Boundaries?
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Boundaries?
I'm intrigued by this. Why does this planning app come under Burnley Council's remit? I thought the borough boundary ended a mile or so up the road at the county line?
https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/n ... n-upgrade/
https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/n ... n-upgrade/
Re: Boundaries?
Looks like Todmorden only has town council status and Burnley Borough Council is the local planning authority.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Boundaries?
Thanks for that. I thought Tod would come under Calderdale Council for planning.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
I don’t know this specifically but here are my musings…Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:33 pmThanks for that. I thought Tod would come under Calderdale Council for planning.
The traditional Lancs/Yorks boundary ran along the main road, splitting Todmorden in half. With Burnley being a much bigger council than Calderdale it makes sense that planning would fall under Burnley
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:33 am
- Been Liked: 21 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Boundaries?
It's a mistake from the LET - the application has been made to Calderdale Council (it's on their Planning Website) not Burnley BC.
The rule is that every local council is the Local Planning Authority that decides planning application for their own area - you can't decide applications outside of your Local Authority boundary. There are cases where a site straddles the area of two councils, in this scenario the developer has to make two planning applications (which both have to be approved if the Scheme is to be built).
The rule is that every local council is the Local Planning Authority that decides planning application for their own area - you can't decide applications outside of your Local Authority boundary. There are cases where a site straddles the area of two councils, in this scenario the developer has to make two planning applications (which both have to be approved if the Scheme is to be built).
These 2 users liked this post: elwaclaret Billy Balfour
Re: Boundaries?
The village of Tosside 3 miles from us has the border running through the middle.
Folk go to Church in Yorkshire then pop over the border to have a pre-lunch Pint in the Dog and Partridge
Folk go to Church in Yorkshire then pop over the border to have a pre-lunch Pint in the Dog and Partridge
-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 329 times
- Has Liked: 364 times
Re: Boundaries?
There’s a tiny bit of the development falls under BBC. The majority is Calderdale BC.
There have been previous applications for the site.
There have been previous applications for the site.
These 2 users liked this post: Billy Balfour IanMcL
-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 329 times
- Has Liked: 364 times
Re: Boundaries?
The boundary between the two district councils runs through the site. The vast majority is in Calderdale but there’s a tiny sliver that’s in Burnley, hence planning applications to both authorities. It’s more protocol than anything else as looking at a previous officer report on the site there’s not much they can recommend relevant to Burnley, but not applying could cause issues.Summerseat Claret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:49 pmIt's a mistake from the LET - the application has been made to Calderdale Council (it's on their Planning Website) not Burnley BC.
The rule is that every local council is the Local Planning Authority that decides planning application for their own area - you can't decide applications outside of your Local Authority boundary. There are cases where a site straddles the area of two councils, in this scenario the developer has to make two planning applications (which both have to be approved if the Scheme is to be built).
These 2 users liked this post: Summerseat Claret Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Boundaries?
Thanks everyone for your input. I did check Burnley Council's planning site before I started the thread and noticed it was there, and this is why I started the thread, but what's been said here makes sense regarding both councils having a say.
Still intriguing through, because the county line sign is maybe a mile or so up the road from the old mill. The jurisdiction over this planning app must be a hangover from the pre-1974 boundary, because the whole site is clearly within what is now called Calderdale, unless the county line sign is in the wrong place.
Still intriguing through, because the county line sign is maybe a mile or so up the road from the old mill. The jurisdiction over this planning app must be a hangover from the pre-1974 boundary, because the whole site is clearly within what is now called Calderdale, unless the county line sign is in the wrong place.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Boundaries?
Oh, ignore that post. I'm thinking in straight lines.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:33 am
- Been Liked: 21 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Boundaries?
There is a "Welcome to Calderdale" road sign on Burnley Road that is well short of the mill itself but the County boundary actually travels down the middle of Burnley Road (as you head towards Todmorden) quite a way. So it does take in a small amount of the mill, as Ricardo Montalban says.
Looking at the map the county boundary follows an old stream as it comes down from the hills, before straightening up as it reaches the road.
Looking at the map the county boundary follows an old stream as it comes down from the hills, before straightening up as it reaches the road.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 317 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
Re: Boundaries?
Sadly not for a number of years,pub been closed and is up for sale as a luxury 9 bed house. My great grandad ran it in the 1930s when it was The Temperance, no alcohol sold

-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Boundaries?
