Maatsen

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11244
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3632 times
Has Liked: 2236 times

Maatsen

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:15 pm

What was that reaction all about?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34798
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12682 times
Has Liked: 6314 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Maatsen

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:16 pm

he was running for his bus and the lad tripping him up made him miss it
This user liked this post: longsidepies

RVclaret
Posts: 16423
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4534 times
Has Liked: 3047 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by RVclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm

Reaction of a 20 year old I’m afraid. Shame as he’d had another decent game.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13260
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1977 times
Has Liked: 386 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm

How long will he be out for that?

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8699
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1873 times
Has Liked: 2236 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm

The Blackpool player tried to break his leg
Allowing the number of fouls from Blackpool to go largely unpunished allowed the refs control to totally vanish.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6024 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm

Nasty, cynical foul but the reaction was ridiculous. The amount of time he had to pick himself up and run at him was plenty for him to realise he shouldn't be doing it.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13266
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3729 times
Has Liked: 2146 times
Contact:

Re: Maatsen

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:18 pm

Being taken out like that I can’t entirely blame him for that reaction, but it was stupid and if it was 11 v 10 we might have got that deciding goal

jos
Posts: 2038
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 321 times
Has Liked: 445 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by jos » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:18 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm
How long will he be out for that?
Three games I think.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34798
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12682 times
Has Liked: 6314 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Maatsen

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:18 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm
How long will he be out for that?
3 games but one of them is Shrewsbury

Hibsclaret
Posts: 4345
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1399 times
Has Liked: 510 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Hibsclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:20 pm

The most worrying part of the game for me is the reaction. We haven’t seen that sort of thing from a Burnley player in the last decade. He’s a loan player but if we are using more loan players they need to buy into the club ethos. This is something that VC needs to sort quickly. Also, it is possible that we may have won the game with eleven men so it’s a needless and naive sending off which also impacts future games.
This user liked this post: spt_claret

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7580
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2301 times
Has Liked: 4081 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:20 pm

Got was brought down by an extremely poor, reckless challenge, but he's needs to learn to calm down and let the referee do his job. He was very silly and it's going to cost us.
Last edited by Dark Cloud on Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2817 times
Has Liked: 2796 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:21 pm

Footballers really are thick.

Their player was being sent off anyway, and although I can't say with any certainty we'd have scored 11 v 10, we'd have stood a darn sight better chance with the extra man.

On the plus side, Taylor will presumably shift over to LB now that Maatsen is suspended for three games. This, in turn, will give either Egan Riley or McNally a chance.
These 2 users liked this post: Stayingup Boss Hogg

Stayingup
Posts: 5949
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 985 times
Has Liked: 2986 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Stayingup » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:22 pm

Charlie Taylor will probably have to play left back now with McNally or even Long coming in. And thank goodness for that because he's no centre back. Maatsen. Lad got absolutely clattered. Pity about his reaction.
Last edited by Stayingup on Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 3264
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 870 times
Has Liked: 424 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Roosterbooster » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:22 pm

The foul was obviously a straight red. But I'm not convinced it would have been given without the reaction of Maatsen

Big loss for us tho

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13260
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1977 times
Has Liked: 386 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:23 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:18 pm
3 games but one of them is Shrewsbury
Heard a few people after the game saying it could be more for violent conduct?

Wembley09
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:43 pm
Been Liked: 94 times
Has Liked: 145 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Wembley09 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:23 pm

He's young and lost his head.

He obviously thought the Blackpool lad was trying to leave one on and hurt him, and just lost it. No excuse for that sort of a reaction though, and he will now miss 3 games.
This user liked this post: 1fatclaret

fidelcastro
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2817 times
Has Liked: 2796 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:24 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:23 pm
Heard a few people after the game saying it could be more for violent conduct?
Why would it be?

superdimitri
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 739 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by superdimitri » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:24 pm

Should know to roll around in pretend pain for 5 mins and get the guy sent off.
Instead, was stupid and naive. With him on the field and a man up we could have won it.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13260
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1977 times
Has Liked: 386 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:27 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:24 pm
Why would it be?
No idea that’s why I’m asking

fidelcastro
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2817 times
Has Liked: 2796 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:28 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:27 pm
No idea that’s why I’m asking
Three games is the standard punishment for violent conduct, so why would it be more?

