Didn’t he want more money after already agreeing .claptrappers_union wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:17 pmHe has a point, there was the fella from Arsenal too who we missed out on, the guy who went to Sunderland.
Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Well Forest are on a proper spree at the moment so wouldn’t surprise me if they splashed the 17.5Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:25 pmEd Aaron’s said a few hours ago that Everton and Forrest are the main teams going after him
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Nixon seems the think the O'Hare deal isn't dead at the moment
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I prefer to keep Cornet if the deals dead. Cornet appears to be settled and should hit the ground running
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I thought there were plenty of reports that we'd offered 9 and they turned it down ? Wouldn't suggest we are cheapskates
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He said it’s ‘definitely not on at the moment’Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:28 pmNixon seems the think the O'Hare deal isn't dead at the moment
-
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4126 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Two of McNeil, Cornet and O’Hare will be playing for us at Huddersfield.
That’s my prediction. I don’t buy the ‘deal is dead’ angle for a second without the addition of a very key word - ‘currently’. Clearly we do not have the leeway to press ahead with more expensive signings right now (Verbuggen and O’Hare) and are reliant on a sale to make progress with them - that’s how I see it.
To be honest, I don’t know enough of O’Hare to be excited or not by him but I’d choose Cornet ahead of him if we knew we were going to get 35-46 games out of him. He’d get a lot of goals.
That’s my prediction. I don’t buy the ‘deal is dead’ angle for a second without the addition of a very key word - ‘currently’. Clearly we do not have the leeway to press ahead with more expensive signings right now (Verbuggen and O’Hare) and are reliant on a sale to make progress with them - that’s how I see it.
To be honest, I don’t know enough of O’Hare to be excited or not by him but I’d choose Cornet ahead of him if we knew we were going to get 35-46 games out of him. He’d get a lot of goals.
These 2 users liked this post: Elizabeth Suntan
-
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1845 times
- Has Liked: 2187 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
When we have VK back in the UK next week things will take off and I feel incoming players will be signed
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Christ - a potentially missed target and it’s all gone to ****. Sign someone tomorrow and it’ll be well done Alan, Burnley are going up.
How about a bit of middle ground at least until the window is closed when we can really assess what has happened and whether we’ve had a good window or not.
How about a bit of middle ground at least until the window is closed when we can really assess what has happened and whether we’ve had a good window or not.
These 14 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 jedi_master ervi34 RVclaret martin_p Red Fox Rocks Socks bobinho Paranoid tiger76 k90bfc Taffy on the wing elwaclaret DubClaret the_magic_rat
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Forest have just signed Lingard on no doubt big money so Cornet probably won’t be ending up there. Still wonder where he’ll end up tbh.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
So here we are less than 2 weeks from the first game of the season and only just over a month left in the transfer window and so far we have only managed to bring in 7 new squad players!
Truly pathetic.
Truly pathetic.
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Different positions swizzlestickSwizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:36 pmForest have just signed Lingard on no doubt big money so Cornet probably won’t be ending up there. Still wonder where he’ll end up tbh.
I still think they will be one of the teams interested
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 1462 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Absolutely agree with your best scenario there about Cornet and money needed for more signings.jedi_master wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:30 pmTwo of McNeil, Cornet and O’Hare will be playing for us at Huddersfield.
That’s my prediction. I don’t buy the ‘deal is dead’ angle for a second without the addition of a very key word - ‘currently’. Clearly we do not have the leeway to press ahead with more expensive signings right now (Verbuggen and O’Hare) and are reliant on a sale to make progress with them - that’s how I see it.
To be honest, I don’t know enough of O’Hare to be excited or not by him but I’d choose Cornet ahead of him if we knew we were going to get 35-46 games out of him. He’d get a lot of goals.
Not sure about your 2 from 3 , reckon it might be 1 from 3 myself
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
problem Forest now have is any new signings will see JL on 200K a week and the 40K per week they might have asked for has suddenly become 90KNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:42 pmDifferent positions swizzlestick
I still think they will be one of the teams interested
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
More budget wise from their point of view. Also does Max want another relegation battle in a team seeing precious little of the ball every game? Not convinced tbh.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:42 pmDifferent positions swizzlestick
I still think they will be one of the teams interested
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We just sold Pope and Collins for over £30m. £13m January profit from Wood. We both know which black hole that money's going into don't wejedi_master wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:30 pm
Clearly we do not have the leeway to press ahead with more expensive signings right now (Verbuggen and O’Hare) and are reliant on a sale to make progress with them - that’s how I see it.
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Potentially not,Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:48 pmMore budget wise from their point of view. Also does Max want another relegation battle in a team seeing precious little of the ball every game? Not convinced tbh.
But I would also suggest Forrest probably arnt looking to sign him on a permanent deal.
