More like,
‘Two predators trawl through Instagram looking for impressionable young women to seduce with the allure of a better life so they can be then used and abused for the Tate’s own monetary gain.’
A new forum low
More like,
DA and JS marching on together.
It’s a sad indictment of society that people are happy to side with rapists just to get one over on people who have different political views. Hapag Lloyd using this thread as a vehicle to attack other posters is another example.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:50 amMore like,
‘Two predators trawl through Instagram looking for impressionable young women to seduce with the allure of a better life so they can be then used and abused for the Tate’s own monetary gain.’
A new forum low
Paedo rapist who would've been found guilty of his crimes had he been exposed whilst alive. It's a tricky line because as you point out, not all rapists are found guilty for various reasons (maybe they simply never get caught). If someone is put on trial and found not guilty? what next? do we still call them a rapist?
Isn't he being held & charged for rape but not convicted yet? I'm not sticking up for him I'm just trying to determine if he is a racist when the court process hasn't finished.
Yeah - since the digital/social media age the Americanisation of world views and defacto positions based upon a bullshit ‘left vs right’ , ‘woke vs based’ yada yada yada, as well as all the grifters that go with it have seriously left some folk deranged.
Ooops, someone I missed
ThisCoolClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:06 amYeah - since the digital/social media age the Americanisation of world views and defacto positions based upon a bullshit ‘left vs right’ , ‘woke vs based’ yada yada yada, as well as all the grifters that go with it have seriously left some folk deranged.
It is possible to agree with someone on some instances, but severely disagree with them on other issues.
Now on someone like Tate who is the epitome of a con artist/snake oil salesman/grifter I really don’t particularly care if he has said ‘some stuff that makes perfect sense’ or whatever, if under all this the bloke is essentially pimping out girls against their own will.
& I actually liked Tate back in sort of 2014 when I was a bit younger and training Muay Thai/MMA regularly, I watched a few of his fights and he was always exciting to watch but i noticed even back then before his first Twitter ban, he started noticing he would gain a larger following grifting on Twitter for morons like KRBFC than he ever could with his kick-boxing
I’m sure he’ll be devastatedLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:07 amOoops, someone I missed
Cheers for popping up so I can sort it out
The only reason he (and others) post is to try to annoy people with more modern views on stuff
Firstly it was attitudes like yours that made it harder to catch and convict someone like Saville when he was aliveKRBFC wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:01 amPaedo rapist who would've been found guilty of his crimes had he been exposed whilst alive. It's a tricky line because as you point out, not all rapists are found guilty for various reasons (maybe they simply never get caught). If someone is put on trial and found not guilty? what next? do we still call them a rapist?
How does someone accused ever shake that tag?
This Tate case won't even go to trial when the victims are refusing to be victims, which makes labelling him a rapist extremely premature.
I don't particularly like the guy, some of the shite he speaks is edgy teenager cringe. Just because I disagree with the majority of what he says, that doesn't make him guilty of rape.
The victim in the case is defending him lol more than anyone on this forum ever could, pretty hard for any sane person to convict someone of a crime the victim said never happenedBig Vinny K wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:19 amIt’s utterly predictable which posters choose to defend which type of people.
The irony is not lost as to how strongly they defend the rights of certain odious individuals but are the first to call “lefty” or “woke” on defending the rights of minorities or greater equality etc.
Are you pretending to believe this or are you this stupid? Genuinely want to know
That's a lie and you know it, my very first comments were simply let the police do their work and lets wait for further facts before putting the rapist jacket on him.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:20 amFirstly it was attitudes like yours that made it harder to catch and convict someone like Saville when he was alive
Secondly, he might not be guilty of rape (I've never accused him of being a rapist) but there's a big jump in the position of lets wait and see what the police have on him to your stance that he's only been arrested because he says stuff online that upsets people.
If you took the position of - he looks like a scumbag and there's obviously some serious stuff the police need to investigate and that is why he is arrested but lets not all jump to deciding he's a rapist just yet then I dont think you'd get much argument. But when your pedalling his farcical narrative that he's just being got at because he upsets the wrong people then you look like a clown and someone who's willing to defend a potential rapist
Never heard of Tate until I saw this post so I couldn’t say if he’s a rapist or not, but what I do find strange is you taking umbrage with my post when you, along with your little coterie, do exactly the same on numerous other threads.