The idea that Burnley Council is “much bigger” than Calderdale is utterly fanciful.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:46 pmI don’t know this specifically but here are my musings…
The traditional Lancs/Yorks boundary ran along the main road, splitting Todmorden in half. With Burnley being a much bigger council than Calderdale it makes sense that planning would fall under Burnley
Burnley is a non-Metropolitan Borough Council, Calderdale is a Metropolitan Borough Council. Calderdale has more Council Seats, has more than double the population of Burnley Borough, and covers more than three times the area too. It incorporates Halifax(itself Larger than Burnley in population), Elland, Brighouse, Sowerby Bridge, Hebden Bridge, and Todmorden(amongst others).
Burnley has, in fact, a much smaller Borough Council than Calderdale.
Other than that, as you were.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
I was drawing my conclusions from history, not from any current insight or first hand knowledge. As I thought I had made clear in my post, but apparently not - which is why I liked the post following mine. But ok.Lord Beamish wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:43 pmThe idea that Burnley Council is “much bigger” than Calderdale is utterly fanciful.
Burnley is a non-Metropolitan Borough Council, Calderdale is a Metropolitan Borough Council. Calderdale has more Council Seats, has more than double the population of Burnley Borough, and covers more than three times the area too. It incorporates Halifax(itself Larger than Burnley in population), Elland, Brighouse, Sowerby Bridge, Hebden Bridge, and Todmorden(amongst others).
Burnley has, in fact, a much smaller Borough Council than Calderdale.
Other than that, as you were.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Boundaries?
You were talking out of your hat and just plain wrong. You’ve been corrected.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:47 pmI was drawing my conclusions from history, not from any current insight or first hand knowledge. As I thought I had made clear in my post, but apparently not - which is why I liked the post following mine. But ok.
You’re welcome.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
Ok well done hope you feel superior.Lord Beamish wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:48 pmYou were talking out of your hat and just plain wrong. You’ve been corrected.
You’re welcome.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Boundaries?
Not really.
I was correct though.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
Where did i state otherwise? I didn’t. A very strange argument to try to create if you were not on a ego mission. I contributed to a thread with my thoughts in passing…
Well done though.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Boundaries?
I’ve hurt your feelings. I didn’t mean to.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:57 pmWhere did i state otherwise? I didn’t. A very strange argument to try to create if you were not on a ego mission. I contributed to a thread with my thoughts in passing…
Well done though.
I’m sorry.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
You haven’t. I lost my grand-daughter yesterday. It would take a lot more than a few posts on a message board to top that and add to my upset.
I took no offence as I have no axe to grind one way or the other.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Boundaries?
I am so sorry for your loss.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 2:10 pmYou haven’t. I lost my grand-daughter yesterday. It would take a lot more than a few posts on a message board to top that and add to my upset.
I took no offence as I have no axe to grind one way or the other.
This user liked this post: elwaclaret
Re: Boundaries?
Wow when did it shut haven`t been in for years... Saturday night Disco`s back in the day in the Barn at the rearAmbleClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:31 pmSadly not for a number of years,pub been closed and is up for sale as a luxury 9 bed house. My great grandad ran it in the 1930s when it was The Temperance, no alcohol sold![]()
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Boundaries?
Sorry to hear about your lost, Elwac.
Re: Boundaries?
It is definitely on the Burnley BC planning portal. So, not an LET error, as such. Agree that border applications can fall in two areas.Summerseat Claret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:49 pmIt's a mistake from the LET - the application has been made to Calderdale Council (it's on their Planning Website) not Burnley BC.
The rule is that every local council is the Local Planning Authority that decides planning application for their own area - you can't decide applications outside of your Local Authority boundary. There are cases where a site straddles the area of two councils, in this scenario the developer has to make two planning applications (which both have to be approved if the Scheme is to be built).
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: Boundaries?
Not for the first time this week, thanks Billy.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 329 times
- Has Liked: 364 times
Re: Boundaries?
It’s just another example of the LT’s less than stellar approach to reporting. Like you say, not an error as such, but you’d think there’s a fair bit of context missing, like, there’s potentially someone’s future flower bed sat in Burnley, but the rest is Calderdale.
When there’s something like this they tend just to lift direct from the applications or committee reports and press ‘submit’. No actual journalism.
-
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 317 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
Re: Boundaries?
Used to go up from Clitheroe, about 15 of us in a Transit, God knows how we made it back in one piece. Slowly closed over the last few years. It's on Hunter's website for sale,they demolished the barn sadly.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
Re: Boundaries?
That is the way local news media operates nowadays. No investigation or using information to write something. Press releases just printed verbatim to fill space.RicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 2:50 pmIt’s just another example of the LT’s less than stellar approach to reporting. Like you say, not an error as such, but you’d think there’s a fair bit of context missing, like, there’s potentially someone’s future flower bed sat in Burnley, but the rest is Calderdale.
When there’s something like this they tend just to lift direct from the applications or committee reports and press ‘submit’. No actual journalism.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times