Lingard has only been offered a year contract on them wages. They might offer us hefty loan fee for Cornet so he comes back to us next season
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
True but from a net spend window point of view them costs were placed on the summer window last season.
As per the accounts them costs have already been taken into account.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not really - from a cash flow perspective they need to be paid when they have been agreed to be paidNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:02 pmTrue but from a net spend window point of view them costs were placed on the summer window last season.
As per the accounts them costs have already been taken into account.
With Collins we are receiving the 20m over 4 years from Wolves
-
- Posts: 4231
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3036 times
- Has Liked: 342 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If you apply this logic to the end, nobody ever signs or plays a bad goalkeeper.....boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:39 pmAre you seriously doubting Vincent Kompany's, and his chosen goalkeeping coach's, ability to judge a goalkeeper's ability?
I'm not saying that either of our current GKs are guaranteed good enough BTW.
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Yes but financially that has been accounted for. That’s what the net spend per window is for.
Similarly the sums we received for Gibson, Dunne, Benson and Wood have already covered last seasons signings. So anything this season is as how KRBFC describes it.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 51 times
- Has Liked: 47 times
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Perhaps we couldn’t agree a deal.
We will now move onto the next target on the list and continue to look at selling Cornet.
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Re the transfer fees income. Charlton FC, have said the Pope money they receive from Burnley as part of their percentage, is a big boost to their transfer kitty. That appears to me like a 7 figure payment. If as suggested the fee was £10m, we’ve not made much money for an International player. It sickens me, when I read of practically unknown other clubs squad players being transferred for a lot more, than our players worth.
-
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4126 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Well I’ve tried very hard not to mention the hole in question all summer, as per the thread title as my commentary on this topic was not being well received!
I’ll reply simply with…quite!
The flip side to that is that I’ve thus far liked the look of our business in terms of incomings, even if they’ve not cost us much it seems we’ve been prudent and quite canny. We do now need to see a striker and goalkeeper coming in though, that’s not in question. We cannot judge a thing as it stands so let’s see how we look teamsheet wise at Huddersfield.
So far we’re about a B- in my eyes, but that can easily go up to an A with two more first 11 additions in those key positions. Obviously, also key to that is keeping McNeil, Roberts, Taylor and Brownhill (Cornet would be lovely but I’m a realist), that is a must in my opinion.
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Man City have offered 30 million for Cucurella and Brighton want 50 million, cheapskate bastards
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
How’s about we all calm down, enjoy the multiple signings we have made with absolute no doubt whatsoever more to follow and judge the window when it closes.
Just a thought like.
Just a thought like.
These 4 users liked this post: Paranoid tiger76 k90bfc Taffy on the wing
-
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4614 times
- Has Liked: 7258 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I certainly don’t think they are…. BPF has occasional glimpses of quality, but occasional won’t get us promoted.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:39 pmAre you seriously doubting Vincent Kompany's, and his chosen goalkeeping coach's, ability to judge a goalkeeper's ability?
I'm not saying that either of our current GKs are guaranteed good enough BTW.
Norris is the equivalent of us having used all our subs, only for our keeper to go off injured, and ending up with the left back playing in the goals.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
So for the sake of saving this thread, you know what is covered by loans transfer fees are being spent on incomings that's a fact. A keeper will be through the door within the week I can guarantee this. Coventry wanted us to pay upwards of 10 million for O'Hare Cornet cost us 12.5 he has CL experience and thus I guarantee every single individual on this board would have cried to almighty hell and once again blamed it all on Pace had we paid their asking price as request so maybe you should all calm down. We will get at least on striker likely two by deadline day and for anyone who doesn't believe that I would recommend you look at Alan Nixon's post in which he blatantly states "They know who they want". Just because its not in public domain doesn't mean we aren't active. We are also looking / expected to bring in a highly rated experienced international defender as well. Right many people need to stop being so fickle and take a calm step back and more rational view on what's actually happening.
Rant Over.
Rant Over.
These 3 users liked this post: Quicknick elwaclaret BennyD
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Am I alone in thinking that if we don't land OHare then so be it. I would rather we don't get our pants pulled down, sign someone over the odds at say £10m. The bloke is less than prolific I front of goal to be getting rinsed for 10m
These 2 users liked this post: Colburn_Claret Zlatan
-
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Someone needs to tell KRBFC we’ve been relegated.
These 4 users liked this post: tiger76 Juan Tanamera Vegas Claret Greenmile
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
To be fair from what I have read on here I don’t think anyone is being fickle. Just discussing the transfers the date.TickTock wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:37 pmSo for the sake of saving this thread, you know what is covered by loans transfer fees are being spent on incomings that's a fact. A keeper will be through the door within the week I can guarantee this. Coventry wanted us to pay upwards of 10 million for O'Hare Cornet cost us 12.5 he has CL experience and thus I guarantee every single individual on this board would have cried to almighty hell and once again blamed it all on Pace had we paid their asking price as request so maybe you should all calm down. We will get at least on striker likely two by deadline day and for anyone who doesn't believe that I would recommend you look at Alan Nixon's post in which he blatantly states "They know who they want". Just because its not in public domain doesn't mean we aren't active. We are also looking / expected to bring in a highly rated experienced international defender as well. Right many people need to stop being so fickle and take a calm step back and more rational view on what's actually happening.