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 735 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:29 pm

Roosterbooster wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:22 pm
The foul was obviously a straight red. But I'm not convinced it would have been given without the reaction of Maatsen

Big loss for us tho
I thought exactly the same.

RVclaret
Posts: 16423
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4534 times
Has Liked: 3047 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by RVclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:31 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:23 pm
Heard a few people after the game saying it could be more for violent conduct?
It’s 3 inc the cup game. So misses Millwall and Wigan. Wouldn’t have played in cup.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:32 pm

The Blackpool player could have committed a professional foul but he kicked deliberately at his shins - straight red without question

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by claretandy » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:33 pm

It wasn't even violent conduct, he pushed him in the chest.

RVclaret
Posts: 16423
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4534 times
Has Liked: 3047 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by RVclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:34 pm

claretandy wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:33 pm
It wasn't even violent conduct, he pushed him in the chest.
I did think this, I’ve seen yellows given for that before

fidelcastro
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2817 times
Has Liked: 2796 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:35 pm

claretandy wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:33 pm
It wasn't even violent conduct, he pushed him in the chest.
Exactly what Matic did to Barnes at Chelsea a few years ago.

Raising your hands is classed as violent conduct.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34798
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12682 times
Has Liked: 6314 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Maatsen

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:37 pm

claretandy wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:33 pm
It wasn't even violent conduct, he pushed him in the chest.
shows how people see/remember things - he pushes him in the back not the chest
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

CaptJohn
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
Been Liked: 559 times
Has Liked: 412 times
Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
Contact:

Re: Maatsen

Post by CaptJohn » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:39 pm

Ridiculous response to a bad challenge. Never saw that happen under SD. Lad needs to have a serious chat with himself and VK needs to kick his ar*e.

Longsidejono
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:51 pm
Been Liked: 29 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Longsidejono » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:42 pm

100% their player wouldn’t of got sent off if he didn’t react like that just a cynical foul stop the break

NewClaret
Posts: 17661
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 4931 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by NewClaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:43 pm

Violent conduct:

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

So did he touch his head or face??

Milltown1882
Posts: 3538
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1258 times
Has Liked: 908 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Milltown1882 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:44 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:43 pm
Violent conduct:

Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.

In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

So did he touch his head or face??
He ran 20 yards to bundle the lad over, anyone debating an appeal is deluded.

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:46 pm

To throw his black armband to the floor and leave it was completely disrespectful.

Claret3495
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:18 pm
Been Liked: 24 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Claret3495 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:50 pm

Sean Dyche's Watch wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:46 pm
To throw his black armband to the floor and leave it was completely disrespectful.
I think he took the tape and strapping off his hands / wrists. Don't think he threw the black arm band did he?

helmclaret
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 628 times
Has Liked: 442 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by helmclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:51 pm

It was his shin pads not armband ffs

NewClaret
Posts: 17661
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 4931 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by NewClaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:52 pm

Milltown1882 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:44 pm
He ran 20 yards to bundle the lad over, anyone debating an appeal is deluded.
Hadn’t watched it when asking that question but just found a clip.

20 yards. Do you always exaggerate length?! :lol: :lol:

In answer to my question, he pushed him in the back, not head or face, so on that basis it likely is worth an appeal based on the rules.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6024 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:53 pm

claretandy wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:33 pm
It wasn't even violent conduct, he pushed him in the chest.
With a fast bowler's run up.

