Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
dsr
Posts: 16199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2581 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:52 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:47 pm
I don't disagree but we have had all window to target and sign players, had more money to spend than most clubs in the division and yet we've still ended up with four first teamers who are loan signings despite our manager stating that they would be the "last resort" kind of deals.

I can't help thinking that a couple of the wide players (of which we are ridiculously well stocked now) should have been loans and we should have used our resources to sign permanent players in other positions.
In principle, we would rather have permanent signings than Harwood-Bellis, Maatsen, and Tella. In practice, could we get players as good on a permanent basis?
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

Pearcey
Posts: 4218
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1439 times
Has Liked: 1787 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Pearcey » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:53 pm

Andy Jones says the Turkish lad has other options but we are hopeful.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6441
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2089 times
Has Liked: 969 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:54 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:52 pm
In principle, we would rather have permanent signings than Harwood-Bellis, Maatsen, and Tella. In practice, could we get players as good on a permanent basis?
You’d hope some of the loans might eventually lead to permanent deals.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14889
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3519 times
Has Liked: 6411 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:54 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:52 pm
In principle, we would rather have permanent signings than Harwood-Bellis, Maatsen, and Tella. In practice, could we get players as good on a permanent basis?
Exactly this

Also boyanno seems to forget that we originally had the likes of Keane, Mee and Trippier in on loan first, which were then turned into permanent deals.

NewClaret
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3935 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:55 pm

Pearcey wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:53 pm
Andy Jones says the Turkish lad has other options but we are hopeful.
Can only imagine that means Archer is definitely not happening.

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:55 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:55 pm
Can only imagine that means Archer is definitely not happening.
Yeah, probably got word from Villa he’s not going to be available?

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20415
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4516 times
Has Liked: 2032 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:58 pm

Pearcey wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:53 pm
Andy Jones says the Turkish lad has other options but we are hopeful.
So its not a done deal yet?

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:01 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:58 pm
So its not a done deal yet?
Not according to them, player has other options but we are hopeful

NewClaret
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3935 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:04 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:55 pm
Yeah, probably got word from Villa he’s not going to be available?
Gutted about that. He’d have been immense.

Tbf, good that we’re not relying on deals and have back up options. Can’t see this the attraction with this one though. Don’t think he’s scored a goal for Bournemouth & 4 in 28 or something for Galatasaray last term.

For £850k!!!

Would rather give Richardson a go?!

AshevilleNCClaret
Posts: 980
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AshevilleNCClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:06 pm

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:54 pm
You’d hope some of the loans might eventually lead to permanent deals.
I think HWB could sign on permanently. Maatsen maybe. Tella almost no chance.

In an ideal world and we get promoted, I can easily see HWB and Maatsen coming back, Tella probably goes back to Southhampton.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20415
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4516 times
Has Liked: 2032 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:08 pm

Tella would be a dream permanent signing.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6747
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1973 times
Has Liked: 504 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:08 pm

The thing in our favour with the Brownhill one is he could easily envisage being on the bench elsewhere and playing in the PL with us next season instead, as an exciting cog in the Kompany system that he seems perfect for. Players are short term chaps but I’d be hopeful.

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 668 times
Has Liked: 1205 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by JimmyRobbo » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:09 pm

I am absolutely fine with loans and moving on from signings if the price is not right.

Signings are often set up months in advance. Look at Collins, Brownhill and the majority of our signings. They may not have come in the window they were first negotiated. Time is sometimes what is required to seal the transfer.

January is another opportunity. At least with this regime, we actively look for transfers.

martin_p
Posts: 11087
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by martin_p » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:12 pm

I’d be making Brownhill club captain as an indication of his value to us. Think he’d make a good captain.

boyyanno
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 157 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:13 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:52 pm
In principle, we would rather have permanent signings than Harwood-Bellis, Maatsen, and Tella. In practice, could we get players as good on a permanent basis?
I think we could have yes. I appreciate you actually understanding my point though.

Chester Perry
Posts: 20135
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3296 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Chester Perry » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:14 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:04 pm
Gutted about that. He’d have been immense.

Tbf, good that we’re not relying on deals and have back up options. Can’t see this the attraction with this one though. Don’t think he’s scored a goal for Bournemouth & 4 in 28 or something for Galatasaray last term.

For £850k!!!

Would rather give Richardson a go?!
It certainly makes you wonder what we are paying for the three we currently have

boyyanno
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 157 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:17 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:54 pm
Exactly this

Also boyanno seems to forget that we originally had the likes of Keane, Mee and Trippier in on loan first, which were then turned into permanent deals.

Loans can be very beneficial to the club just as the examples you've used show. I wasn't anywhere suggesting that's not the case was i? I've no gripes with loanee's. I'd have just preferred to see them in positions that provide back up to our permanent players as oppose to 4 of the first names on the teamsheet. I'd say that's a valid point.

If you don't agree then fair enough but all you and claretonthecoast seem to do is misinterpret everyone's posts to try and start arguments for no reason. Sometimes you'd be better off actually reading what someone says.

forzagranata
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 284 times
Has Liked: 497 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by forzagranata » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:19 pm

Hedontplayforyou wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:51 pm
They’ve already stated that they won’t overpay for players, maybe the targets we desired have been what we consider “too high”, so we have moved on to something more affordable , whilst strengthening other areas for prices that we deem acceptable to move on without too much risk

+

If the loan signings make the squad stronger and are a decent calibre then why on Earth not?

See Maatsen, THB and Tella
I'm glad to see us making a lot more use of loans. Dyche didn't like them and had his reasons but if you can make your squad stronger and achieve your goals with players borrowed from club's with much bigger budgets then why not?

It means you have to do a lot of work again in the next summer window when they return to their parent clubs but that's just something you have to factor in to a recruitment plan.

martin_p
Posts: 11087
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by martin_p » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:20 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:17 pm
Loans can be very beneficial to the club just as the examples you've used show. I wasn't anywhere suggesting that's not the case was i? I've no gripes with loanee's. I'd have just preferred to see them in positions that provide back up to our permanent players as oppose to 4 of the first names on the teamsheet. I'd say that's a valid point.

If you don't agree then fair enough but all you and claretonthecoast seem to do is misinterpret everyone's posts to try and start arguments for no reason. Sometimes you'd be better off actually reading what someone says.
Understand your point, but getting loan players to warm the bench from the Premier League is a difficult sell. Premier League clubs want their players playing week in week out.
This user liked this post: rob63

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:21 pm

I think using loans to secure higher quality players actually states our intentions of promotion this season.

Hopefully a few could be turned into permanents and then we can use the loan market again (2 allowed in Prem IF promoted).

forzagranata
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 284 times
Has Liked: 497 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by forzagranata » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:31 pm

Zaroury official

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1421
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 508 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by EarbyClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:34 pm

You could argue loans of the calibre of THB, Maatsen and Tella are a statement of intent as far as a promotion bid is concerned

Josh Brownhill is an integral part of that. Far better chance of him staying than if we hadn't brought that quality into the squad

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11591
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4726 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:38 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:17 pm
Loans can be very beneficial to the club just as the examples you've used show. I wasn't anywhere suggesting that's not the case was i? I've no gripes with loanee's. I'd have just preferred to see them in positions that provide back up to our permanent players as oppose to 4 of the first names on the teamsheet. I'd say that's a valid point.

If you don't agree then fair enough but all you and claretonthecoast seem to do is misinterpret everyone's posts to try and start arguments for no reason. Sometimes you'd be better off actually reading what someone says.

Do show where the latest name linked who hasn't even signed as yet has been announced as a starter ?

Why feel the need to bring anyone else in, if I have misinterpreted your post as just another whinge fair do's but you are never happy. You have probably whinged before that we didn't use the loan market.

As for "I have no gripes with loanees" .. your words... "another bloody loan"

Mattster
Posts: 1892
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 484 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mattster » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:39 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:21 pm
I think using loans to secure higher quality players actually states our intentions of promotion this season.

Hopefully a few could be turned into permanents and then we can use the loan market again (2 allowed in Prem IF promoted).
IF we get promoted I'd say we wouldn't have much trouble turning Maatsen and THB into permanent deals (as long as we'd accept buyback clauses). Tella would be a lot harder, if he keeps doing what he's done so far Southampton would look at Gibbs-White for a reference point.

Much easier to turn a loan from a top 4 side into a permanent deal as there isn't a pathway to their first team in most cases.

boyyanno
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 157 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:40 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:20 pm
Understand your point, but getting loan players to warm the bench from the Premier League is a difficult sell. Premier League clubs want their players playing week in week out.
Yep I understand your point too mate. It's a tricky balance to get and I also think I've also read too much into Kompany's statement about how the club would utilize the loan market. That being said I just don't like seeing our own players sitting on the bench while others start. For example Vitinho could suffer as a result of this. But I guess we will see where we end up!

Suntan
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Suntan » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:41 pm

AshevilleNCClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:06 pm
I think HWB could sign on permanently. Maatsen maybe. Tella almost no chance.

In an ideal world and we get promoted, I can easily see HWB and Maatsen coming back, Tella probably goes back to Southhampton.
Unless Saints are relegated.........

NewClaret
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3935 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:43 pm

forzagranata wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:31 pm
Zaroury official
Brilliant video.

johnnyjones
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 11:56 pm
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by johnnyjones » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:44 pm

I hope that Southampton dont have a recall clause in Tella's loan deal, if they are struggling come Jan and he has smashed 15 goals in am sure they would want him back

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Hipper » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:45 pm

I wouldn't say that these loans mean we are after promotion. All it means to me is an opportunity to sign quality players (at Championship level) that we can't afford to buy. The three loanees certainly look comfortable at our level.

Suntan
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Suntan » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:48 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:04 pm
Gutted about that. He’d have been immense.

Tbf, good that we’re not relying on deals and have back up options. Can’t see this the attraction with this one though. Don’t think he’s scored a goal for Bournemouth & 4 in 28 or something for Galatasaray last term.

For £850k!!!

Would rather give Richardson a go?!
Not sure why he'd score a goal for Bournemouth when he's contracted to Brentford.

boyyanno
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 157 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:48 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:38 pm
Do show where the latest name linked who hasn't even signed as yet has been announced as a starter ?

Why feel the need to bring anyone else in, if I have misinterpreted your post as just another whinge fair do's but you are never happy. You have probably whinged before that we didn't use the loan market.

As for "I have no gripes with loanees" .. your words... "another bloody loan"
What are you talking about? I haven't brought anyone else in, you commented on the thread after my comment saying some nonsense about people whinging about not using the loan market and then whinging that we are using it. SO you actually responded to the topic, I can assure you I have better things to do than "pick you out".

Secondly you say "you are never happy" to anyone who dares say somthing you don't agree with. I'm not a "whinging" poster at all, I just don't play with fat old men who try and act like 14 year old keyboard warriors. Look at my responses to reasonable posters and you'll understand that it's just you mate.

Thirdly, you're right I did say "another bloody loan", is that the same thing as having an issue with loanees? No it isn't. One refers to volume, the other refers to personnel. I'm sure you knew this though. :lol:

Not exactly a genius are you mate.

jtv
Posts: 1128
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:59 pm
Been Liked: 310 times
Has Liked: 416 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jtv » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:49 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:43 pm
Brilliant video.
Link please!

AshevilleNCClaret
Posts: 980
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AshevilleNCClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:50 pm

Suntan wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:41 pm
Unless Saints are relegated.........
Good point. In my opinion there is not really a big difference between 7-20..... each year there is usually one team that just destined for relegation, but it is cutthroat for the other spots. I believe at least 1 of the non newly-promoted teams get relegated this year. My bet is Leicester.

Suntan
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Suntan » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:51 pm

Forest got promoted last season on mainly loans hence their massive rebuild this summer.......

And Kompany has proven he can rebuild a squad if those on loan cannot be made permanent.

I'm happy with the loans especially the added quality they bring which we couldn't otherwise afford.

Suntan
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Suntan » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:54 pm

AshevilleNCClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:50 pm
Good point. In my opinion there is not really a big difference between 7-20..... each year there is usually one team that just destined for relegation, but it is cutthroat for the other spots. I believe at least 1 of the non newly-promoted teams get relegated this year. My bet is Leicester.
I can see both Fulham & Forest staying up.

Meaning Bournemouth plus two established sides getting relegated.
Southampton's post Christmas form the last few seasons has been terrible but they've always had a decent start to keep them from danger.
This could be the year.

