Do we have McNeil's replacement already
-
- Posts: 3773
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 365 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
There are more statistics and data in football than ever before and we know that most clubs have data analyst teams.
As fans there is a tendency to use certain stats to bias your own view of a player. Clubs will not do that as they know that it’s about the rounded analysis and not individual stats.
A perfect example of this for Burnley fans was those who used to criticise Taylor for his lack of assists and forgetting the fact that when we were playing well a a couple of years ago and Taylor and McNeil were combining well that a lot of this was down to Taylor’s lung bursting runs in the second half especially when he would often run half the pitch combining with McNeil or one of the forwards and get to the bi-line and win a corner or a free kick for being fouled. If we scored from that free kick or corner as we frequently would then it’s not Taylor who gets the assist - but he was integral to the goal.
The way we played under Dyche meant that our full backs just don’t play or get assists like other teams do - it’s about getting the team up the pitch and often fighting for the second balls to try and win free kicks or corners or just pick up a loose ball / pounce on a mistake through pressure etc. And for Burnley under this style of play it’s a different set of statistics that are important to us…..not as sexy as expected goals etc but vitally important to when we got that system to work.
As fans there is a tendency to use certain stats to bias your own view of a player. Clubs will not do that as they know that it’s about the rounded analysis and not individual stats.
A perfect example of this for Burnley fans was those who used to criticise Taylor for his lack of assists and forgetting the fact that when we were playing well a a couple of years ago and Taylor and McNeil were combining well that a lot of this was down to Taylor’s lung bursting runs in the second half especially when he would often run half the pitch combining with McNeil or one of the forwards and get to the bi-line and win a corner or a free kick for being fouled. If we scored from that free kick or corner as we frequently would then it’s not Taylor who gets the assist - but he was integral to the goal.
The way we played under Dyche meant that our full backs just don’t play or get assists like other teams do - it’s about getting the team up the pitch and often fighting for the second balls to try and win free kicks or corners or just pick up a loose ball / pounce on a mistake through pressure etc. And for Burnley under this style of play it’s a different set of statistics that are important to us…..not as sexy as expected goals etc but vitally important to when we got that system to work.
This user liked this post: spt_claret
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Well if that's what someone has paid the answer is clearly yes.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 9:26 amMcNeil 17 assists and 7 goals in 134 league games, was he worth 20 million ?
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:11 am
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Of course we're selling the crown jewels - it's called relegation. Every relegated side in history, unless bankrolled by an oligarch or oil, has sold its best players for a lot more than it will replace them with.Stayingup wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 9:23 amSo we continue to sell the Crown Jewels. Anyone with a sale value is gone or going. 90 millions worth replaced by 10 millions worth. It isn't going to work. A Jamie Vardy is one in a million. Between them our previous owners and the new ones have sold us up the river. I don't blame Mike Garlick for selling I blame him for who he sold it to.
"It isn't going to work" - essentially saying no relegated side has ever bounced back. Get a grip.
This user liked this post: Braindead
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Name one team that has done it on this scale?hetheclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 12:19 pmOf course we're selling the crown jewels - it's called relegation. Every relegated side in history, unless bankrolled by an oligarch or oil, has sold its best players for a lot more than it will replace them with.
"It isn't going to work" - essentially saying no relegated side has ever bounced back. Get a grip.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
But then not many teams will have had so many out of contract and also way past there best on and age front and the average squad age needing addressing ASAP.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET
-
- Posts: 5017
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
We were always gonna lose our best 6/7 players and did urgently need to bring the average age & wage down. That said many were expecting more than loans and cheap Belgians and seemingly no marque signing . Of course belts needed tightening in the champ , but a decent quality experienced( even if older ) prem player or 2 would have helped . VK knows many of the newbies and he’s hardly gonna bring junk in so I remain cautiously optimistic despite the “ semi asset strip “
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
As I recall we didn't sell all our saleable assets the last time we were relegated and from what I understand nether have Noewich or Wstford. Maybe you should get a grip - of some facts.hetheclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 12:19 pmOf course we're selling the crown jewels - it's called relegation. Every relegated side in history, unless bankrolled by an oligarch or oil, has sold its best players for a lot more than it will replace them with.
"It isn't going to work" - essentially saying no relegated side has ever bounced back. Get a grip.
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Which saleable assets did we have the last time we were relegated? Trippier and Ings? They both left.
Watford have sold a few already and expect to lose more inc Sarr and Dennis.
Norwich have maybe 1 player who PL clubs would want (Aarons) but even he was out of their team towards the back end of the season.
-
- Posts: 9615
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 3120 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I’d have liked to have kept McNeil, but he was a luxury and I’m not too upset with him leaving. I think he may struggle again next season, and I expect him to be ‘from the bench’ rather than a regular starter. I think this move could ultimately blow up in his face, but I hope for his sake he can find the form that made him such a favourite here. For me he was a liability last season as he switched off far too often out of possession and others realised he was all left peg. A new coach may be able to fix him but I’m not convinced, as I think it is why United decided against keeping him in the first place. Good luck to him.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
The Mcneil deal can only be judged when we see what's being reinvested, if we get O'Hare and a striker from it, I'm delighted with that. If we replace him with a cheap option like Benson and bank the rest, not so delighted.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
No, I'll be at the Luton game.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:26 pmCalm down love like I said you seem to have things in common ? You going Friday ?
There is plenty of people on here who disagree with me, they don't act like you though, holding grudges because of opinions and following me around the place for years. Some have probably even blocked me. You're supposed to be an adult.
Comments without knowledge? I keep it on topic about football, you're insistent on talking about my personal life like you have any idea how old I am, what I've contributed to the club or anything. Quite frankly it's nothing to do with you and you're wrong.
-
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4800 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:27 pmNo, I'll be at the Luton game.
There is plenty of people on here who disagree with me, they don't act like you though, holding grudges because of opinions and following me around the place for years. Some have probably even blocked me. You're supposed to be an adult.

Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
You have been talking about my attendance, my contribution to the club, my age, my family for years now. It's gone beyond tiresome and harassment.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:29 pmFollowing you, I know you ain't the brightest in the room but you do realise if you post nonsense over and over again on pretty much every thread I am likely to see it. If you would prefer I don't respond to your nonsense, then don't post nonsense. Hope this helps
Debate me on football happily, Do you see me talking about your attendance? age? family? contribution to the club? Quite frankly I have no idea how many games you've attended, so I couldn't speak accurately and it's non of my business.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I find it bizarre when players are criticised for a lack of assists when others don't put the ball in the net. The sitter from a yard out Cornet missed at Norwich comes to mind as an example.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
The criticism of Mcneil is harsh, he was our only creative threat for years and often had to beat 2 men on the halfway line just to pass it forward. I think he finished top 5 for number of tackles in the PL, says quite a lot about the role he played imo. I don't buy the one footed thing either, plenty of world class players are one footed, Messi being the best example.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:42 pm
- Been Liked: 207 times
- Has Liked: 15 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I can still remember his 1 assist last season like it was yesterday
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I am sure Messi had 2 feet Yes definitely 2 feetKRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:46 pmThe criticism of Mcneil is harsh, he was our only creative threat for years and often had to beat 2 men on the halfway line just to pass it forward. I think he finished top 5 for number of tackles in the PL, says quite a lot about the role he played imo. I don't buy the one footed thing either, plenty of world class players are one footed, Messi being the best example.
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:11 am
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I agree with the post above - our only sellable assets in summer 2015 were Trippier and Ings, who both left. Our team was championship standard because we'd only been in the PL for one year.
This time, we've been in it for six years, hence why we have a number of players we cannot keep hold of (I emphasis the cannot).
Some Clarets just seem to have not realised we've been relegated, and what that means for our negotiating position. When the PL teams come coming now, we have next to zero power to keep them.
To suggest selling £70m worth of assets and only buying £10m of replacement is foolish - what do you think we should do? Buy players for £20m? We're in the Championship. People seem to be forgetting it.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
It's the only real measure. We can all make guesses based on stats or whatever but the best way to ascertain the value of something is how much cold, hard cash was handed over to obtain that asset.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 1:48 pmSomeone paying it and what he's worth are clearly not the same
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
sufficient money should be spent on replacements to attempt to be competitive at the top of this league. Nobody expects us to spend £20m on 1 player. We need 2 or 3 in the £7m-9m bracket.hetheclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:05 pm
To suggest selling £70m worth of assets and only buying £10m of replacement is foolish - what do you think we should do? Buy players for £20m? We're in the Championship. People seem to be forgetting it.