Rant Over.
Hopefully your right. Plenty needed before the end of the window
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No I fully agree with you.
6m seemed a fair value to me. He looks a talented lad but until he ups those numbers his value can’t be much higher.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Wasn't it reported that Cornet wasn't interested in Forest?
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:21 am
- Been Liked: 62 times
- Has Liked: 260 times
- Location: Perth Australia
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Someone I know at Coventry has just said he personally would not let the player go for anything less that 12million.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Glad we have taken a backwards step (if that’s the case) with OHare. I’ve no idea how good he is having not watched any Coventry games in recent years, but with stats he possesses he doesn’t seem to warrant such an outlay. The plan is to improve players and move them on (which I’m fine with). Signing OHare for 10m is a big gamble with that policy. How much better can we make him? Is it enough to put 5/10m on him? Can we even keep him at a 10m player? I don’t know the answers and so (similar to the club) I’m not sure it’s worth the risk.
We move on, however remember as things stand in 2 weeks time we’ve got a decent starting 11. Gk, experienced CB and CF are priorities for me.
We move on, however remember as things stand in 2 weeks time we’ve got a decent starting 11. Gk, experienced CB and CF are priorities for me.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Grealish is hardly prolific in front of goal either and I would have hated to have missed out on him for anywhere near 10m!The bloke is less than prolific I front of goal to be getting rinsed for 10m
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
You're putting 2 and 2 together and coming up 6.Milltown1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:06 pmOrsic and O’Hare in back to back windows. We’re getting good at bottling this signing our main target thing.
You've no evidence we bottled anything. Maybe we think he isn't worth what Coventry want. Maybe we have better, more cost effective targets. Personally I'm not fussed, I tend to take every source with a pinch of salt, until the club announce the player. There's far too many false rumours, wind up merchants, look at me characters to get carried away by twitter feeds or opposition fans. To blame the club for not living up to your expectations, based on chinese whispers on the internet, is unfair to the club, and definitely bad for your health.
Put it to bed and move on.
These 2 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1930 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Dead right. Goalkeepers, above anyone else, cannot afford to show ' occasional glimpses of quality'. Most important position on the field because none of the other players can do it.bobinho wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:35 pmI certainly don’t think they are…. BPF has occasional glimpses of quality, but occasional won’t get us promoted.
Norris is the equivalent of us having used all our subs, only for our keeper to go off injured, and ending up with the left back playing in the goals.
-
- Posts: 10458
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3072 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I’m getting more mystified about the sale of Hennessy. I’d have been more than happy with him between the sticks and for him he would have been playing in the build up to a World Cup appearance that will be remembered in Wales forever. Now he will be bench warming with Henderson starting at Florist.
I can only guess that the club wanted him off the books as he didn’t have a relegation clause?
I can only guess that the club wanted him off the books as he didn’t have a relegation clause?
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I personally, wouldn't have let Nick Pope go for anything less than 25 million.
See, it's meaningless.
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He wasn't being offered 200,000 a week.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Could be, but you think it would have been dependent on getting someone in first, regardless of what he was on.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:59 pmI’m getting more mystified about the sale of Hennessy. I’d have been more than happy with him between the sticks and for him he would have been playing in the build up to a World Cup appearance that will be remembered in Wales forever. Now he will be bench warming with Henderson starting at Florist.
I can only guess that the club wanted him off the books as he didn’t have a relegation clause?
I like BPF, there's a good keeper in there, and yes he does have a mistake in him, so do most just look at Pitchfork, so maybe VK and his coach have decided that they can work with him, and save the readies for another target.
-
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Nixon likes a story about this lad. Bit of a contrast between his valuation 5 months ago and the reported bid today…burnmark wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 4:11 pmLatest from Nixon:
Burnley are making a shock bid for Metz’s Mali international Boubacar Kouyate.
Vincent Kompany needs a new defender after the loss of three senior squad men and he hopes to tie down a deal with the French club.
Kouyate, 25, has been a strong player for Metz and stood out for his country in the last African Cup of Nations.
Burnley will try to broker a deal at around £2.5 million for Kouyate who has been looking to play in England for some time.
-
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:21 am
- Been Liked: 62 times
- Has Liked: 260 times
- Location: Perth Australia
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He’s connected.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:59 pmI personally, wouldn't have let Nick Pope go for anything less than 25 million.
See, it's meaningless.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks