Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:40 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:14 pm
Experts v very opinionated people on social media

Tough one
No, it's Experts Vs Experts.

In one corner, you have Prof Neil Ferguson, Anthony Fauci and the Chinese Communist Party who advocate lockdowns.

In the other corner you have Prof Jay Bhattacharya, Anders Tegnell, the Swedish government and the US states of Florida and Texas.

At stake is our health, prosperity, human rights and civil liberties.

I know what side I'm on and it's NOT the one with the Chinese Communist Party. Now the daily scare-mongering has stopped more and more people are seeing the lunacy of what we did. The effects of it are being suffered by everybody right now.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:41 pm

blake's wand wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:24 pm
Looks like he is managing to (intentionally) politicise an already incredibly political platform.
It's the exact opposite. He's attempting to stop one side of the divide from being able to suppress and censor the other.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:42 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:32 pm
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:47 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:41 pm
It's the exact opposite. He's attempting to stop one side of the divide from being able to suppress and censor the other.
....by suspending their Twitter accounts. Brilliant, apolitical, free speech move that.

He bought Twitter, so can do what he wants with it, but anyone still viewing him as a non-partisan free speech warrior at this stage is either not paying attention or lying to themselves and others.

I’m pretty sure Rowls has been paying attention.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:47 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:47 pm
....by suspending their Twitter accounts. Brilliant, apolitical, free speech move that.

He bought Twitter, so can do what he wants with it, but anyone still viewing him as a non-partisan free speech warrior at this stage is either not paying attention or lying to themselves and others.

I’m pretty sure Rowls has been paying attention.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:50 pm

Rowls, I know you don't like to post your evidence, but I'd like to see it

I'm starting to get the nagging feeling that you are on the cusp of a rabbit hole that will inevitably result in you talking about drinking bleach to cure Covid and that a lap top would change the whole scope of the US 2020 Presidential election......oh hang on
This user liked this post: Greenmile

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:56 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:50 pm
Rowls, I know you don't like to post your evidence, but I'd like to see it

I'm starting to get the nagging feeling that you are on the cusp of a rabbit hole that will inevitably result in you talking about drinking bleach to cure Covid and that a lap top would change the whole scope of the US 2020 Presidential election......oh hang on
What evidence?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:02 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:56 pm
What evidence?
The death figures

I saw what happened in Bergamo, and I know that if there wasn't a lockdown then the medical services would have collapsed

I know this, you know this

If you want to seperate the lockdowns after the vaccine was proven to work and was given to the vulnerable, then you may well have a point, but if you are telling me that the first wave lockdown was the wrong tactic then I'm going to tell you right now that you are covid denier and a conspiracy theory follower and you don't deserve anything other than having the p**s relentlessly taken out of you

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:08 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:02 pm
The death figures

I saw what happened in Bergamo, and I know that if there wasn't a lockdown then the medical services would have collapsed

I know this, you know this

If you want to seperate the lockdowns after the vaccine was proven to work and was given to the vulnerable, then you may well have a point, but if you are telling me that the first wave lockdown was the wrong tactic then I'm going to tell you right now that you are covid denier and a conspiracy theory follower and you don't deserve anything other than having the p**s relentlessly taken out of you
Here you go:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/

No lockdown in Sweden. No collapse of medical services.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:09 pm

Inflation in Sweden is currently running at 2.16% versus 11.1% here.

Looks like the virus has only caused inflation in some countries.

claretcarrot93
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
Been Liked: 428 times
Has Liked: 80 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by claretcarrot93 » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:12 pm

They did not know it at the time but when the dust settles lockdowns will have caused more harm than done good.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2656
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 176 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Belgianclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:12 pm

That’s a renewed bid for Grosycky dead in the water then 😎

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:14 pm

claretcarrot93 wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:12 pm
They did not know it at the time but when the dust settles lockdowns will have caused more harm than done good.
1st lockdown I don't agree with you

I can't even remember the timings of the other two, but if its after the vaccine then they probably shouldn't have happened (and that is only with hindsight btw)

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:17 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:08 pm
Here you go:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/

No lockdown in Sweden. No collapse of medical services.
You need to provide the stats for the entire period, not just one of how many deaths there are at the moment

You are going to struggle to convince me that what happened in densely populated parts of the UK wouldn't have been replicated what happened in Bergamo in Italy if there hadn't been a lockdown

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:18 pm

OK, so Sweden might have had far fewer deaths than us as a percentage of their population. But did their government spend BILLIONS of taxpayers money to "Beat the Virus"???

Image

Now we're no longer being scared to death by daily government propaganda, people are starting to realise how we screwed the economy up so much. And they're starting to realise we did NOT have to do it. Sweden didn't.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:18 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:09 pm
Inflation in Sweden is currently running at 2.16% versus 11.1% here.

Looks like the virus has only caused inflation in some countries.
Sorry, where did you get that Swedish inflation rate from? I'm sure I heard on the radio their inflation rate is currently c. 11%

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:19 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:17 pm
You need to provide the stats for the entire period, not just one of how many deaths there are at the moment

You are going to struggle to convince me that what happened in densely populated parts of the UK wouldn't have been replicated what happened in Bergamo in Italy if there hadn't been a lockdown
They ARE the stats for the entire period.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:19 pm

Swizzlestick wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:18 pm
Sorry, where did you get that Swedish inflation rate from? I'm sure I heard on the radio their inflation rate is currently c. 11%
https://www.google.com/search?q=sweish+ ... e&ie=UTF-8

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:21 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:09 pm
Inflation in Sweden is currently running at 2.16% versus 11.1% here.

Looks like the virus has only caused inflation in some countries.
Inflation in Sweden is currently running at 11.5%

https://tradingeconomics.com/sweden/inflation-cpi

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:21 pm

Looks like I've got the Sweden figures wrong. I'd got the 2021 figure. Their current rate is similar to ours.

But the death figures are correct.

As is the fact they did not have a lockdown.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:22 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:21 pm
Looks like I've got the Sweden figures wrong. It's similar to ours.

But the death figures are correct.

As is the fact they did not have a lockdown.
*Siri, show me the dangers of using the internet as a source when I want it to say exactly what I want it to say*

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:23 pm

Yeah, that's 2021. Ours was 2.5% in 2021.

Their current inflation rate is c. 11%.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:23 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:19 pm
They ARE the stats for the entire period.
No, I may have phrased it wrong, detailed stats for the entire period, maybe by month?

Pretty sure that Sweden was being using by people like you all over twitter until it went soaring past us and then it suddenly wasn't

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:24 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:21 pm
Looks like I've got the Sweden figures wrong. I'd got the 2021 figure. Their current rate is similar to ours.

But the death figures are correct.

As is the fact they did not have a lockdown.
It was a pretty important facet of your 'argument', and you didn't bother your arse to check your facts. I'm not entirely sure why we should bother listening to a word you say now, frankly.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11193
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3611 times
Has Liked: 2230 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:25 pm

Oh dear :D :D

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:27 pm

Swizzlestick wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:24 pm
It was a pretty important facet of your 'argument', and you didn't bother your arse to check your facts. I'm not entirely sure why we should bother listening to a word you say now, frankly.
Especially for someone so interested in ‘the truth’.

ClaretRoob
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:54 am
Been Liked: 5 times
Has Liked: 134 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by ClaretRoob » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:27 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:08 pm
Here you go:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/

No lockdown in Sweden. No collapse of medical services.
The great thing about stats is the ease of manipulation, but when you see

Sweden 204.57 deaths per 100,000
UK 290.57 deaths per 100,00

The UK has a population density 11x greater than Sweden.

Sweden 25p/km2
UK 281p/km2

The denser population makes it easier to transmit
1st Lockdown saved thousand's

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1433 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by daveisaclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:28 pm

Very funny that everyone's favourite right wing blowhard is still blabbering on about Sweden's Covid response. Embarrassing yes, but also funny.
This user liked this post: Greenmile

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:29 pm

The raw data of deaths per population is pretty pointless when comparing (eg) Sweden’s approach to the first wave of covid with that of the UK. You’d need to factor in stuff like population density, age profile and the tendency or otherwise of a population to follow government guidelines.

Here’s an interesting paper I found which compares the approaches of Sweden, the UK, and Denmark.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95699-9

It includes the following observation...

“Had the UK adopted Swedish policies, deaths would have increased by a factor of between 1.6 and 4“

I suppose some may think that’s a fair price to pay to avoid an economic slump. I don’t.

milkcrate_mosh
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 5:23 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by milkcrate_mosh » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:31 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:29 pm
The raw data of deaths per population is pretty pointless when comparing (eg) Sweden’s approach to the first wave of covid with that of the UK. You’d need to factor in stuff like population density, age profile and the tendency or otherwise of a population to follow government guidelines.

Here’s an interesting paper I found which compares the approaches of Sweden, the UK, and Denmark.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95699-9

It includes the following observation...

“Had the UK adopted Swedish policies, deaths would have increased by a factor of between 1.6 and 4“

I suppose some may think that’s a fair price to pay to avoid an economic slump. I don’t.
But have you factored in that as a result Swedish inflation is only 11.5% rather than our eye-watering 10.7%?

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:33 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:23 pm
No, I may have phrased it wrong, detailed stats for the entire period, maybe by month?

Pretty sure that Sweden was being using by people like you all over twitter until it went soaring past us and then it suddenly wasn't
If anybody thought that comparing daily/weekly figures dduring the pandemic was in any way useful then they were wrong.

I had friends tell me that the reason that Omicron wasn't spreading in France (but was rampant in the UK) was because they were masks were mandated in France. They had the daily figures to "prove" it. One week later and suddenly Omicron hit France and the masks had no effect whatsoever on its spread.

The final pandemic figures are in now. The public should be fuming.

There is no correlation between lockdown severity and deaths.
There is no evidence to show that mask wearing helps prevent the spread of the virus.

The lockdowners were wrong. The maskers were wrong.

We were conned. You can see it yourself if you're brave enough to accept the Truth.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:35 pm

Swizzlestick wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:24 pm
It was a pretty important facet of your 'argument', and you didn't bother your arse to check your facts. I'm not entirely sure why we should bother listening to a word you say now, frankly.
Well there is such thing as the World Economy and that is the one that was shut down for 18 months.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:36 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:33 pm
If anybody thought that comparing daily/weekly figures dduring the pandemic was in any way useful then they were wrong.

I had friends tell me that the reason that Omicron wasn't spreading in France (but was rampant in the UK) was because they were masks were mandated in France. They had the daily figures to "prove" it. One week later and suddenly Omicron hit France and the masks had no effect whatsoever on its spread.

The final pandemic figures are in now. The public should be fuming.

There is no correlation between lockdown severity and deaths.
There is no evidence to show that mask wearing helps prevent the spread of the virus.

The lockdowners were wrong. The maskers were wrong.

We were conned. You can see it yourself if you're brave enough to accept the Truth.


Give it a break mate, you've gone down that tunnel and I hope that you can find your way out

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:37 pm

Just a matter of time before Rowls goes all “open your eyes,sheeple” on us.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:37 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:29 pm
It includes the following observation...

“Had the UK adopted Swedish policies, deaths would have increased by a factor of between 1.6 and 4“

I suppose some may think that’s a fair price to pay to avoid an economic slump. I don’t.
I'm going to break a rule and include a reply to you just to point out to others the error in your argument.

You are using "observation" incorrectly. An observation is something you can observe.

What the article is making is a supposition.

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:39 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:37 pm
Just a matter of time before Rowls goes all “open your eyes,sheeple” on us.
It’s the logical next step to capitalising ‘truth’.

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:40 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:37 pm
I'm going to break a rule and include a reply to you just to point out to others the error in your argument.

You are using "observation" incorrectly. An observation is something you can observe.

What the article is making is a supposition.
Yet your supposition is labelled ‘the Truth’.

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:41 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:37 pm
I'm going to break a rule and include a reply to you just to point out to others the error in your argument.

You are using "observation" incorrectly. An observation is something you can observe.

What the article is making is a supposition.
...and I suppose the following is not supposition, is it?

“There is no correlation between lockdown severity and deaths.
There is no evidence to show that mask wearing helps prevent the spread of the virus.

The lockdowners were wrong. The maskers were wrong.”

You need to lay off the GBNews before you start accusing Keir Starmer of running a pedophile ring from the basement of his local Pizza Hut.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:43 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:36 pm
Give it a break mate, you've gone down that tunnel and I hope that you can find your way out
No, as I've said before I'm not going to stop banging the drum about the lockdown.

It was a massive unprecedented mistake that took away our prosperity, crashed the economy, denied children of their education, gave us sky high inflation, massive fuel price rises, one million extra unemployed, big tax rises, mental health problems, impingements to our civil liberties, denial of basic human rights.

We're due to suffer excess deaths (from non-covid causes) like excess cancer deaths for year and years to come.

The economy will not recover for years and years.

And what did we get for it? Did we at least save lots of lives?

As I've said, the figures are now in: There is NO correlation between lockdown and deaths.

Studies have shown wearing masks does not prevent the spread of the disease.