-
- Posts: 14913
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:26 pm
As for comments without knowledge you should remember that when it comes to finance, but it doesn't stop you

MODERATOR: I nearly left the complaints live so CT could pull the thread, but have decided to give it one more chance. Can ALL the usual bickering now cease. Because quite frankly it has become more than tedious for the rest of us. I have very little sympathy for posters who lack respect for other posters and even less for those who actively engage in such nonsense and then call foul. Genuine posters come on here looking for debate and rumours not for playground squabbles… if you don’t know who you are ask a friend. CUT IT OUT OR LOSE THE THREAD.
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:11 am
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Maybe - but a high fee does not guarantee you a good player, and a low fee does not guarantee you a bad player.
Samuel Bastien cost us £600k (I think?) and he has been targeted supposedly by Arsenal in the not too distant past. We don't have to spend a fortune to get good players in.
Another point - how do we know we haven't already spent sufficient money? The season hasn't even started yet.
Nobody should be making judgements on the transfer window when it still has a month to go and a ball hasn't been kicked yet.
These 2 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 Top Claret
-
- Posts: 14913
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Why do we need to spend £21-27 million on 3 players?
If we can get the same quality for less money isn't that preferable or wouldn't you accept that?
Arfield was free, as was Heaton.
Pope was £1 million
Mee and Trips were about £1.4 million for the pair I think.
Tarks was about £4 million, Keane £3 million.
It's about quality, not what they cost.
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:11 am
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Hear hear.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:14 pmWhy do we need to spend £21-27 million on 3 players?
If we can get the same quality for less money isn't that preferable or wouldn't you accept that?
Arfield was free, as was Heaton.
Pope was £1 million
Mee and Trips were about £1.4 million for the pair I think.
Tarks was about £4 million, Keane £3 million.
It's about quality, not what they cost.
The people calling for us to spend more are also probably those being most vocal about the "financial mess" we're in.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81
-
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 112 times
- Has Liked: 128 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
A rough estimate of fee and wages it'll cost Everton about forty million over the five years for Dwight. Hard to compete with that.
_____________________________________
Mod… this is just the latest post… and the below comments are not related to this post (just the latest post on the thread, for people to see)
MODERATOR: I nearly left the complaints live so CT could pull the thread, but have decided to give it one more chance. Can ALL the usual bickering now cease. Because quite frankly it has become more than tedious for the rest of us. I have very little sympathy for posters who lack respect for other posters and even less for those who actively engage in such nonsense and then call foul. Genuine posters come on here looking for debate and discussion not for playground squabbles… if you don’t know who you are ask a friend. CUT IT OUT OR LOSE THE THREAD.
_____________________________________
Mod… this is just the latest post… and the below comments are not related to this post (just the latest post on the thread, for people to see)
MODERATOR: I nearly left the complaints live so CT could pull the thread, but have decided to give it one more chance. Can ALL the usual bickering now cease. Because quite frankly it has become more than tedious for the rest of us. I have very little sympathy for posters who lack respect for other posters and even less for those who actively engage in such nonsense and then call foul. Genuine posters come on here looking for debate and discussion not for playground squabbles… if you don’t know who you are ask a friend. CUT IT OUT OR LOSE THE THREAD.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
It's a fair point, there are definitely lower cost quality players out there, we just have to find them. The problem is, you're asking an awful lot to uncover a gem in almost every single position at the same time. We need 2 or 3 like O'Hare to come in and hit the ground running to supplement the gambles, there has to be a balance. You're right about fees too, I'd have been happy with Swift and Wallace on frees for example.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:14 pmWhy do we need to spend £21-27 million on 3 players?
If we can get the same quality for less money isn't that preferable or wouldn't you accept that?
Arfield was free, as was Heaton.
Pope was £1 million
Mee and Trips were about £1.4 million for the pair I think.
Tarks was about £4 million, Keane £3 million.
It's about quality, not what they cost.
-
- Posts: 14913
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
O'Hare is being potentially overpriced by Coventry so if they do sell they'll do very well out of it, we might even go back with a better offer yet.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:38 pmIt's a fair point, there are definitely lower cost quality players out there, we just have to find them. The problem is, you're asking an awful lot to uncover a gem in almost every single position at the same time. We need 2 or 3 like O'Hare to come in and hit the ground running to supplement the gambles, there has to be a balance. You're right about fees too, I'd have been happy with Swift and Wallace on frees for example.