Why am I not supposed to believe the victim when she speaks in this instance?daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:27 amAre you pretending to believe this or are you this stupid? Genuinely want to know
I haven’t taken umbrage with your post, I just find it sad that we live in a time where people can’t agree that a scumbag is a scumbag because they have different political views.Hapag Lloyd wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:37 amNever heard of Tate until I saw this post so I couldn’t say if he’s a rapist or not, but what I do find strange is you taking umbrage with my post when you, along with your little coterie, do exactly the same on numerous other threads.
I hadn’t I didn’t have a jar of glue who he was, didn’t know the first thing about the bloke, I think it demonstrates the deep chasm on here with regards to social media & how some of the more vocal posters on here are so easily influenced/brainwashed by twitter & other outlets particularly the 1s who already have him as a condemned man before he’s even been tried. It’s not healthy & detached away from reality living in that kind of world but that’s probably an age thing where in my day people were taken at face value first & foremost.Hapag Lloyd wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:37 amNever heard of Tate until I saw this post so I couldn’t say if he’s a rapist or not, but what I do find strange is you taking umbrage with my post when you, along with your little coterie, do exactly the same on numerous other threads.
Yes here's other victims on a news platform speaking.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:45 amHave you verified that she is one of the victims? Are you aware there is more than one victim?
I think it's very important to listen to women when they come forward in sexual cases, the victim should be heard loud and clear.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:58 amIf (and it is an if) two of the six victims (on his current charges, as we know there are more) defend him, is it important to listen to the other four?
My final comment was assuming it goes to trial, I wouldn't be so sure it will if those details are correct.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:05 amI'm going to post three quotes from you today on this thread and see if you think they are consistent and if you can understand why someone might think you're being incredibly disingenuous.
"This Tate case won't even go to trial"
"pretty hard for any sane person to convict someone of a crime the victim said never happened"
"I'll await further details before making any judgement on how trial will play out."
Absolutely depressing I agree.
Oh dear
We heard you the first time and this threads been going on long enough for you to realise its something you have no interest in so why bother reading it and posting on it. Do yourself a favour and just ignore itAlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 1:12 pmWhy would anyone give a flying feck about some social media “ star “ ?? The bloke looks a bit of a slimy piece of work , but seems to inspire almost head spinning puce like rage on Twitter so perhaps he can’t be all bad ??
AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:35 amWhy would anyone give a monkeys cuss about this bizarre self aggrandising narcissist? Isn’t being “ controversial “ and upsetting “ wokes” just standard “ right wing “ playbook stuff ? Yet if it wasn’t for the seeming obsession the “ Twitter types” have with him he’d surely be a (relative ) nobody ?
Dave did give you a very good reason why people care and are interested in it but in case you forgot (like you seem to have forgotten you have no interest in this subject) here it is againAlargeClaret wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:44 amThat’s a very fair point . Though re: abuse , rape etc ?? I’ve no idea but if true I’m sure justice will prevail . If he’s ( as I’ve just read) been a bit of a porn web cam impresario as well as wealthy and “famous “ he’s open to all sorts of claims ( legit and otherwise ) unless he runs things whiter than white .
daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:38 amI think I can understand why the women he's abused, trafficked or raped might give a monkey's cuss about him. I don't think him being a relative nobody would help them.
But the point is it's important to care because a hell of a lot of young boys and young men are falling for it. We don't want to blindly raise a generation of misogynists who go out to bat for a rapist.
You know liking people who go out to deliberately upset others isn’t the good look you think it is.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 1:12 pmWhy would anyone give a flying feck about some social media “ star “ ?? The bloke looks a bit of a slimy piece of work , but seems to inspire almost head spinning puce like rage on Twitter so perhaps he can’t be all bad ??