Think Everton, Leicester & Villa could all be in trouble this year.

rob63
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:15 pm
Been Liked: 193 times
Has Liked: 629 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by rob63 » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:57 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 9:49 am
Jack Hendry likely to be off to Cremonese
It sounds like a dessert :!:
These 2 users liked this post: longsidepies Quicknick

NewClaret
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3935 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:59 pm

Chester Perry wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:14 pm
It certainly makes you wonder what we are paying for the three we currently have
Certainly does, CP.

I think there are two factors with loans: what % of wages are paid and sometimes a loan fee.

Apparently his salary is £832k, so I’d imagine if that report is correct, it’s just using his base salary & no fee.

Assuming the others were on the same deals it would be £364k for THB, £480k for IM & £650k for Tella.

In that scenario I don’t think he’ll end up representing best value!!!

NewClaret
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3935 times
Has Liked: 4899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:00 pm

jtv wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:49 pm
Link please!
https://mobile.twitter.com/BurnleyOffic ... 6499551244

burnleymik
Posts: 5678
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 3147 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by burnleymik » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:01 pm

jtv wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:49 pm
Link please!
https://twitter.com/BurnleyOfficial/sta ... 6499551244

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1138 times
Has Liked: 1867 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BleedingClaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:05 pm

Suntan wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:51 pm
Forest got promoted last season on mainly loans hence their massive rebuild this summer.......

And Kompany has proven he can rebuild a squad if those on loan cannot be made permanent.

I'm happy with the loans especially the added quality they bring which we couldn't otherwise afford.
I think if you get promoted you have more chance of the loan players wanting to come permanently and the funds to replace those that don’t
The scenario where we don’t go up but think we’ll be stronger the following year but then lose the loaners and have no one to sell to pay off the MSD loans is the worry

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34443
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12537 times
Has Liked: 6266 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:06 pm

Sepp van den Berg confirmed to Schalke. We still need a CB

jtv
Posts: 1128
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:59 pm
Been Liked: 310 times
Has Liked: 416 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jtv » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:07 pm

Thanks for the links guys. Enjoyed that!

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:15 pm

Pete O’Rouke

‘Rotherham United have accepted a bid worth £3.5m from Burnley for midfielder Ben Wiles’

This makes me nervous for Brownhill

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:18 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:15 pm
Pete O’Rouke

‘Rotherham United have accepted a bid worth £3.5m from Burnley for midfielder Ben Wiles’

This makes me nervous for Brownhill
#MeToo

Firthy
Posts: 5391
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1718 times
Has Liked: 299 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Firthy » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:18 pm

If nothing else the videos are worth waiting for. Never thought I'd see so many promising young players making up the team with videos like that at Burnley. The new owners aren't all bad :)

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 424 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:19 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:15 pm
Pete O’Rouke

‘Rotherham United have accepted a bid worth £3.5m from Burnley for midfielder Ben Wiles’

This makes me nervous for Brownhill
Yep, totally agree.

Spindles
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 8:29 am
Been Liked: 28 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Spindles » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:19 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:40 pm
Yep I understand your point too mate. It's a tricky balance to get and I also think I've also read too much into Kompany's statement about how the club would utilize the loan market. That being said I just don't like seeing our own players sitting on the bench while others start. For example Vitinho could suffer as a result of this. But I guess we will see where we end up!
Thing is I'd want any loans to be paying at least 50%of the games if possible (not in a guaranteed contract way of course).
what's the point of them coming to sit on the bench? In an ideal world they come, have a massive impact on the field, facilitate improvement in the rest of the squad with their skill and encouragement, and most importantly cost us a fraction of a transfer for one years work well done.

If the loaned makes a significant contribution to take us up and costs us say 2 million on fee and wages, that is good business

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nori1958 » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:20 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:15 pm
Pete O’Rouke

‘Rotherham United have accepted a bid worth £3.5m from Burnley for midfielder Ben Wiles’

This makes me nervous for Brownhill
Fake account.... Why do do people fall for these
This user liked this post: Quicknick

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:21 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:15 pm
Pete O’Rouke

‘Rotherham United have accepted a bid worth £3.5m from Burnley for midfielder Ben Wiles’

This makes me nervous for Brownhill
Isn't that a fake account ?
This user liked this post: Quicknick

RVclaret
Posts: 16215
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4470 times
Has Liked: 3010 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:22 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Tue Aug 30, 2022 4:20 pm
Fake account.... Why do do people fall for these
Ah he changed the pic and everything, fair play :lol:

Post Reply