The positive is now we aren't spending most of the window just chasing a single player because that used to be aggravating when it was clear we could be looking at alternatives and not lose out on the final day then leaving ourselves short etc.
Plus with the now viable option of buying in from abroad we may get better value for money.
I suspect we're also being mindful of ensuring the wage bill doesn't get out of hand, WBA probably offered Wallace wages we wouldn't match.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I'm in agreement with you, I'm happy with the business done so far. Plenty of gambles, but they look good risks. I just think we need 2-3 players to slot straight in no questions. If it's not O'Hare, how about Ilias Chair? two of the very best in this division, young with a higher ceiling in a role we need. It's gonna cost but if we're serious about promotion, this team needs those kind of replacements in 3 areas atm. We have brought in more than enough money to not have to gamble in every position.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:45 pmO'Hare is being potentially overpriced by Coventry so if they do sell they'll do very well out of it, we might even go back with a better offer yet.
The positive is now we aren't spending most of the window just chasing a single player because that used to be aggravating when it was clear we could be looking at alternatives and not lose out on the final day then leaving ourselves short etc.
Plus with the now viable option of buying in from abroad we may get better value for money.
I suspect we're also being mindful of ensuring the wage bill doesn't get out of hand, WBA probably offered Wallace wages we wouldn't match.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I am not complaining, I said further up the Mcneil sale is dependant on who is signed with the incoming fee. If selling Dwight means we can fund a striker and O'Hare, it's a very very good decision to sell. I'm just explaining what I'd like to see, obviously we'll have to wait and see before casting judgement.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81
-
- Posts: 14913
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I was just querying the need to spend so much that's all.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:53 pmI am not complaining, I said further up the Mcneil sale is dependant on who is signed with the incoming fee. If selling Dwight means we can fund a striker and O'Hare, it's a very very good decision to sell. I'm just explaining what I'd like to see, obviously we'll have to wait and see before casting judgement.
I agree we still need more attacking players to come in, but Kompany did say in his interview yesterday that the club is still out shopping
This user liked this post: KRBFC
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Oh I think Mee, Boyd, Arfield were worth a bob or two. There are probably more I just can't bring to mind. .aybe Sam Vokes too.RVclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 1:52 pmWhich saleable assets did we have the last time we were relegated? Trippier and Ings? They both left.
Watford have sold a few already and expect to lose more inc Sarr and Dennis.
Norwich have maybe 1 player who PL clubs would want (Aarons) but even he was out of their team towards the back end of the season.
-
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
We will miss McNeils ability and his potential. In my opinion, because of his ability, was asked to fo too much last season and this hung around his neck like a lead weight. He is a exceptional player, still only 22, with a lot too offer if used correctly.
-
- Posts: 10663
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4656 times
- Has Liked: 7306 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Already being remembered as Bobby Charlton, when the reality (certainly for the past two seasons) is he’s been more like Jack Charlton.
Probably would’ve been a good player at championship level, if he’d found his feet again. I’m sure there is a good player in there, we’ve seen it, but maybe the framework and the style went some way to masking that.
Probably would’ve been a good player at championship level, if he’d found his feet again. I’m sure there is a good player in there, we’ve seen it, but maybe the framework and the style went some way to masking that.
-
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 944 times
- Has Liked: 582 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Pulling the thread doesn’t solve anything. They’ll just start another. Suspending the people that spoil the threads (and their IP addresses) , now that’s the answer.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:12 pmbrutal
MODERATOR: I nearly left the complaints live so CT could pull the thread, but have decided to give it one more chance. Can ALL the usual bickering now cease. Because quite frankly it has become more than tedious for the rest of us. I have very little sympathy for posters who lack respect for other posters and even less for those who actively engage in such nonsense and then call foul. Genuine posters come on here looking for debate and rumours not for playground squabbles… if you don’t know who you are ask a friend. CUT IT OUT OR LOSE THE THREAD.
This user liked this post: KRBFC
-
- Posts: 34889
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12709 times
- Has Liked: 6319 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Not long since Bastien was valued at 16-20 by his club. I think we are getting good deals because of lengths of contracts for some of these players.