This is from a poster who once posted one of the worst things I have ever seen on this board bragging about his exploits with women at the Kierby Hotel. So no surprise he is more upset with those people who are outraged than with Tate himself.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 1:49 pmWe heard you the first time and this threads been going on long enough for you to realise its something you have no interest in so why bother reading it and posting on it. Do yourself a favour and just ignore it
Dave did give you a very good reason why people care and are interested in it but in case you forgot (like you seem to have forgotten you have no interest in this subject) here it is again
While you come across as a lonely bedroom based Twitter obsessive type , to think you’ve taken the time to actually find a users posts and copy paste etc ..Jesus wept!Enjoy your raging sir .Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 1:49 pmWe heard you the first time and this threads been going on long enough for you to realise its something you have no interest in so why bother reading it and posting on it. Do yourself a favour and just ignore it
Dave did give you a very good reason why people care and are interested in it but in case you forgot (like you seem to have forgotten you have no interest in this subject) here it is again
God almighty , if taking a random pull back to a hotel is one of “ the worst things you’ve ever read on here “ you really do need to get out more sweetcheeks.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 2:10 pmThis is from a poster who once posted one of the worst things I have ever seen on this board bragging about his exploits with women at the Kierby Hotel. So no surprise he is more upset with those people who are outraged than with Tate himself.
It wasn't hard when all I had to do was skip back two pages and quote your predictable and repetitive diatribe. As for raging the only people I see raging in this affair are the Tate fan boys who are crying because they think the worlds out to get them. The rest of us are just happy that the scumbag got himself arrested by trying to be clever and f*cking it up completely.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:02 pmWhile you come across as a lonely bedroom based Twitter obsessive type , to think you’ve taken the time to actually find a users posts and copy paste etc ..Jesus wept!Enjoy your raging sir .
Post it again and let others see the kind of pr-ick you are then…….sweetcheeks.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:05 pmGod almighty , if taking a random pull back to a hotel is one of “ the worst things you’ve ever read on here “ you really do need to get out more sweetcheeks.
Oh get a grip you’re not on Twitter now . And to be serious, nobody has EVER been “ upset” over mine or anybody’s posts on here. It’s an Internet forum , quit the lip quivering and accept views different to yours won’t hurt you .Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:16 pmIt wasn't hard when all I had to do was skip back two pages and quote your predictable and repetitive diatribe. As for raging the only people I see raging in this affair are the Tate fan boys who are crying because they think the worlds out to get them. The rest of us are just happy that the scumbag got himself arrested by trying to be clever and f*cking it up completely.
As for on here you seem to be permanently mad at all sorts of meaningless stuff and seem to have a very weird obsession with upsetting people you hilariously describe as wokies or lefty's
I get that for some people it must be frustrating to get old and realise you're totally out of touch with the world but why dont you just find a nice cloud to go and shout at and give us some respite from the gibberish you constantly spout on here
I've never suggested anyone is upset at yours or anyone else's posts. You're the one who's jumped on this thread twice with some unhinged post where your only point seems to be your happiness that Tate's upsetting the kind people you seem to dislike.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:10 pmOh get a grip you’re not on Twitter now . And to be serious, nobody has EVER been “ upset” over mine or anybody’s posts on here. It’s an Internet forum , quit the lip quivering and accept views different to yours won’t hurt you .
You can see the contradiction here, right?AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:10 pmOh get a grip you’re not on Twitter now . And to be serious, nobody has EVER been “ upset” over mine or anybody’s posts on here. It’s an Internet forum , quit the lip quivering and accept views different to yours won’t hurt you .
Must be a decent amount of evidence to bring charges. Now, innocent until proven guilty, and let the process run its course.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:51 pmhttps://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/ ... Bwt7g&s=19
Oh dear
How sad
Nevermind
Out of interest what will you be like if he is found not guilty?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:51 pmhttps://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/ ... Bwt7g&s=19
Oh dear
How sad
Nevermind
You know how Mason Greenwood had all charges dropped against him? Yeah, well it doesn't change what I heard on that leaked audio. Speaking for myself, but it's the same for this monster. Being found not guilty in a court is not the same as innocence.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:40 pmOut of interest what will you be like if he is found not guilty?
Nearly everything out there suggests the evidence they have is minimal at best
IF he's found innocent then he's innocent, I'll still think he's a tosspot.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:40 pmOut of interest what will you be like if he is found not guilty?
Nearly everything out there suggests the evidence they have is minimal at best