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:53 pm

Claret3495 wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:50 pm
I think he took the tape and strapping off his hands / wrists. Don't think he threw the black arm band did he?
The blue strapping came off first. Then the armband and something else that was black. The linesman who was walking back to his touchline asked Muric to move the items Maatsen had dropped. Muric picked up the item I could not identify and put it into his goal, but the armband and the strapping remained there.
Last edited by Sean Dyche's Watch on Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by claretandy » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:54 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:37 pm
shows how people see/remember things - he pushes him in the back not the chest
Either way he didn't touch his face/neck.

helmclaret
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 628 times
Has Liked: 442 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by helmclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:55 pm

It was one of his shin pads left on the ground.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2770
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1451 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Maatsen

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:55 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:52 pm
Hadn’t watched it when asking that question but just found a clip.

20 yards. Do you always exaggerate length?! :lol: :lol:

In answer to my question, he pushed him in the back, not head or face, so on that basis it likely is worth an appeal based on the rules.
I don't think you've read the rules right. It says "in addition" before the head or face bit. He clearly used excessive force against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, so it's bang to rights a red card. It doesn't have to be the head or face.

Claret3495
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:18 pm
Been Liked: 24 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Claret3495 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:55 pm

Sean Dyche's Watch wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:53 pm
The blue strapping came off first. Then the armband and something else that was black. The linesman who was walking back to his touchline asked Muric to move the items Maatsen had dropped. Muric picked up the item I could nor identify and put it into his goal, but the armband and the strapping remained there.
Yes I saw Muric move something off the pitch. Didn't see him remove the arm band, but if he did then that is poor

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:56 pm

helmclaret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:55 pm
It was one of his shin pads left on the ground.
He definitely pulled something down from his forearm area.

xxmunkyennuixx
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
Been Liked: 138 times
Has Liked: 377 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by xxmunkyennuixx » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:01 pm

Football is an emotional game. Think he was having a difficult second half. The defending for the second and third was not great. He then latched on to the ball and was determined to repair some of the damage his earlier poor positioning caused only to take a bad challenge. Understandable response. He'd properly lost it. The shove and then he was ready to go when the Blackpool lads went to surround him. He's very likable to watch and he is going to be a Premier League player; I think it will be a one off.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:08 pm

Roosterbooster wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:22 pm
The foul was obviously a straight red. But I'm not convinced it would have been given without the reaction of Maatsen

Big loss for us tho
Having seen a replay, don’t think it was a red for the Blackpool player.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:09 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:17 pm
The Blackpool player tried to break his leg
Allowing the number of fouls from Blackpool to go largely unpunished allowed the refs control to totally vanish.
Seeing a replay, don’t think he was trying to break his leg, nor was it a red.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Top Claret » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:32 pm

Might not be a bad thing him missing the next 3 games as it gives us a chance to sort ourselves out as he appears to be weak defensively

IanMcL
Posts: 34720
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6935 times
Has Liked: 10350 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by IanMcL » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:40 pm

Red for them deserved.

Red for Maatsen was very poor retaliation, from the lad. This is Burnley!!!

As for the after Red reaction, in front of 20,000, a big club fine and possibly one from his fellows, too.

Not acceptable.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1

burnmark
Posts: 3343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
Been Liked: 848 times
Has Liked: 644 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by burnmark » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:41 pm

It was a silly and obvious trip that I’d have said was a yellow sat in The Bob Lord. Maatsen was then an absolute prat and really don’t need to do what he did. I’m firmly of the opinion that the Blackpool player got sent off as a reaction to Maatsen having to go and the ref ‘managing the game.’

Silkyskills1
Posts: 6636
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1946 times
Has Liked: 2892 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Maatsen

Post by Silkyskills1 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:45 pm

No excuses for either player. One swinging out wildly with the ball nowhere near. The other one retaliation with his arms raised. The game itself is in an unhealthy state and offering excuses for either player is just demeaning.

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 760 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Maatsen

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:46 pm

Young lad, reacted foolishly , but will learn and this might just force our hand in a real fro a centre half now
This user liked this post: jen1066

Post Reply