I trust (maybe blindly) that Kompany has learned a lot from not only his playing career but also from his time at Anderlecht - don't forget his end goal will be to manage at someone like City and he won't do that by screwing up at Burnley. Have a little faith at least mate.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
I fell into his trap here, so I'm guilty but I'm bored of being sniped at for years by the same person talking about my family and personal life. Not that I'm innocent with other posters but this is the only poster I'd accuse of harassment. I have never mentioned his family, I never respond to his posts on topics (only retaliate). The moderators wouldn't let this slide if it was them being targeted everytime they posted for years by the same poster.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:18 pmPulling the thread doesn’t solve anything. They’ll just start another. Suspending the people that spoil the threads (and their IP addresses) , now that’s the answer.
-
- Posts: 17365
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7831 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Do you really think O'Hare is worth in excess of £10million?KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:38 pmIt's a fair point, there are definitely lower cost quality players out there, we just have to find them. The problem is, you're asking an awful lot to uncover a gem in almost every single position at the same time. We need 2 or 3 like O'Hare to come in and hit the ground running to supplement the gambles, there has to be a balance. You're right about fees too, I'd have been happy with Swift and Wallace on frees for example.
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Don't get it twisted pal, full faith in Vincent. Happy with the current signings. I want us competing at the top and feel we're a couple of real quality short, seeing the big fees come in, I'd like to see a few proper signings come in (Andre Gray type) to compliment the risky ones. I'll make judgement at the end, just saying what I'd like to see.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:20 pmNot long since Bastien was valued at 16-20 by his club. I think we are getting good deals because of lengths of contracts for some of these players.
I trust (maybe blindly) that Kompany has learned a lot from not only his playing career but also from his time at Anderlecht - don't forget his end goal will be to manage at someone like City and he won't do that by screwing up at Burnley. Have a little faith at least mate.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
50% of Mcneil? I think that's a fair replacement. What will O'Hare be valued at in 2 years? likely more than £10m. If he helps us get promoted, he's undoubtedly worth £10m.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:26 pmDo you really think O'Hare is worth in excess of £10million?
What was Andre Gray worth to us? he was a huge part in promotion (£120m income), huge part in remaining in the PL (£120m income), then sold for almost double (£17m, £9m ish profit). What kind of value do you put on that contribution? his goals were integral to securing the club promotion (and the £120m windfall that followed).
£10m will likely only be if we are promoted, £6m-8m upfront. Standout attacking young midfielder, looks about right to me.
-
- Posts: 2915
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
Back to the OP, I sincerely hope not. Time to pay for O’Hare if that is VKs desire.
-
- Posts: 17365
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7831 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:31 pm50% of Mcneil? I think that's a fair replacement. What will O'Hare be valued at in 2 years? likely more than £10m. If he helps us get promoted, he's undoubtedly worth £10m.
What was Andre Gray worth to us? he was a huge part in promotion (£120m income), huge part in remaining in the PL (£120m income), then sold for almost double (£17m, £9m ish profit). What kind of value do you put on that contribution? his goals were integral to securing the club promotion (and the £120m windfall that followed).
£10m will likely only be if we are promoted, £6m-8m upfront. Standout attacking young midfielder, looks about right to me.
That's not really an answer to my question.
(And for starters Andre Gray didn't earn that money on his own).
Do you think O'Hare's value is currently £10+ million?
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
If we're signing a younger player, I think it's important we consider his likely future value which I'm sure we will do. I don't think £10m is too far off his current value.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:47 pmThat's not really an answer to my question.
(And for starters Andre Gray didn't earn that money on his own).
Do you think O'Hare's value is currently £10+ million?
2018/19 James Maddison sold for £22.5m.
Bowen 19£m 2019/20
Lewis Potter £17m 22/23
Clucas 17/18 £14m
Eze 20/21 £16m
Robbie Brady 16/17 £13.5m
Hendrick £9m
Olise £7m (release clause)
-
- Posts: 17365
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7831 times
Re: Do we have McNeil's replacement already
KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 6:01 pmIf we're signing a younger player, I think it's important we consider his likely future value which I'm sure we will do. I don't think £10m is too far off his current value.
2018/19 James Maddison sold for £22.5m.
Bowen 19£m 2019/20
Lewis Potter £17m 22/23
Clucas 17/18 £14m
Eze 20/21 £16m
Robbie Brady 16/17 £13.5m
Hendrick £9m
Olise £7m (release clause)
Weren't they all signed to PL clubs?