly add-ons. It is the only rational explanation for the approx. £25M value
I would agree but he clearly says then a further 25m

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8730
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 2155 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:49 pm

Good work if we can get it.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:51 pm

Let’s just hope it can happen quickly so we can use the immediate funds ourselves

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:55 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:51 pm
Let’s just hope it can happen quickly so we can use the immediate funds ourselves
Or as i'd prefer, not happen at all.

Bowclaret
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bowclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:00 pm

If it’s a choice of keeping Cornet and losing out on O’Hare then Good luck to O’Hare at Coventry - It’s a no brainer - But, being greedy - O’Hare looks a real player ! And would love it if we had both - YES, greedy I know !!!

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:03 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:55 pm
Or as i'd prefer, not happen at all.
He wants to play in the Prem. I’d much rather have players here who are 100% committed to the cause and can be available to play every Saturday and Tuesday.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18559
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7616 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:06 pm

Sounds like a good deal for us on the face of it. But what it doesn’t do is give us a warchest to use in this transfer window.

dsr
Posts: 16199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2581 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:03 pm
He wants to play in the Prem. I’d much rather have players here who are 100% committed to the cause and can be available to play every Saturday and Tuesday.
The list of players who would rather play at Burnley than in the PL is a very short list. I doubt we could raise a team from them.
These 2 users liked this post: Middle-agedClaret BertiesBeehole

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:42 pm
I would agree but he clearly says then a further 25m
I can’t see his tweets I’m afraid, blocked for some reason

Jambo
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 240 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Jambo » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm

Think this is only a "good deal" if we're done on departures tbh. If not selling Cornet means we have to sell McNeil or Brownhill or whoever instead, then it's just kicking the 'we need money' can down the road.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Swizzlestick » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:13 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:03 pm
He wants to play in the Prem. I’d much rather have players here who are 100% committed to the cause and can be available to play every Saturday and Tuesday.
Every member of our squad wants to play in the PL. Cornet gets this not committed line a few times (a lot more so than other players) and there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that he wouldn't be.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:13 pm

dsr wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm
The list of players who would rather play at Burnley than in the PL is a very short list. I doubt we could raise a team from them.
We’ve just made 7 signings who all have displayed an eagerness to play for Burnley in this league right now.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:14 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm
I can’t see his tweets I’m afraid, blocked for some reason
It’s on his patreon

He also says Forrest and West Ham are monitoring the situation
This user liked this post: Zlatan

Rileybobs
Posts: 18559
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7616 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:16 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:13 pm
We’ve just made 7 signings who all have displayed an eagerness to play for Burnley in this league right now.
But they didn’t choose us over Premier League football. All our squad will want to play in the Premier League and earn more money.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:17 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:13 pm
We’ve just made 7 signings who all have displayed an eagerness to play for Burnley in this league right now.
Think your missing his point.

If them 7 players were offered the chance of premier league they would pick premier league

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:19 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:17 pm
Think your missing his point.

If them 7 players were offered the chance of premier league they would pick premier league
Well yes that’s obvious. But we are talking about Champions League pedigree player here who did very well in his debut season in the PL, he will have more of a desire to play in the Prem over others right now (like Collins did).

Rowls
Posts: 14661
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rowls » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:20 pm

dsr wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:11 pm
The list of players who would rather play at Burnley than in the PL is a very short list. I doubt we could raise a team from them.
I disagree.

I think there are thousands who'd play for Burnley ahead of any PL team. It's just that they wouldn't be very good at playing football.
These 4 users liked this post: Quicknick longsidepies Middle-agedClaret BertiesBeehole

bpgburn
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:02 pm
Been Liked: 232 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by bpgburn » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:29 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:03 pm
He wants to play in the Prem. I’d much rather have players here who are 100% committed to the cause and can be available to play every Saturday and Tuesday.
Course he wants to play in the Prem but for whatever reason, if there is no deal for Cornet and he has to stay a Burnley player I am pretty sure he would give his all for us, not just to showcase himself to the Prem clubs but because he's a professional. I think you are doing him a disservice to imply differently unless you have something to back that up?.

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by spt_claret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:35 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 am
Not a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...

Michy Batshuayi on loan.

Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
Batshuayi would never come to us, but on talent I'd have him.
Similarly on the subject of talented but troublesome Belgian players, Januzaj, who I believe is OOC, although if people think Batshuayi's attitude is a problem then his really would be. If he wasn't a diver I'd leap to get him at Burnley.
SkiptonClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am
Hopefully not. Vydra belongs to an era now past. In any case he's not a goalscorer.
That 'era now past' comment is odd. Don't get the fixation with abandoning any and every trace of what got us so much success. Presumably you'd ship Cork, Brownhill, McNeil, Taylor etc. all out too then on those grounds?

I'd only give him 1 year or pay as you play given he won't be fit til January, but prior to his injury I would have renewed Vydra ahead of Jay and certainly ahead of Barnes. Pacy, good touch, experienced at the Championship, can get goals in the Championship, and fractionally younger than both Barnes & Jay. It would cost more to find an equivalent replacement for him than Jay or Barnes so given our budgets are squeezed, he would be my preferred pick if fit. I stand by the view that if Jay & Ash are our 1 and 2 strikers, good servants though they've been, we're going to struggle.

Socrates
Posts: 951
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 1017 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Socrates » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:38 pm

The release clause isn’t as attractive as you’d first think.

In order to properly trigger it they have to pay it - all, up front, in one fell swoop.

That’s not usually how transfers work. Payments are staged over a period of time.

That may be the reason behind the delay. We’re saying £17.5 mill all now, not if you want to pay over longer then we want more money.

joey13
Posts: 7507
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by joey13 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:39 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:13 pm
It’s a very good deal for us though. If they fail to stay up or we get promoted he stays with us
How is it a good deal we get 5 million for a player who if he stayed could help us get promoted makes no sense whatsoever.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:39 pm

Socrates wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:38 pm
The release clause isn’t as attractive as you’d first think.

In order to properly trigger it they have to pay it - all, up front, in one fell swoop.

That’s not usually how transfers work. Payments are staged over a period of time.

That may be the reason behind the delay. We’re saying £17.5 mill all now, not if you want to pay over longer then we want more money.
Newcastle’s payments for Wood appeared to be 50% at the time and 50% a year later.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:43 pm

According to Nixon, we're the ones who have brokered this deal..

"Burnley co-owner Mike Smith, an American attorney, has been working with an agent to broker the deal on that basis to clubs at home and abroad."

That's what we're offering Cornet at. It's up to clubs whether they take it. So far, Fulham have come forward and made a formal bid.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13055
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:44 pm

joey13 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:39 pm
How is it a good deal we get 5 million for a player who if he stayed could help us get promoted makes no sense whatsoever.
On the pitch it’s not a good deal. But financially it is. I should have clarified

Post Reply