We were lied to and scared, literally, witless.

Those figures again so anybody can see it: https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:43 pm

martin_p wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:40 pm
Yet your supposition is labelled ‘the Truth’.
Here is truth, martin

https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:47 pm

ClaretRoob wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:27 pm
The great thing about stats is the ease of manipulation, but when you see

Sweden 204.57 deaths per 100,000
UK 290.57 deaths per 100,00

The UK has a population density 11x greater than Sweden.

Sweden 25p/km2
UK 281p/km2

The denser population makes it easier to transmit
1st Lockdown saved thousand's
Interesting.

You could take the info from the website and chart it next to population density. See if there's any strong correlation.

Go ahead if you like.

As I said - there is no correlation between lockdown and these deaths.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:47 pm

The reason the public aren't 'fuming' is they can see through charlatans like you a mile off. Bare face liars, who are willing to not only slavishly copy and paste duff stats, but manipulate them too, to fit a political viewpoint. It's embarrassing.
These 2 users liked this post: Greenmile ClaretRoob

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:47 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:43 pm
Here is truth, martin

https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/
I’m not doubting the raw data, just that you can draw the conclusions you draw from it.

martin_p
Posts: 11085
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4061 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by martin_p » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:51 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:43 pm
No, as I've said before I'm not going to stop banging the drum about the lockdown.

It was a massive unprecedented mistake that took away our prosperity, crashed the economy, denied children of their education, gave us sky high inflation, massive fuel price rises, one million extra unemployed, big tax rises, mental health problems, impingements to our civil liberties, denial of basic human rights.
You can’t seriously believe all that. If you do you can’t have been watching what has been going on in the world other than COVID for the last couple of years.

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:52 pm

Swizzlestick wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:47 pm
The reason the public aren't 'fuming' is they can see through charlatans like you a mile off. Bare face liars, who are willing to not only slavishly copy and paste duff stats, but manipulate them too, to fit a political viewpoint. It's embarrassing.
"Duff stats"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statista

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:52 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:43 pm
No, as I've said before I'm not going to stop banging the drum about the lockdown.

It was a massive unprecedented mistake that took away our prosperity, crashed the economy, denied children of their education, gave us sky high inflation, massive fuel price rises, one million extra unemployed, big tax rises, mental health problems, impingements to our civil liberties, denial of basic human rights.

We're due to suffer excess deaths (from non-covid causes) like excess cancer deaths for year and years to come.

The economy will not recover for years and years.

And what did we get for it? Did we at least save lots of lives?

As I've said, the figures are now in: There is NO correlation between lockdown and deaths.

Studies have shown wearing masks does not prevent the spread of the disease.

We were lied to and scared, literally, witless.

Those figures again so anybody can see it: https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... y-country/
You lost - get over it! :)

Rowls
Posts: 14660
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5646 times
Has Liked: 5878 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Rowls » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:55 pm

martin_p wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:51 pm
You can’t seriously believe all that. If you do you can’t have been watching what has been going on in the world other than COVID for the last couple of years.
The damage that lockdown caused simply cannot be denied. It's clear as daylight.

The question is, "Was it worth it?"

The data from places who did not have lockdowns, places like Florida, Texas and Sweden show the enormous costs were not worth the price. They strongly suggest the whole thing was utterly pointless.

What price do you put on cancer patients lives?
What price do you put on civil liberties?
What price should we pay to live in a democracy?
What price human rights?
What price our freedom?

Greenmile
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4517 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by Greenmile » Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:58 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:55 pm
....The data from places who did not have lockdowns, places like Florida, Texas and Sweden show the enormous costs were not worth the price. They strongly suggest the whole thing was utterly pointless....
You keep saying this. It's a lie.

How long before you get this thread deleted out of embarrassment?

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by aggi » Fri Dec 16, 2022 2:04 pm

I'm disappointed at the lack of mentions Belarus is getting here.

ClaretRoob
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:54 am
Been Liked: 5 times
Has Liked: 134 times

Re: Flight tracking of our new striker not allowed anymore?

Post by ClaretRoob » Fri Dec 16, 2022 2:04 pm

Rowls wrote:
Fri Dec 16, 2022 1:47 pm
Interesting.

You could take the info from the website and chart it next to population density. See if there's any strong correlation.

Go ahead if you like.

As I said - there is no correlation between lockdown and these deaths.
But then you would need to include quality of medical care.
Sweden is comparable to the UK

Post Reply